Associativity of celestial OPE, higher spins and self-duality

Mattia Serrani

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 10 cited by

Associativity of celestial OPE, higher spins and self-duality

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that four seemingly independent consistency conditions—celestial OPE associativity, vanishing of tree-level amplitudes, the Jacobi identity for a gauge algebra built from cubic vertices, and the light-cone holomorphic const

desk verdict A genuinely useful general solution to the celestial OPE associativity constraint, with a clean on-shell equivalence to the Jacobi identity and vanishing amplitudes; the advertised link to the off-shell holomorphic light-cone constraint is real but only proven on-shell. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.16804 v2 pith:SOWCLPQR submitted 2025-08-22 hep-th

Mattia Serrani This is my paper

classification hep-th

keywords celestialOPEassociativitychiralhigher-spintheoriesself-dualitylight-coneholomorphicconstraintJacobiidentitygaugealgebraconformalfieldtheoryamplitudes

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish that four separate-looking consistency requirements in four-dimensional chiral higher-spin theories are really one requirement. The celestial OPE associativity constraint, the vanishing of tree-level four-point amplitudes, the Jacobi identity of the "gauge algebra" assembled from cubic vertices, and the light-cone quartic holomorphic constraint all reduce to the same algebraic condition on cubic couplings. Proving this matters because it gives a single test that decides whether a chiral higher-spin theory—including the recently classified higher-spin extensions of self-dual Yang-Mills and self-dual gravity—has a well-defined celestial dual and can be reformulated as a self-duality constraint. The paper also solves the celestial OPE associativity constraint in full generality for the most general cubic vertices and gives explicit lower-spin examples, some of which are new.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the "gauge algebra" extracted from a holomorphic cubic vertex by dividing out the self-dual Yang-Mills kinematic structure, with structure constants built from the coupling C^{λ1,λ2,λ3} times a power of the transverse momentum combination P-bar. Imposing its Jacobi identity (6.13) generates a polynomial condition in three variables A, B and C; once translated into light-cone variables, this product is exactly the celestial OPE associativity constraint (4.14). A second piece of machinery is the operator O_s derived from the boost generator that interchanges the Jacobi/OPE condition with the light-cone quartic holomorphic constraint; its kernel contains the unconstra

What would settle it

Compute the subleading (1/z^0) double-residue part of the celestial OPE for a theory that passes the leading constraint but activates the unconstrained product C^{λ1,λ1,0} C^{0,λ2,λ2}, e.g. couplings with independent F^3 and R^3 coefficients. If the subleading double residue does not vanish, then full OPE associativity imposes conditions beyond the light-cone holomorphic constraint, contradicting the claimed equivalence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the Jacobi identity (6.13) for the gauge algebra associated to any set of holomorphic cubic vertices coincides exactly with the celestial OPE associativity constraint (4.14); the same expression also governs the vanishing of the four-point tree amplitude (6.18). Once the external particles are taken on-shell (H=0), the light-cone quartic holomorphic constraint is equivalent to the same condition, up to a specific product of couplings, C^{λ1,λ1,0} C^{0,λ2,λ2}, that the holomorphic constraint leaves free. Consequently every chiral higher-spin theory that solves the holomorphic constraint—including the new one- and two-derivative theories of [

