Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Measurement Scheduling for ICU Patients with Offline Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.07344 v1 pith:6OAOO2QA submitted 2024-02-12 cs.LG cs.AI

Measurement Scheduling for ICU Patients with Offline Reinforcement Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords offline-rlpatientschedulingtestsbeenlaboratorylearningmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Scheduling laboratory tests for ICU patients presents a significant challenge. Studies show that 20-40% of lab tests ordered in the ICU are redundant and could be eliminated without compromising patient safety. Prior work has leveraged offline reinforcement learning (Offline-RL) to find optimal policies for ordering lab tests based on patient information. However, new ICU patient datasets have since been released, and various advancements have been made in Offline-RL methods. In this study, we first introduce a preprocessing pipeline for the newly-released MIMIC-IV dataset geared toward time-series tasks. We then explore the efficacy of state-of-the-art Offline-RL methods in identifying better policies for ICU patient lab test scheduling. Besides assessing methodological performance, we also discuss the overall suitability and practicality of using Offline-RL frameworks for scheduling laboratory tests in ICU settings.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CodeClinic: Evaluating Automation of Coding Skills for Clinical Reasoning Agents

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CodeClinic benchmark demonstrates that LLM-generated Python skill libraries from clinical guidelines enhance consistency and reduce token consumption by up to 40% compared to zero-shot approaches on MIMIC-IV based tasks.