Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bound orbits of a slowly evolving black hole

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.09022 v4 pith:6WXLB5KD submitted 2018-06-23 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

Bound orbits of a slowly evolving black hole

classification gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords blackholemassbodychangesorbitorbitsspin
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Bound orbits of black holes are very well understood. Given a Kerr black hole of mass $M$ and spin $S = aM^2$, it is simple to characterize its orbits as functions of the orbit's geometry. How do the orbits change if the black hole is itself evolving? How do the orbits change if the orbiting body evolves? In this paper, we consider a process that changes a black hole's mass and spin, acting such that the spacetime is described by the Kerr solution at any moment, or that changes the orbiting body's mass. Provided this change happens slowly, the orbit's actions ($J_r, J_\theta, J_\phi$) are {\it adiabatic invariants}, and thus are constant during this process. By enforcing adiabatic invariance of the actions, we deduce how an orbit evolves due to changes in the black hole's mass and spin and in the orbiting body's mass. We demonstrate the impact of these results with several examples: how an orbit responds if accretion changes a black hole's mass and spin; how it responds if the orbiting body's mass changes due to accretion; and how the inspiral of a small body into a black hole is affected by change to the hole's mass and spin due to the gravitational radiation absorbed by the event horizon. In all cases, the effect is very small, but can be an order of magnitude or more larger than what was found in previous work which did not take into account how the orbit responds due to these effects.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The significance of first post-adiabatic contributions for scalar charge measurements with intermediate and extreme mass ratio inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5

    Neglecting 1PA gravitational self-force biases intrinsic EMRI parameters while scalar-charge inference remains robust; pure-GR templates produce large biases and underestimated errors on charged signals.

  2. Eccentricity-Modulated Phase Degeneracy and Distinguishability between Dark Matter and Accretion Disk Environmental Effects in EMRIs

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    DM dephasing in EMRIs is nearly eccentricity-independent while disk dephasing is strongly suppressed by e0, so residual SNR and distinguishability time favor slightly eccentric orbits for LISA separation of the two effects.