The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2411.04788 · v1 · pith:67MVWCLG · submitted 2024-11-07 · cs.AI · cs.CL· cs.LG· q-fin.ST· q-fin.TR

Enhancing Investment Analysis: Optimizing AI-Agent Collaboration in Financial Research

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:67MVWCLGrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.LGq-fin.STq-fin.TR
keywords financialinvestmentanalysiscollaborationsystemdecision-makingmulti-agentagent
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In recent years, the application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in financial analysis and investment decision-making has gained significant attention. However, most existing approaches rely on single-agent systems, which fail to fully utilize the collaborative potential of multiple AI agents. In this paper, we propose a novel multi-agent collaboration system designed to enhance decision-making in financial investment research. The system incorporates agent groups with both configurable group sizes and collaboration structures to leverage the strengths of each agent group type. By utilizing a sub-optimal combination strategy, the system dynamically adapts to varying market conditions and investment scenarios, optimizing performance across different tasks. We focus on three sub-tasks: fundamentals, market sentiment, and risk analysis, by analyzing the 2023 SEC 10-K forms of 30 companies listed on the Dow Jones Index. Our findings reveal significant performance variations based on the configurations of AI agents for different tasks. The results demonstrate that our multi-agent collaboration system outperforms traditional single-agent models, offering improved accuracy, efficiency, and adaptability in complex financial environments. This study highlights the potential of multi-agent systems in transforming financial analysis and investment decision-making by integrating diverse analytical perspectives.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Signal or Noise in Multi-Agent LLM-based Stock Recommendations?

    q-fin.PM 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A multi-agent LLM equity system produces statistically significant outperformance on S&P 500 stocks, with strong-buy portfolios returning +2.18% monthly versus +1.15% for the equal-weight benchmark over 19 months.

  2. MetaGraph: A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of GenAI in Financial NLP (2022-2025)

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MetaGraph uses ontology-guided LLM extraction to build knowledge graphs from 681 papers on GenAI in financial NLP, identifying three distinct phases of development from 2022 to 2025.