Applications of canonical quantum gravity to cosmology

Claus Gerhardt

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 18 references

Applications of canonical quantum gravity to cosmology

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dark energy and dark matter are the vacuum and ground-state eigenvalues of the quantum gravity Hamiltonian.

desk verdict A speculative but clearly written application of the author's quantum gravity framework; the physics is postulated rather than derived, and the key spectral theorem is imported from a monograph, so the cosmological claims are conditional on unverified inputs. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02145 v1 pith:75G6QT3R submitted 2019-08-03 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-th

Claus Gerhardt This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qcastro-ph.HEhep-th MSC 8383C83C45

keywords canonicalquantumgravitydarkenergydensitymatterFriedmannuniversenegativecosmologicalconstantinflationmissingantimatterthermaloperator

topics Dark Energy Dark Matter Quantum Gravity

open problems Dark Matter Dark Energy Quantum Gravity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that dark energy and dark matter are not new substances but the vacuum and ground-state levels of the quantum gravitational Hamiltonian itself. In a canonical quantization of gravity with a negative cosmological constant, the thermal density operator $\hat\rho = Z^{-1}e^{-\beta H}$ has expectation value $Z^{-1}$ on the vacuum and $\alpha_0 e^{-\beta\lambda_0}Z^{-1}$ on the ground state $u_0$; the paper identifies these with the dark energy and dark matter densities. It then proves that for $-1<\Lambda<0$ and suitable initial data the Friedmann equations, together with an extra equation for the inverse temperature $\beta$, have global solutions with $\dot a>0$, $\ddot a>0$ and $\dot\beta>0$. If correct, this would explain the dark sector, cosmic acceleration, and the missing antimatter from a single quantization of Einstein's equations rather than from new particles or modified gravity.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the thermal density operator $\hat\rho = Z^{-1}e^{-\beta H}$ of canonical quantum gravity, whose trace-class property comes from the pure-point spectrum of the temporal Hamiltonian. The identity that makes the cosmology work is the eigenvalue scaling $\lambda_i = \bar\lambda_i |\Lambda|^{(n-1)/n}$, which turns the partition function into $\bar Z(\beta|\Lambda|^{(n-1)/n})$; from this the paper proves that $Z^{-1}(\beta) > |\Lambda|$ for all sufficiently large $\beta$, so the vacuum eigenvalue dominates the negative cosmological constant and produces $\ddot a>0$. The dark-matter term $\alpha_0 e^{-\beta\lambda_0}Z^{-1}$, with $\alpha_0>1$, makes $\partial_\beta(\rho_{\rm dm}+\rho_{\rm de})<0$ for large $\beta$, which turns the continuity equation into the evolution equation $\dot\beta = -n\rho_{\rm dm}[\partial_\beta(\rho_{\rm dm}+\rho_{\rm de})]^{-1}a^{-1}\dot a$ and forces $\dot\beta>0$ while $\dot a>0$.

