Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Every four-dimensional model of U(1) duality-invariant nonlinear electrodynamics can be extended to a self-dual theory of a gauge (2p−1)-form in 4p>4 dimensions, controlled by the same scalar self-duality equation that governs 4D models.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 09:39 UTC pith:6LMOZQ44

load-bearing objection The paper's central self-duality equation (2.5) is missing a factor of 2; the construction as written does not hold. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2601.13022 v3 pith:6LMOZQ44 submitted 2026-01-19 hep-th math-phmath.MP

On nonlinear self-duality in 4p dimensions

Sergei M. Kuzenko This is my paper
classification hep-th math-phmath.MP
keywords self-dualitynonlinear electrodynamicsp-form gauge theoriesduality invarianceBorn-InfeldModMaxenergy-momentum tensor flowhigher dimensions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the self-duality condition defining U(1) duality-invariant nonlinear electrodynamics in four dimensions is not four-dimensional at all: for Lagrangians depending only on the two Lorentz invariants S and P, the same equation (2.5) governs a gauge (2p−1)-form in 2n=4p dimensions. If true, every known four-dimensional duality-invariant model—Born-Infeld, ModMax, and the deformed families built from them—has a higher-dimensional counterpart, and an explicit deformation recipe generates new self-dual theories for higher-rank forms. The paper also shows that within this class, the flow of the Lagrangian under a duality-invariant deformation parameter is fixed by the trace of the energy-momentum tensor through equation (4.11). A sympathetic reader cares because this collapses a seemingly higher-dimensional classification problem onto the well-mapped four-dimensional landscape, while leaving room for genuinely new invariants beyond S and P in d>4.

Core claim

The central claim is that equation (2.5)—P(L_S^2 − L_P^2 − 1) = S L_S L_P—is the dimension-independent core of self-duality. Any Lagrangian L(S,P) satisfying it in d=4 automatically satisfies the full self-duality equation (1.1) for a gauge (n−1)-form field strength in d=2n=4p. Consequently the Born-Infeld and ModMax Lagrangians, together with the deformation recipe (3.6), transfer to higher dimensions, and the trace of the energy-momentum tensor, Θ = d(L − S L_S − P L_P), determines the g-flow of the rescaled family L^(g)(F) = g^{-2}L(gF).

What carries the argument

The workhorse is the reduction of the self-duality equation (1.1) to the single scalar condition (2.5) for Lagrangians of the form L(S,P). In d=2n=4p, S and P are the two Lorentz invariants of the rank-n field strength, and the paper asserts that equation (2.5) is equivalent to the full duality-invariance condition in this restricted class. From it flow the deformation recipe Ω = S cosh γ + √(S²+P²) sinh γ, which takes any solution to a new one, and the trace-flow identity (4.11). The auxiliary-field formulation is used to argue that in d>4 more general self-dual theories exist beyond this class.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the self-duality equation (1.1) for an L(S,P) Lagrangian in d=2n reduces without n-dependent corrections to the four-dimensional equation (2.5); if the Hodge-star algebra or the deformation recipe (3.6) introduces extra terms for n>2, the higher-dimensional extension collapses.

