Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

Chiral higher-spin theories from twistor space

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Chiral higher-spin Yang-Mills and gravity reduce to a single CR Chern-Simons action on the unit-norm twistor space, with all helicities appearing as Kaluza-Klein modes.

desk verdict A genuinely new twistor packaging of chiral higher-spin theories, with a real but likely fixable gap in the spacetime reduction. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09419 v1 pith:77U4MTJX submitted 2025-05-14 hep-th

Lionel Mason , Atul Sharma This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords chiralhigher-spintheoriestwistorspaceCRChern-SimonstheoryMoyaldeformationself-dualYang-MillsgravityMHVamplitudes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that chiral higher-spin Yang-Mills and gravity—theories with massless fields of every helicity—are not separate constructions but arise from a single seven-dimensional action of Chern-Simons type on the space of unit-length twistors. In this formulation spacetime appears as a quotient of that space, and the infinite tower of higher-spin fields emerges as Fourier modes on the circle fibres. The claim is that the perturbative reduction of this twistor action reproduces the known chiral higher-spin theories, with all three-point vertices of anti-self-dual/MHV type and helicity sums fixed by the choice of gauge group, gravity, or Moyal deformation. If correct, it provides a unified geometric starting point for the chiral sector and opens a direct route to quantization and to non-chiral extensions.

What carries the argument

The central object is $ST$, the 7-manifold of unit-norm twistors, a circle bundle over projective twistor space $PT$ with a CR structure inherited from its embedding in $\mathbb{C}^4$. The $S^1$ Fourier decomposition along the fibre turns the infinite higher-spin tower into ordinary holomorphic line-bundle cohomology on $PT$, so each mode is a Penrose-transform massless field. The spacetime reduction is carried by an AHS fibration to Euclidean-signature spacetime, together with a harmonic gauge condition that fixes the fibre components $a_{n0} = \varphi_{\alpha_1\ldots\alpha_n}\sigma^{\alpha_1}\ldots\sigma^{\alpha_n}$ for negative modes, and an iterative solution of the fibre equations using a chosen right inverse of the fibre operator $\bar{\eth}$. That machinery converts the single 7D action into the spacetime action and vertex formulae.

What would settle it

Derive the three-point amplitude for a specific helicity assignment, say $(++-)$ in chiral Yang-Mills, by explicitly performing the fibre integrals in harmonic gauge with a concretely constructed right inverse, and compare it with the known light-front chiral higher-spin amplitude; a mismatch or an obstruction in constructing the inverse would show the reduction does not hold as claimed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the unit-norm twistor space $ST$, the partial connection $a$ of Yang-Mills type obeys a CR Chern-Simons action, while gravity is governed by the same action with the commutator replaced by the Poisson bracket. Decomposing $a$ into Fourier modes on the $S^1$ fibres over projective twistor space yields fields $a_n$ of homogeneity $n$, which the Penrose transform identifies with massless fields of helicity $(n+2)/2$. In harmonic gauge the fibre components can be solved iteratively, giving spacetime kinetic terms and cubic vertices of MHV type supported on proportional anti-self-dual spinors. The helicity sum at any three-point vertex is $1$ for chiral Yang-Mills, $2$ for chiral gravity, and $r+1$ for the $r$-th order of the Moyal deformation, giving the vertex formula with exponents $a_i = 2h_j + 2h_k - r - 1$. Higher-valence vertices that appear in the spacetime reduction are argued to be gauge artifacts, absent in twistor or momentum space.