What would settle it

Compute the partition function $Z(\beta)$ for a negative cosmological constant of the observed magnitude and check whether, at the cosmic microwave background temperature in the paper's units, $Z^{-1} > |\Lambda|$ actually holds; if it fails for all $T$, the expansion mechanism is false. On the observational side, a measurement of $\Omega_{\rm dm}/\Omega_{\rm de}$ that cannot be written as $\alpha_0 e^{-\beta\lambda_0}$ with $\alpha_0>1$ and the predicted spectral gap would falsify the dark-matter identification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, stated on the paper's own terms, is that the spectrum of one operator determines both dark components. For a negative cosmological constant $-1<\Lambda<0$, the wave equation obtained from the quantized Hamilton condition splits into temporal and spatial eigenvalue problems, and the temporal Hamiltonian $H_0$ has pure point spectrum $0<\lambda_0<\lambda_1<\cdots$. One therefore forms the operator density $\hat\rho = Z^{-1}e^{-\beta H}$ with $Z=\operatorname{tr} e^{-\beta H}$; its vacuum expectation gives the dark energy density $\rho_{\rm de}=Z^{-1}$ with equation of state $p=-\rho$, and its expectation on the lowest eigenvector $u_0$ gives the dark matter density $\rho_{\rm dm}=\alpha_0 e^{-\beta\lambda_0}Z^{-1}$ with $\alpha_0>1$ and zero pressure. The main theorem asserts that the coupled system of the second Friedmann equation and the continuity equation for $\rho_{\rm dm}+\rho_{\rm de}$ is solvable globally in time, with $\dot a>0$, $\ddot a>0$, $\dot\beta>0$, whenever the temperature is low enough that $Z^{-1}>|\Lambda|$ and the initial data satisfy two explicit inequalities; the first Friedmann equation then holds automatically if the initial velocity is chosen to satisfy it at $t_0$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the earlier claimed spectral theorem that the quantized temporal Hamiltonian has only discrete energy levels when the cosmological constant is negative; if that theorem is wrong, the partition function and hence both dark densities do not exist as claimed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any $T<T_0$, a Friedmann universe with flat or hyperbolic spatial sections and $-1<\Lambda<0$ expands with positive acceleration, so a negative cosmological constant is compatible with the observed accelerating expansion.
The ratio of dark matter to dark energy is $\rho_{\rm dm}/\rho_{\rm de} = \alpha_0 e^{-\beta\lambda_0}$ with $\alpha_0>1$; the two dark-sector densities are not independent parameters but are linked through the spectral gap and the temperature.
During inflation the dominant densities are large Hamiltonian eigenvalues $\lambda_i$; decay of those excited states ends the inflationary period and leaves the ground state plus ordinary matter and radiation.
The temporal eigenfunctions extend oddly across the big-bang singularity, giving either a single big-crunch-to-big-bang transition or two universes with opposite light cones; in the latter case CPT makes one universe the antimatter counterpart of ours.
The first Friedmann equation is conserved by the flow: if it holds at $t_0$, it holds for all later times, so solving the second Friedmann equation together with the $\beta$-equation automatically gives a full cosmological solution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Taken literally, the identification gives dark energy an exact $w=-1$ equation of state while its magnitude inherits a temperature dependence through $Z(\beta)$; a time-varying vacuum energy would be a signature that a constant-$\Lambda$ model does not have.
The model predicts $\Omega_{\rm dm}/\Omega_{\rm de} = \alpha_0 e^{-\beta\lambda_0}$ with $\alpha_0>1$; fitting this relation to supernova, cosmic-microwave-background, and large-scale-structure data would be a concrete test, and a measured ratio outside the allowed range would falsify the dark-matter identification.
A striking implicit consequence is that the sign of the cosmological constant is forced by the spectral structure: if a positive cosmological constant also admitted a pure point spectrum, or if observations showed a positive vacuum energy with no compensating $Z^{-1}$ term, the scenario would collapse.
The construction restricts the spatial side to spherically symmetric one-dimensional eigenspaces in hyperbolic space; relaxing that choice would change the density operator and could shift the predicted dark-sector ratio, so stability under that generalization is a natural next check.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear Colleague,

Here is my read of Gerhardt's arXiv:1908.02145. The paper takes the author's canonical quantum gravity program and applies it to cosmology: dark energy is the vacuum eigenvalue of a Gibbs density operator, rho_de = Z^{-1}; dark matter is the ground-state eigenvalue, rho_dm = alpha0 e^{-beta lambda0} Z^{-1}; inflation comes from high eigenvalues near the big bang; and missing antimatter is explained by a CPT twin universe. The genuinely new piece is the coupled beta-dynamics: because dark matter is dust and dark energy has p = -rho, the continuity equation forces an evolving inverse temperature, and the paper proves a global existence theorem (Theorem 4.3) for the Friedmann equations plus the beta-evolution equation. That proof is plausible under the stated assumptions, and the section on spherical eigenfunctions in hyperbolic space is a solid technical note.

The paper is clearly written and does not pretend the framework is derived from scratch: the spectral machinery is referenced to the author's monograph [15]. That is also the main problem. The key input is a theorem that the temporal Hamiltonian H0 has pure point spectrum with positive eigenvalues when Lambda<0, which makes the trace-class density operator meaningful. This theorem is not proved or even sketched in the paper; it is imported lock, stock, and barrel. If that theorem is wrong, rho_de and rho_dm are undefined and the cosmological model has no object. That is a load-bearing conditional, and the reader cannot verify it from this manuscript.

