Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Axial meson exchange and the Z_c(3900) and Z_(cs)(3985) resonances as heavy hadron molecules

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.13058 v2 pith:6CDYXEJR submitted 2021-02-25 hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-th

Axial meson exchange and the $Z_c(3900)$ and $Z_{cs}(3985)$ resonances as heavy hadron molecules

classification hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-th
keywords mesonexchangeaxialmoleculesbindingheavyexistencehadron
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Early speculations about the existence of heavy hadron molecules were grounded on the idea that light-meson exchanges forces could lead to binding. In analogy to the deuteron, the light-mesons usually considered include the pion, sigma, rho and omega, but not the axial meson $a_1(1260)$. Though it has been argued in the past that the coupling of the axial meson to the nucleons is indeed strong, its mass is considerably heavier than that of the vector mesons and thus its exchange ends up being suppressed. Yet, this is not necessarily the case in heavy hadrons molecules: we find that even though the contribution to binding from the axial meson is modest, it cannot be neglected in the isovector sector where vector meson exchange cancels out. This might provide a natural binding mechanism for molecular candidates such as the $Z_c(3900)$, $Z_c(4020)$ or the more recently observed $Z_{cs}(3985)$. However the $Z_{cs}(3985)$ is more dependent on a mixture of different factors, which (besides axial meson exchange) include $\eta$ exchange and the nature of scalar meson exchange. Together they point towards the existence of two $Z_{cs}(3985)$-like resonances instead of one, while the observations about the role of scalar meson exchange in the $Z_{cs}(3985)$ might be relevant for the $P_{cs}(4459)$. Finally, the combination of axial meson exchange and flavor symmetry breaking effects indicates that the isovector $J^{PC} = 0^{++}$ $D^*\bar{D}^*$ and the strange $J^P = 2^{+}$ $D^*\bar{D}_s^*$ molecules are the most attractive configurations and thus the most likely molecular partners of the $Z_c(3900)$, $Z_c(4020)$ and $Z_{cs}(3985)$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Determination of the $Z_c(3900)$ and the $Z_{cs}(3985)$ states from joint analysis of experimental and lattice data

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Joint analysis of experimental and lattice data confirms Z_c(3900) and Z_cs(3985) as SU(3) flavor partners with pole masses (3879.6 ± 4.8) MeV and (3976.9 ± 5.1) MeV, half-widths (32.2 ± 4.7) MeV and (28.8 ± 5.9) MeV,...

  2. Decoding the near-threshold $X_{0,\,1}(4140)$ and $X_{1}(4685)$ states via OZI-suppressed coupled-channel scattering

    hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    X0(4140) is a dynamically generated J/psi phi pole with single-channel scattering length 1.11 fm; X1(4685) is interpreted as a psi(2S) phi hadronic molecule under heavy quark spin symmetry.