Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 35 references

High performance vacuum annealed beta-(AlxGa1-x)2O3/Ga2O3 HFET with f_T/f_MAX of 32/65 GHz

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A beta-(AlGa)2O3/Ga2O3 HFET with low-damage regrowth and Al2O3 passivation reaches 32 GHz current-gain and 65 GHz power-gain cutoff frequencies with no current collapse.

desk verdict Solid beta-Ga2O3 HFET process-and-passivation demonstration with plausibly record RF numbers, but unshown raw RF extraction and a not-fully-controlled passivation comparison keep me from endorsing the exact figures. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02714 v1 pith:72BELT6K submitted 2025-02-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph

Chinmoy Nath Saha , Noor Jahan Nipu , Uttam Singisetti This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph
keywords beta-Ga2O3HFETRFcutofffrequencyAl2O3passivationMBEregrowthcurrentcollapseplasmaetchingwidebandgapsemiconductor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a beta-(Al,Ga)2O3/Ga2O3 heterostructure field-effect transistor whose fabrication was changed at two critical steps: the AlGaO barrier and Ga2O3 cap are removed with low-power plasma etches, and the wafer is cleaned and vacuum-annealed immediately before MBE regrowth of the degenerate N++ source/drain contacts. The authors argue that these changes lower the interface resistance between the regrown contacts and the two-dimensional electron gas, eliminating the low-voltage nonlinearity seen in their earlier devices. The resulting device delivers 0.5 A/mm drain current, 110 mS/mm peak transconductance, 6.1 Ω·mm on-resistance, and RF cutoff frequencies f_T = 32 GHz and f_MAX = 65 GHz, the latter among the highest reported for Ga2O3. After a 100 nm Al2O3 passivation layer is deposited, pulsed measurements show no current collapse, which the paper presents as the first successful Al2O3 trap passivation for beta-Ga2O3 devices. If these results hold, they strengthen the case for Ga2O3 as a candidate material for high-power RF amplifiers.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the regrown N++ contact/2DEG interface. The paper reduces interface resistance by using low-power plasma etches (ICP 300/RIE 50 for BCl3/Ar; ICP 150/RIE 50 for SF6/Ar, etching at 1–2 nm/min), removing surface contaminants with a 1:3 HCl:DI water dip, and annealing at 600 °C in ultra-high vacuum ($10^{-10}$ torr) immediately before ozone-MBE regrowth of the N++ layer. This sequence is credited with eliminating the low-bias output nonlinearity of the earlier generation device and enabling the high gm and current. The other central element is the 100 nm Al2O3 passivation deposited by ALD at 300 °C, which the paper reports as passivating traps and eliminating DC-RF dispersion as seen in 200 ns pulsed I-V.

What would settle it

A direct test is to measure S-parameters up to at least 65 GHz on the passivated device and locate the unity-gain crossings of |h21| and unilateral gain without relying on extrapolation; if the measured rolloff deviates from 20 dB/dec or the crossings are below 32 and 65 GHz, the headline numbers would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a specific process sequence—low-power BCl3/Ar etching of the AlGaO barrier, very low-power SF6/Ar etching of the Ga2O3 cap, a 1:3 HCl dip, and a 600 °C anneal at $10^{-10}$ torr in the MBE chamber before regrowing 100 nm of N++ Ga2O3 at $3x10^{19}$ $cm^{-3}$—reduces the regrowth interface resistance enough to unlock the intrinsic performance of the $\beta$-(Al,Ga)2O3/Ga2O3 2DEG channel. The evidence is a device with no low-VDS nonlinearity, peak gm of 110 mS/mm at 15 V, 0.5 A/mm on-current, and an f_T·L_G product of 6.1 GHz·μm, described as one of the highest for Ga2O3. The paper also claims that a 100 nm Al2O3 ALD layer passivates surface traps, shown by the absence of current collapse in 200 ns pulsed I-V under gate and dual bias stress, and that RF gain only appears after this passivation. The authors state the f_MAX of 65 GHz is one of the highest reported for Ga2O3-based RF devices.

