Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

You Can Generate It Again: Data-to-Text Generation with Verification and Correction Prompting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.15933 v2 pith:6G6DRZOL submitted 2023-06-28 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords verificationapproachdata-to-textgenerationlanguagemodelscorrectioneffectively
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Small language models like T5 excel in generating high-quality text for data-to-text tasks, offering adaptability and cost-efficiency compared to Large Language Models (LLMs). However, they frequently miss keywords, which is considered one of the most severe and common errors in this task. In this work, we explore the potential of using feedback systems to enhance semantic fidelity in smaller language models for data-to-text generation tasks, through our Verification and Correction Prompting (VCP) approach. In the inference stage, our approach involves a multi-step process, including generation, verification, and regeneration stages. During the verification stage, we implement a simple rule to check for the presence of every keyword in the prediction. Recognizing that this rule can be inaccurate, we have developed a carefully designed training procedure, which enabling the model to incorporate feedback from the error-correcting prompt effectively, despite its potential inaccuracies. The VCP approach effectively reduces the Semantic Error Rate (SER) while maintaining the text's quality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How good is my story? Towards quantitative metrics for evaluating LLM-generated XAI narratives

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    This paper introduces an automated evaluation framework with extraction-based faithfulness metrics, perplexity for assumptions, and embedding-based human similarity, and shows it can reveal LLM sign self-correction on...

Pith tools