Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 67 references

The paper claims that edge dislocations in silicon, diamond, germanium, and black phosphorene bind mid-gap polarization bands whenever the Burgers vector and line direction satisfy B·(M^SSH_ν·T)=π mod 2π.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 21:13 UTC pith:7EUZFXAV

load-bearing objection Credible edge-dislocation predictions for common semiconductors; the 'always trivial' screw claim is under-supported and should be tightened or derived. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2602.20754 v2 pith:7EUZFXAV submitted 2026-02-24 cond-mat.mes-hall

Topological Dislocation Response in Elementary Semiconductors

Yuteng Zhou , Alexandre Chaduteau , Frank Schindler This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords obstructed atomic insulatortopological dislocation responsepolarization bandsweak SSH invariantfilling anomalyinversion symmetrytight-binding simulationsilicon diamond germanium black phosphorene
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that ordinary semiconductors such as silicon, diamond, germanium, and black phosphorene are obstructed atomic insulators whose Wannier centers sit away from atomic sites. Because of that shift, a pair of inversion-related edge dislocations can bind one-dimensional mid-gap electron bands, called polarization bands, whenever the Burgers vector and dislocation line direction satisfy a quantized condition. Using tight-binding simulations of realistic models, the authors find such bands in all four materials, with a filling anomaly that keeps the response topologically protected even if the bands merge with the bulk. Screw dislocations, by contrast, are claimed to always show a trivial response.

Core claim

For an inversion-symmetric obstructed atomic insulator, an inversion-symmetric pair of dislocations with Burgers vector B and line vector T binds filling-anomalous polarization bands exactly when B·(M^SSH_ν · T) = π mod 2π. The matrix M^SSH_ν is built from weak SSH invariants extracted from inversion eigenvalues at time-reversal invariant momenta. The paper shows that black phosphorene has M^SSH_ν = π(1/a,1/b), so any odd lattice combination Burgers vector responds, and that silicon, diamond, and germanium all have nonvanishing off-diagonal invariants that make every edge dislocation respond. Tight-binding simulations for these materials show two inversion-related polarization bands inside t

What carries the argument

The central object is the weak SSH invariant matrix M^SSH_ν, a set of quantized polarizations computed from the product of occupied inversion eigenvalues at time-reversal invariant momenta, relative to a reference atomic limit. In 3D its entries ν^SSH_{ij} form a symmetric matrix; the dislocation response condition is B·(M^SSH_ν·T)=π mod 2π. The off-diagonal entries vanish for screw dislocations because T is parallel to B, reducing the condition to the weak invariant, which is zero for obstructed atomic insulators.

Load-bearing premise

The statement that screw dislocations never bind polarization bands relies on the assumption, taken from earlier work, that at zero momentum along the dislocation the Hamiltonian is unchanged by inserting a screw dislocation; if that equivalence breaks down, screw dislocations could also bind states.

