Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

SecQA: A Concise Question-Answering Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Computer Security

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.15838 v1 pith:7CLUVVHM submitted 2023-12-26 cs.CL cs.CR

classification cs.CLcs.CR
keywords secqasecuritycomputerllmsmodelsconcisedatasetevaluating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce SecQA, a novel dataset tailored for evaluating the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the domain of computer security. Utilizing multiple-choice questions generated by GPT-4 based on the "Computer Systems Security: Planning for Success" textbook, SecQA aims to assess LLMs' understanding and application of security principles. We detail the structure and intent of SecQA, which includes two versions of increasing complexity, to provide a concise evaluation across various difficulty levels. Additionally, we present an extensive evaluation of prominent LLMs, including GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4, Llama-2, Vicuna, Mistral, and Zephyr models, using both 0-shot and 5-shot learning settings. Our results, encapsulated in the SecQA v1 and v2 datasets, highlight the varying capabilities and limitations of these models in the computer security context. This study not only offers insights into the current state of LLMs in understanding security-related content but also establishes SecQA as a benchmark for future advancements in this critical research area.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ExCyTIn-Bench: Evaluating LLM agents on Cyber Threat Investigation

    cs.CR 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    ExCyTIn-Bench is the first benchmark of 7542 questions from Microsoft Sentinel threat investigation graphs, where the best LLM agent achieves a reward of 0.606.

  2. Cybersecurity AI (CAI) Dataset

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    CAI Dataset is presented as the largest described corpus of LLM-driven hacker trajectories, with the claim that operator data concentration in frontier-model providers creates a major security risk best addressed by o...

  3. CyberMaskQA: A Privacy-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Cybersecurity Question Answering

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    CyberMaskQA is a new privacy-aware QA benchmark for cybersecurity that annotates private entities in realistic organizational scenarios with causal dependencies to jointly evaluate reasoning accuracy and masking performance.

  4. CyberCertBench: Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Certification Knowledge

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    CyberCertBench shows frontier LLMs reach human-expert performance on general IT and networking security but drop on vendor-specific and formal standards questions such as IEC 62443, with a new framework for producing ...

  5. SIR-Bench: Evaluating Investigation Depth in Security Incident Response Agents

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    SIR-Bench supplies 794 test cases replayed from anonymized real incidents via the OUAT framework and scores agents on triage accuracy, novel evidence discovery, and tool use with an adversarial LLM judge, reporting 97...

  6. Capture the Flags: Family-Based Evaluation of Agentic LLMs via Semantics-Preserving Transformations

    cs.SE 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Agentic LLMs remain robust to renaming and insertion but degrade on composed transformations and deeper obfuscation in CTF tasks, enabled by a new Evolve-CTF tool for generating equivalent challenge families.

  7. Domyn-Small: A European 10B Reasoning Language Model

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Domyn-Small is a 10B reasoning LLM that claims to deliver roughly one-third the inference tokens of Qwen3.5-9B at competitive accuracy, though results are marked as preliminary.

  8. Llama-3.1-FoundationAI-SecurityLLM-8B-Instruct Technical Report

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Foundation-Sec-8B-Instruct, an instruction-tuned 8B cybersecurity LLM, is released and claimed to beat Llama 3.1-8B-Instruct on CTIBench-RCM and CTIBench-MCQA while remaining competitive on general instruction-following.

Pith tools