Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LISA and the LISA Science Team

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2601.15365 v2 pith:6QPGSPNN submitted 2026-01-21 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.GAgr-qc

LISA and the LISA Science Team

Anna Heffernan , Chiara Caprini , Neil Cornish , Jonathan Gair , Catia Grimani , Zoltan Haiman , Erin Kara , Nikos Karnesis
show 14 more authors
Valeriya Korol Astrid Lamberts Nora L\"utzgendorf Guido M\"uller Gijs Nelemans Antoine Petiteau Elena Maria Rossi Alberto Sesana Joey Shapiro Key Deirdre Shoemaker Krista Lynne Smith Stephen R. Taylor Alberto Vecchio William Joseph Weber
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM astro-ph.GAgr-qc
keywords lisasciencespacelaunchteamgravitationalmissionnasa
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

LISA, the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, due to launch mid-2035, is a large class space mission by the European Space Agency (ESA). In partnership with NASA and ESA-member states, ESA is on track to launch what is expected to be the first space-based gravitational wave detector. By hosting detectors in space, one gains access to a lower frequency band of gravitational wave sources and, with them, a plethora of new science. To maximise this scientific gain, ESA and NASA selected 20 scientists for the LISA Science Team to carry out and/or lead the necessary actions leading up to LISA's launch. We give a short overview and update of the LISA mission, its science objectives and related waveforms, as well as the work of the LISA Science Team as of April 2026.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Benchmarking wall velocities in cosmological phase transitions: Fluid Ansatz and WallGo

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    The fluid-Ansatz and WallGo methods agree for mild phase transitions but diverge by tens of percent for strong ones, where the semi-classical approximation itself may break down.