Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 102 references

The paper constructs the complete d=5 parity-odd spatially covariant gravity basis (59 monomials) and reduces the tensor sector to four coefficient combinations.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 10:09 UTC pith:7LJTHXFT

load-bearing objection First complete d=5 parity-odd SCG basis, with new (k/a)^3 tensor signatures; the 59-count is careful but hand-verified, so treat it as provisional until independently checked. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20317 v1 pith:7LJTHXFT submitted 2026-07-22 gr-qc

Parity-violating spatially covariant gravity at total derivative order d=5

Jin-Jian Song , Xian Gao This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords parity violationspatially covariant gravityhigher-derivative gravityoperator classificationtensor perturbationsgravitational-wave birefringenceluminal propagationextrinsic curvature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

At total derivative order five, the paper sorts every parity-violating contraction built from the lapse, the spatial metric, extrinsic curvature, and spatial curvature into three derivative sectors, and reduces them using integrations by parts and three-dimensional tensor identities. The result is a claimed complete and independent 59-element basis, split as 2, 40, and 17 monomials in the (0,5), (2,3), and (4,1) sectors. A sympathetic reader should care because, on a flat cosmological background, the tensor gravitational-wave sector collapses dramatically: 16 basis elements and ten contributing coefficients enter through only four combinations, α1, α3, β1, and β3. Those combinations generate helicity-odd corrections to the kinetic and gradient functions proportional to k/a and, for the first time at this order, (k/a)^3. The paper closes by deriving two coefficient relations that make both circular polarizations propagate luminally while still allowing helicity-dependent damping.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the parity-odd sector of spatially covariant gravity at total derivative order five has a complete basis of 59 monomials: 2 in the purely spatial (0,5) sector, 40 in the mixed (2,3) sector, and 17 in the mostly temporal (4,1) sector. Spatially covariant gravity is a unitary-gauge description of gravity adapted to a preferred foliation, built from the lapse, the extrinsic curvature, the spatial curvature, and their spatial and normal derivatives. The basis separates by temporal content into 35 monomials containing neither the lapse velocity nor the Lie derivative of the extrinsic curvature (so all time derivatives enter through first-order extrinsic curvature

What carries the argument

The counting machine is the reduction toolkit: spatial integrations by parts that trade derivatives between factors and redefine coefficient functions, plus three three-dimensional identities — the decomposition of the Riemann tensor into Ricci and scalar pieces (Eq. 20), the Cayley-Hamilton relation for a (1,1) tensor (Eq. 21), and the Schouten identity relating a rank-two tensor to the Levi-Civita symbol (Eq. 22). These decide which candidate contractions vanish and which are equivalent, producing the 59-dimensional basis. In the tensor sector, the second level of machinery is the projection onto transverse-traceless perturbations: the lapse acceleration vanishes on a homogeneous backgroun

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the enumeration of candidate contractions and the reduction toolkit (integrations by parts plus the three listed three-dimensional identities) are complete, so that exactly 59 independent monomials remain; a missed contraction or an unused identity would change the basis dimension and could alter the tensor-sector reduction.

