Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 53 references

Zoomed In, Diffused Out: Towards Local Degradation-Aware Multi-Diffusion for Extreme Image Super-Resolution

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that pre-trained text-to-image diffusion models can be steered to produce 4x super-resolved images at 2K, 4K, and 8K, without any retraining, by combining MultiDiffusion with per-tile degradation-aware prompt extraction.

desk verdict Plausible training-free extreme SR recipe, but the local-prompt source is underspecified and the gains are small; worth reviewing, not yet trustworthy. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12072 v1 pith:7QRZEDE7 submitted 2024-11-18 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LGcs.MM

Brian B. Moser , Stanislav Frolov , Tobias C. Nauen , Federico Raue , Andreas Dengel This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.MM
keywords extremeimagesuper-resolutiontext-to-imagediffusionMultidegradation-awarepromptstraining-freelatentmodelslocalpromptextractionhigh-resolutiongeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that pre-trained text-to-image diffusion models, which natively generate only 512x512 images, can be repurposed for extreme image super-resolution (4x upscaling to 2K, 4K, and 8K) with no additional training. The trick is to run the diffusion process on overlapping latent tiles through MultiDiffusion, so global coherence is maintained, and to give each tile its own degradation-aware text prompt extracted from the corresponding low-resolution crop rather than one global prompt. On DIV2K, Test4K, and Test8K, this beats the global-prompt MultiDiffusion baseline on PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS, and a user study rates its outputs as near-indistinguishable from ground truth. If true, frozen T2I models become a practical, training-free super-resolution engine at resolutions that matter for real-world use.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the combination of MultiDiffusion, a stitching procedure in which a large latent is denoised by cropping overlapping 64x64 windows, denoising each with a frozen T2I model conditioned on a prompt, and averaging overlapping regions to form the next latent; and local degradation-aware prompt extraction, in which each low-resolution crop is tagged by a pre-trained DAPE tagger to produce a tile-specific prompt, so the i-th diffusion path uses its own prompt rather than a single global one. The averaging of latents denoised under different per-tile prompts produces global coherence, while the per-tile prompts suppress hallucinated texture. A stride of 32 is chosen as a compromise between computational efficiency and image consistency.

What would settle it

Run the same pipeline with shuffled or corrupted per-tile prompts (e.g., swap tags between tiles) and measure PSNR and LPIPS on Test4K; if quality does not drop, the local-prompt mechanism is not doing the work attributed to it. Alternatively, compute a seam-focused metric, such as the maximum gradient difference across tile boundaries, to see whether MultiDiffusion averaging under differing prompts leaves visible seams at stride 32.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the failure of T2I diffusion super-resolution beyond 512x512 is not a model-capacity problem but a conditioning-granularity problem. MultiDiffusion already lets a frozen 512x512 latent diffusion model synthesize arbitrarily large images by denoising overlapping 64x64 latent windows and averaging the overlaps; but when every window is guided by the same global prompt, the model hallucinates details (e.g., bird patterns on leaves) because the prompt does not describe local content. The discovery is that extracting a degradation-aware prompt from each 512x512 low-resolution crop with a frozen tagger and conditioning the corresponding diffusion path with that tile-specific prompt suppresses over-hallucination and improves both pixel-based and perceptual metrics, in a fully training-free pipeline.