What would settle it

Run the same tight-binding models with a screw dislocation (B parallel to T) in silicon or germanium. If a mid-gap polarization band appears, the predicted trivial response is wrong. Alternatively, explicitly compare the κ∥=0 Bloch Hamiltonian with and without the screw dislocation; any difference invalidates the cited equivalence.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Edge dislocations in silicon, diamond, germanium, and black phosphorene should host detectable mid-gap electron states in realistic samples.
  • The response survives even when polarization bands merge with the bulk because of the filling anomaly.
  • The condition B·(M^SSH_ν·T)=π predicts dislocation responses for any pair of line directions, not just the simulated cases.
  • Screw dislocations in these materials should show no such bound states, in contrast to dislocation responses studied in other crystals.
  • The invariants are computable from band structure alone, so the prediction extends to any material with the same inversion eigenvalues.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the response is fixed by inversion eigenvalues rather than chemistry, other inversion-symmetric obstructed atomic insulators with the same symmetry-indicator data should show the same dislocation bands; these four materials are examples, not the complete list.
  • A direct check of the screw-dislocation premise could be made by simulating a screw dislocation with the same tight-binding models; if mid-gap states appear, the 'always trivial' statement would need revision.
  • If the polarization bands are near the Fermi energy, scanning tunneling microscopy across the dislocation line could image them; beyond that, transport along aligned dislocation arrays might reveal the filling anomaly as a half-integer conductance signature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies inversion-symmetric elementary semiconductors and insulators (black phosphorene, silicon, diamond, germanium) as obstructed atomic insulators (OAIs). It constructs weak Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) invariants from inversion eigenvalues at TRIM points and predicts that dislocations in these materials host filling-anomalous polarization bands when the Burgers vector and line vector satisfy Eq. (6). Tight-binding simulations with I-related pairs of edge dislocations show in-gap localized bands for all four materials (BP also as λ interpolates); screw dislocations are claimed to always have a trivial response. The paper argues that the polarization bands are protected by a filling anomaly even when they merge with bulk bands.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper would establish common elemental semiconductors as experimentally accessible platforms for dislocation-induced topological response, extending the OAI-defect correspondence of Ref. [9] and providing a concrete bulk-defect prediction. The invariant calculations are explicit (Eqs. (2), (5) and SM), and the numerical tight-binding simulations of realistic models with explicit dislocation cores are a clear strength: they show localized in-gap bands with computed IPR for all three 3D semiconductors, including realistic (non-chiral) models. The filling-anomaly argument is appropriate and does not rely on fitting to the dislocation states themselves, so circularity is not a concern. However, the advertised universal statement about screw dislocations is not backed by a derivation or simulation in this manuscript, and the central formula Eq. (6) is asserted rather than proved for arbitrary dislocation types. The edge-dislocation result is well supported; the screw result currently rests on an unexamined citation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Topological invariants for dislocation response (Eq. (6) and following paragraph)] The claim that screw dislocations 'always display a trivial response' is load-bearing but unsupported. The only arguments are (i) 'At κ∥=0, the 2D Hamiltonians with or without the screw dislocation are identical [9]' and (ii) ν^SSH_{ii} reduces to the weak invariant ν_i, which vanishes for OAIs. Neither establishes Eq. (6) for screws. Statement (i) is a nontrivial property of screw-defect Bloch Hamiltonians; even if the branch-cut phase drops at κ∥=0, the dislocation core is a local perturbation, so the two Hamiltonians are not literally identical, and the paper does not show that any difference is topologically irrelevant. Statement (ii) only shows the right-hand side of Eq. (6) vanishes for screws if Eq. (6) is already known to apply, so the argument is circular. No screw dislocation is simulated and no independent derivation is supplied. To retain the abstract's 'always' claim, please
  2. [Eqs. (4)-(6)] Eq. (6) is introduced as a 'formalization' of the preceding observations, but no derivation is given from the bulk invariants or from the dislocation construction. The matrix M_SSH is computed from TRIM parity data, yet the passage from the 2D condition (3) to the 3D condition (6) involves nontrivial assumptions about how a dislocation with line vector T and Burgers vector B affects the 2D slice Hamiltonians at κ∥ = 0,1/2. The numerical simulations provide empirical support for edge dislocations with the specific (B,T) choices used, but not for the general formula or for mixed/screw dislocations. Please state the status of Eq. (6) (theorem vs. conjecture), give a derivation, or restrict the claims accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction/Abstract] Typographical issues: 'symm etric', 'An clear next step', and 'B a an odd combination of lattice basis vectors' should be corrected.
  2. [Topological invariants for dislocation response] The sentence 'At κ∥=0, the 2D Hamiltonians with or without the screw dislocation are identical [9]' is ambiguous. If 'identical' means unitarily equivalent up to an irrelevant local perturbation, say so explicitly; as written it is too strong and invites the objection that the core differs.
  3. [Main text, paragraph on 3D semiconductors] The citation to the Supplemental Material as '[67]' appears to be a numbering error; the SM is already cited as [63]. Please check.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The figure caption contains garbled text: 'Cutting Plane(,)' appears repeatedly. Please repair the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: edge-dislocation predictions come from external tight-binding inversion eigenvalues and are verified in simulation; no parameter is fitted to the defect states. The screw-dislocation 'always trivial' claim rests on a cited equivalence and a proposed 3D criterion, a rigor gap but not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (i) compute inversion eigenvalues from independent tight-binding Hamiltonians (Refs. [62,65]); (ii) evaluate the symmetry-indicator products in Eqs. (1)-(2) and (5); (iii) compare with the dislocation condition Eq. (6); (iv) verify with tight-binding simulations of dislocation supercells. None of these steps fits any parameter to the dislocation bound states; the only inputs are the bulk Hamiltonians and the prior invariant framework of Ref. [9]. The edge-dislocation 'confirmation' uses the same Hamiltonian for the bulk and the defect, so it is a self-consistency check of the bulk-defect correspondence, not a circular fit. The screw-dislocation triviality is the weakest link: in the paragraph beginning 'Conversely, screw dislocations...', the statement 'At κ∥=0, the 2D Hamiltonians with or without the screw dislocation are identical [9]' is cited rather than derived, and no screw dislocation is simulated. The subsequent algebraic observation that ν^SSH_{i,i}=ν_i=0 for OAIs makes screw triviality a formal consequence of the assumed Eq. (6), but Eq. (6) is proposed as a formalization of the earlier observations, not fitted to the defect data. This is an omitted-proof/universality gap and a correctness risk, but it is not a demonstrated equivalence of a prediction to a fitted input by construction. The self-citations (notably Ref. [9]) are to a parameter-free prior derivation; under the stated rule, such citations are real evidence and do not by themselves establish circularity. Score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free constants fitted to data; the two parameters listed are simulation/model choices. The main load-bearing assumptions are the faithfulness of the tight-binding models and two imported lemmas about dislocation-slice Hamiltonians, one of which (screw triviality) is flagged as a red flag.

