IsarStep: a Benchmark for High-level Mathematical Reasoning
read the original abstract
A well-defined benchmark is essential for measuring and accelerating research progress of machine learning models. In this paper, we present a benchmark for high-level mathematical reasoning and study the reasoning capabilities of neural sequence-to-sequence models. We build a non-synthetic dataset from the largest repository of proofs written by human experts in a theorem prover. The dataset has a broad coverage of undergraduate and research-level mathematical and computer science theorems. In our defined task, a model is required to fill in a missing intermediate proposition given surrounding proofs. This task provides a starting point for the long-term goal of having machines generate human-readable proofs automatically. Our experiments and analysis reveal that while the task is challenging, neural models can capture non-trivial mathematical reasoning. We further design a hierarchical transformer that outperforms the transformer baseline.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
IsabeLLM: Automated Theorem Proving Applied to Formally Verifying Consensus
Improved IsabeLLM adds RAG, error tracing, and Isabelle compatibility updates and is tested on verifying Bitcoin Proof of Work consensus.
-
Rethinking Wireless Communications through Formal Mathematical AI Reasoning
Proposes a three-layer framework using formal AI reasoning for verification, derivation, and discovery in wireless communications theory.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.