Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Explaining the Road Not Taken

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.14973 v2 pith:6DVZYKDL submitted 2021-03-27 cs.CL cs.AIcs.HCcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.HCcs.LG
keywords explanationsinterpretationsmodelquestionsroadtakenusersalthough
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

It is unclear if existing interpretations of deep neural network models respond effectively to the needs of users. This paper summarizes the common forms of explanations (such as feature attribution, decision rules, or probes) used in over 200 recent papers about natural language processing (NLP), and compares them against user questions collected in the XAI Question Bank. We found that although users are interested in explanations for the road not taken -- namely, why the model chose one result and not a well-defined, seemly similar legitimate counterpart -- most model interpretations cannot answer these questions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools