REVIEW 4 cited by
SEMQA: Semi-Extractive Multi-Source Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recently proposed long-form question answering (QA) systems, supported by large language models (LLMs), have shown promising capabilities. Yet, attributing and verifying their generated abstractive answers can be difficult, and automatically evaluating their accuracy remains an ongoing challenge. In this work, we introduce a new QA task for answering multi-answer questions by summarizing multiple diverse sources in a semi-extractive fashion. Specifically, Semi-extractive Multi-source QA (SEMQA) requires models to output a comprehensive answer, while mixing factual quoted spans -- copied verbatim from given input sources -- and non-factual free-text connectors that glue these spans together into a single cohesive passage. This setting bridges the gap between the outputs of well-grounded but constrained extractive QA systems and more fluent but harder to attribute fully abstractive answers. Particularly, it enables a new mode for language models that leverages their advanced language generation capabilities, while also producing fine in-line attributions by-design that are easy to verify, interpret, and evaluate. To study this task, we create the first dataset of this kind, QuoteSum, with human-written semi-extractive answers to natural and generated questions, and define text-based evaluation metrics. Experimenting with several LLMs in various settings, we find this task to be surprisingly challenging, demonstrating the importance of QuoteSum for developing and studying such consolidation capabilities.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
RCStat: A Statistical Framework for using Relative Contextualization in Transformers
RCStat uses pre-softmax attention logits to define a Relative Contextualization score that improves adaptive KV-cache eviction and attention-head selection for attribution on LLaMA models.
-
TokenShapley: Token Level Context Attribution with Shapley Value
TokenShapley computes token-level Shapley attributions from context to response by treating context tokens as (prefix, token) data points in a KNN datastore.
-
DBRouting: Routing End User Queries to Databases for Answerability
The paper introduces DB routing, a task of ranking databases for answerability, with synthesized benchmarks from Spider and BIRD showing that LLMs outperform embeddings but both struggle with many or similar databases.
-
PLD+: Accelerating LLM inference by leveraging Language Model Artifacts
PLD+ accelerates LLM inference on input-guided tasks by ranking prompt-derived draft spans with hidden states or attention heads, beating tuning-free baselines and often surpassing the tuned EAGLE method.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.