Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Identifying Best Interventions through Online Importance Sampling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1701.02789 v3 pith:67PL5PUE submitted 2017-01-10 stat.ML cs.ITcs.LGmath.IT

Identifying Best Interventions through Online Importance Sampling

classification stat.ML cs.ITcs.LGmath.IT
keywords bestinterventionsproblemarmsidentificationidentifyingnoderesults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Motivated by applications in computational advertising and systems biology, we consider the problem of identifying the best out of several possible soft interventions at a source node $V$ in an acyclic causal directed graph, to maximize the expected value of a target node $Y$ (located downstream of $V$). Our setting imposes a fixed total budget for sampling under various interventions, along with cost constraints on different types of interventions. We pose this as a best arm identification bandit problem with $K$ arms where each arm is a soft intervention at $V,$ and leverage the information leakage among the arms to provide the first gap dependent error and simple regret bounds for this problem. Our results are a significant improvement over the traditional best arm identification results. We empirically show that our algorithms outperform the state of the art in the Flow Cytometry data-set, and also apply our algorithm for model interpretation of the Inception-v3 deep net that classifies images.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Information-Directed Sampling for Causal Bandits

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Bayesian causal-bandit TS and IDS algorithms achieve sublinear Bayesian regret, with IDS's Monte Carlo error entering as an explicit additive term.