What would settle it

Take the ModMax-Born Lagrangian produced by the recipe (3.6) in d=8, insert it into the self-duality equation (1.1) for a generic rank-3 field strength, and check algebraically whether Im(G+·G+ + F+·F+) vanishes identically; a single non-vanishing component would refute the deformation recipe. Equivalently, directly prove that (2.5) is equivalent to (1.1) for n=4; failure for any n would refute the universality claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Born-Infeld and ModMax acquire well-defined higher-form generalisations in all dimensions d=4p, not just d=4.
  • The deformation recipe (3.6) yields new families of self-dual (n−1)-form electrodynamics, including a higher-dimensional analog of ModMax-Born theory, with no extra input beyond a 4D seed satisfying (2.5).
  • Within the L(S,P) class, the g-flow of a duality-invariant family is determined by the trace of the energy-momentum tensor: ∂L^(g)/∂g = −(2/(gd))Θ^(g), a T Tbar-like flow valid beyond four dimensions.
  • The construction cannot be generic in d>4, because additional field-strength invariants beyond S and P exist; the paper's results cover the subclass (2.4), and the auxiliary-field formalism shows that more general conformal self-dual models also exist.
  • The paper poses the open problem of computing the induced action when the duality group is enhanced from compact U(1) to non-compact SL(2,R) by coupling to dilaton and axion fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: Because (2.5) is dimension-blind, the entire four-dimensional taxonomy of duality-invariant models is likely a template for higher-rank forms; one could test whether every 4D duality-invariant Lagrangian admitting a polynomial expansion lifts order by order to a 4p-dimensional model, making the statement constructive rather than existential.
  • Editorial inference: The trace-flow equation (4.11) suggests that in 4p dimensions the space of self-dual L(S,P) models is organised by a one-dimensional flow, much as T Tbar deformations organise two-dimensional theories; a natural extension would be to ask whether any two models in the class are connected by such a flow.
  • Editorial inference: The paper's restriction to L(S,P) means the 'every model' claim is not a full classification in d>4; for n=3 (d=12) and higher, additional invariants define new universality classes that the 4D-based construction cannot reach, and mapping those may be the real higher-dimensional problem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that every four-dimensional U(1) duality-invariant nonlinear electrodynamics model, written as L(S,P), extends to a self-dual theory of a gauge (n−1)-form in d=4p dimensions. The bridge is the dimension-independent Białynicki-Birula-type equation (2.5). The paper also proposes a deformation recipe (3.6) and derives a trace-flow equation (4.11) for a rescaled family. The central novelty is the transfer of the 4D duality-invariant program to higher-rank forms, together with new models generated by (3.6). The paper is clearly written and cites the relevant literature, but the fundamental equation (2.5) is not correct as written.

Significance. If the central claims were correct, the paper would give a systematic way to import the rich 4D duality-invariant electrodynamics program into higher-dimensional p-form theories, and the trace-flow equation would generalize known 4D results. The paper also honestly acknowledges substantial prior work, especially Buratti–Lechner–Melotti [19] and the higher-dimensional ModMax construction [32]. However, the validity of the entire construction rests on equation (2.5), and that equation fails by a factor of two for the paper's own duality-invariant examples. Since §3 and §4 are built directly on (2.5), the main results are not supported. The paper does not contain machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations that would mitigate this issue.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Eq. (2.5)] The asserted equivalence between (2.3) and (2.5) is not merely unproved; equation (2.5) is algebraically incorrect as written. Using the paper's definitions G = n!∂L/∂F = −L_S F − L_P \tilde F and the Lorentzian identity \tilde{\tilde F} = −F for n even, substitution into (2.3) yields P(L_S² − L_P² − 1) = 2 S L_S L_P, not (2.5). The missing factor of 2 is confirmed by the paper's own examples: for the ModMax model (3.2) at S=P=1, γ=0.5, the left side of (2.5) is ≈ 1.10 and the right side is ≈ 0.55; for the Born–Infeld model (3.1) at T=1, S=−1, P=1, the left side is −1 and the right side is −0.5. Both models are asserted to be duality invariant, so (2.5) cannot characterize that property. This is a load-bearing error: the deformation recipe (3.6) and the extension theorem in §4 both rely on (2.5).
  2. [§4, Eqs. (4.8) and (4.11)] The trace-flow derivation depends on the identification L − (1/(2n!))F·\tilde G = L − S L_S − P L_P in (4.8). This identity is not justified and is not consistent with the Hodge-star conventions used in §2. With G = −L_S F − L_P \tilde F and \tilde{\tilde F} = −F, one obtains (1/(2n!))F·\tilde G = P L_S − S L_P, not S L_S + P L_P. A different Hodge-star convention would change the derivation of (2.5), so the two equations cannot both hold in a single convention. The flow equation (4.11) therefore is not established. The circularity concern is also real: once Θ is defined by (4.5) as d times the combination in (4.10), the flow equation becomes nearly tautological for the rescaling family (4.9) unless the nontrivial content of (4.10) is proved independently.
  3. [§3, Eq. (3.6)] The deformation recipe is stated without proof: 'if the Lagrangian (2.4) is a solution of (2.5), then (3.6) is also a solution.' This is a load-bearing step for the construction of new models, but no derivation is given. Since (2.5) itself must be corrected, the validity of (3.6) for (n−1)-forms in d>4 is open. A proof or a reference with a derivation valid in all dimensions is required.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §4] The abstract states that every 4D self-dual model has a duality-invariant extension to 4p dimensions. This is true within the restricted class L(S,P), but the paper itself notes in §4 that in d>4 there are additional invariants of the field strength. The abstract should state the restriction clearly.
  2. [§3, text around (3.6)] There are typographical errors: 'is also a a solution', 'discoved', 'filed strengths', 'of of', and 'ModMaxBorn' should be 'ModMax-Born'. These do not affect the physics but should be corrected.
  3. [§2, footnote 2] The statement that P is identically equal to zero in the d=2n=4p+2 case is made without explanation or reference. It would be helpful to add a brief justification or cite the relevant identity.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Trace-flow equation is an identity of the rescaling construction; the main extension claim is not circular.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [§4, equations (4.5), (4.8), (4.10), (4.11)]
    "Now we restrict our attention to the case of L(F_{a(n)}) of the form (2.4). Then a direct calculation gives ... ∂L^(g)/∂g = −(2/g){L^(g) − 1/(2n!) F·widetilde G^(g)}. (4.10) The relations (4.5) and (4.10) lead to the flow equation ∂L^(g)/∂g = −(2/(gd)) Θ^(g). (4.11)"