What would settle it

Independently enumerate all nonvanishing parity-odd contractions of the d=5 building blocks in Table I with one Levi-Civita symbol, then reduce them using equations (20)-(22) and integrations by parts; if the number of independent representatives is not 59, or if the quadratic tensor action from the 16 tensor-relevant monomials depends on more than the four combinations α1, α3, β1, and β3, the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Every parity-violating spatially covariant gravity action at total derivative order five is, up to integrations by parts, a linear combination of the 59 listed monomials, so no further independent operator exists at this order.
  • The 24 monomials containing the lapse velocity or the Lie derivative of the extrinsic curvature are not automatically healthy; the paper shows they require a dedicated kinetic-matrix and constraint analysis to determine whether extra Ostrogradsky modes appear.
  • Tensor gravitational-wave propagation at d=5 is controlled by exactly four time-dependent coefficient combinations, so observational bounds on amplitude and velocity birefringence translate directly into constraints on these combinations.
  • The cubic-in-momentum parity-odd corrections, proportional to (k/a)^3 in the kinetic and gradient functions, are specific to d=5 and come from the ∇K∇²K and R∇R classes; they are absent in truncations at d≤4.
  • Two coefficient relations make both circular polarizations propagate luminally — a background-dependent relation between α1 and β1, and the algebraic equality α3 = β3 — while still allowing helicity-dependent kinetic normalization and hence amplitude birefringence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 59-count is correct, the generally covariant parity-odd scalar-tensor space at d=5 should have the same dimension once temporal diffeomorphisms are restored; that mapping is a natural next step the paper leaves for future work.
  • Because only four combinations enter tensor propagation, future gravitational-wave constraints will underdetermine the ten underlying coefficients; breaking that degeneracy will require either the omitted higher-time-derivative sectors or theoretical priors.
  • The (k/a)^3 term gives a concrete distinguishing signature: a parity-odd dispersion relation with cubic momentum dependence could be searched for in high-frequency gravitational-wave data or in the stochastic background, separating d=5 effects from the linear-momentum parity-odd terms at lower orders.
  • A degeneracy analysis of the 24 omitted monomials might reveal healthy combinations; if none exist, the physically viable parity-odd d=5 theory is exactly the 35-monomial sector studied here, and its tensor phenomenology is the one described by α1, α3, β1, and β3.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper undertakes the polynomial classification of parity-odd, spatially covariant gravity interactions at total derivative order d=5. Working in (3+1)-dimensional variables, the authors partition monomials by (dt,ds) into sectors (0,5), (2,3), and (4,1) and claim that, after reduction by integrations by parts, tensor symmetries, three-dimensional curvature identities, the Schouten identity, and the Cayley-Hamilton relation, the independent basis has 59 elements: 2+40+17. They further split these by temporal-derivative content into 35 'manifestly first-order-in-time' elements, 11 involving the lapse velocity F, and 13 involving LuKij. Restricting to the acceleration-free, F/LuK-free subset that survives a transverse-traceless tensor projection (16 monomials), they derive the quadratic tensor action and show that the ten contributing coefficient functions enter through four combinations alpha1, alpha3, beta1, beta3, producing helicity-odd corrections of order k/a and (k/a)^3. They then derive conditions (59)-(60) for luminal phase velocities of both circular polarizations, and note that helicity-dependent kinetic normalization and damping can persist.