Load-bearing premise

The method works only if per-tile tags accurately describe local content and if averaging latents denoised under different per-tile prompts stays coherent at tile boundaries, neither of which the paper directly tests.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, pre-trained T2I diffusion models become a drop-in, training-free super-resolution engine at any resolution, removing the 512x512 ceiling.
  • T2I-based super-resolution can now be evaluated on true 2K, 4K, and 8K benchmarks such as Test4K and Test8K instead of only 512x512 crops.
  • In the paper's user study, its outputs were chosen as the better high-resolution version 53.3% of the time against ground truth, versus 25.3% for the global-prompt baseline and 23.0% for a regression method.
  • The paper itself notes that pixel-based metrics still trail SR-trained methods such as RRDB and ESRGAN, so the result is best read as a perceptual-quality gain rather than a fidelity win.
  • The method's local tag analysis shows that per-tile extraction produces 10-80 unique tags per image versus 5-20 for a global prompt, supporting the claim that finer-grained conditioning drives the improvement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's argument would be stronger with an ablation that corrupts or shuffles per-tile tags; if quality does not drop, the proposed local prompts are not the mechanism driving the gains.
  • The mechanism may generalize beyond super-resolution: any tiled latent diffusion application, such as large-image editing or panorama generation, could benefit from per-tile conditioning, though this is an extension the paper does not claim.
  • Because the method is training-free, it could be combined on the fly with a coarse SR model to close the pixel-metric gap, an idea the paper itself suggests as future work.
  • A concrete testable extension is to measure seam artifacts across tile boundaries as a function of stride and tagger accuracy, since the paper provides no tile-boundary consistency analysis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a training-free method for extreme image super-resolution (2K/4K/8K) using pre-trained text-to-image diffusion models. The method combines MultiDiffusion, which denoises overlapping latent tiles and averages them for global coherence, with local degradation-aware prompt extraction: each tile is guided by its own DAPE-generated text prompt rather than a single global prompt. Experiments on DIV2K, Test4K, and Test8K at 4x magnification report small improvements over a SeeSR+MultiDiffusion baseline in PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS, plus a small user study and a prompt-diversity analysis. The paper claims this is the first approach to scale repurposed T2I diffusion models to 2K/4K/8K SR without additional training.