Load-bearing premise

The chain of equivalences assumes that the leading, holomorphic, double-residue part of the celestial OPE is the complete associativity condition; subleading powers of 1/z, anti-holomorphic sectors, and loop-level log(z12) terms are set aside.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every solution of the light-cone holomorphic constraint is automatically a solution of the celestial OPE associativity constraint, so consistency at the level of the quartic holomorphic condition is sufficient for a celestial dual at tree level.
The celestial OPE associativity test imposes no independent restriction beyond the Jacobi identity / vanishing four-point amplitude condition, except for the product C^{λ1,λ1,0} C^{0,λ2,λ2} left free by the light-cone holomorphic constraint.
All chiral higher-spin theories, including the new HS-SDYM and HS-SDGR theories with one- and two-derivative couplings, have a gauge algebra and therefore admit a self-duality formulation.
The general solution to OPE associativity for arbitrary cubic vertices (Appendix D) provides an explicit formula for all couplings in terms of the total derivative number Λ and two constants per channel, enabling systematic construction of higher-derivative and higher-spin examples.
New lower-spin theories pass the test, including the coloured graviton coupling C^{−2,1,2} and the three-coupling relation C^{1,1,2}=C^{0,1,1}C^{0,2,2}/C^{−2,2,2} for singlet fields once photon–scalar couplings are included.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the equivalence survives subleading collinear residues, then subleading OPE associativity would constrain the currently free product C^{λ1,λ1,0} C^{0,λ2,λ2}, fixing the coefficients of F^3 and R^3 terms that the leading constraint leaves arbitrary.
The gauge-algebra/self-duality perspective suggests a double-copy mechanism: since the Jacobi identity holds for the kinematic algebra, chiral higher-spin theories may sit in the same double-copy web as self-dual Yang-Mills and self-dual gravity, giving a constructive explanation of the vanishing amplitudes.
The polynomial A/B/C cancellation method is not obviously limited to four dimensions; the same Jacobi-iff-associativity-iff-holomorphic-constraint triangle could be tested for massive cubic vertices or in dimensionally reduced settings.
The finite-spectrum higher-spin theories flagged in the paper are natural clean probes of loop-level OPE associativity: if loop log(z12) corrections fail to cancel there, the tree-level equivalence would not be the full story.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Serrani's paper does something concrete: it rewrites the celestial OPE associativity constraint in light-cone variables and solves it for the most general cubic vertices. The solution has a closed form, reproduces the lower-spin results from Ren et al., and extends them to higher spins and new couplings, including the colored graviton. The equivalence between the OPE constraint, the Jacobi identity of the gauge algebra built from cubic vertices, and the vanishing of the four-point tree amplitude is shown explicitly and is convincing on its own.

The soft spot is the fourth corner of the claimed diamond: the relation to the off-shell light-cone holomorphic constraint. Equation (6.24), which connects the operator J acting on the exchanged-channel product to the polynomial appearing in the OPE constraint, is derived after imposing H = 0 for the external legs. The operators Os, Ot, Ou are said to differ by terms proportional to H, but the proof that any Jacobi/OPE solution satisfies the full off-shell [H3, J3] = 0 constraint is not actually given. The stress-test note is right that this leaves a gap: the difference might vanish only on the energy shell, not identically under momentum conservation. The author states that the two solution sets coincide up to the product C^{lambda1,lambda1,0} C^{0,lambda2,lambda2}, and says this can be checked directly, but the direct check is not shown. A referee should ask for that.

Also, the claim that all theories from arXiv:2505.12839 pass the OPE test inherits the classification from that paper. That is acceptable if the check is straightforward, but here it is part of the main conclusion.

Minor caveats: the derivation uses only the leading 1/z12 singularities of the tree-level OPE and excludes loop log(z12) terms; the paper acknowledges this, so it is not an oversight. The most general solution is derived under a symmetry assumption (2.16) that may not cover all coupling tensors, but the same framework is used in the cited classification.

Bottom line: the paper deserves a serious referee. The core derivation is explicit, the general solution is new, and the on-shell equivalence chain is a real result. The gap in the off-shell bridge should be fixable or at least clearly delineated. I would cite this when discussing OPE associativity in celestial CFT and would send it to review.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims a four-way equivalence: celestial OPE associativity, the Jacobi identity of a 'gauge' algebra built from the cubic chiral vertices, the vanishing of the four-point tree amplitude, and the light-cone quartic holomorphic constraint. The author solves the celestial OPE associativity constraint for the most general class of cubic vertices in light-cone variables, reproduces and extends lower-spin examples from [8], and concludes that all chiral higher-spin theories classified in [1], including the new self-dual Yang-Mills / self-dual gravity extensions, admit a gauge algebra and pass the celestial OPE associativity test, up to a specific product of couplings C^{λ1,λ1,0}C^{0,λ2,λ2}.

Significance. If the main equivalence is fully established, the paper provides a practical and unifying criterion: the light-cone holomorphic constraint can serve as a classification tool for celestial CFTs, and the Jacobi-identity/self-duality point of view connects several previously separate results. The derivation from double residues to the light-cone polynomial constraint is explicit and self-contained, and the general solution in Section 4 and Appendix D is a useful technical contribution. The paper also gives credit where due and is honest about several caveats, including the unconstrained product and the exclusion of loop and all-order MHV corrections. However, the load-bearing equivalence in Section 6.4 is only shown on the energy shell H=0, while the holomorphic light-cone constraint is an off-shell identity; this gap directly affects the universal claim about the theories of [1].

major comments (2)

