Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

A unified study of the \(B_c\) meson: from spectrum and form factors to weak and radiative decays

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spectroscopic wave functions fix the couplings for B_c weak decays and radiative transitions.

desk verdict The paper updates masses in an old potential-model plus sum-rule setup for B_c and extends the channels, but shortcuts the sum-rule rederivation by refitting normalization only. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.31208 v1 pith:7NLO2EWE submitted 2026-05-29 hep-ph

Vikas Patel , Chetan Lodha , Raghav Chaturvedi , A. K. Rai This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords B_cmesonscreenedpotentialmodelQCDsumrulesweakdecaysradiativeReggetrajectoriesdecayconstants
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper computes the B_c mass spectrum and wave functions inside a screened potential model that incorporates relativistic kinetic corrections and spin-dependent terms. These wave functions supply the inputs for a three-point QCD sum-rule calculation of weak transitions to S-, P-, and D-wave charmonium states and to final states containing charmonium plus D mesons, after the heavy-quark masses are updated to m_c = 1.48 GeV and m_b = 4.90 GeV. The same spectroscopic quantities also determine the decay constants, purely leptonic widths, and E1/M1 radiative rates. Regge trajectories extracted from the spectrum serve as an independent global check on the underlying dynamics. A reader cares because the approach links the bound-state structure to multiple observable decay channels through a single set of wave functions.

What carries the argument

Screened potential model wave functions that supply inputs to mass-updated three-point QCD sum rules for decay calculations.

What would settle it

A measured branching fraction for B_c decay to a specific P-wave charmonium state that lies well outside the range predicted from the updated masses and wave functions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The spectroscopic wave functions determine the short-distance couplings that enter both weak and electromagnetic observables, while the Regge analysis serves as a complementary global consistency test of the same dynamical picture.

Load-bearing premise

Updating the heavy-quark masses and refitting only the overall normalization is enough to update the QCD sum-rule results without recomputing all perturbative and condensate contributions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Weak decay widths to S-, P-, and D-wave charmonium states follow directly from the same wave functions used for the mass spectrum.
  • Radiative E1 and M1 transition rates are fixed by the spectroscopic parameters without additional model inputs.
  • Leptonic decay widths are determined consistently with the computed decay constants.
  • Regge trajectories of the computed spectrum provide an independent test of the overall dynamical picture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same wave-function inputs could be reused for other doubly-heavy mesons by repeating only the mass update step.
  • Future precision measurements of B_c branching fractions would directly test whether the controlled refit captures the dominant mass dependence.
  • If the approach holds, sum-rule normalizations for heavy-meson transitions may be more stable under modest mass shifts than a full rederivation would suggest.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to provide a unified description of the B_c meson by computing its mass spectrum and decay constants in a screened potential model with relativistic and spin-dependent corrections, then feeding these into a three-point QCD sum-rule analysis (with updated heavy-quark masses m_c=1.48 GeV, m_b=4.90 GeV and a controlled refit of overall normalization while retaining prior thresholds, Borel windows, and Lorentz structures) to obtain form factors and widths for weak decays to S-, P-, D-wave charmonia and D^{(*)}(s) states, supplemented by leptonic widths, E1/M1 radiative transitions, and a Regge-trajectory consistency check.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies a coherent dynamical picture in which spectroscopic wave functions fix the short-distance couplings entering both weak and electromagnetic observables, with the Regge analysis providing an independent global test. The unified scope across spectrum, form factors, and multiple decay channels is a strength, as is the explicit retention of the underlying sum-rule structures for reproducibility.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and the three-point QCD sum-rule framework section): the claim that spectroscopic inputs determine the short-distance couplings for weak decays rests on form factors obtained by updating only m_c and m_b and refitting the overall normalization while keeping all prior hadronic thresholds, Borel windows, and Lorentz decompositions. Because the perturbative spectral densities in three-point sum rules depend explicitly on the heavy-quark masses (and condensates enter with mass-dependent coefficients), this shortcut is load-bearing for the accuracy of the predicted weak widths and requires explicit justification or a full rederivation of the spectral densities.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that the Regge analysis serves as a 'complementary global consistency test'; a brief quantitative statement of how well the computed spectrum aligns with linear Regge trajectories (e.g., slope values or χ^{2}) would strengthen this claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and positive assessment of the unified approach in our manuscript. We provide a point-by-point response to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and the three-point QCD sum-rule framework section): the claim that spectroscopic inputs determine the short-distance couplings for weak decays rests on form factors obtained by updating only m_c and m_b and refitting the overall normalization while keeping all prior hadronic thresholds, Borel windows, and Lorentz decompositions. Because the perturbative spectral densities in three-point sum rules depend explicitly on the heavy-quark masses (and condensates enter with mass-dependent coefficients), this shortcut is load-bearing for the accuracy of the predicted weak widths and requires explicit justification or a full rederivation of the spectral densities.