Load-bearing premise

The reported cutoff frequencies rest on standard open-pad de-embedding and a 20 dB/dec extrapolation from S-parameter data measured only up to 20 GHz; if parasitic pad effects are not fully removed or the gain rolloff is not exactly -20 dB/dec, the extracted f_T = 32 GHz and f_MAX = 65 GHz could be different.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The reported f_T·L_G product of 6.1 GHz·μm sits among the highest for Ga2O3 FETs and implies a saturation velocity near 3×10^6 cm/s.
  • Al2O3 passivation can eliminate current collapse in beta-Ga2O3 devices, enabling pulsed operation at high drain bias without DC-RF dispersion.
  • The combination of low-power etch, HCl clean, and UHV anneal can be adopted by other Ga2O3 regrowth processes to reduce contact resistance and improve RF figures.
  • RF gain is only observed after passivation, indicating that surface traps, not the channel itself, were the dominant limit in prior unpassivated devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If interface resistance reduction is the root cause, the same pre-regrowth treatment may transfer to other oxide semiconductors where regrown contacts limit RF performance.
  • The absence of current collapse with a 100 nm Al2O3 layer suggests testing a thickness series could separate surface trap passivation from mechanical stress effects.
  • The f_T·L_G product still falls short of GaN HEMTs (typically above 10 GHz·μm), so further gains may require channel mobility or saturation-velocity engineering rather than gate scaling alone.
  • The paper does not report breakdown voltage for the passivated device; combining this regrowth process with field-plate design may yield a device that is simultaneously high-speed and high-voltage.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This letter reports a β-(AlxGa1-x)2O3/Ga2O3 heterostructure FET fabricated with low-power BCl3/Ar and SF6/Ar plasma etching, an HCl surface clean, and ultra-high-vacuum annealing before MBE regrowth of degenerately doped source/drain contacts. The device is reported to achieve DC ID = 0.5 A/mm, RON = 6.1 Ω·mm at VGS = 3 V, peak gm = 110 mS/mm, fT = 32 GHz, fMAX = 65 GHz, and an fT·LG product of 6.1 GHz·µm for LG = 191 nm. The authors further claim that 100 nm Al2O3 passivation eliminates current collapse, based on pulsed I-V measurements before and after passivation and on the appearance of RF gain only after passivation.

