Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.19166 v3 pith:7JXR4WNX submitted 2025-02-26 cs.SE cs.LG

CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generation

classification cs.SE cs.LG
keywords codecodeifgenerationllmsinstruction-followingmodelstasksautomated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs), the demand for robust instruction-following capabilities in code generation tasks has grown significantly. Code generation not only facilitates faster prototyping and automated testing, but also augments developer efficiency through improved maintainability and reusability of code. In this paper, we introduce CodeIF, the first benchmark specifically designed to assess the abilities of LLMs to adhere to task-oriented instructions within diverse code generation scenarios. CodeIF encompasses a broad range of tasks, including function synthesis, error debugging, algorithmic refactoring, and code explanation, thereby providing a comprehensive suite to evaluate model performance across varying complexity levels and programming domains. We conduct extensive experiments with LLMs, analyzing their strengths and limitations in meeting the demands of these tasks. The experimental results offer valuable insights into how well current models align with human instructions, as well as the extent to which they can generate consistent, maintainable, and contextually relevant code. Our findings not only underscore the critical role that instruction-following LLMs can play in modern software development, but also illuminate pathways for future research aimed at enhancing their adaptability, reliability, and overall effectiveness in automated code generation. CodeIF data and code are publicly available: https://github.com/lin-rany/codeIF

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Many-Tier Instruction Hierarchy in LLM Agents

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ManyIH and ManyIH-Bench address instruction conflicts in LLM agents with up to 12 privilege levels across 853 tasks, revealing frontier models achieve only ~40% accuracy.

  2. Steerable Instruction Following Coding Data Synthesis with Actor-Parametric Schema Co-Evolution

    cs.SE 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    IFCodeEvolve synthesizes coding data via actor-schema co-evolution with MCTS, boosting a 32B model's performance to match proprietary SOTA on instruction following.

  3. Automating Structural Analysis Across Multiple Software Platforms Using Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A two-stage multi-agent LLM converts structural inputs to JSON then platform-specific scripts for ETABS, SAP2000, and OpenSees, achieving over 90% accuracy on 20 frame problems across ten trials.