    Authors: We agree that the perturbative spectral densities in three-point sum rules depend on the heavy quark masses, and that a full rederivation would be the most rigorous approach. However, in our work, the spectroscopic inputs from the screened potential model are used to fix the B_c masses and decay constants, which serve as inputs to the sum rules. The update of m_c and m_b is done to be consistent with the model, and the refit of the normalization is performed to account for the changes in the spectral densities and condensate contributions. To address the referee's concern, we will include in the revised manuscript an additional subsection or paragraph in the QCD sum-rule framework section that provides explicit justification for this procedure. Specifically, we will discuss the mass dependence of the leading perturbative terms and show that the refit captures the dominant effects, supported by numerical checks on the stability of the results. This constitutes a partial revision as we add the requested justification without performing a complete rederivation of all terms. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Normalization refit after mass update in three-point QCD sum-rules makes form factors partly fitted by construction

  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "the hadronic thresholds, Borel-window prescriptions, Lorentz decompositions, and decay-width expressions of the underlying sum-rule formulations are retained, while the heavy-quark masses are updated to m_c=1.48 GeV and m_b=4.90 GeV, leading to a controlled refit of the overall normalization rather than a full rederivation of all perturbative and condensate contributions"

    The refit of overall normalization after the mass update means the form factors (short-distance couplings) entering the weak-decay predictions are scaled to match data or prior results inside the same sum-rule setup. Because the perturbative spectral densities depend explicitly on the heavy-quark masses, this shortcut forces the outputs to be consistent with the fit rather than providing an independent derivation from the spectroscopic wave functions.

full rationale

The paper's unified claim rests on spectroscopic wave functions feeding into short-distance couplings via three-point sum-rules for weak decays. However, the abstract explicitly states that only masses are updated while retaining prior thresholds/Borel windows and performing a controlled refit of overall normalization instead of rederiving perturbative densities and condensates. This directly matches the fitted_input_called_prediction pattern: the refit adjusts the output to data within the framework, so subsequent decay-width predictions are statistically forced rather than independently derived from the potential-model inputs. No other patterns (self-definitional, self-citation load-bearing, etc.) are exhibited in the provided text. The central derivation therefore contains partial circularity but retains independent content from the spectrum calculation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a screened potential model whose parameters are not specified in the abstract, on the validity of QCD sum rules with only a normalization refit, and on the assumption that wave functions from one model directly control couplings in another.

free parameters (3)
  • m_c = 1.48 GeV
    Updated charm quark mass set to 1.48 GeV for the sum-rule analysis.
  • m_b = 4.90 GeV
    Updated bottom quark mass set to 4.90 GeV for the sum-rule analysis.
  • overall normalization
    Refitted in the QCD sum-rule expressions rather than recomputed from perturbative and condensate terms.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The screened potential model with relativistic kinetic-energy corrections and spin-dependent interactions accurately reproduces the B_c spectrum and wave functions.
    Invoked to obtain masses, decay constants, and inputs for subsequent calculations.
  • domain assumption Retaining the hadronic thresholds, Borel-window prescriptions, and Lorentz decompositions of prior sum-rule formulations remains valid after the mass update.
    Explicitly stated as the basis for the weak-decay analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A unified study of the \(B_c\) meson: from spectrum and form factors to weak and radiative decays." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7NLO2EWE

@misc{pith2026260531208,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A unified study of the \(B_c\) meson: from spectrum and form factors to weak and radiative decays},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7NLO2EWE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.31208}
}
abstract

The $B_c$ meson constitutes a unique system for investigating heavy-hadron dynamics, since it exhibits quarkonium-like bound-state structure while decaying predominantly through weak interactions. In this work, we present a unified study of $B_c$-meson spectroscopy, decay constants, weak decays, radiative transitions, and Regge trajectories within a single framework. The mass spectrum is computed in a screened potential model including relativistic kinetic-energy corrections and spin-dependent interactions, from which we obtain both spin-averaged and spin-resolved states together with the corresponding pseudoscalar and vector decay constants. Using these spectroscopic inputs, we then analyze weak decays within a mass-updated three-point QCD sum-rule framework for transitions to $S$-, $P$-, and $D$-wave charmonium states, as well as to final states containing charmonium and $D^{(*)}_{(s)}$ mesons. In this part of the analysis, the hadronic thresholds, Borel-window prescriptions, Lorentz decompositions, and decay-width expressions of the underlying sum-rule formulations are retained, while the heavy-quark masses are updated to $m_c=1.48~\mathrm{GeV}$ and $m_b=4.90~\mathrm{GeV}$, leading to a controlled refit of the overall normalization rather than a full rederivation of all perturbative and condensate contributions. We further investigate purely leptonic decay widths and radiative $E1$ and $M1$ transitions, and examine the Regge behavior of the resulting spectrum. The present study therefore provides a coherent description of the $B_c$ meson in which the spectroscopic wave functions determine the short-distance couplings that enter both weak and electromagnetic observables, while the Regge analysis serves as a complementary global consistency test of the same dynamical picture.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.31208 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Decay-width distributions in the S-wave sector for the bare and Coulomb-corrected variants. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Bare and Coulomb-corrected form factors f+(q 2 ) and f0 (q 2 ) for Bc → ηc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Bare and Coulomb-corrected form factors V (q 2 ), A0 (q 2 ), A1 (q 2 ), and A2 (q 2 ) for Bc → J/ψ. The P-wave sector, summarized in Tables 11–16 and Figs. 4–7, is more differentiated among final states and therefore probes the internal spin structure of the framework more stringently. A central result is the persistent dominance of the hc channels. Both semileptonic and nonleptonic modes involving hc are generally … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Decay-width distributions in the P-wave sector for the bare and Coulomb-corrected variants [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Bare and Coulomb-corrected form factors F0 (q 2 ) and F1 (q 2 ) for Bc → χc0 . 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Bare and Coulomb-corrected form factors A(q 2 ), V0 (q 2 ), V1 (q 2 ), and V2 (q 2 ) for Bc → χc1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Bare and Coulomb-corrected form factors A(q 2 ), V0 (q 2 ), V1 (q 2 ), and V2 (q 2 ) for Bc → hc . The D-wave sector, shown in Tables 17 and 18 together with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Decay-width distributions in the D-wave sector for the bare and Coulomb-corrected variants. Taken together, the weak-decay analysis gives a coherent picture across all orbital sectors, but the quality of external validation is not uniform. The corrected S-wave sector c…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Regge trajectories of the Bc meson in the (J, M2 ) plane: natural-parity states (left) and unnatural-parity states (right). Open symbols denote the model predictions and filled symbols denote experimentally observed states included in the construction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Regge trajectories of the Bc meson in the (nr , M2 ) plane. The left panel shows trajectories for representative pseudoscalar, vector, and orbitally excited states, while the right panel displays the spin-averaged S-, P-, D-, and F-wave trajectories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Unified Study of Hidden-Charm and Hidden-Bottom Mesons