Significance. If the reported RF numbers are confirmed, this is a meaningful advance for β-Ga2O3 RF transistors: the fT·LG product and fMAX are among the highest reported for the material system, and the process improvements (low-power etch, HCl clean, vacuum annealing before regrowth) appear to reduce the regrowth interface resistance that limited earlier devices. The central DC and RF figures are direct measurements rather than outputs of a fitted model, and the fT·LG product follows from measured fT and LG without free parameters; the cryogenic characterization and TLM analysis are additional strengths. However, the verification of the headline RF claims is currently incomplete: no raw S-parameter traces or extrapolation lines are shown, the de-embedding is open-pad-only, and the before/after passivation comparison uses different quiescent bias conditions. These gaps are load-bearing because the novelty of the letter rests on the RF performance and on the passivation claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [RF measurements, Fig. 4] The headline fT = 32 GHz and fMAX = 65 GHz are obtained by extrapolating |h21| and U to 0 dB from measurements taken only up to 20 GHz, but the manuscript does not show the measured gain traces, the extrapolation lines, or a comparison of raw and de-embedded data. Since fMAX = 65 GHz lies well above the 20 GHz measurement ceiling, this result depends entirely on the assumed -20 dB/dec roll-off and on the adequacy of the open-pad-only de-embedding described in the RF paragraph and Ref. 28. Open-only de-embedding leaves series pad resistance and inductance in the data, which can shift both fT and fMAX. Please provide the raw S-parameters, the de-embedded |h21|, U, and MAG/MSG curves with extrapolation lines for the bias points of Fig. 4(a)-(c), and state the resulting uncertainty in the extrapolated fT and fMAX.
  2. [Pulsed IV and passivation, Fig. 3] The before/after passivation comparison is not fully controlled. Before passivation, the gate-lag and double-pulse quiescent biases are VGS,q = -4 V, while after passivation the same measurements use VGS,q = -8 V, justified by VTH = -6 V for that device; the pre-passivation threshold voltage is not reported. If VTH differed before passivation, the two measurements do not sample the same trap-filling condition, so the attribution of the disappearance of current collapse to Al2O3 is not conclusive. In addition, the statement that the device showed no RF gain before passivation (RF paragraph) is made without showing the corresponding RF traces, even though DC-RF dispersion is invoked as the cause.
  3. [Device benchmarking, Figs. 2(e), 4(d), 5] The record claims are based on different best devices for different metrics: ID = 0.5 A/mm and RON = 6.1 Ω·mm are from a 173 nm gate device, peak gm = 110 mS/mm is from a 100 nm gate device at VDS = 15 V, fT = 32 GHz is from a 191 nm gate device, and fMAX = 65 GHz is obtained at VDS = 21 V. No error bars, device-to-device spread, or wafer statistics are reported, and the fT·LG benchmark in Fig. 4(d) uses the single highest product 'among other values'. The state-of-the-art conclusions would be substantially strengthened by reporting the range and median of these key figures across the measured devices and by using a consistent device-selection rule for all benchmark plots.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fabrication and notation] There are several typos and notation issues: 'theoritical' in the Supplementary Material, 'schotty' in the fabrication text, 'I shaped gate' should be 'I-shaped gate', and 'AlGaO/GaO HFET' should be 'AlGaO/Ga2O3 HFET' in several places. Also, '2500C' should be '250 °C', and the gate-length range '100-200 nm' is inconsistent with the specific 'DUT of 173 nm gate length (LG)' used for the main DC figures.
  2. [Device labels and measurement conditions] The device names A and B are used without being formally defined; the reader cannot tell which device produced each of the reported ID, gm, fT, and fMAX values. Please label the devices consistently and specify which gate length and bias point correspond to each reported record.
  3. [Saturation velocity estimate] The text states that fT·LG = 6.1 GHz·µm corresponds to Vsat ≈ 3 x 10^6 cm/s. Using the standard relation v_eff = 2π fT LG gives approximately 3.8 x 10^6 cm/s for 32 GHz and 191 nm; please state the formula and any correction factor used, or adjust the stated value.
  4. [Passivation novelty claim] The claim that this is the first demonstration of successful Al2O3 passivation for β-Ga2O3 should be qualified relative to Ref. 9, which reports a similar Al2O3 passivation technique with moderate dispersion; a quantitative criterion for 'successful' (e.g., percentage of current collapse before and after) would make the novelty claim precise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the headline fT/fMAX/gm/RON values are direct measurements, and derived figures such as fT.LG and saturation velocity are arithmetic from measured quantities.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental measurements rather than outputs of a model fitted to those same measurements. The abstract states that fT = 32 GHz and fMAX = 65 GHz were 'extracted from RF measurements,' and the RF section describes standard S-parameter measurement with an isolated open-pad de-embedding structure and extrapolation to 0 dB. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction; the only derived quantities are the fT.LG product (computed as 32 GHz times 191 nm from measured fT and SEM/FIB-measured gate length) and an approximate saturation velocity obtained from the same product using the standard relation. The mobility estimate of 145 cm2/V.s uses a simulated 2DEG density from a self-consistent Schrodinger-Poisson solver together with measured sheet resistance, which is an assumption-based estimate rather than a circular derivation, and it is not a headline claim. Self-citations to the authors' prior work (refs 16-19, 22, 25) supply process context, previous device results, and growth details; they do not serve as a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the central result. The passivation conclusion is supported by before/after pulsed-IV comparisons, and the RF figures are independently measurable quantities. Therefore no circular step satisfying the criteria can be identified, and the honest finding is a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard device measurement assumptions: TLM extraction, a simulated 2DEG density, open-pad RF de-embedding with -20 dB/dec extrapolation, and the interpretation that pulsing differences before and after passivation are caused by trap passivation. None of these assumptions are independently verified with raw data in the letter.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption TLM measurements with the stated spacings yield uniform sheet and contact resistance across the access region and regrown N++ layer.
    Used to extract R_C,total=0.5 Ohm.mm, R_sheet,ch=9.6 kOhm/sq, and the mobility estimate; if the TLM structures do not represent the actual access regions, the resistance and mobility numbers shift.
  • domain assumption The self-consistent Schrodinger-Poisson simulation with the stated doping and layer thicknesses gives the correct 2DEG density of 4.47e12 cm-2.
    Used with the measured sheet resistance to estimate a mobility of 145 cm2/Vs; the simulation inputs are not independently verified in this letter.
  • domain assumption Open-pad de-embedding removes all parasitic pad capacitance, and the measured gain rolls off at -20 dB/dec so extrapolation to unity gain yields fT and fMAX.
    This determines the headline RF figures; no raw S-parameter traces or extrapolation lines are shown in the letter.
  • domain assumption The before/after passivation comparison is made on equivalent devices under identical pulse conditions, so the disappearance of current collapse is due to Al2O3 trap passivation.
    The letter does not explicitly state that the same device was measured before and after passivation, nor does it control for drift, thermal, or measurement-order effects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High performance vacuum annealed beta-(AlxGa1-x)2O3/Ga2O3 HFET with f_T/f_MAX of 32/65 GHz." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/72BELT6K