Significance. If correct, this would complete the parity-odd SCG operator space at d=5 and identify the minimal set of coefficient combinations controlling tensor perturbations, including cubic-momentum parity violation absent at lower order. The internal arithmetic is consistent: family dimensions, sector sums, and the reported 16-to-4 reduction all agree. The paper is honest about the sectors that require a separate degeneracy analysis and does not overclaim dynamical health. However, the value of the paper depends on the reliability of an exhaustive enumeration that is not independently verifiable from the text; this is the main obstacle to acceptance.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.A, Eqs. (23), (28), (30); Appendix A] The central claim is that the schematic classes in (23), (28), and (30) are exhaustive and reduce to exactly 59 independent monomials. The manuscript lists only the surviving representatives and class-level reduction relations; it does not give the complete set of candidate contractions before reduction, a step-by-step reduction log, or a machine-checkable certificate. This is not a cosmetic point: footnote 2 shows that the earlier d=4 classification in Ref. [95] was overcomplete by one element, so manual enumeration in this framework has a documented failure mode. To verify the dimension counts, I would need either a computer-algebra notebook/certificate or an appendix containing the exhaustive candidate list and all identifying reductions. The luminality conditions (59)-(60) inherit this uncertainty.
  2. [Sec. II.B, paragraph after Eq. (19)] The assertion that 'it is sufficient to retain building blocks of derivative order at most three' is a completeness premise, not a consequence. If higher-order building blocks can be reduced only in combination with certain contraction patterns, the enumeration in (23), (28), and (30) might miss a class. Please justify this claim explicitly or include it in the certificate requested above.
  3. [Sec. IV.B, Eqs. (48)-(54), Table IV] The reduction from the 16 selected monomials to the four combinations (51)-(54) is asserted without derivation. In particular, the vanishing of V6_1, V6_2, V9_1, V9_2 and the non-contribution of V6_5 and V9_3 after integration by parts are not shown; these steps are needed to trust the quadratic action (49)-(50) and hence the luminality relations. A sample calculation or a supplementary file would suffice.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] In the sentence '35 monomials containing neither the lapse velocity ... from 11 lapse-velocity monomials', 'from' should read 'and'.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (57)] The expression 'H H2' should be written as H^3 (or with parentheses) for readability.
  3. [Table I] The caption says 'order'; please specify that this is the total derivative order, to avoid confusion with derivative rank.
  4. [Sec. IV.C, paragraph after Eq. (58)] When stating that the x_s and x_s^3 coefficients must vanish separately, it would help to note explicitly that for each helicity the two powers have different scaling in k, so coefficient-wise matching is justified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the basis count and tensor reduction are derived rather than fitted; remaining concerns are reproducibility, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are an exhaustive operator classification at d=5 and a derived tensor-propagation action. Neither reduces to its own inputs or to a fitted parameter. The 59-element basis (Sec. III.A, Table II, Appendix A) is presented as the output of an enumeration reduced by standard identities (20)-(22), integration by parts, and coefficient redefinitions; the paper does not ship a machine-checkable certificate (Data Availability: 'No data were created or analyzed in this study'), and the same group's prior d=4 basis was overcomplete by one (footnote 2). This is a completeness/reproducibility concern, not circularity: no monomial is defined in terms of the final basis, and no 'prediction' is fitted. The tensor-sector reduction 35→16→4 is a derived projection onto an FLRW background: the four combinations α1, α3, β1, β3 (Eqs. 51-54) simply name the coefficient combinations that survive the quadratic expansion, and the luminality relations (59)-(60) follow by equating W^(s)=G^(s) coefficient by coefficient. They are constraints on arbitrary functions of (t,N), not values fitted to a target. Self-citations (refs. [41,76,77,81-86,95]) supply the framework and lower-order background, but the d=5 calculation is carried out in the paper and even corrects the prior d=4 count; no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely from those citations. The stated limitations (deferred degeneracy analysis of the 11+13 higher-time-derivative monomials, unit-lapse restrictiveness) are acknowledged caveats, not circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper fits no data; its coefficients are free functions of (t,N), and the alpha/beta combinations are derived linear combinations, so the free-parameter ledger is empty. The load-bearing premises are standard 3D geometric identities (20)-(22), the framework conventions defining 'basis' modulo integrations by parts, the unit-lapse branch assumption, and—the only computationally risky premise—the exhaustiveness of the candidate enumeration, which is asserted without shipped code. No new physical entities are introduced; all monomials are built from standard ADM/SCG variables.

