REVIEW 6 cited by
MV-MATH: Evaluating Multimodal Math Reasoning in Multi-Visual Contexts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promising capabilities in mathematical reasoning within visual contexts across various datasets. However, most existing multimodal math benchmarks are limited to single-visual contexts, which diverges from the multi-visual scenarios commonly encountered in real-world mathematical applications. To address this gap, we introduce MV-MATH: a meticulously curated dataset of 2,009 high-quality mathematical problems. Each problem integrates multiple images interleaved with text, derived from authentic K-12 scenarios, and enriched with detailed annotations. MV-MATH includes multiple-choice, free-form, and multi-step questions, covering 11 subject areas across 3 difficulty levels, and serves as a comprehensive and rigorous benchmark for assessing MLLMs' mathematical reasoning in multi-visual contexts. Through extensive experimentation, we observe that MLLMs encounter substantial challenges in multi-visual math tasks, with a considerable performance gap relative to human capabilities on MV-MATH. Furthermore, we analyze the performance and error patterns of various models, providing insights into MLLMs' mathematical reasoning capabilities within multi-visual settings.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
PeRL: Permutation-Enhanced Reinforcement Learning for Interleaved Vision-Language Reasoning
PeRL applies reinforcement learning to a vision-language model with image-order permutation and difficulty-based data filtering, improving multi-image reasoning while keeping single-image performance.
-
MATP-BENCH: Can MLLM Be a Good Automated Theorem Prover for Multimodal Problems?
MATP-BENCH pairs 1,056 multimodal math problems with formal theorem statements in Lean 4, Coq, and Isabelle; the strongest tested model solves only 5.68% of Lean 4 end-to-end proving tasks at pass@10.
-
Benchmarking Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with Explicit Visual Dependency
VCBench, built from elementary math problems with multiple images, shows top vision-language models score under 50% while humans score about 93%.
-
Reinforced MLLM: A Survey on RL-Based Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models
A structured survey of reinforcement-learning-based reasoning methods for multimodal large language models, including a taxonomy, reward design review, benchmark tables, and open challenges.
-
Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Powers Reasoning Capability of Multimodal Large Language Models
A survey-style position paper claims that reinforcement fine-tuning powers reasoning in multimodal LLMs, summarizing over a hundred recent works and proposing five future research directions.
-
Large Language Models as Computable Approximations to Solomonoff Induction
The paper argues LLMs are computable approximations of Solomonoff induction, but its central derivation recovers the model's own probabilities by construction.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.