@misc{pith2026250202714,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High performance vacuum annealed beta-(AlxGa1-x)2O3/Ga2O3 HFET with f_T/f_MAX of 32/65 GHz},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/72BELT6K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02714}
}
abstract

This letter reports high performance beta-(AlxGa1-x)2O3/Ga2O3 Heterostructure FET (HFET) with improved regrowth process. Highly scaled I shaped gate have been fabricated with degenerately doped (N++) source/drain contact regrown by ozone molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). Aiming to address the limitations observed in previous generation devices, this work incorporates a low-power BCl3/Ar and SF6/Ar plasma etching process to remove the AlGaO barrier layer and Ga2O3 layer respectively before regrowth. Additionally, the surface was cleaned and vacuum annealing was carried out before MBE regrowth to reduce any interface resistance between highly doped regrowth N++ and 2DEG layer. These meticulously designed fabrication steps enabled us to achieve the high DC current 0.5 A/mm at 5V drain bias with 6.1 $\mathrm{\Omega}$.mm on resistance (R\textsubscript{ON}) at V_GS=3V, peak transconductance (g_m) of 110 mS/mm at room temperature (V_DS=15V) and around 0.8 A/mm (V_DS=5V) peak I_ON} at low temperature (100K). Current gain cut-off frequency (f_T) of 32 GHz and peak power gain cut-off frequency (f_MAX) of 65 GHz were extracted from RF measurements. f_T.L_G product was estimated to be 6.1 GHz-$\mu$m for 191 nm L_G and 32 GHz f_T, which is one of the highest reported among Ga2O3 devices. With thicker Al2O3, device shows no current collapse demonstrating first time successful traps passivation with Al2O3 for Ga2O3 devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02714 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Cross section of final fabricated device structure with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (c) shows ID - VGS transfer curve before passivation, where at VGS,q = -4 V and VDS,q = 0 V bias condition negli￾gible current collapse is found, but we observe a small shift in threshold voltage. Theoretically, this bias condition should favor trapping of the electron under gate26. Combined use of a high drain voltage (VDS,q = 7 V) and negative gate voltage (VGS,q = -4 V) resulted in a significant decrease (33%) of… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5. (a) fT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Small signal RF measurement showing fT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    author author A. J. \ Green , author J. Speck , author G. Xing , author P. Moens , author F. Allerstam , author K. Gumaelius , author T. Neyer , author A. Arias-Purdue , author V. Mehrotra , author A. Kuramata , et al. ,\ title title - G allium oxide power electronics , \ @noop journal journal APL Materials \ volume 10 ,\ pages 029201 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    author author A. J. \ Green , author K. D. \ Chabak , author E. R. \ Heller , author R. C. \ Fitch , author M. Baldini , author A. Fiedler , author K. Irmscher , author G. Wagner , author Z. Galazka , author S. E. \ Tetlak , author A. Crespo , author K. Leedy , \ and\ author G. H. \ Jessen ,\ title title 3.8- MV /cm breakdown strength of MOVPE -grown S n-...

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Ghosh \ and\ author U

    author author K. Ghosh \ and\ author U. Singisetti ,\ title title Ab initio velocity-field curves in monoclinic -Ga 2 O 3 , \ 10.1063/1.4986174 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 122 ,\ pages 035702 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4986174

  7. [7]

    Wang , author Q

    author author C. Wang , author Q. Yan , author C. Zhang , author C. Su , author K. Zhang , author S. Sun , author Z. Liu , author W. Zhang , author S. Alghamdi , author E. Ghandourah , et al. ,\ title title - Ga 2 O 3 lateral schottky barrier diodes with> 10 kv breakdown voltage and anode engineering , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Electron Device Letters ...

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    author author D. H. \ Mudiyanselage , author D. Wang , \ and\ author H. Fu ,\ title title Wide bandgap vertical kv-class -Ga 2 O 3 / GaN heterojunction pn power diodes with mesa edge termination , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society \ volume 10 ,\ pages 89--97 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page 2021

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Farzana , author F

    author author E. Farzana , author F. Alema , author W. Y. \ Ho , author A. Mauze , author T. Itoh , author A. Osinsky , \ and\ author J. S. \ Speck ,\ title title Vertical -Ga 2 O 3 field plate schottky barrier diode from metal-organic chemical vapor deposition , \ @noop journ...

