REVIEW 5 cited by
Symbiotic Game and Foundation Models for Cyber Deception Operations in Strategic Cyber Warfare
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We are currently facing unprecedented cyber warfare with the rapid evolution of tactics, increasing asymmetry of intelligence, and the growing accessibility of hacking tools. In this landscape, cyber deception emerges as a critical component of our defense strategy against increasingly sophisticated attacks. This chapter aims to highlight the pivotal role of game-theoretic models and foundation models (FMs) in analyzing, designing, and implementing cyber deception tactics. Game models (GMs) serve as a foundational framework for modeling diverse adversarial interactions, allowing us to encapsulate both adversarial knowledge and domain-specific insights. Meanwhile, FMs serve as the building blocks for creating tailored machine learning models suited to given applications. By leveraging the synergy between GMs and FMs, we can advance proactive and automated cyber defense mechanisms by not only securing our networks against attacks but also enhancing their resilience against well-planned operations. This chapter discusses the games at the tactical, operational, and strategic levels of warfare, delves into the symbiotic relationship between these methodologies, and explores relevant applications where such a framework can make a substantial impact in cybersecurity. The chapter discusses the promising direction of the multi-agent neurosymbolic conjectural learning (MANSCOL), which allows the defender to predict adversarial behaviors, design adaptive defensive deception tactics, and synthesize knowledge for the operational level synthesis and adaptation. FMs serve as pivotal tools across various functions for MANSCOL, including reinforcement learning, knowledge assimilation, formation of conjectures, and contextual representation. This chapter concludes with a discussion of the challenges associated with FMs and their application in the domain of cybersecurity.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Guarding Against Malicious Biased Threats (GAMBiT) Experiments: Revealing Cognitive Bias in Human-Subjects Red-Team Cyber Range Operations
Three multi-modal datasets capture 59 skilled attackers' full operational traces (keystrokes, shell history, PCAP, surveys) in a simulated enterprise network, with labels designed to reveal cognitive biases.
-
In-Context Reinforcement Learning via Communicative World Models
CORAL trains an information agent as a world model that sends concise messages to a control agent, improving in-context reinforcement learning and zero-shot adaptation.
-
Bi-Level Game-Theoretic Planning of Cyber Deception for Cognitive Arbitrage
A bi-level game-theoretic framework for timing and selecting cyber deception against biased attackers, with simulated evidence that optimal switching yields at least a 40% reward improvement.
-
Online Incident Response Planning under Model Misspecification through Bayesian Learning and Belief Quantization
MOBAL learns a model of an ongoing cyberattack with Bayesian updates and computes incident responses with a quantized version of that model, giving robustness to model misspecification on CAGE-2.
-
A Multi-Resolution Dynamic Game Framework for Cross-Echelon Decision-Making in Cyber Warfare
A two-resolution game framework lets cyber defenders zoom between tactical game trees and strategic Markov game states to refine defense plans.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.