Load-bearing premise

The spacetime action and vertex formula rest on being able to solve the fibre equations level by level with a chosen right inverse of the fibre operator whose inhomogeneous part integrates to zero against negative-weight modes; the paper assumes such a right inverse exists without constructing it or proving convergence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single 7D CR Chern-Simons action packages the complete tree-level chiral sector of higher-spin Yang-Mills and gravity, with each helicity labelling a Fourier mode.
  • All three-point amplitudes in these theories are MHV-type, supported on proportional anti-self-dual spinors and given by the universal momentum-space formula with $h_1+h_2+h_3=1$ for Yang-Mills, $2$ for gravity, and $r+1$ at order $\alpha^r$ in the Moyal deformation.
  • The Moyal deformation interpolates between the Yang-Mills and gravitational cases and produces vertices with all-positive helicities at higher orders.
  • Spacetime vertices of valence four and higher are gauge artifacts of the harmonic reduction rather than genuine interactions, since they are absent from the twistor action and from momentum space.
  • The construction outlines natural extensions to supersymmetric and fermionic theories, and to non-chiral theories on ambitwistor space.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that if the twistor action is perturbatively complete, the higher-spin S-matrix could be constructed directly in seven dimensions without summing the infinite spacetime tower, making quantization more tractable than in spacetime formulations.
  • The Fourier-mode picture suggests interpreting spin as U(1) charge on the twistor circle, so the entire infinite-spin tower behaves like a single charged field; this may connect naturally to celestial holography.
  • A concrete testable extension is to compute a one-loop four-point amplitude from the 7D action and check whether the claimed one-loop anomaly freedom is realized as a finite, regulator-independent result.
  • The Moyal parameter $\alpha$ may act as a continuous deformation of the self-dual sector; if the deformation is exact, amplitudes at different $\alpha$ should satisfy recursion relations in $\alpha$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a seven-dimensional CR-holomorphic Chern-Simons action (12) on the unit-norm twistor space ST as a generating action for chiral higher-spin Yang-Mills, and a Poisson Chern-Simons version (38) for chiral higher-spin gravity, together with a Moyal deformation. By Fourier decomposing fields on the S1 fibre of ST over projective twistor space, the linear spectrum is identified via the Penrose transform as massless fields of helicity h=(n+2)/2. A harmonic-gauge reduction to spacetime is sketched, producing kinetic terms (30) and three-point vertices whose helicity sums are 1 for Yang-Mills, 2 for gravity, and r+1 for the Moyal-deformed case, Eqs. (37), (43), and (48). The paper also claims that higher-valence spacetime vertices are gauge artifacts and discusses truncations, fermionic extensions, supersymmetry, and anomaly-freedom.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a compact geometric formulation that unifies the chiral higher-spin Yang-Mills and gravity towers and their Moyal deformations, with concrete momentum-space predictions for three-point vertices. Its strengths are the clean use of the Penrose transform for the spectrum, the simple mode-counting derivation of the helicity-sum rules, and the explicit noncommutative deformation proposal. The central claims are, however, conditional on analytic steps in the spacetime reduction that are only sketched, and on vertex computations that are quoted rather than shown. The paper is likely to be of interest to the twistor and higher-spin communities, but it currently reads as a research announcement of a program rather than a fully verified derivation.

