REVIEW 2 cited by
In or Out? Fixing ImageNet Out-of-Distribution Detection Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is the problem of identifying inputs which are unrelated to the in-distribution task. The OOD detection performance when the in-distribution (ID) is ImageNet-1K is commonly being tested on a small range of test OOD datasets. We find that most of the currently used test OOD datasets, including datasets from the open set recognition (OSR) literature, have severe issues: In some cases more than 50$\%$ of the dataset contains objects belonging to one of the ID classes. These erroneous samples heavily distort the evaluation of OOD detectors. As a solution, we introduce with NINCO a novel test OOD dataset, each sample checked to be ID free, which with its fine-grained range of OOD classes allows for a detailed analysis of an OOD detector's strengths and failure modes, particularly when paired with a number of synthetic "OOD unit-tests". We provide detailed evaluations across a large set of architectures and OOD detection methods on NINCO and the unit-tests, revealing new insights about model weaknesses and the effects of pretraining on OOD detection performance. We provide code and data at https://github.com/j-cb/NINCO.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Synthesizing Near-Boundary OOD Samples for Out-of-Distribution Detection
SynOOD generates synthetic near-boundary OOD images with MLLM-guided inpainting and energy-score gradients, then fine-tunes CLIP image and text features, reporting state-of-the-art OOD detection on ImageNet benchmarks.
-
Multi-Method Ensemble for Out-of-Distribution Detection
MME, a product of SCALE, VRA, fDBD, PCA, ViM, NME+ and CO+ scores, shows state-of-the-art OOD detection on common benchmarks, with a theoretical guarantee that is weaker than claimed.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.