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A common screened-potential and QCD sum-rule framework yields consistent spectra, E1/M1 widths, Regge slopes, decay constants and finite-spectrum thermal indicators for c¯c and b¯b mesons.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Masses of new particles containingb quarks,

    W.-K. Kwong and J. L. Rosner, “Masses of new particles containingb quarks,” Phys. Rev. D44, 212 (1991)

    1991

  2. [2]

    Mesons with beauty and charm: Spectroscopy,

    E. J. Eichten and C. Quigg, “Mesons with beauty and charm: Spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. D49, 5845 (1994)

    1994

  3. [3]

    Bc spectroscopy,

    S. S. Gershtein, V. V. Kiselev, A. K. Likhoded and A. V. Tkabladze, “Bc spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. D51, 3613 (1995)

    1995

  4. [4]

    Bc spectroscopy in a quantum chromodynamic potential model,

    S. N. Gupta and J. M. Johnson, “Bc spectroscopy in a quantum chromodynamic potential model,” Phys. Rev. D53, 312 (1996)

    1996

  5. [5]

    TheBc mass up to orderα4 s,

    N. Brambilla and A. Vairo, “TheBc mass up to orderα4 s,” Phys. Rev. D62, 094019 (2000)

    2000

  6. [6]

    Spectroscopy ofBc mesons in the relativized quark model,

    S. Godfrey, “Spectroscopy ofBc mesons in the relativized quark model,” Phys. Rev. D70, 054017 (2004). 38

    2004

  7. [7]

    Spectroscopy and Regge trajectories of heavy quarkonia andBc mesons,

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, “Spectroscopy and Regge trajectories of heavy quarkonia andBc mesons,” Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1825 (2011)

    2011

  8. [8]

    Excited bottom-charmed mesons in a nonrelativistic quark model,

    Q. Li, M.-S. Liu, L.-S. Lu, Q.-F. Lü, L.-C. Gui and X.-H. Zhong, “Excited bottom-charmed mesons in a nonrelativistic quark model,” Phys. Rev. D99, 096020 (2019)

    2019

Show all 115 references
  1. [9]

    Unravelling theoretical challenges in understanding Bc mesons,

    S. Patnaik, S. Tripathy and A. K. Rai, “Unravelling theoretical challenges in understanding Bc mesons,” arXiv:2411.11413 [hep-ph]

  2. [10]

    The production ofBc or ¯Bc meson associated with two heavy-quark jets inZ0 boson decay,

    C.-H. Chang and Y.-Q. Chen, “The production ofBc or ¯Bc meson associated with two heavy-quark jets inZ0 boson decay,” Phys. Rev. D46, 3845 (1992)

    1992

  3. [11]

    The decays ofBc meson,

    C.-H. Chang and Y.-Q. Chen, “The decays ofBc meson,” Phys. Rev. D49, 3399 (1994)

    1994

  4. [12]

    Physics ofBc mesons,

    S. S. Gershtein, V. V. Kiselev, A. K. Likhoded and A. V. Tkabladze, “Physics ofBc mesons,” Phys. Usp.38, 1 (1995)

    1995

  5. [13]

    Bc decays and lifetime in QCD sum rules,

    V. V. Kiselev, A. E. Kovalsky and A. K. Likhoded, “Bc decays and lifetime in QCD sum rules,” Nucl. Phys. B585, 353 (2000)

    2000

  6. [14]

    Properties of heavy quarkonia andBc mesons in the relativistic quark model,

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, “Properties of heavy quarkonia andBc mesons in the relativistic quark model,” Phys. Rev. D67, 014027 (2003)

    2003

  7. [15]

    Semileptonic and nonleptonicBc decays,

    A. Abd El-Hady, J. H. Munoz and J. P. Vary, “Semileptonic and nonleptonicBc decays,” Phys. Rev. D62, 014019 (2000)

    2000

  8. [16]

    Exclusive semileptonic and nonleptonic decays of theBc meson,

    M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Korner and P. Santorelli, “Exclusive semileptonic and nonleptonic decays of theBc meson,” Phys. Rev. D73, 054024 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    Bc mesons and their properties on the light front,

    S. Tang, Y. Li, P. Maris and J. P. Vary, “Bc mesons and their properties on the light front,” Phys. Rev. D98, 114038 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Bc→J/ψform factors for the fullq2 range from lattice QCD,

    J. Harrison, C. T. H. Davies and A. Lytle [HPQCD Collaboration], “Bc→J/ψform factors for the fullq2 range from lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D102, 094518 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Relations among Bc→J/ψ,ηc form factors,

    P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, F. Loparco, N. Losacco and M. N. Brunet, “Relations among Bc→J/ψ,ηc form factors,” JHEP09, 028 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Spectroscopy ofBc mesons and the possibility of finding exoticBc-like structures,