free parameters (2)
  • Interpolation parameter λ for black phosphorene = 0 to 1
    Interpolates between the 90° model and the realistic black phosphorene Hamiltonian (Eq. 7). Not fitted, but chosen by hand to test robustness.
  • Number of deleted unit cells in dislocation construction = 7 (BP), 10 (3D semiconductors)
    Hand-chosen in the numerical simulations of the dislocation cores; no convergence scan with respect to this number is shown.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The tight-binding models from Refs. [62] and [65] faithfully represent the band topology of the real materials.
    All inversion-eigenvalue and dislocation-band calculations are performed in these models; if the models misrepresent the real band topology, the predictions fail.
  • domain assumption An inversion-symmetric pair of dislocations can be modeled by cutting the lattice along a plane, deleting an integer number of unit cells, and gluing the halves back together.
    This cut-and-glue construction (Figs. 1 and 2) is assumed to capture the physical dislocation core; no comparison to ab initio dislocation structures is made.
  • domain assumption At κ∥=0 the 2D Hamiltonians with and without a screw dislocation are identical (cited to Ref. [9]).
    This equivalence is the entire basis for the claim that screw dislocations cannot bind polarization bands; it is not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption OAIs have identical weak SSH invariants for the two 2D Hamiltonians at κ∥=0 and κ∥=1/2 because their 3D weak index Mν vanishes.
    Used to argue that edge dislocations in OAIs cannot host gapless helical modes and can only host filling-anomalous polarization bands; stated without proof.
  • standard math The filling-anomaly bulk-defect correspondence from Refs. [9,53] is valid.
    The central criterion Eq. (6) assumes this correspondence; the paper does not re-derive it.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 10091 in / 13239 out tokens · 129446 ms · 2026-08-02T21:13:59.462185+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Dislocation Response in Elementary Semiconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7EUZFXAV