    For the rescaled family L^(g)(F) = g^(−2)L(gF), eq. (4.10) is just the Euler scaling identity for L(S,P): the bracket is L − S L_S − P L_P. Eq. (4.5) defines Θ as d times exactly that same bracket (via (4.8)). Hence (4.11) is an identity that holds for every L(S,P), independent of the self-duality equation; the 'trace determines the flow' is installed by choosing a homothetically rescaled family rather than derived as a nontrivial dynamical consequence. The paper itself signals this by noting that the general T_ab flow (4.1) 'appears to be negative in general,' so the presented family is special by construction.

full rationale

The central claim of the paper—that every four-dimensional self-dual nonlinear electrodynamics model of the form L(S,P) has a U(1) duality-invariant extension to 4p dimensions—is not circular. It rests on the assertion that the self-duality equation (2.3) reduces to the dimension-independent Białynicki-Birula form (2.5), and on the prior independent works [14,15,19], especially Buratti–Lechner–Melotti [19], which is explicitly credited with the same conclusion. The author's self-citations ([20], [26], [39]) are used for caveats, background, or a by-product remark, and are not the load-bearing support for the main construction; [19] provides the external anchor. The only place where a presented result is true by construction is the trace-flow relation (4.11): since L^(g) is defined by rescaling, (4.10) is the Euler identity, and Θ is defined as d times the same combination that appears in that identity, so (4.11) is an algebraic identity rather than an independent prediction. This is a section-level, non-central circularity; it does not undermine the main extension theorem. The alleged factor-of-two discrepancy in (2.5) is a correctness/validity concern, not a circularity issue, and is therefore not scored under this rubric.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new fields, particles, forces, or dimensions are postulated; the paper works entirely within the established U(1) duality-invariant (n−1)-form framework. The free parameters are standard model parameters (γ, g), not fitted to data. The main burden sits on three unproven-or-asserted algebraic steps: the reduction (2.3)→(2.5), the preservation claim (3.6), and the energy-momentum trace formula from [45].