    P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem and F. Fernandez, “Spectroscopy ofBc mesons and the possibility of finding exoticBc-like structures,” Eur. Phys. J. C80, 223 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Spectroscopic survey of higher-lying states of theB c meson family,

    X.-J. Li, Y.-S. Li, F.-L. Wang and X. Liu, “Spectroscopic survey of higher-lying states of theB c meson family,” Eur. Phys. J. C83, 1148 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Kaon and strangeonium spectrum in Regge phenomenology,

    J. Oudichhya, K. Gandhi and A. K. Rai, “Kaon and strangeonium spectrum in Regge phenomenology,” Phys. Rev. D108, 014034 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Spectroscopic study of D-meson in Regge phenomenology,

    J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, “Spectroscopic study of D-meson in Regge phenomenology,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39, 2443004 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Spectroscopic study of charm-strange meson in Regge phenomenology,

    J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, “Spectroscopic study of charm-strange meson in Regge phenomenology,” PoS(HQL2023)090 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Strangeonium spectra in Regge phenomenology,

    J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, “Strangeonium spectra in Regge phenomenology,” DAE Symp. Nucl. Phys.68, 897–898 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Kaon Spectroscopy within Regge Phenomenology,

    J. Oudichhya, R. Tiwari, V. Patel and A. K. Rai, “Kaon Spectroscopy within Regge Phenomenology,” DAE Symp. Nucl. Phys.69, 851–852 (2026). 39

    2026

  19. [27]

    Spectroscopic Exploration of Charmed-Strange Meson Using Regge Phenomenology,

    J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, “Spectroscopic Exploration of Charmed-Strange Meson Using Regge Phenomenology,” inProceedings of the XXVI DAE-BRNS High Energy Physics (HEP) Symposium 2024, 19–23 December, Varanasi, India, Springer Proc. Phys.432, 896–899 (2026)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Spectroscopic properties ofD-meson using screened potential,

    V. Patel, R. Chaturvedi and A. K. Rai, “Spectroscopic properties ofD-meson using screened potential,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus136, no.1, 42 (2021), doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-01039-7

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    Interpreting charm-strange mesons with a screened potential model,

    V. Patel, K. Gandhi and A. K. Rai, “Interpreting charm-strange mesons with a screened potential model,” Few Body Syst.62, no.3, 68 (2021), doi:10.1007/s00601-021-01651-y

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    Spectroscopic properties ofB and Bs meson using screened potential,

    V. Patel, R. Chaturvedi and A. K. Rai, “Spectroscopic properties ofB and Bs meson using screened potential,” Indian J. Phys.98, no.8, 2961–2979 (2024), doi:10.1007/s12648- 023-03048-5, arXiv:2201.01120 [hep-ph]

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    Exploring strangeonium meson and all strange tetraquark candidates through mass spectra and decay properties,

    C. Lodha and A. K. Rai, “Exploring strangeonium meson and all strange tetraquark candidates through mass spectra and decay properties,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus139, 663 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Exploring charm bound states: Mass spectra and decay dynamics of D mesons andcq¯q¯qtetraquarks,

    C. Lodha, M. G. Parmar and A. K. Rai, “Exploring charm bound states: Mass spectra and decay dynamics of D mesons andcq¯q¯qtetraquarks,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A40, 2550125 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Probing Kaons as Light-Strange Tetraquarks through Spectral and Decay Dynamics,

    C. Lodha and A. K. Rai, “Probing Kaons as Light-Strange Tetraquarks through Spectral and Decay Dynamics,” arXiv:2505.01195 [hep-ph]

  26. [34]

    Investigation of Mass and Decay Characteristics of the All-light Tetraquark,

    C. Lodha and A. K. Rai, “Investigation of Mass and Decay Characteristics of the All-light Tetraquark,” Few-Body Syst.65, 99 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Investigation of mass and decay characteristics of the light-strange tetraquark,

    C. Lodha and A. K. Rai, “Investigation of mass and decay characteristics of the light-strange tetraquark,” Indian J. Phys.99, 3055–3081 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Spectroscopy ofcc¯c¯cand ss¯c¯ctetraquarks within the framework of Regge phenomenology,

    V. Patel, J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, “Spectroscopy ofcc¯c¯cand ss¯c¯ctetraquarks within the framework of Regge phenomenology,” Few Body Syst.66, no.4, 39 (2025), doi:10.1007/s00601-025-02011-w, arXiv:2511.02279 [hep-ph]

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    Spectroscopic study ofss¯b¯b and bb¯b¯b tetraquarks using Regge phenomenology,

    V. Patel, J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, “Spectroscopic study ofss¯b¯b and bb¯b¯b tetraquarks using Regge phenomenology,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A40, no.31, 2550152 (2025), doi:10.1142/S0217751X25501520, arXiv:2509.23149 [hep-ph]

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    Mass spectra ofqq¯q¯q,ss¯s¯sandqq¯s¯stetraquarks us- ing Regge phenomenology,

    V. Patel, J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, “Mass spectra ofqq¯q¯q,ss¯s¯sandqq¯s¯stetraquarks us- ing Regge phenomenology,” Eur. Phys. J. A61, no.9, 218 (2025), doi:10.1140/epja/s10050- 025-01701-7, arXiv:2510.04496 [hep-ph]

    2025 doi

  31. [39]

    Exploring beauty bound states: mass spectra and decay dynamics ofB mesons andbq¯q¯qtetraquarks,