[§6.4, Eqs. (6.23)-(6.29), (6.30)-(6.33)] The central equivalence between the Jacobi identity / OPE associativity constraint and the light-cone holomorphic constraint is established only after imposing the energy-shell condition H=0. The paper explicitly states that O_s=O_t=O_u 'can be proven for H=0' and that the operators differ only by terms proportional to the total free Hamiltonian H. The holomorphic quartic constraint (2.24)-(2.25) is an off-shell operator identity, while the Jacobi identity (6.14) and the four-point amplitude condition (6.18) are on-shell objects. Therefore, the argument as written proves, at best, that on-shell solutions of one constraint satisfy the other on-shell. It does not prove that the off-shell solutions of the holomorphic constraint used in the [1] classification automatically satisfy the celestial OPE associativity constraint. The kernel analysis in (6.30)-(6.33) identifies one product C^{λ1,λ1
[§4.1 and Appendix D, Eqs. (4.18)-(4.20), (D.5)-(D.6)] The claim that (4.20)/(D.6) is the 'most general' solution rests on the step 'setting to zero all monomials except those that can be generated by at least two different functions.' This assumes that the variables A,B,C are algebraically independent in the polynomial identity (4.19). The paper itself uses linear relations among the \bar P_{ij} in (4.15) and the Schouten-type identity (6.10); if these relations imply dependencies among monomials of total degree Λ−2, additional cancellations beyond the pairwise monomial matching may exist. The derivation should either prove that A,B,C can be treated as independent coordinates on the constraint surface, or explicitly state that (4.25)/(D.10) is the solution within that ansatz. Since the lower-spin classification in Section 5 uses this 'general' solution, this completeness step is load-bearing.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract / §3] The associativity constraint is derived and tested only at tree level and using the leading 1/z_{12} singularities of the holomorphic OPE; loop contributions of order log(z_{12}) and all-order MHV corrections are excluded. The abstract should explicitly say 'tree-level, leading holomorphic' to match the actual claim.
[§6.3] The phrase 'four-point three-level amplitude' should read 'four-point tree-level amplitude'.
[§3] Typo: 'quatisation' should be 'quantisation'.
[§5.1] The text says 'there may be—and likely are—other admissible lower-spin theories that satisfy OPE associativity'; this is fine, but the earlier phrase 'we derive all possible solutions' should be softened to match this caveat.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the Jacobi/OPE/amplitude/holomorphic-constraint equivalence is a nontrivial reformulation; reliance on [1] is a domain input, and the H=0 caveat is a completeness gap, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's main chain—OPE associativity (4.14), Jacobi identity (6.13)/(6.14), vanishing four-point amplitude (6.18), and the light-cone quartic holomorphic constraint (2.24)—is not circular. (4.14) is derived independently in Secs. 3–4 from the double-residue/collinear-limit amplitude identity (3.10)–(3.16), without invoking the gauge algebra. In Sec. 6.2 the structure constants f are defined from the same cubic vertices via (6.1)–(6.2), and the Jacobi identity then manifestly yields the same polynomial condition; this is an algebraic equivalence, not an input fitted to the target. Similarly, (6.18) is an on-shell amplitude rewriting of the same expression. The bridge to the light-cone holomorphic constraint in Sec. 6.4 is the only weak point: the equality O_s=O_t=O_u is stated to hold for H=0, and the kernel of J is analyzed only for monomials of the form (6.30). That is an incompleteness in the converse direction, appropriately flagged by the paper's own caveats, but it is not circular reasoning. The use of the author's prior classification [1] supplies the list of chiral higher-spin theories; that citation is load-bearing for the domain of the conclusion, but [1]'s classification was obtained from the holomorphic constraint and does not already assume OPE associativity, so it is independent support under rule 4. Score 2 reflects this minor self-citation dependence and the admitted on-shell gap, not a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The gauge algebra f_{ABC} constructed from cubic vertices in Eq. (6.1) is a derived algebraic object built from existing couplings, not an independent postulate. The main unpaid inputs are the light-cone framework, the truncated OPE associativity definition, the on-shell reduction, and the prior classification [1].

free parameters (2)