major comments (4)
  1. [III.A, Eqs. (23)-(27)] The spacetime reduction is not complete. The iterative solution of the fibre equations uses a right inverse of the fibre operator that is neither constructed nor proved to satisfy the required compatibility conditions. For the modes with n <= -2 the fibre operator has a nontrivial cokernel, so the inhomogeneous term involving the fibre derivative of a_{n0} must be orthogonal to the negative-weight harmonic modes; the statement that the inverse is chosen so that the inhomogeneous part integrates to zero against expressions of the form (22) is exactly this condition, but its validity at every iterative order is not demonstrated. No convergence or global-existence argument is given for the iterative expansion. Since the kinetic terms (30) and the vertex formulas (34)-(37) are derived through this reduction, the central claim that (12) reproduces chiral higher-spin Yang-Mills on spacetime is not yet established.
  2. [III.B, Eq. (37)] The momentum-space three-point vertex is a central result, but it is only stated as “easily seen” after inserting the Penrose transform (36). The delta-function support condition and the exponent formula a_i = 2h_j + 2h_k - 1 require a real computation involving the s-integration, the measure, and the treatment of the momentum eigenstates. The analogous statements for gravity in Section IV and for the Moyal deformation in Section V are even less explicit. Without this derivation, the reader cannot verify that the twistor cubic vertex reproduces the claimed MHV-type amplitudes.
  3. [III.B, final paragraph] The assertion that quartic and higher spacetime vertices are gauge artifacts is supported only by their absence from twistor space and momentum space. That absence is consistent with a gauge artifact, but it is not a proof; if the higher vertices are not removable by a field redefinition or gauge transformation, the reduced spacetime action is not equivalent to the original twistor action. The authors should either provide an equivalence argument or explicitly label this statement as a conjecture.
  4. [I and VI, spectrum and statistics] The action (12) is a bosonic Chern-Simons action, so the Fourier modes with odd n, which the Penrose transform identifies with half-integer helicities, are commuting fields. The paper does not address spin-statistics for these modes; a kinetic term such as (30) with n=1 is not the standard Weyl action for a fermion. If the intended chiral higher-spin theories only contain integer spins, the Z2 projection mentioned in Section VI should be imposed from the outset and the “all helicities” claim should be qualified. If the half-integer modes are kept, their statistics and consistency need to be discussed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title page and abstract] There are typographical errors in the author affiliations and in the running text (“K ing”, “Universi ty”); the abstract and introduction should also reconcile “R4” with the general Euclidean-signature spacetimes S4 and H4 used in Section II.
  2. [Eq. (34)] The notation in Eq. (34) is unclear: the subscripts l and m on the fields rho are not defined, and the index structure should be spelled out so that the reader can see which mode labels and which spacetime indices are contracted.
  3. [Footnote [20]] The footnote on MHV conventions is confusing: it appears to mix the standard MHV helicity sum -1 with the overline-MHV convention used in the abstract and in Eq. (37). Please clarify the convention in one place and use it consistently.
  4. [V, Moyal deformation] The sentence stating that self-dual higher-spin gravity arises from the GL(1) case “by rescaling to pick out the interaction at O(alpha)” is telegraphic; a precise definition of the rescaling and of the limiting procedure would help the reader verify the claimed relation.
  5. [VI, anomaly-freedom] The claim that the twistor actions are free of one-loop gauge and gravitational anomalies is presented through a reference and a heuristic seven-dimensional argument; since this is stated as a formal result, a more precise statement or a pointer to the specific argument would be useful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the spectrum, helicity-sum rules, and MHV support are explicit consequences of the proposed twistor actions and the Penrose transform, not fitted inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The action (12) and its gravity analogue (38) are proposed inputs, not outputs; the paper's new claims are the mode decomposition (15)-(17), the Penrose-transform identification of the spectrum, and the homogeneity-counting rules h1+h2+h3=1, 2, and r+1. Each of these follows from the mode weights and the weight of the volume form or Poisson structure by explicit arithmetic; they are not fitted to the target vertices. The spacetime reduction (23)-(30) is a calculation from the action using harmonic gauge, and the momentum-space vertex formula (37) is quoted as 'easily seen' rather than derived; an unproved assertion is an incompleteness, not a circularity. The paper does invoke prior work by the same authors, notably [22] for the gravitational Poisson Chern-Simons action and [16,17] for the reduction strategy, but these are explicit starting points and techniques with independent published content, not disguised restatements of the paper's target results. The lack of an explicit construction of the right inverse of the fibre operator and unverified compatibility conditions on negative modes are correctness or rigor concerns about the reduction, not evidence that a prediction is equivalent to an input. No step satisfies the quoted-reduction test for circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on standard twistor theory, a self-dual gravity action from prior work, and a harmonic-gauge perturbative reduction whose inversion and convergence are not proven. No parameters are fitted to data; the only free parameter in the family is the Moyal deformation alpha.

free parameters (1)
  • Moyal deformation parameter alpha = unspecified (alpha=0 gives Yang-Mills; the GL(1) rescaled case gives gravity at O(alpha))
    Introduced in Eq. (45) to deform the multiplication to a noncommutative star product; it parameterizes the family chs(alpha) and gl-chs(alpha) and is not fitted to data.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math The Penrose transform identifies H^{0,1}(PT,O(n)) with massless fields of helicity (n+2)/2.
    Used in Section III after Eq. (20) to identify the spectrum from Fourier modes on ST.
  • standard math For n >= -1, H^{0,1}(CP1,O(n)) vanishes, and for n <= -2, H^{0,1}(CP1,O(-n-2)) = C^{n+1} realized by symmetric spinors.
    Used in Section III.A to set the fibre component to zero in harmonic gauge and to write a^{-n-2}_0 in Eq. (22).
  • domain assumption The self-dual higher-spin gravity Poisson Chern-Simons action of Mason-Wolf is integrable on-shell, so (partial-bar_h)^2 = 0.
    Invoked in Section IV after Eq. (40) as the starting point for the gravity theory; the paper cites the earlier work rather than proving integrability again.
  • ad hoc to paper The right inverse to the fibre operator can be chosen so that inhomogeneous terms integrate to zero, and the iterative solution of Eq. (23) converges.
    Needed in Section III.A to reduce the twistor action to spacetime; no global existence or convergence argument is given, and the choice feeds into the derived vertices.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral higher-spin theories from twistor space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/77U4MTJX

@misc{pith2026250509419,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral higher-spin theories from twistor space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/77U4MTJX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09419}
}
abstract

