Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On the Benefits of Memory for Modeling Time-Dependent PDEs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.02313 v2 pith:7HQ5IF4J submitted 2024-09-03 cs.LG cs.AI

On the Benefits of Memory for Modeling Time-Dependent PDEs

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords pdesmemoryneuraltime-dependentwhenbenefitsfouriermarkovian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data-driven techniques have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional numerical methods for solving PDEs. For time-dependent PDEs, many approaches are Markovian -- the evolution of the trained system only depends on the current state, and not the past states. In this work, we investigate the benefits of using memory for modeling time-dependent PDEs: that is, when past states are explicitly used to predict the future. Motivated by the Mori-Zwanzig theory of model reduction, we theoretically exhibit examples of simple (even linear) PDEs, in which a solution that uses memory is arbitrarily better than a Markovian solution. Additionally, we introduce Memory Neural Operator (MemNO), a neural operator architecture that combines recent state space models (specifically, S4) and Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs) to effectively model memory. We empirically demonstrate that when the PDEs are supplied in low resolution or contain observation noise at train and test time, MemNO significantly outperforms the baselines without memory -- with up to 6x reduction in test error. Furthermore, we show that this benefit is particularly pronounced when the PDE solutions have significant high-frequency Fourier modes (e.g., low-viscosity fluid dynamics) and we construct a challenging benchmark dataset consisting of such PDEs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. No Free Lunch in Flow Surrogates under Time-Varying Boundary Conditions: A Two-Regime Study

    math.NA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    No single flow-surrogate architecture transfers from a boundary-driven Stokes film to a self-sustained Kármán wake; time treatment decides the winner and pointwise RMSE ranks the wrong models.

  2. Graph Mamba Operator: A Latent Simulator for Interacting Particle Systems

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GraMO couples graph interactions and temporal state updates in one linear recurrence with input-dependent coefficients to simulate N-body, motion, and robotics systems with lower long-horizon error than prior GNN or S...