@misc{pith2026260220754,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Dislocation Response in Elementary Semiconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7EUZFXAV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.20754}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We study elementary semiconductors and insulators that are symmetric under spatial inversion: silicon, diamond, germanium, and black phosphorene. These materials are ideal candidates for realizing obstructed atomic insulators, which differ from trivial atomic insulators by a quantized spatial shift of their electronic Wannier centers with respect to the atomic lattice. We use symmetry indicator invariants that allow the prediction of non-trivial responses to crystal dislocations in these materials. We find that edge dislocations generically exhibit a non-trivial response, while screw dislocations always display a trivial response. With the aid of numerical simulations of realistic tight-binding models, we confirm the presence of mid-gap polarization bands localized along dislocations in silicon, diamond, and germanium.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.20754 by Alexandre Chaduteau, Frank Schindler, Yuteng Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Dislocation response of black phosphorene (BP). (a) Bril [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Edge dislocation response of 3D silicon. (a) Brillouin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Tight-binding simulations of 3D diamond and germaniu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wen, Colloquium: Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter, Rev

    X.-G. Wen, Colloquium: Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041004 (2017)

    2017

  2. [2]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    M. G. Vergniory, L. Elcoro, C. Felser, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, and Z. Wang, A complete catalogue of high-quality topological materials, Nature 566, 480–485 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    K. W. B¨ oer and U. W. Pohl, Crystal defects, in Semi- conductor Physics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023) pp. 595–648

    2023

  5. [5]

    Y. Ran, Y. Zhang, and A. Vishwanath, One-dimensional topologically protected modes in topological insulators with lattice dislocations, Nature Physics 5, 298 (2009)

    2009

  6. [6]

    J. C. Y. Teo and C. L. Kane, Topological defects and gapless modes in insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 82, 115120 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    Juriˇ ci´ c, A

    V. Juriˇ ci´ c, A. Mesaros, R.-J. Slager, and J. Zaanen, Uni- versal probes of two-dimensional topological insulators: Dislocation and π flux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 106403 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    Queiroz, I

    R. Queiroz, I. C. Fulga, N. Avraham, H. Beidenkopf, and J. Cano, Partial lattice defects in higher-order topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 266802 (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    Schindler, S

    F. Schindler, S. S. Tsirkin, T. Neupert, B. An- drei Bernevig, and B. J. Wieder, Topological zero- dimensional defect and flux states in three-dimensional insulators, Nature Communications 13, 10.1038/s41467- 022-33471-x (2022)

    doi:10.1038/s41467- 2022

  10. [10]

    S. S. Yamada, T. Li, M. Lin, C. W. Peterson, T. L. Hughes, and G. Bahl, Bound states at partial dislocation defects in multipole higher-order topological insulators, Nature Communications 13, 2035 (2022)

    2035

  11. [11]

    D. Zhu, D. Liu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Field- sensitive dislocation bound states in two-dimensional d- wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, 165141 (2024)

    2024

  12. [12]

    Paulose, B

    J. Paulose, B. G.-g. Chen, and V. Vitelli, Topological modes bound to dislocations in mechanical metamateri- als, Nature Physics 11, 153 (2015)

    2015

  13. [13]

    Li, H.-X

    F.-F. Li, H.-X. Wang, Z. Xiong, Q. Lou, P. Chen, R.- X. Wu, Y. Poo, J.-H. Jiang, and S. John, Topological light-trapping on a dislocation, Nature Communications 9, 2462 (2018)

    2018

  14. [14]

    I. H. Grinberg, M. Lin, W. A. Benalcazar, T. L. Hughes, and G. Bahl, Trapped state at a dislocation in a weak magnetomechanical topological insulator, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 064042 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    Zhong, B

    J.-X. Zhong, B. Roy, and Y. Jing, Observation of disloca- tion bound states and skin effects in non-hermitian chern insulators, Advanced Materials n/a, e15496 (2026)