Significance. If the central mechanism is validated, the work would be practically relevant: it would let frozen T2I diffusion models be applied to high-resolution SR without retraining, with a simple prompt-side change to MultiDiffusion. The paper ships a GitHub link and uses reproducible public components (Stable Diffusion, SeeSR's DAPE), which is a strength. However, the significance is currently limited by the lack of a controlled demonstration that per-tile local prompts are what drive the gains, by the very small numerical differences, and by the absence of statistical validation. The claims about 'global coherence' and 'no boundary artifacts' from averaging differently conditioned latents are plausible but untested. The reported improvements over the baseline are consistent but marginal, so the contribution rests entirely on the local-prompt mechanism being causally responsible; this is not yet established.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.3, Algorithm 1] The source of the image patches I_i is never specified. For a 4x SR of a 2K DIV2K image, the LR input is 512x512 while the output is 2048x2048, and with stride 32 there are 49 overlapping latent windows. The paper states that DAPE is applied to 'the corresponding tiles in image space (i.e., extracted from 512x512 image patches)', but it does not say whether these patches are crops of an upsampled LR image, crops of the LR image at a different scale, or something else. Without defining I_i, Algorithm 1 is not reproducible and the assertion that DAPE provides locally specific degradation-aware tags is unsupported.
  2. [Section 3.2, Algorithm 1 (lines 6-8)] The core mechanism is averaging latents that have been denoised under different per-tile prompts y_i, but the paper provides no analysis, ablation, or diagnostic to show that this averaging preserves coherence. MultiDiffusion was designed for a single shared condition; with distinct y_i, overlapping averaged latents encode conflicting semantic conditions and may not lie on the model's sampling manifold. The paper reports no seam or boundary-consistency metric, no qualitative failure analysis of tile edges, and no ablation with a global prompt, shuffled local prompts, or a single prompt. A controlled comparison of these variants is essential because the quantitative gains over SeeSR+MD are very small (Tables 1-3: PSNR differences of +0.03 to +0.06).
  3. [Tables 1-3, Section 5.2] All quantitative results are reported without error bars, multiple seeds, or significance tests. Given that the reported improvements are on the order of 0.03-0.06 dB PSNR and 0.002-0.005 LPIPS, these differences could be within run-to-run variation of the stochastic diffusion process. The paper should provide variance estimates or significance tests, or at least multiple independent runs, before claiming consistent improvement.
  4. [Section 5.3, Figure 6] The user study is too small and the interpretation of the 53.3% fool rate is overstated. With 25 subjects and 36 images, a 53.3% rate is not shown to be statistically different from 50% chance; no confidence interval or test against chance is reported. Moreover, the forced-choice question ('Which of the two images is a better high-quality version...') measures preference, not indistinguishability from HR, so the sentence 'rendering its outputs nearly indistinguishable from HR ground-truth images' is not supported by the protocol as described. Please clarify the task, report per-image or per-subject variance, and provide a statistical test.
  5. [Section 5.4, Figures 7-8] The prompt-diversity analysis counts unique tags and shows that local extraction produces more tags than global extraction, but it does not establish that tag diversity causes better SR quality. The paper should connect this analysis to the quantitative results, for example by ablating tag diversity or correlating per-image tag counts with per-image metric changes.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.1] The text says the latent space is divided into '64x64 patches' but Algorithm 1 requires 'non-overlapping latent mappings' while the stride of 32 implies overlapping windows; please reconcile the terminology.
  2. [Section 3.3] The sentence 'Inspired by SpotDiffusion, we reduce the overlap between patches by setting the stride to 32' is unclear: it is not obvious what the default stride would be and how it relates to computational efficiency and consistency; please state the default value used in SeeSR+MD and in MultiDiffusion.
  3. [Section 5.2, Table 1 caption] The caption says 'Regression-, Normalizing Flow- and GAN-based SR models are also included for comparison' but the table also includes SR-trained diffusion models; this is fine but the contrast between SR-trained and T2I-trained methods should be stated more clearly in the main text.
  4. [Section 5.3, Figure 6] The bar chart reports fool rates of 53.3%, 25.3%, and 23.0%; the y-axis label says 'Fool Rates [%]' and the caption says 'higher is better', but for a two-alternative forced-choice against ground truth, 50% is the ceiling for indistinguishability, so 'higher is better' only holds up to 50% and should be explained.
  5. [Section 4.1] There is a minor grammar issue in 'For the scaling factor, we selected a 4 × magnification'; consider revising to 'We selected a scaling factor of 4 ×'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central claim is empirical and self-contained, with only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation for the MultiDiffusion stride choice.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain is not circular. The method (Algorithm 1) combines a frozen T2I diffusion model, a frozen DAPE prompt extractor, and the MultiDiffusion stitching rule; no parameter is fitted to the evaluation targets. The reported PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS results are obtained by running this frozen pipeline on held-out DIV2K-Val, Test4K, and Test8K images against a self-constructed SeeSR+MD baseline. Local prompts yi = φ(Ii) are extracted from image patches and used as conditioning, and the claim that local conditioning improves over a global prompt is an empirical hypothesis tested on data, not a quantity forced by construction. Self-citations are present: the stride of 32 is attributed to SpotDiffusion by the same authors, and prior author works (YODA, DiWa) appear in comparisons, but none of these citations supplies a load-bearing premise that makes the result true by definition. The stride choice is a hyperparameter, and the reported gains over SeeSR+MD are small and data-dependent. The main weakness is a completeness gap rather than circularity: the paper does not analyze whether averaging overlapping latents denoised under different per-tile prompts preserves distributional coherence (Algorithm 1, lines 6-8), and it offers no ablation with shuffled or global prompts. A missing proof or ablation is a correctness risk, not a circular step. Overall circularity score: 2, reflecting one minor non-load-bearing self-citation while the central derivation remains self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical or architectural entities. It relies on pre-trained components (StableDiffusion V2, DAPE/RAM, MultiDiffusion) and on two hand-chosen hyperparameters (stride and tile size). The central claim does not depend on any newly fitted constants beyond the frozen weights of existing models.

