Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

PolygloToxicityPrompts: Multilingual Evaluation of Neural Toxic Degeneration in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.09373 v3 pith:7MDB46VN submitted 2024-05-15 cs.CL

PolygloToxicityPrompts: Multilingual Evaluation of Neural Toxic Degeneration in Large Language Models

classification cs.CL
keywords toxicitylanguagelanguagesllmsmultilingualpreference-tuningevaluationimpact
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to their extensive global deployment, and ensuring their safety calls for comprehensive and multilingual toxicity evaluations. However, existing toxicity benchmarks are overwhelmingly focused on English, posing serious risks to deploying LLMs in other languages. We address this by introducing PolygloToxicityPrompts (PTP), the first large-scale multilingual toxicity evaluation benchmark of 425K naturally occurring prompts spanning 17 languages. We overcome the scarcity of naturally occurring toxicity in web-text and ensure coverage across languages with varying resources by automatically scraping over 100M web-text documents. Using PTP, we investigate research questions to study the impact of model size, prompt language, and instruction and preference-tuning methods on toxicity by benchmarking over 60 LLMs. Notably, we find that toxicity increases as language resources decrease or model size increases. Although instruction- and preference-tuning reduce toxicity, the choice of preference-tuning method does not have any significant impact. Our findings shed light on crucial shortcomings of LLM safeguarding and highlight areas for future research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Where Does Toxicity Live? Mechanistic Localization and Targeted Suppression in Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Toxicity in language models is disproportionately encoded in early MLP layers and can be localized via activation differentials then suppressed at inference time without gradient descent.

  2. Opir: Efficient Multi-Task Safety Classification for Toxicity, Jailbreaks, Hate Speech, and Harmful Content

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Opir introduces efficient multi-task encoder models trained on a 996-category safety taxonomy that match or exceed larger baselines on most safety benchmarks while using under 100M parameters for edge variants.

  3. Measuring and Mitigating Toxicity in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Replication Study

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    DExperts blocks explicit toxicity at 100% but drops to 98.5% on implicit hate speech while increasing generation latency by roughly 10x.

  4. Measuring and Mitigating Toxicity in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Replication Study

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 2.0

    DExperts reaches 100% safety on explicit toxicity benchmarks but only 98.5% on implicit hate speech from ToxiGen while imposing a 10x latency increase on GPT-2.