    C. Lodha, M. Parmar and A. K. Rai, “Exploring beauty bound states: mass spectra and decay dynamics ofB mesons andbq¯q¯qtetraquarks,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus141, no.4, 453 (2026), doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-026-07724-3

    2026 doi

  32. [40]

    Observation of the Bc meson in p¯pcollisions at√s= 1.8TeV,

    F. Abeet al.[CDF Collaboration], “Observation of the Bc meson in p¯pcollisions at√s= 1.8TeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 2432 (1998)

    1998

  33. [41]

    Observation ofBc mesons inp¯pcollisions at√s = 1.8 TeV,

    F. Abeet al.[CDF Collaboration], “Observation ofBc mesons inp¯pcollisions at√s = 1.8 TeV,” Phys. Rev. D58, 112004 (1998)

    1998

  34. [42]

    Measurement of theB+ c meson lifetime using B+ c →J/ψe+νe,

    A. Abulenciaet al.[CDF Collaboration], “Measurement of theB+ c meson lifetime using B+ c →J/ψe+νe,” arXiv:hep-ex/0603027. 40

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Measurement of the lifetime of theBc meson in the semileptonic decay channel,

    V. M. Abazovet al.[D0 Collaboration], “Measurement of the lifetime of theBc meson in the semileptonic decay channel,” arXiv:0805.2614 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Measurements ofB+ c production and mass with the B+ c →J/ψπ+ decay,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], “Measurements ofB+ c production and mass with the B+ c →J/ψπ+ decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 232001 (2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    Measurement of the B+ c meson lifetime using B+ c →J/ψµ+νµX,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], “Measurement of the B+ c meson lifetime using B+ c →J/ψµ+νµX,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 182003 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    Precision measurement of theB+ c meson mass,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], “Precision measurement of theB+ c meson mass,” JHEP07, 123 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    Observation of an excitedB± c meson state with the ATLAS detector,

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS Collaboration], “Observation of an excitedB± c meson state with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 212004 (2014)

    2014

  40. [48]

    Observation of two excitedB+ c states and measurement of theB+ c (2S)mass in pp collisions at√s = 13TeV,

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.[CMS Collaboration], “Observation of two excitedB+ c states and measurement of theB+ c (2S)mass in pp collisions at√s = 13TeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 132001 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Observation of an excitedB+ c state,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], “Observation of an excitedB+ c state,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 232001 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], “Review of Particle Physics,” Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Bc meson weak decays and CP violation,

    J.-F. Liu and K.-T. Chao, “Bc meson weak decays and CP violation,” Phys. Rev. D56, 4133 (1997)

    1997

  44. [52]

    Radiative leptonicBc decays,

    P. Colangelo and F. De Fazio, “Radiative leptonicBc decays,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A14, 2303 (1999)

    1999

  45. [53]

    Using heavy quark spin symmetry in semileptonicBc decays,

    P. Colangelo and F. De Fazio, “Using heavy quark spin symmetry in semileptonicBc decays,” Phys. Rev. D61, 034012 (2000)

    2000

  46. [54]

    The semileptonic decays of theBc meson,

    M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Korner and P. Santorelli, “The semileptonic decays of theBc meson,” arXiv:hep-ph/0007169

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Bc→(J/ψ,ηc)τνsemileptonic decays within the Standard Model and beyond,

    R. Dutta and A. Bhol, “Bc→(J/ψ,ηc)τνsemileptonic decays within the Standard Model and beyond,” Phys. Rev. D96, 076001 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    R(J/ψ)and B− c → J/ψℓ−¯νℓlepton-flavor-universality violating observables from lattice QCD,

    J. Harrison, C. T. H. Davies and A. Lytle [HPQCD Collaboration], “R(J/ψ)and B− c → J/ψℓ−¯νℓlepton-flavor-universality violating observables from lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 222003 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    Properties ofBc meson,

    A. K. Rai and P. C. Vinodkumar, “Properties ofBc meson,” Pramana66, 953 (2006)

    2006

  50. [58]

    Bc mesons in a Bethe–Salpeter model,

    A. Abd El-Hady, M. A. K. Lodhi and J. P. Vary, “Bc mesons in a Bethe–Salpeter model,” Phys. Rev. D59, 094001 (1999)

    1999

  51. [59]

    Weak decays of theBc meson to charmonium andDmesons in the relativistic quark model,

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, “Weak decays of theBc meson to charmonium andDmesons in the relativistic quark model,” Phys. Rev. D68, 094020 (2003)

    2003

  52. [60]

    Weak decays of theBc meson toBs and B mesons in the relativistic quark model,

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, “Weak decays of theBc meson toBs and B mesons in the relativistic quark model,” Eur. Phys. J. C32, 29 (2003)

    2003

  53. [61]

    Radiative decays ofBc mesons in a Bethe–Salpeter model,

    A. Abd El-Hady, J. R. Spence and J. P. Vary, “Radiative decays ofBc mesons in a Bethe–Salpeter model,” Phys. Rev. D71, 034006 (2005). 41

    2005

  54. [62]

    The decaysBc→J/ψ+ ¯ℓνℓand Bc→ ηc + ¯ℓνℓin the covariant confined quark model,

    A. Issadykov, M. A. Ivanov and S. Kovalenko, “The decaysBc→J/ψ+ ¯ℓνℓand Bc→ ηc + ¯ℓνℓin the covariant confined quark model,” Phys. Rev. D98, 014002 (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    SemileptonicBc→ηc,J/ψtransitions,

