pith. sign in

arxiv: 1703.04886 · v3 · pith:6KGBEP45new · submitted 2017-03-15 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.IT· math.IT· math.ST· stat.TH

Information Theoretic Optimal Learning of Gaussian Graphical Models

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.ITmath.ITmath.STstat.TH
keywords boundlowercomplexitysamplealgorithmmodelnumberdice
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:6KGBEP45 Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{6KGBEP45}

Prints a linked pith:6KGBEP45 badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

What is the optimal number of independent observations from which a sparse Gaussian Graphical Model can be correctly recovered? Information-theoretic arguments provide a lower bound on the minimum number of samples necessary to perfectly identify the support of any multivariate normal distribution as a function of model parameters. For a model defined on a sparse graph with $p$ nodes, a maximum degree $d$ and minimum normalized edge strength $\kappa$, this necessary number of samples scales at least as $d \log p/\kappa^2$. The sample complexity requirements of existing methods for perfect graph reconstruction exhibit dependency on additional parameters that do not enter in the lower bound. The question of whether the lower bound is tight and achievable by a polynomial time algorithm remains open. In this paper, we constructively answer this question and propose an algorithm, termed DICE, whose sample complexity matches the information-theoretic lower bound up to a universal constant factor. We also propose a related algorithm SLICE that has a slightly higher sample complexity, but can be implemented as a mixed integer quadratic program which makes it attractive in practice. Importantly, SLICE retains a critical advantage of DICE in that its sample complexity only depends on quantities present in the information theoretic lower bound. We anticipate that this result will stimulate future search of computationally efficient sample-optimal algorithms.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.