    2026

  16. [16]

    H. Xue, D. Jia, Y. Ge, Y.-j. Guan, Q. Wang, S.-q. Yuan, H.-x. Sun, Y. D. Chong, and B. Zhang, Observa- tion of dislocation-induced topological modes in a three- dimensional acoustic topological insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 214301 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Slager, A

    R.-J. Slager, A. Mesaros, V. Juriˇ ci´ c, and J. Zaanen, In- terplay between electronic topology and crystal symme- try: Dislocation-line modes in topological band insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B 90, 241403 (2014)

    2014

  18. [18]

    Roy and V

    B. Roy and V. Juriˇ ci´ c, Dislocation as a bulk probe of higher-order topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033107 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    Y. Liu, X. Zhang, C.-P. Liang, F.-F. Li, Y. Poo, and J.-H. Jiang, Observation of bulk-dislocation correspondence in photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 064097 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Schindler and A

    F. Schindler and A. Prem, Dislocation non-hermitian skin effect, Phys. Rev. B 104, L161106 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    Hu and R.-X

    L.-H. Hu and R.-X. Zhang, Dislocation majorana bound states in iron-based superconductors, Nature Communi- cations 15, 2337 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    A. K. Nayak, J. Reiner, R. Queiroz, F. Huixia, and H. Beidenkopf, Resolving the topological classifica- tion of bismuth with topological defects, Science Ad- vances 5, eaax6996 (2019), pMID: 31701006, PMCID: PMC6824853

    2019

  23. [23]

    Z.-K. Lin, Q. Wang, Y. Liu, H. Xue, B. Zhang, Y. Chong, and J.-H. Jiang, Topological phenomena at defects in acoustic, photonic and solid-state lattices, Nature Re- views Physics 6, 149 (2024), published online 10 July 2023; Author Correction published 5 December 2023

    2024

  24. [24]

    L. Ye, C. Qiu, M. Xiao, T. Li, J. Du, M. Ke, and Z. Liu, Topological dislocation modes in three-dimensional acoustic topological insulators, Nature Communications 13, 10.1038/s41467-022-28182-2 (2022), published online 26 January 2022

    doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28182-2 2022

  25. [25]

    Others include: α-Sn, with near-zero band gap and potential band inversions induced by strain at the Γ point, which does not contribute to a dislocation re- sponse; and boron, whose tight-binding model has a com- plex structure and large unit cell, rendering the study of dislocation-bound states significantly more involved

  26. [26]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological quantum chemistry, Nature 547, 298–305 (2017)

    2017

  27. [27]

    Z. Liu, P. Deng, Y. Xu, H. Yang, D. Pei, C. Chen, S. He, D. Liu, S.-K. Mo, T. Kim, C. Cacho, H. Yao, Z.-D. Song, X. Chen, Z. Wang, B. Yan, L. Yang, B. A. Bernevig, and Y. Chen, Massive 1d dirac line, solitons and reversible manipulation on the surface of a prototype obstructed atomic insulator, silicon (2024), arXiv:2406.08114 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Li, D.-S

    X.-P. Li, D.-S. Ma, C.-C. Liu, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, From atomic semimetal to topological nontrivial insula- tor, Phys. Rev. B 105, 165135 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    Elcoro, B

    L. Elcoro, B. J. Wieder, Z. Song, Y. Xu, B. Bradlyn, and B. A. Bernevig, Magnetic topological quantum chemistry, Nature Communications 12, 10.1038/s41467-021-26241- 8 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26241- 2021

  30. [30]