Second, the circularity concern is fair. The constant alpha0>1 is introduced specifically to make the beta-derivative of rho_dm + rho_de negative, and the temperature bound T

Overall: the paper is coherent and honest, but the central physical claims are conditional on an unverified spectral theorem and on parameter choices chosen to fit. It is a hypothesis, not a derivation. I would not cite it, but I think a specialist referee could usefully check whether the imported spectral theorem is correct and whether the parameter choices are as free as they appear. For a general journal, desk rejection is defensible; for a quantum gravity venue, I would let a referee see it.

Best, [Your name]

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper applies the author's earlier canonical quantization of gravity to spatially unbounded Friedmann universes with a negative cosmological constant. It identifies the eigenvalue of the Fock-space density operator on the vacuum, Z^{-1}, with the dark energy density, and the α0-weighted ground-state eigenvalue α0 e^{-βλ0} Z^{-1} with dark matter. A β-evolution equation is introduced from the continuity equation for the combined dark sector, and a global existence theorem is stated for the coupled Friedmann-β system, yielding ˙β>0, ˙a>0, and ä>0. The paper also discusses an inflationary epoch driven by large eigenvalues and proposes a CPT twin universe to account for the missing antimatter. The main theorem, Theorem 4.3, is an ODE existence result conditional on inequalities involving the arbitrary constant α0 and on the spectral properties of the temporal Hamiltonian imported from the author's monograph.

Significance. If the quantum-gravitational framework and the identification of density-operator eigenvalues with cosmological energy densities were established, the proposal would connect canonical quantum gravity to dark energy and dark matter in a novel way. The manuscript is clearly organized, states explicit theorems, and provides a self-contained existence proof (Theorem 4.3) for the ODE system under its assumptions. Section 6 gives a concrete construction of spherically symmetric spatial eigenfunctions in hyperbolic space. However, the significance is severely limited because the central identifications are stipulated rather than derived, the dark matter density contains an arbitrary constant α0 chosen to force the desired inequalities, and the entire construction depends on nontrivial spectral theorems that are cited from the author's monograph but not verified here. The cosmological conclusions are therefore conditional on assumptions and free choices rather than being predictions of the framework.

major comments (4)

[Sections 1–2, Eqs. (1.4)–(1.13)] The partition function Z and the density operator ρ̂ are defined only after asserting that, for Λ<0, the temporal Hamiltonian H0 has a pure point spectrum with positive eigenvalues and that e^{-βH} is trace class. These properties are imported from the author's earlier work [15, Theorems 6.2.5, 6.5.6, 6.5.8] without stating the theorems or their hypotheses in this manuscript. If those spectral results fail, the Gibbs state and both dark-sector densities are undefined, so Theorem 1.1 and all cosmological claims rest on unverified external results. The manuscript should either state and prove the needed spectral facts or clearly mark the entire application as conditional on them.
[Sections 2 and 4, Eqs. (2.4) and (4.3)] The identifications ρde = Z^{-1} and ρdm = α0 e^{-βλ0} Z^{-1} are proposed definitions, not derived consequences. No semiclassical limit, correspondence principle, or operator-to-fluid mapping is provided to show that eigenvalues of a Fock-space density operator source the Einstein tensor as a perfect fluid. Since the Friedmann equations are then solved with these quantities as the energy density, the central physical claim is a stipulation rather than a derivation. This is a load-bearing gap that would require a substantial new argument to close.
[Section 4, Eqs. (4.3)–(4.6) and Theorem 4.3] The dark matter density contains an arbitrary constant α0>1 whose stated purpose is to guarantee the inequality (4.6), and Theorem 4.3 further requires β0 to be large enough that (4.46) holds. Thus the sign of ˙β and the global existence of the accelerating solution are constructed by choosing the free parameter α0 and the initial temperature, rather than being consequences of the quantum-gravitational framework. Because α0 is unconstrained, the model makes no prediction for the dark matter abundance and is therefore difficult to falsify.
[Section 2, Lemma 2.1 and Theorem 2.2] The claimed expansion with ä>0 is obtained only under the imposed temperature bound T<T0, which is chosen specifically so that Z^{-1} exceeds |Λ|. The paper does not derive this bound from the quantum theory nor connect T0 to observable cosmic temperatures. The result is therefore conditional on an externally imposed restriction on the state of the system, rather than a prediction that the framework selects the appropriate regime.