    2021

  2. [10]

    Bhattacharyya , author S

    author author A. Bhattacharyya , author S. Roy , author P. Ranga , author C. Peterson , \ and\ author S. Krishnamoorthy ,\ title title High- M obility T ri-gate - Ga 2 O 3 MESFET s with a power figure of merit over 0.9 GW /cm 2 , \ 10.1109/LED.2022.3196305 journal journal IEEE...

  3. [11]

    author author N. K. \ Kalarickal , author Z. Xia , author H.-L. \ Huang , author W. Moore , author Y. Liu , author M. Brenner , author J. Hwang , \ and\ author S. Rajan ,\ title title -(Al 0.18 Ga 0.82 ) 2 O 3 double heterojunction transistor with average field of 5.5 MV /cm ,...

    2021

  4. [12]

    author author D. M. \ Dryden , author K. J. \ Liddy , author A. E. \ Islam , author J. C. \ Williams , author D. E. \ Walker , author N. S. \ Hendricks , author N. A. \ Moser , author A. Arias-Purdue , author N. P. \ Sepelak , author K. DeLello , et al. ,\ title title Scaled t...

    2022

  5. [13]

    Krishnamoorthy , author Z

    author author S. Krishnamoorthy , author Z. Xia , author C. Joishi , author Y. Zhang , author J. McGlone , author J. Johnson , author M. Brenner , author A. R. \ Arehart , author J. Hwang , author S. Lodha , et al. ,\ title title Modulation-doped -(Al 0.2 Ga 0.8 ) 2 /Ga 2 O 3 ...

    2017

  6. [14]

    Zhang , author A

    author author Y. Zhang , author A. Neal , author Z. Xia , author C. Joishi , author J. M. \ Johnson , author Y. Zheng , author S. Bajaj , author M. Brenner , author D. Dorsey , author K. Chabak , et al. ,\ title title Demonstration of high mobility and quantum transport in mod...

    2018

  7. [15]

    Xia , author H

    author author Z. Xia , author H. Xue , author C. Joishi , author J. Mcglone , author N. K. \ Kalarickal , author S. H. \ Sohel , author M. Brenner , author A. Arehart , author S. Ringel , author S. Lodha , author W. Lu , \ and\ author S. Rajan ,\ title title -ga2o3 delta-doped...

  8. [16]

    Zhou , author H

    author author M. Zhou , author H. Zhou , author S. Huang , author M. Si , author Y. Zhang , author T. Luan , author H. Yue , author K. Dang , author C. Wang , author Z. Liu , et al. ,\ title title 1.1 A /mm - Ga 2 O 3 -on- SiC RF MOSFETs with 2.3 w/mm p out and 30\ year 2023 )...

    2023

  9. [17]

    Zhou , author H

    author author M. Zhou , author H. Zhou , author S. Mengwei , author G. Gao , author X. Chen , author X. Zhu , author K. Dang , author M. Peijun , author M. Xiaohua , author X. Zheng , et al. ,\ title title 71 ghz-f max -ga 2 o 3-on-sic rf power mosfets with record p out= 3.1 w...

    2024

  10. [18]

    Yu , author W

    author author X. Yu , author W. Xu , author Y. Wang , author B. Qiao , author R. Shen , author J. Zhou , author Z. Li , author T. You , author Z. Shen , author K. Zhang , et al. ,\ title title Heterointegrated -Ga 2 O 3 -on-sic rf mosfets with f (t)/f MAX of 47/51 ghz by ion-c...

    2023

  11. [19]

    Vaidya , author C

    author author A. Vaidya , author C. N. \ Saha , \ and\ author U. Singisetti ,\ title title Enhancement mode -(Al x Ga 1-x ) 2 O 3 /Ga 2 O 3 heterostructure FET ( HFET ) with high transconductance and cutoff frequency , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Electron Device Letters \ vol...

    2021

  12. [20]

    author author C. N. \ Saha , author A. Vaidya , author N. J. \ Nipu , author L. Meng , author D. S. \ Yu , author H. Zhao , \ and\ author U. Singisetti ,\ title title Thin channel Ga 2 O 3 MOSFET with 55 GHz fmax and > 100v breakdown , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics L...