    D.-S. Ma, K. Yu, X.-P. Li, X. Zhou, and R. Wang, Obstructed atomic insulators with robust corner modes, Phys. Rev. B 108, L100101 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    Y. Xu, L. Elcoro, Z.-D. Song, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, S. S. P. Parkin, N. Regnault, J. L. Ma˜ nes, and B. A. Bernevig, Filling-enforced obstructed atomic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 109, 165139 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    L. Wang, Y. Jiang, J. Liu, S. Zhang, J. Li, P. Liu, Y. Sun, H. Weng, and X.-Q. Chen, Two-dimensional obstructed atomic insulators with fractional corner charge in the MA 2Z4 family, Phys. Rev. B 106, 155144 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Y. Xu, L. Elcoro, G. Li, Z.-D. Song, N. Regnault, Q. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Parkin, C. Felser, and B. A. Bernevig, Three-dimensional real space invariants, ob- structed atomic insulators and a new principle for active catalytic sites (2021), arXiv:2111.02433 [cond-mat.mtrl- 6 sci]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Schindler and B

    F. Schindler and B. A. Bernevig, Noncompact atomic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 104, L201114 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    X. Ding, X. Jin, Z. Chen, X. Lv, D.-S. Ma, X. Wu, and R. Wang, Abundant surface-semimetal phases in three- dimensional obstructed atomic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 108, 085135 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    Liu, M.-Y

    X.-R. Liu, M.-Y. Zhu, Y. Feng, M. Zeng, X.-M. Ma, Y.- J. Hao, Y. Dai, R.-H. Luo, Y.-P. Zhu, K. Yamagami, Y. Liu, S. Cui, Z. Sun, J.-Y. Liu, Y. Huang, Z. Liu, M. Ye, D. Shen, B. Li, and C. Liu, Observation of floating surface state in obstructed atomic insulator candidate nip2, npj Quantum Materials 9, 85 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    J. Cano, L. Elcoro, M. I. Aroyo, B. A. Bernevig, and B. Bradlyn, Topology invisible to eigenvalues in ob- structed atomic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 105, 125115 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Y. Li, J. Wang, S. Qian, W. Meng, and X. Wang, Ob- structed atomic insulator inorganic electrides, Phys. Rev. B 112, 205112 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    Arroyo-Gasc´ on, S

    O. Arroyo-Gasc´ on, S. Bravo, M. Pacheco, and L. Chico, Two-dimensional orbital-obstructed insulators with higher-order band topology, Phys. Rev. B 112, 075114 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    I. A. Day, A. Varentcova, D. Varjas, and A. R. Akhmerov, Pfaffian invariant identifies magnetic obstructed atomic insulators, SciPost Phys. 15, 114 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    Wang, T.-T

    J. Wang, T.-T. Zhang, Q. Zhang, X. Cheng, W. Wang, S. Qian, Z. Cheng, G. Zhang, and X. Wang, 3d carbon al- lotropes: Topological quantum materials with obstructed atomic insulating phases, multiple bulk-boundary corre- spondences, and real topology, Advanced Functional Ma- terials 34, 2316079 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    S. K. Radha and W. R. L. Lambrecht, Topological ob- structed atomic limit insulators by annihilating dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B 103, 075435 (2021)

    2021

  43. [43]

    Verma, S.-M

    R. Verma, S.-M. Huang, and B. Singh, Atomically thin obstructed atomic insulators with robust edge modes and quantized spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 110, 165122 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    Marsal, D

    Q. Marsal, D. Varjas, and A. G. Grushin, Obstructed in- sulators and flat bands in topological phase-change ma- terials, Phys. Rev. B 107, 045119 (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    Singh, S

    G. Singh, S. Bera, and V. B. Shenoy, Arboreal obstructed atomic insulating and metallic phases of fermions, Phys. Rev. B 110, 205143 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Nu˜ nez, S

    V. Nu˜ nez, S. Bravo, J. D. Correa, L. Chico, and M. Pacheco, Higher-order obstructed atomic insulator phase in pentagonal monolayer pdse2, 2D Materials 11, 015015 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    Wada and S