axioms (7)
  • standard math Three-dimensional Riemann tensor decomposes into Ricci-scalar and Ricci terms (Eq. 20).
    Used in the (0,5) reduction (e.g., Eq. 25) to eliminate [R nabla^2 a] contractions. Standard in 3D Riemannian geometry.
  • standard math Cayley-Hamilton relation for (1,1) tensors (Eq. 21).
    Used in Sec. II.B to reduce contractions containing several copies of K_ij; standard linear algebra.
  • standard math Schouten identity for epsilon_{ijk} contracted with a rank-two tensor (Eq. 22).
    Used alongside Cayley-Hamilton to reduce parity-odd contractions in the (2,3) and (4,1) sectors; standard 3D identity.
  • domain assumption The 'basis' equivalence relation quotients by integrations by parts with arbitrary coefficient functions of (t,N) (Sec. III.A).
    The 59-dimensionality is defined modulo boundary terms and induced coefficient redefinitions per Eqs. (11)-(12); this is the SCG framework's convention.
  • domain assumption Unit-lapse branch N=1 is an allowed homogeneous background solution (footnote 3).
    The tensor action (49)-(50) and luminality conditions are computed on this branch. If the background equations force N(t) != 1, monomials containing undifferentiated F can contribute (footnote 4), changing the tensor response; the paper assumes the branch exists and is chosen.
  • ad hoc to paper Building blocks of derivative order at most three suffice at d=5 (Sec. II.B).
    The claim 'higher-order building blocks can be reduced by integrations by parts' underlies the Table I inventory; exhaustiveness of the basis depends on this reduction claim.
  • ad hoc to paper The candidate contraction enumeration (schematic classes (23), (28), (30)) is exhaustive and the reduction leaves exactly 59 independent representatives.
    The central completeness claim rests on this enumeration, which is asserted in Sec. III.A with the final basis listed in the appendix; no machine-checkable certificate is shipped.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21222 in / 18582 out tokens · 157554 ms · 2026-08-01T10:09:50.969295+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We extend the polynomial construction of parity-violating spatially covariant gravity (SCG) to total derivative order $d=5$, where $d=d_{\mathrm{t}}+d_{\mathrm{s}}$ counts the total number of temporal and spatial derivatives. After organizing the monomials by $(d_{\mathrm{t}},d_{\mathrm{s}})$ and reducing them using integrations by parts, tensor symmetries, three-dimensional curvature identities, the Schouten identity, and the Cayley-Hamilton relation, we obtain a $59$-element basis: $2$, $40$, and $17$ monomials in the sectors $(0,5)$, $(2,3)$, and $(4,1)$, respectively. A direct inspection separates $35$ monomials containing neither the lapse velocity $\mathcal{L}_{\bm{u}}\ln N$ nor $\mathcal{L}_{\bm{u}}K_{ij}$ from $11$ lapse-velocity monomials and $13$ monomials containing higher normal derivatives of the spatial metric. The latter two sectors require a dedicated degeneracy analysis. For tensor perturbations about a spatially flat cosmological background, the acceleration-free part of the manifestly first-order-in-time sector contains $16$ basis elements, whose quadratic action depends on only four combinations of coefficients. These combinations generate helicity-odd corrections proportional to $k/a$ and $(k/a)^3$ in the kinetic and gradient functions. We derive two relations that enforce luminal phase velocity for both circular polarizations while still allowing helicity-dependent kinetic normalization and damping.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 89 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    nonvanishing

    Purely spatial sector:(0,5) Following the notation of Ref. [95], we use[· · ·]to denote a schematic class specified by its building-block content, with all admissible scalar contractions of the tensor indices understood. The schematic classes admitting at least one nonvanishing contraction are [a∇aR],[R∇R],[∇a∇R],[R∇ 2a],[∇a∇ 2a].(23) Here “nonvanishing” ...

  2. [2]

    Mixed sector:(2,3) The(2,3)sector is the largest. The schematic classes admitting nonvanishing contractions are [Kaa∇F],[KaF∇a],[Kaa∇K],[KKa∇a],[KKaR], [aRLK],[a∇aLK],[KaF R],[K∇F R],[F R∇K],[a∇K∇K], [KR∇K],[LK∇R],[F∇a∇K],[K∇a∇K],[a∇F∇K],[∇K∇ 2K], [aaF∇K],[K∇F∇a],[LK∇ 2a],[∇K∇ 2F],[∇F∇ 2K],[R∇LK],[∇a∇LK].(28) Within these schematic brackets,LK abbreviates...

  3. [3]

    Manifestly first order in time

    Predominantly temporal sector:(4,1) The candidate classes in the(4,1)sector are [KF F∇K],[KKF∇K],[KKK∇K],[K∇FLK],[FLK∇K], [KLK∇K],[LK∇LK],[KaFLK], [KLF∇K],[KKaLK],[∇KL 2K].(30) The last three classes reduce to the preceding classes by temporal and spatial integrations by parts together with the commutators betweenL u and∇ i. The surviving 17 monomials are...