    Z.-Q. Yao, D. Binosi, Z.-F. Cui and C. D. Roberts, “SemileptonicBc→ηc,J/ψtransitions,” Phys. Lett. B818, 136344 (2021)

    2021

  56. [64]

    Bc spectroscopy from lattice QCD,

    C. T. H. Davies, K. Hornbostel, G. P. Lepage, A. Lidsey, J. Shigemitsu and J. H. Sloan, “Bc spectroscopy from lattice QCD,” Phys. Lett. B382, 131 (1996)

    1996

  57. [65]

    Mass of the Bc meson in three-flavor lattice QCD,

    I. F. Allisonet al.[HPQCD, Fermilab Lattice and UKQCD Collaborations], “Mass of the Bc meson in three-flavor lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 172001 (2005)

    2005

  58. [66]

    A prediction of theBc mass in full lattice QCD,

    E. B. Gregoryet al., “A prediction of theBc mass in full lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 022001 (2010)

    2010

  59. [67]

    PreciseB, Bs and Bc meson spectroscopy from full lattice QCD,

    R. J. Dowdallet al.[HPQCD Collaboration], “PreciseB, Bs and Bc meson spectroscopy from full lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D85, 054509 (2012)

    2012

  60. [68]

    B-meson decay constantsf Bc,f Bs andf B from QCD sum rules,

    M. J. Baker, J. Bordes, C. A. Dominguez, J. Peñarrocha and K. Schilcher, “B-meson decay constantsf Bc,f Bs andf B from QCD sum rules,” JHEP07, 032 (2014)

    2014

  61. [69]

    Three-loop QCD corrections to the decay constant of Bc,

    F. Feng, Y. Jia and W.-L. Sang, “Three-loop QCD corrections to the decay constant of Bc,” arXiv:2301.11446 [hep-ph]

  62. [70]

    Potential model calculations and predictions for heavy quarkonium,

    S. F. Radford and W. W. Repko, “Potential model calculations and predictions for heavy quarkonium,” Phys. Rev. D75, 074031 (2007)

    2007

  63. [71]

    Masses and electromagnetic transitions of theBc mesons,

    N. Devlani and A. K. Rai, “Masses and electromagnetic transitions of theBc mesons,” Eur. Phys. J. A50, 154 (2014)

    2014

  64. [72]

    cb spectrum and decay properties with coupled-channel effects,

    A. P. Monteiro, M. Bhat and K. B. V. Kumar, “cb spectrum and decay properties with coupled-channel effects,” Phys. Rev. D95, 054016 (2017)

    2017

  65. [73]

    Conventional and hybridBc mesons in an extended potential model,

    N. Akbar, F. Akram, B. Masud and M. A. Sultan, “Conventional and hybridBc mesons in an extended potential model,” Eur. Phys. J. A55, 82 (2019)

    2019

  66. [74]

    Unified spectroscopic study of bottom mesons and doubly bottom baryons using a relativistic flux-tube model,

    P. Jakhad and A. K. Rai, “Unified spectroscopic study of bottom mesons and doubly bottom baryons using a relativistic flux-tube model,” Phys. Rev. D112, 074011 (2025)

    2025

  67. [75]

    Relativistic flux-tube model predictions from charmed mesons to double-charmed baryons,

    P. Jakhad and A. K. Rai, “Relativistic flux-tube model predictions from charmed mesons to double-charmed baryons,” Phys. Rev. D113, 054046 (2026)

    2026

  68. [76]

    Quarkonium spectroscopy of the linear plus modified Yukawa potential,

    K. R. Purohit, P. Jakhad and A. K. Rai, “Quarkonium spectroscopy of the linear plus modified Yukawa potential,” Phys. Scr.97, 044002 (2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    Systematic analysis of the form factors ofBc→ηc, J/ψand corresponding weak decays,

    B. Wu, G.-L. Yu, J. Lu and Z.-G. Wang, “Systematic analysis of the form factors ofBc→ηc, J/ψand corresponding weak decays,” Phys. Lett. B859, 139118 (2024), arXiv:2406.08181 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Systematic analysis of the form factors ofBc to P-wave charmonia and corresponding weak decays,

    J. Lu, D.-Y. Chen, G.-L. Yu, Z.-G. Wang and B. Wu, “Systematic analysis of the form factors ofBc to P-wave charmonia and corresponding weak decays,” Phys. Rev. D111, 114037 (2025), arXiv:2501.15534 [hep-ph]

    2025

  71. [79]

    Analysis of the form factors of Bc→D(∗),D (∗) s and relevant nonleptonic decays,

    B. Wu, G.-L. Yu, Z.-G. Wang, Z. Zhou and J. Lu, “Analysis of the form factors of Bc→D(∗),D (∗) s and relevant nonleptonic decays,” Chin. Phys. C49, 103109 (2025), arXiv:2412.00515 [hep-ph]. 42

    2025 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Systematic analysis of the transition form fac- tors ofBc to D-wave charmonia and corresponding semileptonic decays,

    J. Lu, D.-Y. Chen, G.-L. Yu and Z.-G. Wang, “Systematic analysis of the transition form fac- tors ofBc to D-wave charmonia and corresponding semileptonic decays,” arXiv:2510.03757 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    Bottom-charmed meson spectrum from a QCD approach based on the Tamm-Dancoff approximation,

    L. M. Abreu, F. M. da Costa Júnior and A. G. Favero, “Bottom-charmed meson spectrum from a QCD approach based on the Tamm-Dancoff approximation,” Phys. Rev. D102, 034002 (2020)

    2020

  74. [82]

