Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Safe Testing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.07801 v5 pith:72H6GACA submitted 2019-06-18 math.ST cs.ITcs.LGmath.ITstat.MEstat.TH

classification math.STcs.ITcs.LGmath.ITstat.MEstat.TH
keywords e-valuessafetestingcontinuationoptionalseveraltheoryacceptable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop the theory of hypothesis testing based on the e-value, a notion of evidence that, unlike the p-value, allows for effortlessly combining results from several studies in the common scenario where the decision to perform a new study may depend on previous outcomes. Tests based on e-values are safe, i.e. they preserve Type-I error guarantees, under such optional continuation. We define growth-rate optimality (GRO) as an analogue of power in an optional continuation context, and we show how to construct GRO e-variables for general testing problems with composite null and alternative, emphasizing models with nuisance parameters. GRO e-values take the form of Bayes factors with special priors. We illustrate the theory using several classic examples including a one-sample safe t-test and the 2 x 2 contingency table. Sharing Fisherian, Neymanian and Jeffreys-Bayesian interpretations, e-values may provide a methodology acceptable to adherents of all three schools.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 12 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Efficient Sequential Evaluation of Large Language Models

    stat.ML 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A confidence-sequence framework for sequentially estimating an LLM's average benchmark accuracy under adaptive question selection, with growth-oriented sampling rules that in practice often lose to uniform sampling.

Pith tools