minor comments (4)

[Section 5] The CPT twin-universe scenario is presented as an explanation for the missing antimatter, but it is purely qualitative: no dynamical mechanism, no quantitative asymmetry, and no observational consequence is given. This section should be clearly labeled as speculative if it is retained.
[Section 6, Eq. (6.10)] For small temporal eigenvalues λ_i, the right-hand side of (6.10) may be less than (n-1)ρ^2, making μ_i imaginary. The paper should state explicitly whether the spherical functions φ_μ remain admissible eigendistributions in that regime and how the matching to H1 eigenvalues is ensured.
[Theorem 4.3, proof] The global-existence argument in the proof of Theorem 4.3 is compressed: the claim that a bounded maximal interval would force β, ˙β, a, and ˙a to diverge simultaneously, and that this contradicts the second Friedmann equation, deserves a more detailed derivation. The inequality (4.55) is asserted after this divergence, but the route to it is not fully shown.
[General] The manuscript contains numerous typographical and formatting issues (e.g., 'W e' in the abstract, 'inﬂatio n' in the contents, inconsistent spacing around equations). These should be corrected in a revision.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The negative-cosmological-constant premise is imported from the author's own monograph, and the dark matter density is defined with an arbitrary constant chosen to force the sign of the β-evolution; the central cosmological conclusions are thereby conditional on self-supplied inputs.

uniqueness imported from authors [Section 1, p. 4 and Section 2, p. 6]
"Assuming Λ < 0 we proved that H0 has a pure point spectrum with positive eigenvalues λi, cf. [15, Chapter 6.2], especially [15, Theorem 6.2.5 on page 144] ... we assume Λ < 0 because of the spectral resolution of the wave equation, otherwise the temporal Hamiltonian does not have a pure point spectrum."

The claim that Λ must be negative is not proved here; it is imported from the author's own prior monograph [15]. This premise is load-bearing because the density operator ρ = Z^{-1} e^{-βH}, the partition function, and hence both dark-sector identifications require H0 to have pure point spectrum with positive eigenvalues. If the cited self-authored theorem were false or incomplete, the entire construction would lack an object. The paper does not provide an external, machine-checked, or independent verification of this spectral theorem, so the central cosmological conclusion depends on a self-citation chain rather than on a demonstrated result within the manuscript.
fitted input called prediction [Section 4, eq. (4.3) and Lemma 4.1]
"we propose to define the dark matter density by ρdm = α0⟨ˆρu0, u0⟩ = α0 e^{-βλ0} Z^{-1}, where u0 is a unit eigenvector ... and α0 > 1 an otherwise arbitrary constant. Its presence should guarantee that there exists β0 > 0 such that ∂/∂β(ρdm + ρde) < 0 ∀ β ≥ β0, as we shall now prove."

The arbitrary constant α0 is introduced specifically to make the inequality (4.6) true. Lemma 4.1 then 'proves' that inequality using that same choice of α0, and Lemma 4.2 plus Theorem 4.3 use it to conclude βdot > 0 and global solvability. Thus the sign of βdot—one of the main advertised results—is not an independent output of the quantum gravity formalism; it is guaranteed by construction through a free parameter in the definition of ρdm. The dark matter density therefore has no predictive content beyond the chosen α0.

full rationale

The paper contains a genuine conditional existence proof for the Friedmann system, and the scale-factor dynamics are not simply a renamed observable. However, the two key physical inputs are not independently established here: the requirement Λ < 0 is asserted on the basis of a spectral theorem in the author's own monograph [15], and the dark matter density is defined with an arbitrary constant α0 > 1 chosen precisely to force the sign condition that drives the β-evolution. If the cited spectral theorem were independently verified, the derivation would be legitimate; as the manuscript stands, the central cosmological claims reduce to self-supplied premises and a construction-level tuning parameter, warranting a moderate-to-high circularity score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