  4. [4]

    The(0,5)sector The purely spatial(0,5)sector contains the following two basis elements: U (1) 1 =ε ijk ai∇jalRkl,(A1) U (1) 2 =ε ijk Ri l∇jRkl.(A2)

  5. [5]

    The(2,3)sector The40monomials in the(2 , 3)sector are organized into nine families. The first family contains nine monomials arising from schematic classes for which a single inequivalent contraction is retained: V (1) 1 =ε ijk Ki lalaj∇kF,(A3) V (1) 2 =ε ijk F aiKj l∇kal,(A4) V (1) 3 =ε ijk aiRj lLuKkl,(A5) V (1) 4 =ε ijk ai∇jalLuKkl,(A6) V (1) 5 =ε ijk ...

  6. [6]

    The(4,1)sector The17monomials in the(4 , 1)sector are organized into four families. Analogously toV (1), the first family contains five monomials arising from schematic classes for which a single inequivalent contraction is retained: W (1) 1 =ε ijk F 2Ki l∇jKkl,(A43) W (1) 2 =ε ijk Ki l∇jFL uKkl,(A44) W (1) 3 =ε ijk FL uKil∇jKk l,(A45) W (1) 4 =ε ijk LuKi...

  7. [7]

    Horndeski,Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space,Int.J.Theor.Phys.10(1974) 363

    G.W. Horndeski,Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space,Int.J.Theor.Phys.10(1974) 363

    1974

  8. [8]

    Deffayet, X

    C. Deffayet, X. Gao, D. Steer and G. Zahariade,From k-essence to generalised Galileons,Phys.Rev.D84(2011) 064039 [1103.3260]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  9. [9]

    Kobayashi, M

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general second-order field equations,Prog.Theor.Phys.126(2011) 511 [1105.5723]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  10. [10]

    Zumalacárregui and J

    M. Zumalacárregui and J. García-Bellido,Transforming gravity: from derivative couplings to matter to second-order scalar-tensor theories beyond the Horndeski Lagrangian,Phys.Rev.D89(2014) 064046 [1308.4685]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    Langlois and K

    D. Langlois and K. Noui,Degenerate higher derivative theories beyond Horndeski: evading the Ostrogradski instability, JCAP1602(2016) 034 [1510.06930]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    Langlois, M

    D. Langlois, M. Mancarella, K. Noui and F. Vernizzi,Effective Description of Higher-Order Scalar-Tensor Theories,JCAP 1705(2017) 033 [1703.03797]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    De Felice, D

    A. De Felice, D. Langlois, S. Mukohyama, K. Noui and A. Wang,Generalized instantaneous modes in higher-order scalar-tensor theories,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 084024 [1803.06241]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    De Felice, S

    A. De Felice, S. Mukohyama and K. Takahashi,Nonlinear definition of the shadowy mode in higher-order scalar-tensor theories,JCAP12(2021) 020 [2110.03194]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Chern and J

    S.-S. Chern and J. Simons,Characteristic forms and geometric invariants,Annals Math.99(1974) 48. 18

    1974

  16. [16]

    Deser, R

    S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton,Topologically Massive Gauge Theories,Annals Phys.140(1982) 372

    1982

  17. [17]

    Jackiw and S.Y

    R. Jackiw and S.Y. Pi,Chern-Simons modification of general relativity,Phys. Rev.D68(2003) 104012 [gr-qc/0308071]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  18. [18]

    Alexander and N

    S. Alexander and N. Yunes,Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity,Phys. Rept.480(2009) 1 [0907.2562]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    Crisostomi, K

    M. Crisostomi, K. Noui, C. Charmousis and D. Langlois,Beyond Lovelock gravity: Higher derivative metric theories,Phys. Rev.D97(2018) 044034 [1710.04531]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Horava,Membranes at Quantum Criticality,JHEP0903(2009) 020 [0812.4287]

    P. Horava,Membranes at Quantum Criticality,JHEP0903(2009) 020 [0812.4287]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  21. [21]