Integration constants k^{1234}_-, k^{1234}_+, and permutations
These are left arbitrary by the general OPE-associativity solution (4.25)-(4.26) and (D.10); they set the overall scale and relative strengths of the allowed cubic couplings and are not fixed by the constraint itself.
Phase factor theta_{lambda_i} in the colour-ordered Poisson bracket = theta_{lambda_i} = (-1)^{lambda_i}
Chosen by hand in Eq. (4.35) to make the colour-ordered solution consistent with the binomial-sum identity and to absorb signs; it is a convention choice rather than a datum.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Light-cone gauge Hamiltonian deformation with local n-point vertices (2.5)-(2.7) for massless fields
The whole classification of cubic vertices and the quartic holomorphic constraint are formulated in this framework, Sections 2 and Appendix A.
domain assumption The leading-singularity, tree-level holomorphic OPE associativity condition (3.12) is necessary and sufficient for the claimed equivalence
The paper explicitly sets aside one-loop log(z12) terms and all-order MHV corrections, so the equivalence is established only in this truncation.
domain assumption On-shell external kinematics and H=0 are used to equate the light-cone quartic constraint with the amplitude/Jacobi condition
Eq. (6.24) and the surrounding discussion require momentum and energy conservation for the external fields.
domain assumption The coupling ansatz and symmetry property (2.16) for f^{lambda1,lambda2,lambda3}_{abc}, together with semisimple compact Lie algebra trace identities
Used to organize all possible cubic vertices and to reduce colour-ordered constraints in Sections 2 and 4.
domain assumption The classification of chiral higher-spin theories in arXiv:2505.12839 [1] is correct
The claim that all those theories pass OPE associativity and have a gauge algebra inherits that classification rather than re-deriving it in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Associativity of celestial OPE, higher spins and self-duality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SOWCLPQR

@misc{pith2026250816804,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Associativity of celestial OPE, higher spins and self-duality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SOWCLPQR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16804}
}

read the original abstract

We highlight and clarify the connection between several ideas and self-dual theories: (a) the operator product expansion (OPE) associativity in celestial conformal field theory (CCFT); (b) the vanishing of tree-level amplitudes; (c) the Jacobi identity for the "gauge" algebra; (d) the light-cone holomorphic constraints. Naturally, (b), (c), or (d) are closely related to self-duality. In particular, the recently classified arXiv:2505.12839 chiral higher-spin theories with one- and two-derivative interactions (i.e. with gauge and gravitational interactions, which are extensions of self-dual Yang-Mills and self-dual gravity) also satisfy the OPE associativity constraint. We discuss the OPE associativity constraint and the holomorphic constraint for the most general class of cubic vertices.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Light-Front approach to $4d$ massless Higher-Spin interactions
hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.5 of 10

Solving Poincaré-algebra closure at quartic order yields infinitely many local 4d massless higher-spin theories (finite or infinite spectra), classifies chiral one-/two-derivative models, and determines all local unit...
Infinite Symmetry Algebras in Four-Dimensional Conformal Field Theories
hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Universal light-ray operators from the stress tensor generate the wedge subalgebra of w_{1+∞} in generic interacting 4D CFTs, with finite one-point functions matching the full tower of soft graviton and gluon factors.
Light-Front approach to $4d$ massless Higher-Spin interactions
hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Quartic Poincaré-closure in the light-front gauge classifies all one- and two-derivative chiral higher-spin theories in 4d and yields new finite-spectrum local theories and quasi-chiral families.
Massless spinning fields on the Light-Front: quartic vertices and amplitudes
hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A light-front quartic-constraint analysis classifies local massless higher-spin vertices and amplitudes, yielding no-go results for unitary theories and new quasi-chiral higher-spin sectors.
Self-dual holography: four-point AdS/CFT correlators in higher-spin gravity
hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

Develops holographic dictionary for self-dual higher-spin theories and computes four-point AdS/CFT correlators in a higher-spin extension of self-dual Yang-Mills.
$N$-body modelling of the ED-2 stream progenitor shows Gaia BH3's formation involved dynamical interactions
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

N-body modeling indicates Gaia BH3 formed as an exchange binary via dynamical interactions in the ED-2 progenitor cluster.
Amplitudes in self-dual (higher-spin) theories
hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

All self-dual theories with or without higher-spin fields possess nontrivial tree-level amplitudes in Kleinian or complex Minkowski kinematics, completing the celestial analogue of the higher-spin duality.
Three-dimensional non-relativistic chiral massive higher-spin gravity
hep-th 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A non-relativistic massive higher-spin gravity in deformed AdS₃ is constructed by Lifshitz-deforming and null-reducing chiral massless higher-spin gravity; under an assumed mass-spin relation its cubic couplings vanis...
$N$-body modelling of the ED-2 stream progenitor shows Gaia BH3's formation involved dynamical interactions
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

N-body modeling of the ED-2 progenitor shows Gaia BH3 formed as an exchange binary via multiple dynamical interactions in a dense cluster, not in isolation.
Dirichlet, Neumann, Mixed and self-dual holography: (self-dual) Yang--Mills theory II
hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