    Leptonic constant of pseudoscalarBc meson,

    V. V. Kiselev, “Leptonic constant of pseudoscalarBc meson,” arXiv:hep-ph/0211021

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Decay constants ofBc(nS)and B∗ c (nS),

    C. Sun, R.-H. Ni and M. Chen, “Decay constants ofBc(nS)and B∗ c (nS),” Chin. Phys. C 47, 023101 (2023)

    2023

  76. [84]

    Singularities and discontinuities of Feynman amplitudes,

    R. E. Cutkosky, “Singularities and discontinuities of Feynman amplitudes,” J. Math. Phys. 1, 429–433 (1960), doi:10.1063/1.1703676

    1960 doi

  77. [85]

    QCD sum rules, a modern perspective,

    P. Colangelo and A. Khodjamirian, “QCD sum rules, a modern perspective,” inAt the Frontier of Particle Physics: Handbook of QCD, ed. M. Shifman, World Scientific, Singapore, Vol. 3, pp. 1495–1576 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0010175

    2001 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Model-independent description ofB→πℓν decays and a determination of|Vub|,

    C. Bourrely, I. Caprini and L. Lellouch, “Model-independent description ofB→πℓν decays and a determination of|Vub|,” Phys. Rev. D79, 013008 (2009) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D82, 099902 (2010)], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.013008, arXiv:0807.2722 [hep-ph]

    2009 doi arXiv

  79. [87]

    Properties ofQ ¯Q (Q∈b,c)mesons in Coulomb plus power potential,

    B. Patel and P. C. Vinodkumar, “Properties ofQ ¯Q (Q∈b,c)mesons in Coulomb plus power potential,” J. Phys. G36, 035003 (2009)

    2009

  80. [88]

    Two-photon, two-gluon and radiative decays of heavy flavoured mesons,

    A. Parmar, B. Patel and P. C. Vinodkumar, “Two-photon, two-gluon and radiative decays of heavy flavoured mesons,” Nucl. Phys. A848, 299 (2010)

    2010

  81. [89]

    Properties of excited charmed-bottom mesons,

    I. Asghar, F. Akram, B. Masud and M. A. Sultan, “Properties of excited charmed-bottom mesons,” Phys. Rev. D100, 096002 (2019)

    2019

  82. [90]

    Toward the discovery of novelBc states: radiative and hadronic transitions,

    B. Martín-González, P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, F. Fernández and J. Segovia, “Toward the discovery of novelBc states: radiative and hadronic transitions,” Phys. Rev. D106, 054009 (2022)

    2022

  83. [91]

    B-meson decay constants: a more complete picture from full lattice QCD,

    B. Colquhounet al., “B-meson decay constants: a more complete picture from full lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D91, 114509 (2015)

    2015

  84. [92]

    SemileptonicBc decays from full lattice QCD,

    A. Lytle, B. Colquhoun, C. Davies, J. Koponen and C. McNeile, “SemileptonicBc decays from full lattice QCD,” PoSBEAUTY2016(2016) 069, doi:10.22323/1.273.0069, arXiv:1605.05645 [hep-lat]

    2016 doi arXiv

  85. [93]

    ImprovedlatticeQCDBc→J/ψvector, axial-vector, andtensorformfactors,

    J.Harrison, “ImprovedlatticeQCDBc→J/ψvector, axial-vector, andtensorformfactors,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 034503, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.112.034503, arXiv:2503.15090 [hep-lat]

    2025 doi

  86. [94]

    Semileptonic decaysBc→(ηc,J/ψ)l¯νl in the ‘PQCD + Lattice’ approach,

    X.-Q. Hu, S.-P. Jin and Z.-J. Xiao, “Semileptonic decaysBc→(ηc,J/ψ)l¯νl in the ‘PQCD + Lattice’ approach,” Chin. Phys. C44(2020) 023104, doi:10.1088/1674-1137/44/2/023104, arXiv:1904.07530 [hep-ph]

    2020 doi

  87. [95]

    Analyzing the semileptonic and nonleptonicBc→ J/ψ,ηc decays,

    A. Biswas, S. Nandi and S. Sahoo, “Analyzing the semileptonic and nonleptonicBc→ J/ψ,ηc decays,” JHEP01(2025) 198, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2025)198, arXiv:2311.00758 [hep-ph]. 43

    2025 doi

  88. [96]

    The decaysBc→J/ψ+ ¯ℓνℓand Bc→ J/ψ+π(K)in covariant confined quark model,

    A. Issadykov, M. A. Ivanov and G. Nurbakova, “The decaysBc→J/ψ+ ¯ℓνℓand Bc→ J/ψ+π(K)in covariant confined quark model,” Phys. Lett. B783(2018) 178–183, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.06.037, arXiv:1804.00472 [hep-ph]

    2018 doi arXiv

  89. [97]

    TheBc decays toP-wave charmonium by improved Bethe-Salpeter approach,

    Z.-H. Wang, G.-L. Wang and C.-H. Chang, “TheBc decays toP-wave charmonium by improved Bethe-Salpeter approach,” J. Phys. G39(2012) 015009, doi:10.1088/0954- 3899/39/1/015009, arXiv:1107.0474 [hep-ph]

    2012 doi arXiv

  90. [98]

    SemileptonicBc decaysto P-wavechar- monia in the light-cone QCDSR,

    T.Akan, E.Cincioglu, A.OzpineciandA.Tegmen, “SemileptonicBc decaysto P-wavechar- monia in the light-cone QCDSR,” Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 687, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 022-10665-7, arXiv:2203.07729 [hep-ph]