    Horava,Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point,Phys.Rev.D79(2009) 084008 [0901.3775]

    P. Horava,Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point,Phys.Rev.D79(2009) 084008 [0901.3775]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  22. [22]

    Takahashi and J

    T. Takahashi and J. Soda,Chiral Primordial Gravitational Waves from a Lifshitz Point,Phys.Rev.Lett.102(2009) 231301 [0904.0554]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  23. [23]

    Pereira-Dias, C.A

    B. Pereira-Dias, C.A. Hernaski and J.A. Helayel-Neto,Considerations on the Graviton Excitation Modes of Horava-Lifshitz Gravity,JHEP03(2012) 013 [1111.5345]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  24. [24]

    A. Wang, Q. Wu, W. Zhao and T. Zhu,Polarizing primordial gravitational waves by parity violation,Phys. Rev.D87 (2013) 103512 [1208.5490]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  25. [25]

    C. Gong, T. Zhu, R. Niu, Q. Wu, J.-L. Cui, X. Zhang et al.,Gravitational wave constraints on Lorentz and parity violations in gravity: High-order spatial derivative cases,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 044034 [2112.06446]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    M. Li, H. Rao and D. Zhao,A simple parity violating gravity model without ghost instability,JCAP11(2020) 023 [2007.08038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    M. Li, H. Rao and Y. Tong,Revisiting a parity violating gravity model without ghost instability: Local Lorentz covariance, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 084077 [2104.05917]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    R.-G. Cai, C. Fu and W.-W. Yu,Parity violation in stochastic gravitational wave background from inflation in Nieh-Yan modified teleparallel gravity,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 103520 [2112.04794]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Li and D

    M. Li and D. Zhao,A simple parity violating model in the symmetric teleparallel gravity and its cosmological perturbations, Phys. Lett. B827(2022) 136968 [2108.01337]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    M. Li, Y. Tong and D. Zhao,Possible consistent model of parity violations in the symmetric teleparallel gravity,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 104002 [2203.06912]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Z. Chen, Y. Yu and X. Gao,Polarized gravitational waves in the parity violating scalar-nonmetricity theory,JCAP06 (2023) 001 [2212.14362]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Conroy and T

    A. Conroy and T. Koivisto,Parity-Violating Gravity and GW170817 in Non-Riemannian Cosmology,JCAP12(2019) 016 [1908.04313]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Z. Yu, Z. Yang and T. Qiu,Parity violation in framework of nonmetricity gravity,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.69 (2026) 240416 [2508.10532]

    arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Iosifidis and L

    D. Iosifidis and L. Ravera,Parity Violating Metric-Affine Gravity Theories,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 115003 [2009.03328]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Sulantay, M

    F. Sulantay, M. Lagos and M. Bañados,Chiral gravitational waves in Palatini-Chern-Simons gravity,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 104025 [2211.08925]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Iosifidis,The full quadratic metric-affine gravity (including parity odd terms): exact solutions for the affine-connection, Class

    D. Iosifidis,The full quadratic metric-affine gravity (including parity odd terms): exact solutions for the affine-connection, Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022) 095002 [2112.09154]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Nieh and M.L

    H.T. Nieh and M.L. Yan,An Identity in Riemann-cartan Geometry,J. Math. Phys.23(1982) 373

    1982

  38. [38]

    Chatzistavrakidis, G

    A. Chatzistavrakidis, G. Karagiannis and P. Schupp,Torsion-induced gravitationalθterm and gravitoelectromagnetism, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1034 [2007.06632]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    M. Li, Z. Li and H. Rao,Ghost instability in the teleparallel gravity model with parity violations,Phys. Lett. B834(2022) 137395 [2201.02357]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Hohmann and C

    M. Hohmann and C. Pfeifer,Gravitational wave birefringence in spatially curved teleparallel cosmology,2203.01856

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Rao and D

    H. Rao and D. Zhao,Parity violating scalar-tensor model in teleparallel gravity and its cosmological application,JHEP08 (2023) 070 [2304.07138]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration,Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 061102 [1602.03837]. [37]LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration,GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 161101 [1710.05832]. [38]LISAcollaboration,Laser Interferome...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    Alexander and N