    H. Wada and S. Murakami, Local expression of fractional corner charges in obstructed atomic insulators and rela- tionship with the fractional disclination charges, Phys. Rev. B 113, 075306 (2026)

    2026

  48. [48]

    Hwang, V

    Y. Hwang, V. Gupta, F. Schindler, L. Elcoro, Z. Song, B. A. Bernevig, and B. Bradlyn, Stable real-space invari- ants and topology beyond symmetry indicators (2025), arXiv:2505.09697 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Herzog-Arbeitman, V

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, V. Peri, F. Schindler, S. D. Huber, and B. A. Bernevig, Superfluid weight bounds from sym- metry and quantum geometry in flat bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 087002 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    G. H. Wannier, The structure of electronic excitation lev- els in insulating crystals, Phys. Rev. 52, 191 (1937)

    1937

  51. [51]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979)

    1979

  52. [52]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Soliton ex- citations in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. B 22, 2099 (1980)

    2099

  53. [53]

    W. A. Benalcazar, T. Li, and T. L. Hughes, Quantiza- tion of fractional corner charge in Cn-symmetric higher- order topological crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. B 99, 245151 (2019)

    2019

  54. [54]

    Schindler, M

    F. Schindler, M. Brzezi´ nska, W. A. Benalcazar, M. Iraola, A. Bouhon, S. S. Tsirkin, M. G. Vergniory, and T. Neu- pert, Fractional corner charges in spin-orbit coupled crys- tals, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033074 (2019)

    2019

  55. [55]

    L. Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Topological insulators in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007)

    2007

  56. [56]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Topological insulators with inver- sion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 76, 045302 (2007)

    2007

  57. [57]

    Takao, H

    Y. Takao, H. Asahina, and A. Morita, Electronic struc- ture of black phosphorus in tight binding approach, Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan 50, 3362 (1981)

    1981

  58. [58]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polariza- tion of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  59. [59]

    Vanderbilt and R

    D. Vanderbilt and R. D. King-Smith, Electric polariza- tion as a bulk quantity and its relation to surface charge, Phys. Rev. B 48, 4442 (1993)

    1993

  60. [60]

    Alexandradinata, X

    A. Alexandradinata, X. Dai, and B. A. Bernevig, Wilson- loop characterization of inversion-symmetric topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 89, 155114 (2014)

    2014

  61. [61]

    Imura, Y

    K.-I. Imura, Y. Takane, and A. Tanaka, Weak topological insulator with protected gapless helical states, Phys. Rev. B 84, 035443 (2011)

    2011

  62. [62]

    Hitomi, T

    M. Hitomi, T. Kawakami, and M. Koshino, Multiorbital edge and corner states in black phosphorene, Phys. Rev. B 104, 125302 (2021)

    2021

  63. [63]

    See the Supplemental Material for calculations of invari- ants, as well as a plot summarizing results for diamond and germanium

  64. [64]

    Resta, Macroscopic polarization in crystalline di- electrics: the geometric phase approach, Rev

    R. Resta, Macroscopic polarization in crystalline di- electrics: the geometric phase approach, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 899 (1994)

    1994

  65. [65]

    Nakhaee, S

    M. Nakhaee, S. A. Ketabi, and F. M. Peeters, Tight- binding studio: A technical software package to find the parameters of tight-binding hamiltonian, Computer Physics Communications 254, 107379 (2020)

    2020

  66. [66]

    J. C. Slater and G. F. Koster, Simplified lcao method for the periodic potential problem, Phys. Rev. 94, 1498 (1954)

    1954

  67. [67]

    Topological Dislocation Response in Elementary Semiconductors

    For all materials, we choose I-symmetric unit cells, im- plying vanishing polarization in the reference atomic limit. Supplemental Material for “Topological Dislocation Response in Elementary Semiconductors” Yuteng Zhou, 1 Alexandre Chaduteau, 1 and Frank Schindler 1 1Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, London SW7 2 AZ, United Kingdom I. NUMERIC...