Derives bulk and boundary propagators and computes 3- and 4-point correlators for YM, CS and SDYM in AdS/CFT with multiple boundary conditions to relate their observables.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 8 Pith papers

[8]

On effective field theories with celestial duals,

L. Ren, M. Spradlin, A. Yelleshpur Srikant, and A. Volovich, “On effective field theories with celestial duals,” JHEP 08 (2022) 251, arXiv:2206.08322 [hep-th]

arXiv 2022
[1]

On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space,

M. Serrani, “On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space,” JHEP 08 (2025) 032, arXiv:2505.12839 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025
[2]

Celestial operator products of gluons and gravitons,

M. Pate, A.-M. Raclariu, A. Strominger, and E. Y. Yuan, “Celestial operator products of gluons and gravitons,” Rev. Math. Phys.33 no. 09, (2021) 2140003, arXiv:1910.07424 [hep-th]

arXiv 2021
[3]

Celestial operator product expansions and w 1+∞ symmetry for all spins,

E. Himwich, M. Pate, and K. Singh, “Celestial operator product expansions and w 1+∞ symmetry for all spins,” JHEP 01 (2022) 080, arXiv:2108.07763 [hep-th]

arXiv 2022
[4]

w1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,

A. Strominger, “ w1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127 no. 22, (2021) 221601, arXiv:2105.14346 [hep-th]

arXiv 2021
[5]

Associativity of One-Loop Corrections to the Celestial Operator Product Expansion,

K. Costello and N. M. Paquette, “Associativity of One-Loop Corrections to the Celestial Operator Product Expansion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129 no. 23, (2022) 231604, arXiv:2204.05301 [hep-th]

arXiv 2022
[6]

On the associativity of 1-loop corrections to the celestial operator product in gravity,

R. Bittleston, “On the associativity of 1-loop corrections to the celestial operator product in gravity,” JHEP 01 (2023) 018, arXiv:2211.06417 [hep-th]

arXiv 2023
[7]

Deformed w1+∞ Algebras in the Celestial CFT,

J. Mago, L. Ren, A. Y. Srikant, and A. Volovich, “Deformed w1+∞ Algebras in the Celestial CFT,” SIGMA 19 (2023) 044, arXiv:2111.11356 [hep-th]

arXiv 2023

Show all 66 references

[9]

Celestial chiral algebras, colour-kinematics duality and integrability,

R. Monteiro, “Celestial chiral algebras, colour-kinematics duality and integrability,” JHEP 01 (2023) 092, arXiv:2208.11179 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[10]

Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,

R. R. Metsaev, “Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,” Mod. Phys. Lett.A6 (1991) 359–367

1991
[11]

S matrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal symmetry,

R. R. Metsaev, “ S matrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal symmetry,” Mod. Phys. Lett.A6 (1991) 2411–2421

1991
[12]

Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space,

D. Ponomarev and E. D. Skvortsov, “Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space,” J. Phys. A50 no. 9, (2017) 095401, arXiv:1609.04655 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[13]

Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality,

D. Ponomarev, “Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality,” JHEP 12 (2017) 141, arXiv:1710.00270 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[14]

Snowmass White Paper: Higher Spin Gravity and Higher Spin symmetry,

X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, A. Campoleoni, M. Chiodaroli, D. Francia, M. Grigoriev, E. Sezgin, and E. Skvortsov, “Snowmass White Paper: Higher Spin Gravity and Higher Spin symmetry,” arXiv:2205.01567 [hep-th]

arXiv
[15]

Basic Introduction to Higher-Spin Theories,

D. Ponomarev, “Basic Introduction to Higher-Spin Theories,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.62 no. 7, (2023) 146, arXiv:2206.15385 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[16]

Cubic interaction terms for arbitrary spin,

A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and L. Brink, “Cubic interaction terms for arbitrary spin,” Nucl. Phys. B227 (1983) 31

1983
[17]

Cubic interaction terms for arbitrarily extended Supermultiplets,

A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and L. Brink, “Cubic interaction terms for arbitrarily extended Supermultiplets,” Nucl. Phys. B227 (1983) 41

1983
[18]

From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial algebras,

R. Monteiro, “From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial algebras,” JHEP 03 (2023) 062, arXiv:2212.11266 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[19]

The Kinematic Algebra From the Self-Dual Sector,

R. Monteiro and D. O’Connell, “The Kinematic Algebra From the Self-Dual Sector,” JHEP 07 (2011) 007, arXiv:1105.2565 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[20]