    S.H. Alexander and N. Yunes,Gravitational wave probes of parity violation in compact binary coalescences,Phys. Rev.D97 (2018) 064033 [1712.01853]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    W. Zhao, T. Zhu, J. Qiao and A. Wang,Waveform of gravitational waves in the general parity-violating gravities,Phys. Rev.D101(2020) 024002 [1909.10887]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Gao and X.-Y

    X. Gao and X.-Y. Hong,Propagation of gravitational waves in a cosmological background,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 064057 [1906.07131]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Jenks, L

    L. Jenks, L. Choi, M. Lagos and N. Yunes,Parametrized parity violation in gravitational wave propagation,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) 044023 [2305.10478]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Nishizawa and T

    A. Nishizawa and T. Kobayashi,Parity-violating gravity and GW170817,Phys. Rev.D98(2018) 124018 [1809.00815]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    Okounkova, W.M

    M. Okounkova, W.M. Farr, M. Isi and L.C. Stein,Constraining gravitational wave amplitude birefringence and Chern-Simons gravity with GWTC-2,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 044067 [2101.11153]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Callister, L

    T. Callister, L. Jenks, D. Holz and N. Yunes,A New Probe of Gravitational Parity Violation Through (Non-)Observation of the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background,2312.12532

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Zhang, T

    B.-Y. Zhang, T. Zhu, J.-M. Yan, J.-F. Zhang and X. Zhang,Constraining parity and Lorentz violations in gravity with 19 future ground- and space-based gravitational wave detectors,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 104012 [2502.04776]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Y.-F. Wang, R. Niu, T. Zhu and W. Zhao,Gravitational Wave Implications for the Parity Symmetry of Gravity in the High Energy Region,Astrophys. J.908(2021) 58 [2002.05668]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Wang, S.M

    Y.-F. Wang, S.M. Brown, L. Shao and W. Zhao,Tests of Gravitational-Wave Birefringence with the Open Gravitational-Wave Catalog,2109.09718

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    Q. Wu, T. Zhu, R. Niu, W. Zhao and A. Wang,Constraints on the Nieh-Yan modified teleparallel gravity with gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 024035 [2110.13870]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Califano, R

    M. Califano, R. D’Agostino and D. Vernieri,Parity violation in gravitational waves and observational bounds from third-generation detectors,2311.02161

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Seto,Measuring Parity Asymmetry of Gravitational Wave Backgrounds with a Heliocentric Detector Network in the mHz Band,Phys

    N. Seto,Measuring Parity Asymmetry of Gravitational Wave Backgrounds with a Heliocentric Detector Network in the mHz Band,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 251101 [2009.02928]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Satoh, S

    M. Satoh, S. Kanno and J. Soda,Circular Polarization of Primordial Gravitational Waves in String-inspired Inflationary Cosmology,Phys. Rev.D77(2008) 023526 [0706.3585]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  57. [57]

    Satoh,Slow-roll Inflation with the Gauss-Bonnet and Chern-Simons Corrections,JCAP11(2010) 024 [1008.2724]

    M. Satoh,Slow-roll Inflation with the Gauss-Bonnet and Chern-Simons Corrections,JCAP11(2010) 024 [1008.2724]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Creminelli, J

    P. Creminelli, J. Gleyzes, J. Noreña and F. Vernizzi,Resilience of the standard predictions for primordial tensor modes, Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 231301 [1407.8439]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    Cannone, J.-O

    D. Cannone, J.-O. Gong and G. Tasinato,Breaking discrete symmetries in the effective field theory of inflation,JCAP 1508(2015) 003 [1505.05773]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [60]

    Lue, L.-M

    A. Lue, L.-M. Wang and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmological signature of new parity violating interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 1506 [astro-ph/9812088]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  61. [61]

