REVIEW 3 cited by
Style-Aware Radiology Report Generation with RadGraph and Few-Shot Prompting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Automatically generated reports from medical images promise to improve the workflow of radiologists. Existing methods consider an image-to-report modeling task by directly generating a fully-fledged report from an image. However, this conflates the content of the report (e.g., findings and their attributes) with its style (e.g., format and choice of words), which can lead to clinically inaccurate reports. To address this, we propose a two-step approach for radiology report generation. First, we extract the content from an image; then, we verbalize the extracted content into a report that matches the style of a specific radiologist. For this, we leverage RadGraph -- a graph representation of reports -- together with large language models (LLMs). In our quantitative evaluations, we find that our approach leads to beneficial performance. Our human evaluation with clinical raters highlights that the AI-generated reports are indistinguishably tailored to the style of individual radiologist despite leveraging only a few examples as context.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
MedAutoCorrect: Image-Conditioned Autocorrection in Medical Reporting
An image-conditioned detect-then-correct pipeline fixes injected errors in radiology reports and improves automatic report generation quality on MIMIC-CXR.
-
Gla-AI4BioMed at RRG24: Visual Instruction-tuned Adaptation for Radiology Report Generation
A LLaVA-style radiology report generator using LoRA fine-tuning and stitched chest X-ray inputs placed fourth in the RRG24 shared task.
-
Best Practices for Large Language Models in Radiology
The paper recommends starting LLM use in radiology with prompt optimization and retrieval augmentation, fine-tuning only when needed, and preferring locally hosted open models with human expert evaluation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.