free parameters (2)
  • g (duality-invariant rescaling parameter) = g ∈ R₊, arbitrary
    Defines the one-parameter family (4.9) and the trace-flow (4.11); chosen by hand, not fitted to data. The flow statement depends on this choice.
  • γ (ModMax-type deformation parameter) = real, arbitrary
    Controls the deformation recipe (3.6) claimed to generate new self-dual models; inherited from ModMax/Murcia construction, not fitted.
axioms (5)
  • standard math The self-duality equation (1.1)/(2.3) is equivalent to P(L_S² − L_P² − 1) = S L_S L_P for any L(S,P) in d = 2n.
    Stated in §2 ('the self-duality equation (2.3) is equivalent to (2.5)') without the intervening calculation; this dimension-independent equivalence is the bridge that lets 4D solutions become higher-dimensional solutions.
  • domain assumption Restriction to Lagrangians L(S,P); the extension claim covers only this subclass.
    In 4D, S and P exhaust the invariants, but in d>4 more invariants exist (paper cites [20]). §4 concedes this, meaning 'every model' extends only within the L(S,P) ansatz; the abstract does not carry this caveat.
  • ad hoc to paper L_γ(F) := L(Ω, P), with Ω = S coshγ + √(S²+P²) sinhγ, solves (2.5) whenever L(S,P) does.
    Stated at eq. (3.6) without proof; this claim generates the 'new self-dual models' of §3 and is the main unverified step.
  • standard math Energy-momentum tensor has the form T_ab = L_S T^(free)_ab + η_ab(L − SL_S − PL_P), with T^(free) traceless.
    Taken from [45] (eqs. 4.2–4.4); used to identify the trace Θ with d(L − SL_S − PL_P), which enters the flow equation (4.11).
  • standard math Rescaling L^(g)(F) := (1/g²)L(gF) preserves duality invariance.
    Invoked as 'the observation given in [6]' (§4) to define the flow family; combined with (4.8) yields (4.11).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 7192 in / 24868 out tokens · 234339 ms · 2026-08-03T09:39:55.150808+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Building on the earlier work by Araki and Tanii, Aschieri {\it et al.}, and Buratti {\it et al.}, we demonstrate that every model for self-dual nonlinear electrodynamics in four dimensions has a $\mathsf{U}(1)$ duality-invariant extension to $4p>4$ dimensions and construct new self-dual nonlinear theories for a gauge $(2p-1)$-form. We present a family of models for self-dual nonlinear $(2p-1)$-form electrodynamics in which the trace of the energy-momentum tensor determines the flow with respect to a duality-invariant deformation parameter. Finally, we propose the interesting problem of computing the so-called induced action in the case that self-dual $(2p-1)$-form electrodynamics is coupled to dilaton and axion fields and the compact duality group $\mathsf{U}(1)$ is enhanced to the non-compact group $\mathsf{SL}(2, {\mathbb R})$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonlinear self-duality for arbitrary spin, superspin, and supersymmetry type

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0

    Every U(1) duality-invariant (super)conformal gauge theory of arbitrary (super)spin obeys a universal self-duality equation, is Legendre self-dual, and (for spin > 1) lives only on conformally flat backgrounds.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 37 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Duality rotations for interacting fields,

    M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino, “Duality rotations for interacting fields,” Nucl. Phys.B193, 221 (1981)

    1981

  2. [2]

    Electric-magnetic duality rotations in nonlinear electrodynamics,

    G. W. Gibbons and D. A. Rasheed, “Electric-magnetic duality rotations in nonlinear electrodynamics,” Nucl. Phys.B454, 185 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9506035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  3. [3]

    SL(2,R) invariance of non-linear electrodynamics coupled to an axion and a dilaton,

    G. W. Gibbons and D. A. Rasheed, “SL(2,R) invariance of non-linear electrodynamics coupled to an axion and a dilaton,” Phys. Lett.B365, 46 (1996) [hep-th/9509141]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  4. [4]

    Self-duality in nonlinear electromagnetism,

    M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino, “Self-duality in nonlinear electromagnetism,” inSupersymmetry and Quan- tum Field Theory, J. Wess and V. P. Akulov (Eds.), Springer Verlag, 1998, p. 121 [arXiv:hep-th/9705226]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    Nonlinear electromagnetic self-duality and Legendre transformations,

    M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino, “Nonlinear electromagnetic self-duality and Legendre transformations,” in Duality and Supersymmetric Theories, D. I. Olive and P. C. West eds., Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 33 [hep-th/9712103]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    Nonlinear self-duality and supersymmetry,

    S. M. Kuzenko and S. Theisen, “Nonlinear self-duality and supersymmetry,” Fortsch. Phys.49, 273 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0007231]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Duality rotations in nonlinear electrodynamics and in extended supergravity,

    P. Aschieri, S. Ferrara and B. Zumino, “Duality rotations in nonlinear electrodynamics and in extended supergravity,” Riv. Nuovo Cim.31, 625 (2008) [arXiv:0807.4039 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Supersymmetric duality rotations,

    S. M. Kuzenko and S. Theisen, “Supersymmetric duality rotations,” JHEP0003, 034 (2000) [arXiv:hep- th/0001068]

    arXiv 2000

  9. [9]

    Nonlinear self-duality and supergravity,

    S. M. Kuzenko and S. A. McCarthy, “Nonlinear self-duality and supergravity,” JHEP0302, 038 (2003) [hep-th/0212039]; “On the component structure of N=1 supersymmetric nonlinear electrodynamics,” JHEP 05, 012 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0501172 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  10. [10]

    Nonlinear self-duality in N=2 supergravity,

    S. M. Kuzenko, “Nonlinear self-duality in N=2 supergravity,” JHEP1206, 012 (2012) [arXiv:1202.0126 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    N=2 supersymmetry and U(1)- duality,