Chiral higher-spin double copy,

D. Ponomarev, “Chiral higher-spin double copy,” JHEP 01 (2025) 143, arXiv:2409.19449 [hep-th]. 44

2025 arXiv
[21]

Off-Shell Spinor-Helicity Amplitudes from Light-Cone Deformation Procedure,

D. Ponomarev, “Off-Shell Spinor-Helicity Amplitudes from Light-Cone Deformation Procedure,” JHEP 12 (2016) 117, arXiv:1611.00361 [hep-th]

2016 arXiv
[22]

Interacting Higher Spin Gauge Fields on the Light Front,

A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and N. Linden, “Interacting Higher Spin Gauge Fields on the Light Front,” Class. Quant. Grav.4 (1987) 1333

1987
[23]

Cubic interaction vertices for massive and massless higher spin fields,

R. R. Metsaev, “Cubic interaction vertices for massive and massless higher spin fields,” Nucl. Phys. B759 (2006) 147–201, arXiv:hep-th/0512342

2006 arXiv
[24]

More on Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,

E. Skvortsov, T. Tran, and M. Tsulaia, “More on Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D101 no. 10, (2020) 106001, arXiv:2002.08487 [hep-th]

2020 arXiv
[25]

Celestial locality and the Jacobi identity,

A. Ball, “Celestial locality and the Jacobi identity,” JHEP 01 (2023) 146, arXiv:2211.09151 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[26]

Multicollinear singularities in celestial CFT,

A. Ball, Y. Hu, and S. Pasterski, “Multicollinear singularities in celestial CFT,” JHEP 02 (2024) 219, arXiv:2309.16602 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[27]

Supersymmetry and the celestial Jacobi identity,

A. Ball, M. Spradlin, A. Yelleshpur Srikant, and A. Volovich, “Supersymmetry and the celestial Jacobi identity,” JHEP 04 (2024) 099, arXiv:2311.01364 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[28]

Currents in celestial CFT,

A. Ball, “Currents in celestial CFT,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A39 no. 29n30, (2024) 2430007, arXiv:2407.13558 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[29]

Associativity is enough: an all-orders 2d chiral algebra for 4d form factors,

V. E. Fern´ andez and N. M. Paquette, “Associativity is enough: an all-orders 2d chiral algebra for 4d form factors,” arXiv:2412.17168 [hep-th]

arXiv
[30]

Lectures on celestial amplitudes,

S. Pasterski, “Lectures on celestial amplitudes,” Eur. Phys. J. C81 no. 12, (2021) 1062, arXiv:2108.04801 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[31]

Lectures on Celestial Holography,

A.-M. Raclariu, “Lectures on Celestial Holography,” arXiv:2107.02075 [hep-th]

arXiv
[32]

From the lorentz group to the celestial sphere,

B. Oblak, “From the lorentz group to the celestial sphere,” 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.00920

2018 arXiv
[33]

Soft Limits of Yang-Mills Amplitudes and Conformal Correlators,

W. Fan, A. Fotopoulos, and T. R. Taylor, “Soft Limits of Yang-Mills Amplitudes and Conformal Correlators,” JHEP 05 (2019) 121, arXiv:1903.01676 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[34]

Logarithmic doublets in CCFT,

A. Bissi, L. Donnay, and B. Valsesia, “Logarithmic doublets in CCFT,” JHEP 12 (2024) 031, arXiv:2407.17123 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[35]

All-order celestial OPE in the MHV sector,

T. Adamo, W. Bu, E. Casali, and A. Sharma, “All-order celestial OPE in the MHV sector,” JHEP 03 (2023) 252, arXiv:2211.17124 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[36]

All-order celestial OPE from on-shell recursion,

L. Ren, A. Schreiber, A. Sharma, and D. Wang, “All-order celestial OPE from on-shell recursion,” JHEP 10 (2023) 080, arXiv:2305.11851 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[37]

Holographic symmetry algebras for gauge theory and gravity,

A. Guevara, E. Himwich, M. Pate, and A. Strominger, “Holographic symmetry algebras for gauge theory and gravity,” JHEP 11 (2021) 152, arXiv:2103.03961 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[38]

Inconsistency of interacting, multigraviton theories,

N. Boulanger, T. Damour, L. Gualtieri, and M. Henneaux, “Inconsistency of interacting, multigraviton theories,” Nucl. Phys. B597 (2001) 127–171, arXiv:hep-th/0007220

2001 arXiv
[39]