    Saito, K

    S. Saito, K. Ichiki and A. Taruya,Probing polarization states of primordial gravitational waves with CMB anisotropies, JCAP09(2007) 002 [0705.3701]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  62. [62]

    Contaldi, J

    C.R. Contaldi, J. Magueijo and L. Smolin,Anomalous CMB polarization and gravitational chirality,Phys. Rev. Lett.101 (2008) 141101 [0806.3082]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  63. [63]

    Gluscevic and M

    V. Gluscevic and M. Kamionkowski,Testing Parity-Violating Mechanisms with Cosmic Microwave Background Experiments,Phys. Rev.D81(2010) 123529 [1002.1308]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  64. [64]

    Sorbo,Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton,JCAP06(2011) 003 [1101.1525]

    L. Sorbo,Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton,JCAP06(2011) 003 [1101.1525]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  65. [65]

    Moretti, N

    T. Moretti, N. Bartolo and A. Greco,Breaking parity: the case of the trispectrum from chiral scalar-tensor theories of gravity,JCAP07(2025) 051 [2410.11801]

    arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    J. Qiao, T. Zhu, W. Zhao and A. Wang,Polarized primordial gravitational waves in the ghost-free parity-violating gravity, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 043528 [1911.01580]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    T.-C. Li, T. Zhu, W. Zhao and A. Wang,Power spectra and circular polarization of primordial gravitational waves with parity and Lorentz violations,JCAP07(2024) 005 [2403.05841]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Minami and E

    Y. Minami and E. Komatsu,New Extraction of the Cosmic Birefringence from the Planck 2018 Polarization Data,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 221301 [2011.11254]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    Eskilt and E

    J.R. Eskilt and E. Komatsu,Improved constraints on cosmic birefringence from the WMAP and Planck cosmic microwave background polarization data,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 063503 [2205.13962]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    Komatsu,New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background,Nature Rev

    E. Komatsu,New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background,Nature Rev. Phys.4(2022) 452 [2202.13919]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    T. Zhu, W. Zhao and A. Wang,Polarized primordial gravitational waves in spatial covariant gravities,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 024031 [2210.05259]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    T. Zhu, W. Zhao and A. Wang,Gravitational wave constraints on spatial covariant gravities,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 044051 [2211.04711]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    T. Zhu, W. Zhao, J.-M. Yan, Y.-Z. Wang, C. Gong and A. Wang,Constraints on parity and Lorentz violations in gravity from GWTC-3 through a parametrization of modified gravitational wave propagations,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 064044 [2304.09025]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Zhang, J.-X

    F. Zhang, J.-X. Feng and X. Gao,Circularly polarized scalar induced gravitational waves from the Chern-Simons modified gravity,JCAP10(2022) 054 [2205.12045]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    J.-X. Feng, F. Zhang and X. Gao,Scalar induced gravitational waves from Chern-Simons gravity during inflation era, JCAP07(2023) 047 [2302.00950]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    Zhang, J.-X

    F. Zhang, J.-X. Feng and X. Gao,Scalar induced gravitational waves in symmetric teleparallel gravity with a parity-violating term,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 063513 [2307.00330]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    Zhang, J.-X

    F. Zhang, J.-X. Feng and X. Gao,Scalar induced gravitational waves in metric teleparallel gravity with the Nieh-Yan term, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 023537 [2404.02922]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    J.-X. Feng, F. Zhang and X. Gao,Scalar induced gravitational waves in chiral scalar–tensor theory of gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 736 [2404.05289]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Feng, J.-Y

    J.-X. Feng, J.-Y. Fang and X. Gao,Circularly polarized gravitational waves from parity-violating scalar-tensor theory, 2602.07430

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    Gao,Unifying framework for scalar-tensor theories of gravity,Phys.Rev.D90(2014) 081501 [1406.0822]

    X. Gao,Unifying framework for scalar-tensor theories of gravity,Phys.Rev.D90(2014) 081501 [1406.0822]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

Showing first 80 references.