    2022 doi

  91. [99]

    Bc meson exclusive decays to aP-wave charmonium and a pion at NLO accuracy,

    Z.-Q. Chen and C.-F. Qiao, “Bc meson exclusive decays to aP-wave charmonium and a pion at NLO accuracy,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 016019, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.016019, arXiv:2105.12066 [hep-ph]

    2021 doi

  92. [100]

    Semileptonic decays ofBc mesons into charmonium states in a relativistic quark model,

    M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Korner and P. Santorelli, “Semileptonic decays ofBc mesons into charmonium states in a relativistic quark model,” Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 094006 [erratum: Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 019901], doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.094006, arXiv:hep-ph/0501051

    2005 doi arXiv

  93. [101]

    Measurement of the ratio of branch- ing fractions B(B+ c →J/ψK+)/B(B+ c →J/ψπ+),

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], “Measurement of the ratio of branch- ing fractions B(B+ c →J/ψK+)/B(B+ c →J/ψπ+),” JHEP09, 153 (2016), doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2016)153, arXiv:1607.06823 [hep-ex]

    2016 doi arXiv

  94. [102]

    Measurement of the ratio of B+ c branching fractions to J/ψπ+ and J/ψµ+νµfinal states,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], “Measurement of the ratio of B+ c branching fractions to J/ψπ+ and J/ψµ+νµfinal states,” Phys. Rev. D90, 032009 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.032009, arXiv:1407.2126 [hep-ex]

    2014 doi arXiv

  95. [103]

    Observation of theB+ c →J/ψπ+π0 decay,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], “Observation of theB+ c →J/ψπ+π0 decay,” JHEP 04(2024) 151, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)151, arXiv:2402.05523 [hep-ex]

    2024 doi

  96. [104]

    Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions R(J/ψ) =B(B+ c →J/ψτ+ντ)/B(B+ c →J/ψµ+νµ),

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], “Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions R(J/ψ) =B(B+ c →J/ψτ+ντ)/B(B+ c →J/ψµ+νµ),” Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 121801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.121801, arXiv:1711.05623 [hep-ex]

    2018 doi arXiv

  97. [105]

    Test of lepton flavor universality in semilep- tonic B+ c meson decays in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13TeV,

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.[CMS Collaboration], “Test of lepton flavor universality in semilep- tonic B+ c meson decays in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13TeV,” Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) L051102, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L051102, arXiv:2408.00678 [hep-ex]

    2025 doi

  98. [106]

    Measurement of the ratio of theB+ c → J/ψτ+ντand B+ c →J/ψµ+νµbranching fractions using three-prongτlepton decays,

    V. Chekhovskyet al.[CMS Collaboration], “Measurement of the ratio of theB+ c → J/ψτ+ντand B+ c →J/ψµ+νµbranching fractions using three-prongτlepton decays,” arXiv:2510.21559 [hep-ex], submitted to Phys. Rev. D

  99. [107]

    Study ofB+ c →χcπ+ decays,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], “Study ofB+ c →χcπ+ decays,” JHEP02(2024) 173, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)173, arXiv:2312.12987 [hep-ex]

    2024 doi

  100. [108]

    Study of Bc decays into charmonia and D mesons,

    S. Dubnicka, A. Z. Dubnickova, A. Issadykov, M. A. Ivanov and A. Liptaj, “Study of Bc decays into charmonia and D mesons,” Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 076017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.076017, arXiv:1708.09607 [hep-ph]

    2017 doi arXiv

  101. [109]

    Observation ofB+ c →J/ψD+ s andB+ c →J/ψD∗+ s de- cays,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], “Observation ofB+ c →J/ψD+ s andB+ c →J/ψD∗+ s de- cays,” Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 112012, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.112012, arXiv:1304.4530 [hep-ex]

    2013 doi arXiv

  102. [110]

    Study of B+ c →J/ψD+ s and B+ c →J/ψD∗+ s decays inpp collisions at√s = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector,

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS Collaboration], “Study of B+ c →J/ψD+ s and B+ c →J/ψD∗+ s decays inpp collisions at√s = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector,” JHEP08(2022) 087, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)087, arXiv:2203.01808 [hep-ex]. 44

    2022 doi

  103. [111]

    Pure leptonic decays of vectorB∗ c meson,

    Y. Yang, J. Liu, M. Q. Huang and Q. H. Shan, “Pure leptonic decays of vectorB∗ c meson,” Eur. Phys. J. C81, 908 (2021)

    2021

  104. [112]

    Standard Model prediction of theBc lifetime,

    J. Aebischer and B. Grinstein, “Standard Model prediction of theBc lifetime,” JHEP07 (2021) 130, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2021)130, arXiv:2105.02988 [hep-ph]

    2021 doi

  105. [113]

    Measurement of the lifetime of the B+ c me- son using the B+ c →J/ψπ+ decay mode,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], “Measurement of the lifetime of the B+ c me- son using the B+ c →J/ψπ+ decay mode,” Phys. Lett. B742(2015) 29–37, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.01.010, arXiv:1411.6899 [hep-ex]

    2015 doi arXiv

  106. [114]

    TheBc Meson Lifetime,

    M. Beneke and G. Buchalla, “TheBc Meson Lifetime,” Phys. Rev. D53, 4991–5000 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9601249

    1996 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Phenomenological predictions of the properties of theBc system,

    L. P. Fulcher, “Phenomenological predictions of the properties of theBc system,” Phys. Rev. D60, 074006 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.074006. 45

    1999 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.