Moyal deformations, W 1+∞ and celestial holography,

W. Bu, S. Heuveline, and D. Skinner, “Moyal deformations, W 1+∞ and celestial holography,” JHEP 12 (2022) 011, arXiv:2208.13750 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[40]

The Selfdual sector of QCD amplitudes,

G. Chalmers and W. Siegel, “The Selfdual sector of QCD amplitudes,” Phys. Rev.D54 (1996) 7628–7633, arXiv:hep-th/9606061 [hep-th]

1996 arXiv
[41]

Towards Gravity From a Color Symmetry,

A. Guevara, “Towards Gravity From a Color Symmetry,” arXiv:2209.00696 [hep-th]

arXiv
[42]

Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,

E. D. Skvortsov, T. Tran, and M. Tsulaia, “Quantum Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121 no. 3, (2018) 031601, arXiv:1805.00048 [hep-th]. 45

2018 arXiv
[43]

One-loop Finiteness of Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,

E. Skvortsov and T. Tran, “One-loop Finiteness of Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,” JHEP 07 (2020) 021, arXiv:2004.10797 [hep-th]

2020 arXiv
[44]

Supersymmetric quantum chiral higher spin gravity,

M. Tsulaia and D. Weissman, “Supersymmetric quantum chiral higher spin gravity,” JHEP 12 (2022) 002, arXiv:2209.13907 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[45]

Twistor constructions for higher-spin extensions of (self-dual) Yang-Mills,

T. Tran, “Twistor constructions for higher-spin extensions of (self-dual) Yang-Mills,” JHEP 11 (2021) 117, arXiv:2107.04500 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[46]

Higher-spin self-dual Yang-Mills and gravity from the twistor space,

Y. Herfray, K. Krasnov, and E. Skvortsov, “Higher-spin self-dual Yang-Mills and gravity from the twistor space,” JHEP 01 (2023) 158, arXiv:2210.06209 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[47]

Toward a twistor action for chiral higher-spin gravity,

T. Tran, “Toward a twistor action for chiral higher-spin gravity,” Phys. Rev. D107 no. 4, (2023) 046015, arXiv:2209.00925 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[48]

Higher-spin Yang–Mills, amplitudes and self-duality,

T. Adamo and T. Tran, “Higher-spin Yang–Mills, amplitudes and self-duality,” Lett. Math. Phys.113 no. 3, (2023) 50, arXiv:2210.07130 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[49]

Chiral higher-spin theories from twistor space,

L. Mason and A. Sharma, “Chiral higher-spin theories from twistor space,” arXiv:2505.09419 [hep-th]

arXiv
[50]

Chiral higher-spin symmetry of the celestial twistor sphere,

T. Tran, “Chiral higher-spin symmetry of the celestial twistor sphere,” arXiv:2507.00340 [hep-th]
[51]

Anomaly-free twistorial higher-spin theories,

T. Tran, “Anomaly-free twistorial higher-spin theories,” arXiv:2505.13785 [hep-th]
[52]

Invariant traces of the flat space chiral higher-spin algebra as scattering amplitudes,

D. Ponomarev, “Invariant traces of the flat space chiral higher-spin algebra as scattering amplitudes,” JHEP 09 (2022) 086, arXiv:2205.09654 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[53]

Towards higher-spin holography in flat space,

D. Ponomarev, “Towards higher-spin holography in flat space,” JHEP 01 (2023) 084, arXiv:2210.04035 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[54]

Chiral higher-spin holography in flat space: the Flato-Fronsdal theorem and lower-point functions,

D. Ponomarev, “Chiral higher-spin holography in flat space: the Flato-Fronsdal theorem and lower-point functions,” JHEP 01 (2023) 048, arXiv:2210.04036 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[55]

Actions for self-dual Higher Spin Gravities,

K. Krasnov, E. Skvortsov, and T. Tran, “Actions for self-dual Higher Spin Gravities,” JHEP 08 (2021) 076, arXiv:2105.12782 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[56]

Light-Front Bootstrap for Chern-Simons Matter Theories,

E. Skvortsov, “Light-Front Bootstrap for Chern-Simons Matter Theories,” JHEP 06 (2019) 058, arXiv:1811.12333 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[57]

Chiral higher spin gravity in (A)dS4 and secrets of Chern–Simons matter theories,

A. Sharapov and E. Skvortsov, “Chiral higher spin gravity in (A)dS4 and secrets of Chern–Simons matter theories,” Nucl. Phys. B985 (2022) 115982, arXiv:2205.15293 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[58]