All free parameters and assumptions are listed. The paper's conclusions depend on an arbitrary dark matter constant α0, an initial temperature condition β0, the negative cosmological constant choice for spectral reasons, the one-dimensional spatial eigenspace assumption, and the postulated identification of operator eigenvalues with physical densities. The quantum gravity framework itself is imported from the author's own publications.

free parameters (2)

α0
Arbitrary constant > 1 in dark matter density (4.3); chosen to guarantee the monotonicity inequality (4.6). No physical origin or fitted value is given.
β0 (initial inverse temperature)
Initial value chosen 'large enough' to satisfy inequalities (2.12) and (4.46); not determined by the theory, but assumed by the existence theorem.

assumptions (4)

ad hoc to paper The quantized wave equation (1.4) and the associated spectral theory from refs [14,15] are correct.
The entire paper imports the quantum gravity framework from the author's own prior work; no independent verification is provided.
ad hoc to paper Λ < 0 is required for a pure point spectrum of the temporal Hamiltonian (page 4, Section 1).
The negative cosmological constant is assumed for spectral reasons, not derived from observations or theory.
ad hoc to paper The spatial eigenspaces for the Friedmann case are one-dimensional due to considering only spherically symmetric spatial eigenfunctions (page 4).
This assumption is needed to construct the Hilbert space and density operator with simple eigenvalues; no physical justification is given.
ad hoc to paper The density operator eigenvalues can be identified with thermodynamic energy densities in a Friedmann perfect fluid (Sections 2 and 4).
This identification is the central physical postulate of the paper; it is assumed, not derived.

invented entities (1)

CPT twin universe on the opposite side of the big bang
purpose: To explain the missing antimatter by placing it in a universe with opposite time direction and light cone (Section 5).
No observational or experimental handle is provided; it is a speculative scenario based on C^{2,α} extension of temporal eigenfunctions and the CPT theorem.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Applications of canonical quantum gravity to cosmology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/75G6QT3R

@misc{pith2026190802145,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Applications of canonical quantum gravity to cosmology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/75G6QT3R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02145}
}

read the original abstract

We apply quantum gravitational results to spatially unbounded Friedmann universes and try to answer some questions related to dark energy, dark matter, inflation and the missing antimatter.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

[15]

194, Springer, Cham, 2018, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77371-1

, The Quantization of Gravity , 1st ed., Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol. 194, Springer, Cham, 2018, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77371-1

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77371-1 2018
[1]

Wave and Klein-Gordon equations on hyperbolic spaces

Jean-Philippe Anker and Vittoria Pierfelice, Wave and Klein-Gordon equations on hyperbolic spaces, Anal. PDE 7 (2014), 953–995, arXiv:1104.0177

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[2]

Jean-Philippe Anker, Vittoria Pierfelice, and Maria Va llarino, The wave equation on hyperbolic spaces, (2010), arXiv:1010.2372

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[3]

Arnowitt, S

R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, The dynamics of general relativity , Grav- itation: an introduction to current research (Louis Witten , ed.), John Wiley, New York, 1962, pp. 227–265

work page 1962
[4]

Salvatore Capozziello, Francisco S. N. Lobo, and Jos´ e P . Mimoso, Generalized energy conditions in Extended Theories of Gravity , Phys. Rev. D91 (2015), no. 12, 124019, 1407.7293, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.124019

arXiv 2015
[5]

9, 494, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4323-2

Sayantan Choudhury, Manibrata Sen, and Soumya Sadhukha n, Can dark matter be an artifact of extended theories of gravity? , The European Physical Journal C 76 (2016), no. 9, 494, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4323-2

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4323-2 2016
[6]

DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity

Bryce S. DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory , Phys. Rev. 160 (1967), 1113–1148, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.160.1113

doi:10.1103/physrev.160.1113 1967
[7]

Paul A. M. Dirac, Lectures on quantum mechanics , Belfer Graduate School of Science Monographs Series, vol. 2, Belfer Graduate School of Scienc e, New York, 1967, Second printing of the 1964 original

work page 1967

Show all 18 references

[8]