    J. Broedel, J. J. M. Carrasco, S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh and R. Roiban, “N=2 supersymmetry and U(1)- duality,” Phys. Rev. D85, 125036 (2012) [arXiv:1202.0014 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  12. [12]

    Self-dualN= 2 Born-Infeld theory through auxiliary superfields,

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik, “Self-dualN= 2 Born-Infeld theory through auxiliary superfields,” JHEP 05, 061 (2014) [arXiv:1312.5687 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    Tanii,Introduction to supergravities in diverse dimensions, hep-th/9802138

    Y. Tanii,Introduction to supergravities in diverse dimensions, hep-th/9802138

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Duality symmetries in non-linear gauge theories,

    M. Araki and Y. Tanii, “Duality symmetries in non-linear gauge theories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys.A14, 1139 (1999) [hep-th/9808029]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  15. [15]

    Nonlinear self-duality in even dimensions,

    P. Aschieri, D. Brace, B. Morariu and B. Zumino, “Nonlinear self-duality in even dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B574, 551 (2000) [hep-th/9909021]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  16. [16]

    Partial breaking of global D = 4 supersymmetry, constrained superfields, and 3-brane actions,

    M. Roˇ cek and A. A. Tseytlin, “Partial breaking of global D = 4 supersymmetry, constrained superfields, and 3-brane actions,” Phys. Rev. D59, 106001 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9811232]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  17. [17]

    A new Goldstone multiplet for partially broken supersymmetry,

    J. Bagger and A. Galperin, “A new Goldstone multiplet for partially broken supersymmetry,” Phys. Rev. D55, 1091 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9608177]. 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  18. [18]

    Spontaneous breaking of N=2 global supersymmetry,

    I. Antoniadis, H. Partouche and T. R. Taylor, “Spontaneous breaking of N=2 global supersymmetry,” Phys. Lett. B372, 83 (1996) [arXiv:hep-th/9512006 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  19. [19]

    Duality invariant self-interactions of abelian p-forms in arbitrary dimensions,

    G. Buratti, K. Lechner and L. Melotti, “Duality invariant self-interactions of abelian p-forms in arbitrary dimensions,” JHEP09, 022 (2019) [arXiv:1906.07094 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Some remarks on invariants,

    M. Cederwall, J. Hutomo, S. M. Kuzenko, K. Lechner and D. P. Sorokin, “Some remarks on invariants,” J. Phys. A59, no.6, 065203 (2026) [arXiv:2509.14350 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Nonlinear electrodynamics: Variations on a theme by Born and Infeld,

    I. Bialynicki-Birula, “Nonlinear electrodynamics: Variations on a theme by Born and Infeld,” inQuantum Theory of Particles and Fields, B. Jancewicz and J. Lukierski (Eds.), World Scientific, 1983, pp. 31–48

    1983

  22. [22]

    N=8 supergravity in six dimensions,

    Y. Tanii, “N=8 supergravity in six dimensions,” Phys. Lett.B145, 197 (1984)

    1984

  23. [23]

    Hidden non-compact symmetries in string theory,

    S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara and L. Girardello, “Hidden non-compact symmetries in string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B308, 436 (1988)

    1988

  24. [24]

    Dualisation of dualities. I,

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. L¨ u and C. N. Pope, “Dualisation of dualities. I,” Nucl. Phys.B523, 73 (1998) [hep-th/9710119]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  25. [25]

    Dualisation of dualities. II: Twisted self-duality of doubled fields and superdualities,

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. L¨ u and C. N. Pope, “Dualisation of dualities. II: Twisted self-duality of doubled fields and superdualities,” Nucl. Phys.B535, 242 (1998) [hep-th/9806106]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  26. [26]

    Nonlinear self-duality for arbitrary spin, superspin, and supersymmetry type,

    S. M. Kuzenko, “Nonlinear self-duality for arbitrary spin, superspin, and supersymmetry type,” [arXiv:2602.04336 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Strong field limit of the Born-Infeld p-form electrodynamics,

    D. Chruscinski, “Strong field limit of the Born-Infeld p-form electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D62, 105007 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0005215 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  28. [28]

    Foundations of the new field theory,

    M. Born and L. Infeld, “Foundations of the new field theory,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A144, no.852, 425-451 (1934)

    1934

  29. [29]