Hidden sectors of Chern-Simons matter theories and exact holography,

S. Jain, D. K. S, and E. Skvortsov, “Hidden sectors of Chern-Simons matter theories and exact holography,” Phys. Rev. D111 no. 10, (2025) 106017, arXiv:2405.00773 [hep-th]

2025
[59]

A chiral limit for Chern-Simons-matter theories,

O. Aharony, R. R. Kalloor, and T. Kukolj, “A chiral limit for Chern-Simons-matter theories,” JHEP 10 (2024) 051, arXiv:2405.01647 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[60]

Minimal model of Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,

A. Sharapov, A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, E. Skvortsov, A. Sukhanov, A. Sukhanov, R. Van Dongen, and R. Van Dongen, “Minimal model of Chiral Higher Spin Gravity,” JHEP 09 (2022) 134, arXiv:2205.07794 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 02, 183 (2023)]

2022 arXiv
[61]

Chiral higher spin gravity and convex geometry,

A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, and R. Van Dongen, “Chiral higher spin gravity and convex geometry,” SciPost Phys. 14 no. 6, (2023) 162, arXiv:2209.01796 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[62]

More on Chiral Higher Spin Gravity and convex geometry,

A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, A. Sukhanov, and R. Van Dongen, “More on Chiral Higher Spin Gravity and convex geometry,” Nucl. Phys. B990 (2023) 116152, arXiv:2209.15441 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[63]

Strong homotopy algebras for chiral higher spin gravity via Stokes theorem,

A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, and R. Van Dongen, “Strong homotopy algebras for chiral higher spin gravity via Stokes theorem,” JHEP 06 (2024) 186, arXiv:2312.16573 [hep-th]. 46

2024 arXiv
[64]

Low spin solutions of higher spin gravity: BPST instanton,

E. Skvortsov and Y. Yin, “Low spin solutions of higher spin gravity: BPST instanton,” JHEP 07 (2024) 032, arXiv:2403.17148 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[65]

Self-dual pp-wave solutions in chiral higher-spin gravity,

T. Tran, “Self-dual pp-wave solutions in chiral higher-spin gravity,” JHEP 03 (2025) 041, arXiv:2501.06445 [hep-th]

2025
[66]

Scattering Amplitudes,

H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang, “Scattering Amplitudes,” arXiv:1308.1697 [hep-th]. 47

arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [8]

On effective field theories with celestial duals,

L. Ren, M. Spradlin, A. Yelleshpur Srikant, and A. Volovich, “On effective field theories with celestial duals,” JHEP 08 (2022) 251, arXiv:2206.08322 [hep-th]

arXiv 2022

[2] [1]

On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space,

M. Serrani, “On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space,” JHEP 08 (2025) 032, arXiv:2505.12839 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025

[3] [2]

Celestial operator products of gluons and gravitons,

M. Pate, A.-M. Raclariu, A. Strominger, and E. Y. Yuan, “Celestial operator products of gluons and gravitons,” Rev. Math. Phys.33 no. 09, (2021) 2140003, arXiv:1910.07424 [hep-th]

arXiv 2021

[4] [3]

Celestial operator product expansions and w 1+∞ symmetry for all spins,

E. Himwich, M. Pate, and K. Singh, “Celestial operator product expansions and w 1+∞ symmetry for all spins,” JHEP 01 (2022) 080, arXiv:2108.07763 [hep-th]

arXiv 2022

[5] [4]

w1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,

A. Strominger, “ w1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127 no. 22, (2021) 221601, arXiv:2105.14346 [hep-th]

arXiv 2021

[6] [5]

Associativity of One-Loop Corrections to the Celestial Operator Product Expansion,

K. Costello and N. M. Paquette, “Associativity of One-Loop Corrections to the Celestial Operator Product Expansion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129 no. 23, (2022) 231604, arXiv:2204.05301 [hep-th]

arXiv 2022

[7] [6]

On the associativity of 1-loop corrections to the celestial operator product in gravity,

R. Bittleston, “On the associativity of 1-loop corrections to the celestial operator product in gravity,” JHEP 01 (2023) 018, arXiv:2211.06417 [hep-th]

arXiv 2023

[8] [7]

Deformed w1+∞ Algebras in the Celestial CFT,

J. Mago, L. Ren, A. Y. Srikant, and A. Volovich, “Deformed w1+∞ Algebras in the Celestial CFT,” SIGMA 19 (2023) 044, arXiv:2111.11356 [hep-th]

arXiv 2023