We reformulate chiral higher-spin Yang-Mills and gravity on $\mathbb{R}^4$ as 'CR-holomorphic' theories of Chern-Simons type; in the most general case, these are Moyal deformed to become non-commutative. They are defined on the space of non-projective twistors of unit length. These spaces carry $S^7$, $S^3\times \mathbb{R}^4$ or AdS$_{3+4}$ metrics but are also endowed with a Cauchy-Riemann structure, an odd-dimensional analogue of a complex structure, with respect to which the theories are holomorphic. They are circle bundles over standard projective twistor spaces and the higher spin fields arise naturally as Kaluza-Klein modes. We give a perturbative analysis to identify the spectrum and three-point vertices on spacetime and, for flat space, in momentum space. These vertices can have helicities $(+++)$, $(++-)$ or $(+--)$, but are nevertheless all of $\overline{\text{MHV}}$ type in the sense that they are supported on momenta with proportional anti-self-dual spinors. On reduction to spacetime, there are higher valence vertices but these appear to be a gauge artifact. Further generalizations are discussed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Light-Front approach to $4d$ massless Higher-Spin interactions

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.5 of 10

    Solving Poincaré-algebra closure at quartic order yields infinitely many local 4d massless higher-spin theories (finite or infinite spectra), classifies chiral one-/two-derivative models, and determines all local unit...

  2. On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper solves the quartic light-cone consistency constraint to classify all one- and two-derivative chiral higher-spin theories in 4d flat space, including new finite-spectrum theories.

  3. Higher-spins on Taub-NUT and higher-spin Taub-NUT

    hep-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Higher-spin fields are solved exactly on the Taub-NUT instanton in the self-dual Yang-Mills truncation, and an order-by-order convergent higher-spin Taub-NUT solution is constructed in self-dual gravity, organized by ...

  4. Associativity of celestial OPE, higher spins and self-duality

    hep-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Celestial OPE associativity, the Jacobi identity of a vertex-derived gauge algebra, vanishing four-point amplitudes, and the light-cone holomorphic constraint are shown to be the same consistency condition, solved for...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Adamo and T

    T. Adamo and T. Tran, Higher-spin Yang–Mills, amplitudes and self-duality , Lett. Math. Phys. 113 (2023), no. 3 50, [ arXiv:2210.07130]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Sharapov and E

    A. Sharapov and E. Skvortsov, Chiral higher spin gravity in (A)dS4 and secrets of Chern–Simons matter theories, Nucl. Phys. B 985 (2022) 115982, [ arXiv:2205.15293]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Sharapov, E

    A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, and R. Van Dongen, Chiral higher spin gravity and convex geometry , SciPost Phys. 14 (2023), no. 6 162, [ arXiv:2209.01796]

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Aharony, R

    O. Aharony, R. R. Kalloor, and T. Kukolj, A chiral limit for Chern-Simons-matter theories , arXiv:2405.01647

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Ponomarev and E

    D. Ponomarev and E. D. Skvortsov, Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space , J. Phys. A 50 (2017), no. 9 095401, [ arXiv:1609.04655]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    R. R. Metsaev, S matrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal symmetry , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 (1991) 2411–2421

    work page 1991

  7. [7]

    R. R. Metsaev, Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 (1991) 359–367

    work page 1991

  8. [8]

    Ponomarev, Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality, JHEP 12 (2017) 141, [ arXiv:1710.00270]

    D. Ponomarev, Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality, JHEP 12 (2017) 141, [ arXiv:1710.00270]

    arXiv 2017

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Krasnov, E

    K. Krasnov, E. Skvortsov, and T. Tran, Actions for self-dual Higher Spin Gravities , JHEP 08 (2021) 076, [arXiv:2105.12782]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Monteiro, From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial algebras , JHEP 03 (2023) 062, [ arXiv:2212.11266]

    R. Monteiro, From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial algebras , JHEP 03 (2023) 062, [ arXiv:2212.11266]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    M. G. Eastwood, R. Penrose, and R. O. Wells, Cohomology and Massless Fields , Commun. Math. Phys. 78 (1981) 305–351

    1981

  4. [12]

    Our original Chern-Simons action has full gauge free- dom on ST

    and performing the integral over S1 yields the twistor action S[a] = ∫ PT D3Z ∧ tr (∑ n a− n− 4 ∧ ¯∂an + 2 3 ∑ ℓ+m+n=− 4 aℓ ∧am ∧an ) , (17) where D 3Z ∈ Ω 3,0(4) is the projective volume form D3Z = 1 3!εABCD Z A dZ B ∧ dZ C ∧ dZ D, (18) withεABCD being the 4-dimensional Levi ...