    A non-linear duality-invariant conformal extension of Maxwell’s equations,

    I. Bandos, K. Lechner, D. Sorokin and P. K. Townsend, “A non-linear duality-invariant conformal extension of Maxwell’s equations,” Phys. Rev. D102, 121703 (2020) [arXiv:2007.09092 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Nonlinear electrodynamics with the maximum allowable symmetries,

    B. P. Kosyakov, “Nonlinear electrodynamics with the maximum allowable symmetries,” Phys. Lett. B810, 135840 (2020) [arXiv:2007.13878 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Novel duality-invariant theories of electrodynamics,

    ´A. J. Murcia, “Novel duality-invariant theories of electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.10, L101902 (2025) [arXiv:2507.16502 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    On p-form gauge theories and their conformal limits,

    I. Bandos, K. Lechner, D. Sorokin and P. K. Townsend, “On p-form gauge theories and their conformal limits,” JHEP03, 022 (2021) [arXiv:2012.09286 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Manifestly duality-invariant interactions in diverse dimensions,

    S. M. Kuzenko, “Manifestly duality-invariant interactions in diverse dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B798, 134995 (2019) [arXiv:1908.04120 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    N=3 supersymmetric Born-Infeld theory,

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik, “N=3 supersymmetric Born-Infeld theory,” Nucl. Phys. B618, 3 (2001) [hep-th/0110074]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  35. [35]

    New representation for Lagrangians of self-dual nonlinear electrodynam- ics,

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik, “New representation for Lagrangians of self-dual nonlinear electrodynam- ics,” hep-th/0202203. 8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    New approach to nonlinear electrodynamics: Dualities as symmetries of interaction,

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik, “New approach to nonlinear electrodynamics: Dualities as symmetries of interaction,” Phys. Atom. Nucl.67, 2188 (2004) [Yad. Fiz.67, 2212 (2004)] [hep-th/0303192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  37. [37]

    Superconformal duality-invariant models andN= 4 SYM effective action,

    S. M. Kuzenko, “Superconformal duality-invariant models andN= 4 SYM effective action,” JHEP09, 180 (2021) [arXiv:2106.07173 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Nonlinear (chiral) p-form electrodynamics,

    Z. Avetisyan, O. Evnin and K. Mkrtchyan, “Nonlinear (chiral) p-form electrodynamics,” JHEP08, 112 (2022) [arXiv:2205.02522 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Duality-invariant nonlinear electro- dynamics and stress tensor flows,

    C. Ferko, S. M. Kuzenko, L. Smith and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Duality-invariant nonlinear electro- dynamics and stress tensor flows,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.10, 106021 (2023) [arXiv:2309.04253 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Generalised Born-Infeld models, Lax operators and the T T perturbation,

    R. Conti, L. Iannella, S. Negro and R. Tateo, “Generalised Born-Infeld models, Lax operators and the T T perturbation,” JHEP11, 007 (2018) [arXiv:1806.11515 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Emergence of non-linear electrodynamic theories fromT ¯T-like deformations,

    H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, K. B. Velni, D. M. Yekta and H. Mohammadzadeh, “Emergence of non-linear electrodynamic theories fromT ¯T-like deformations,” Phys. Lett. B829, 137079 (2022) [arXiv:2202.11156 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    On current-squared flows and ModMax theories,

    C. Ferko, L. Smith and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “On current-squared flows and ModMax theories,” SciPost Phys.13, no.2, 012 (2022) [arXiv:2203.01085 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Interacting chiral form field theories andT T-like flows in six and higher dimensions,

    C. Ferko, S. M. Kuzenko, K. Lechner, D. P. Sorokin and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Interacting chiral form field theories andT T-like flows in six and higher dimensions,” JHEP05, 320 (2024) [arXiv:2402.06947 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    On non-linear chiral 4-form theories in D=10,

    J. Hutomo, K. Lechner and D. P. Sorokin, “On non-linear chiral 4-form theories in D=10,” JHEP02, 147 (2026) [arXiv:2509.14351 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Effective actions for dual massive (super)p-forms,

    S. M. Kuzenko and K. Turner, “Effective actions for dual massive (super)p-forms,” JHEP01, 040 (2021) [arXiv:2009.08263 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    T T-like flows in non-linear electrodynamic theories and S-duality,

    H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, K. Babaei Velni, D. M. Yekta and H. Mohammadzadeh, “T T-like flows in non-linear electrodynamic theories and S-duality,” JHEP04, 187 (2021) [arXiv:2012.13636 [hep-th]]. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021