Quantum Grav

Claus Gerhardt, Quantum cosmological Friedman models with an initial sin- gularity, Class. Quantum Grav. 26 (2009), no. 1, 015001, arXiv:0806.1769, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/1/015001

2009 arXiv
[9]

, The quantization of gravity in globally hyperbolic spaceti mes, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17 (2013), no. 6, 1357–1391, arXiv:1205.1427, doi:10.4310/ATMP.2013.v17.n6.a5

2013 arXiv
[10]

, A uniﬁed quantum theory I: gravity interacting with a Yang-M ills ﬁeld, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 18 (2014), no. 5, 1043–1062, arXiv:1207.0491, doi:10.4310/ATMP.2014.v18.n5.a2

2014 arXiv
[11]

, The quantization of a black hole , (2016), arXiv:1608.08209

2016 arXiv
[12]

, The quantum development of an asymptotically Euclidean Cau chy hypersur- face, (2016), arXiv:1612.03469

2016 arXiv
[13]

2018 (2018), Article ID 4328312, 10 pages, arXiv:1708.04611, doi:10.1155/2018/4328312

, The quantization of a Kerr-AdS black hole , Advances in Mathemati- cal Physics vol. 2018 (2018), Article ID 4328312, 10 pages, arXiv:1708.04611, doi:10.1155/2018/4328312

2018 arXiv
[14]

, The quantization of gravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 22 (2018), no. 3, 709– 757, arXiv:1501.01205, doi:10.4310/ATMP.2018.v22.n3.a4

2018 arXiv
[16]

Claus Kiefer, Quantum Gravity , 2nd ed., International Series of Monographs on Physics, Oxford University Press, 2007

2007
[17]

Lions and E

J.-L. Lions and E. Magenes, Non-homogeneous boundary value problems and appli- cations. Vol. I , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1972, Translated from the Fren ch by P. Kenneth, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaft en, Band 181

1972
[18]

Thomas Thiemann, Modern canonical quantum general relativity , Cambridge Mono- graphs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Pres s, Cambridge, 2007, With a foreword by Chris Isham. 18 CLAUS GERHARDT Ruprecht-Karls-Universit¨at, Institut f ¨ur Angew andte Mathematik, Im...

2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [15]

194, Springer, Cham, 2018, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77371-1

, The Quantization of Gravity , 1st ed., Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol. 194, Springer, Cham, 2018, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77371-1

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77371-1 2018

[2] [1]

Wave and Klein-Gordon equations on hyperbolic spaces

Jean-Philippe Anker and Vittoria Pierfelice, Wave and Klein-Gordon equations on hyperbolic spaces, Anal. PDE 7 (2014), 953–995, arXiv:1104.0177

work page Pith review arXiv 2014

[3] [2]

Jean-Philippe Anker, Vittoria Pierfelice, and Maria Va llarino, The wave equation on hyperbolic spaces, (2010), arXiv:1010.2372

work page Pith review arXiv 2010

[4] [3]

Arnowitt, S

R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, The dynamics of general relativity , Grav- itation: an introduction to current research (Louis Witten , ed.), John Wiley, New York, 1962, pp. 227–265

work page 1962

[5] [4]

Salvatore Capozziello, Francisco S. N. Lobo, and Jos´ e P . Mimoso, Generalized energy conditions in Extended Theories of Gravity , Phys. Rev. D91 (2015), no. 12, 124019, 1407.7293, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.124019

arXiv 2015

[6] [5]

9, 494, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4323-2

Sayantan Choudhury, Manibrata Sen, and Soumya Sadhukha n, Can dark matter be an artifact of extended theories of gravity? , The European Physical Journal C 76 (2016), no. 9, 494, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4323-2

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4323-2 2016

[7] [6]

DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity

Bryce S. DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory , Phys. Rev. 160 (1967), 1113–1148, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.160.1113

doi:10.1103/physrev.160.1113 1967

[8] [7]

Paul A. M. Dirac, Lectures on quantum mechanics , Belfer Graduate School of Science Monographs Series, vol. 2, Belfer Graduate School of Scienc e, New York, 1967, Second printing of the 1964 original

work page 1967