  5. [13]

    They reduce to self-dual higher-spin Yang-Mills ( 13) at α = 0

    but with multiplication replaced by the noncommutative ∗-product. They reduce to self-dual higher-spin Yang-Mills ( 13) at α = 0. Self-dual higher- spin gravity then arises from the GL(1) case by rescaling to pick out the interaction at O(α). The corresponding 3-point vertices...

  6. [14]

    Tran, Twistor constructions for higher-spin extensions of (self-dual) Yang-Mills , JHEP 11 (2021) 117, [ arXiv:2107.04500]

    T. Tran, Twistor constructions for higher-spin extensions of (self-dual) Yang-Mills , JHEP 11 (2021) 117, [ arXiv:2107.04500]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    M. F. Atiyah, N. J. Hitchin, and I. M. Singer, Selfduality in Four-Dimensional Riemannian Geometry , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 362 (1978) 425–461

    1978

  8. [16]

    L. J. Mason, Twistor actions for non-self-dual fields: A New Foundation for twistor-string theory , JHEP 10 (2005) 009, [ hep-th/0507269]

    2005 arXiv

  9. [17]

    In the first case, the interaction term is easily evaluated as V ++− = ∫ d4µM tr ( φα1...αnρα1...αl l ˙α ραl+1...αn ˙α m )

    come in two types, with, two positive helicities and one negative helicity or vice versa. In the first case, the interaction term is easily evaluated as V ++− = ∫ d4µM tr ( φα1...αnρα1...αl l ˙α ραl+1...αn ˙α m ) . (34) We also have vertices V −− + given by V −− + = ∫ d4µM tr(ρ...

  10. [18]

    Adamo, P

    T. Adamo, P. H¨ ahnel, and T. McLoughlin, Conformal higher spin scattering amplitudes from twistor space , JHEP 04 (2017) 021, [ arXiv:1611.06200]

    2017 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Herfray, K

    Y. Herfray, K. Krasnov, and E. Skvortsov, Higher-spin self-dual Yang-Mills and gravity from the twistor space , JHEP 01 (2023) 158, [ arXiv:2210.06209]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    MHV will have h1 + h2 + h3 = − 1, proportional dotted momentum spinors, and corresponding angle-bracket expressions

  13. [21]

    L. Ren, M. Spradlin, A. Yelleshpur Srikant, and A. Volovich, On effective field theories with celestial duals, JHEP 08 (2022) 251, [ arXiv:2206.08322]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    but of weight −n − 3. We can now evaluate the action in the quadratic ap- proximation as the sum over n ≥ 0 of S[a]2 n = ∫ PT D3Z ∧ tr(a− n− 2 ∧ ¯∂an− 2)2, (28) = ∫ PT d6Z ∧ tr(a− n− 2 0 ¯∇ ˙αan− 2 ˙α +a ˙α − n− 2¯ðan− 2 ˙α) (29) Here d 6Z = i D3Z ∧ D3 ¯Z/|σ|8. To quadratic or...

  15. [23]

    Boels, L

    R. Boels, L. J. Mason, and D. Skinner, Supersymmetric Gauge Theories in Twistor Space , JHEP 02 (2007) 014, [hep-th/0604040]

    2007 arXiv

  16. [24]

    N. M. J. Woodhouse, Real methods in twistor theory , Class. Quant. Grav. 2 (1985) 257–291

    1985

  17. [25]

    Penrose and W

    R. Penrose and W. Rindler, Spinors and Space-Time , vol. 1 of Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1984

    1984

  18. [26]

    Freidel and S

    L. Freidel and S. Speziale, On the relations between gravity and BF theories , SIGMA 8 (2012) 032, [arXiv:1201.4247]

    2012 arXiv

  19. [27]

    I. A. B. Strachan, The Moyal algebra and integrable deformations of the selfdual Einstein equations , Phys. Lett. B 283 (1992) 63–66

    1992

  20. [28]

    L. J. Mason and M. Wolf, Twistor Actions for Self-Dual Supergravities, Commun. Math. Phys. 288 (2009) 97–123, [ arXiv:0706.1941]

    2009 arXiv

  21. [29]