    2024

  13. [21]

    author author C. N. \ Saha , author A. Vaidya , author A. F. M. A. U. \ Bhuiyan , author L. Meng , author S. Sharma , author H. Zhao , \ and\ author U. Singisetti ,\ title title Scaled - Ga 2 O 3 thin channel MOSFET with 5.4 MV/cm average breakdown field and near 50 GHz f MAX ...

    doi

  14. [22]

    author author C. N. \ Saha , author A. Vaidya , \ and\ author U. Singisetti ,\ title title Temperature dependent pulsed IV and RF characterization of -(Al x Ga 1-x ) 2 O 3 /Ga 2 O 3 hetero-structure FET with ex situ passivation , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters...

    2022

  15. [23]

    Joishi , author Z

    author author C. Joishi , author Z. Xia , author J. S. \ Jamison , author S. H. \ Sohel , author R. C. \ Myers , author S. Lodha , \ and\ author S. Rajan ,\ title title Deep-recessed -Ga 2 O 3 delta-doped field-effect transistors with in situ epitaxial passivation , \ @noop jo...

    2020

  16. [24]

    Bhattacharyya , author P

    author author A. Bhattacharyya , author P. Ranga , author S. Roy , author C. Peterson , author F. Alema , author G. Seryogin , author A. Osinsky , \ and\ author S. Krishnamoorthy ,\ title title Multi-kv class -Ga 2 O 3 MESFET s with a lateral figure of merit up to 355 MW /cm ^...

    2021

  17. [25]

    Vaidya , author J

    author author A. Vaidya , author J. Sarker , author Y. Zhang , author L. Lubecki , author J. Wallace , author J. D. \ Poplawsky , author K. Sasaki , author A. Kuramata , author A. Goyal , author J. A. \ Gardella , \ and\ author U. Singisetti ,\ title title Structural, band and...

    2019

  18. [26]

    Alema , author C

    author author F. Alema , author C. Peterson , author A. Bhattacharyya , author S. Roy , author S. Krishnamoorthy , \ and\ author A. Osinsky ,\ title title Low resistance ohmic contact on epitaxial movpe grown - Ga 2 O 3 and -(Al x Ga 1-x ) 2 O 3 films , \ @noop journal journal...

    2022

  19. [27]

    Zhang , author Z

    author author Y. Zhang , author Z. Xia , author J. Mcglone , author W. Sun , author C. Joishi , author A. R. \ Arehart , author S. A. \ Ringel , \ and\ author S. Rajan ,\ title title Evaluation of low-temperature saturation velocity in -(Al x Ga 1-x ) 2 O 3 modulation-doped fi...

    2019

  20. [28]

    Vaidya \ and\ author U

    author author A. Vaidya \ and\ author U. Singisetti ,\ title title Temperature-dependent current dispersion study in -Ga 2 O 3 fets using sub-microsecond pulsed i--v characteristics , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices \ volume 68 ,\ pages 3755--3761...

    2021

  21. [29]

    Meneghesso , author M

    author author G. Meneghesso , author M. Meneghini , author D. Bisi , author I. Rossetto , author A. Cester , author U. K. \ Mishra , \ and\ author E. Zanoni ,\ title title Trapping phenomena in AlGaN/GaN HEMT s: A study based on pulsed and transient measurements , \ @noop jour...

    2013

  22. [30]

    Meneghesso , author G

    author author G. Meneghesso , author G. Verzellesi , author R. Pierobon , author F. Rampazzo , author A. Chini , author U. K. \ Mishra , author C. Canali , \ and\ author E. Zanoni ,\ title title Surface-related drain current dispersion effects in AlGaN-GaN HEMT , \ @noop journ...

    2004

  23. [31]

    Koolen , author J

    author author M. Koolen , author J. Geelen , \ and\ author M. Versleijen ,\ title title An improved de-embedding technique for on-wafer high-frequency characterization , \ in\ @noop booktitle Proceedings of the 1991 Bipolar Circuits and Technology Meeting \ ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    1991

  24. [32]

    author author A. J. \ Green , author K. D. \ Chabak , author M. Baldini , author N. Moser , author R. Gilbert , author R. C. \ Fitch , author G. Wagner , author Z. Galazka , author J. Mccandless , author A. Crespo , author K. Leedy , \ and\ author G. H. \ Jessen ,\ title title...

  25. [33]

    Chabak , author D

    author author K. Chabak , author D. Walker , author A. Green , author A. Crespo , author M. Lindquist , author K. Leedy , author S. Tetlak , author R. Gilbert , author N. A. \ Moser , \ and\ author G. Jessen ,\ title title Sub-micron gallium oxide radio frequency field-effect ...

  26. [34]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number orga...

    2010

  27. [35]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number orga...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.