    L. J. Mason, Local twistors and the Penrose transform for homogeneous bundles , in Further Advances in Twistor Theory (L. J. Mason and L. P. Hughston, eds.), vol. 231, ch. 1.2.17. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics, 1990

    1990

  22. [30]

    L. J. Mason, The relationship between spin-2 fields, linearized gravity and linearized amformal gravity , in Further Advances in Twistor Theory (L. J. Mason and L. P. Hughston, eds.), vol. 231, ch. 1.2.18. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics, 1990

    1990

  23. [31]

    Durka and J

    R. Durka and J. Kowalski-Glikman, Gravity as a constrained BF theory: Noether charges and Immirzi parameter, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 124011, [ arXiv:1103.2971]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Costello and S

    K. Costello and S. Li, Twisted supergravity and its quantization, arXiv:1606.00365

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Raghavendran, I

    S. Raghavendran, I. Saberi, and B. R. Williams, Twisted Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 402 (2023), no. 2 1103–1166, [ arXiv:2111.03049]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    W. Bu, S. Heuveline, and D. Skinner, Moyal deformations, W 1+∞ and celestial holography , JHEP 12 (2022) 011, [ arXiv:2208.13750]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Monteiro and D

    R. Monteiro and D. O’Connell, The Kinematic Algebra From the Self-Dual Sector , JHEP 07 (2011) 007, [arXiv:1105.2565]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Tran, Toward a twistor action for chiral higher-spin gravity, Phys

    T. Tran, Toward a twistor action for chiral higher-spin gravity, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023), no. 4 046015, [arXiv:2209.00925]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Twistors and higher-spins

    remains valid but now with a1 = 2h2 + 2h3 −r − 1 and cyclic. VI. FUR THER DEVELOPMENTS The geometrization of spin implicit in the phase of a twistor has always been suggestive of unified theories with arbitrary higher-spins. We have given three such models, with the first two be...

    2024

  30. [38]

    Berkovits and E

    N. Berkovits and E. Witten, Conformal supergravity in twistor-string theory , JHEP 08 (2004) 009, [hep-th/0406051]

    2004 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Bittleston, D

    R. Bittleston, D. Skinner, and A. Sharma, Quantizing the Non-linear Graviton , Commun. Math. Phys. 403 (2023), no. 3 1543–1609, [ arXiv:2208.12701]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    L. J. Mason and D. Skinner, An Ambitwistor 7 Yang-Mills Lagrangian, Phys. Lett. B 636 (2006) 60–67, [hep-th/0510262]

    2006 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Sharma, Twistor action for general relativity , arXiv:2104.07031

    A. Sharma, Twistor action for general relativity , arXiv:2104.07031

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Penrose, Nonlinear gravitons and curved twistor theory, Gen

    R. Penrose, Nonlinear gravitons and curved twistor theory, Gen. Rel. Grav. 7 (1976) 31–52

    1976

  35. [43]

    The momentum space version is easy in flat space because then the Poisson structure is simply Π = ε ˙α ˙β ∂ ∂µ ˙α ∧ ∂ ∂µ ˙β

    provides an r = 1 example. The momentum space version is easy in flat space because then the Poisson structure is simply Π = ε ˙α ˙β ∂ ∂µ ˙α ∧ ∂ ∂µ ˙β . (49) Thus its action on momentum eigenstates ( 36) simply introduces additional square-bracket factors into the mo- mentum sp...

  36. [44]

    R. S. Ward, On self-dual gauge fields , Phys. Lett. A61 (1977) 81–82

    1977

  37. [45]

    R. S. Ward, Self-dual space-times with cosmological constant, Commun. Math. Phys. 78 (1980) 1–17

    1980

  38. [46]

    Costello and N

    K. Costello and N. M. Paquette, Celestial holography meets twisted holography: 4d amplitudes from chiral correlators, JHEP 10 (2022) 193, [ arXiv:2201.02595]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Costello and N

    K. Costello and N. M. Paquette, Associativity of One-Loop Corrections to the Celestial Operator Product Expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022), no. 23 231604, [ arXiv:2204.05301]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Bittleston, On the associativity of 1-loop corrections to the celestial operator product in gravity , JHEP 01 (2023) 018, [ arXiv:2211.06417]

    R. Bittleston, On the associativity of 1-loop corrections to the celestial operator product in gravity , JHEP 01 (2023) 018, [ arXiv:2211.06417]

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.