free parameters (2)
  • Diffusion stride omega = 32
    Chosen by hand as a balance between computational efficiency and coherence; no ablation study is provided to justify this value.
  • Latent tile size = 64x64 (512x512 image)
    Adopted as the standard MultiDiffusion configuration; not tuned for this specific SR task, and no analysis of tile-size sensitivity is given.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Pre-trained StableDiffusion V2.0 with its 8x VAE provides a generative prior that remains useful for super-resolution when conditioned on degradation-aware text prompts.
    Invoked throughout Section 3.3; the entire method depends on the frozen T2I model behaving as expected on per-tile conditioning.
  • domain assumption The DAPE/RAM tagger, fine-tuned in SeeSR, produces accurate and locally meaningful degradation-aware tags when applied to arbitrary 512x512 image patches.
    Stated in Section 3.3 and used in Algorithm 1; no direct validation of tag accuracy on the test datasets is provided.
  • domain assumption MultiDiffusion's overlap-and-average merging of latents preserves global coherence at arbitrary resolutions.
    Taken from Bar-Tal et al. (2023), cited in Section 3.1; the paper relies on this property without re-deriving it.
  • domain assumption The low-resolution input image, upscaled to tile size, is a sufficient source for per-tile degradation-aware prompt extraction.
    Used in Algorithm 1, where prompts are extracted from image patches corresponding to latent windows; the mapping from LR to HR tile content is assumed to be informative.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Zoomed In, Diffused Out: Towards Local Degradation-Aware Multi-Diffusion for Extreme Image Super-Resolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7QRZEDE7

@misc{pith2026241112072,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Zoomed In, Diffused Out: Towards Local Degradation-Aware Multi-Diffusion for Extreme Image Super-Resolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7QRZEDE7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12072}
}
read the original abstract

Large-scale, pre-trained Text-to-Image (T2I) diffusion models have gained significant popularity in image generation tasks and have shown unexpected potential in image Super-Resolution (SR). However, most existing T2I diffusion models are trained with a resolution limit of 512x512, making scaling beyond this resolution an unresolved but necessary challenge for image SR. In this work, we introduce a novel approach that, for the first time, enables these models to generate 2K, 4K, and even 8K images without any additional training. Our method leverages MultiDiffusion, which distributes the generation across multiple diffusion paths to ensure global coherence at larger scales, and local degradation-aware prompt extraction, which guides the T2I model to reconstruct fine local structures according to its low-resolution input. These innovations unlock higher resolutions, allowing T2I diffusion models to be applied to image SR tasks without limitation on resolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12072 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of 4x Super-Resolution (SR) predictions us [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of SeeSR (top) compared to our local degradation-aware method (bottom). While SeeSR is limited to a fixed image size of 512×512, our method can technically upscale to any resolution due to two components: MultiDiffusion (MD) and local degradation-aware prompt extraction. The MD process is applied to overlapping tiles. Without local degradation-aware prompt extraction, the classifier guidance generates h… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Qualitative comparison of a 2K image (899; DIV2K Val) between LR, SeeSR+MD (PSNR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparison (886; DIV2K Val) between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: DIV2K Val fool rates (higher is better; photo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The distribution of unique tag counts for DIV2K Val. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Social media and the visual, 2016

    Elisabetta Adami and Carey Jewitt. Social media and the visual, 2016. 1

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study

    Eirikur Agustsson and Radu Timofte. Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study. In CVPRW, pages 126–135, 2017. 4, 5

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Multidiffusion: Fusing diffusion paths for controlled image generation

    Omer Bar-Tal, Lior Yariv, Yaron Lipman, and Tali Dekel. Multidiffusion: Fusing diffusion paths for controlled image generation. 2023. 1, 3, 4, 5

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Improving image generation with better captions

    James Betker, Gabriel Goh, Li Jing, Tim Brooks, Jianfeng Wang, Linjie Li, Long Ouyang, Juntang Zhuang, Joyce Lee, Yufei Guo, et al. Improving image generation with better captions. Computer Science. https://cdn. openai. com/papers/dall-e-3. pdf, 2(3):8, 2023. 1

    2023

  5. [5]

    Low-complexity single-image super-resolution based on nonnegative neighbor embedding

    Marco Bevilacqua, Aline Roumy, Christine Guillemot, and Marie Line Alberi-Morel. Low-complexity single-image super-resolution based on nonnegative neighbor embedding

  6. [6]

    Improving mass discrimination in mammogram-cad system using texture information and super-resolution recon- struction

    Sawsen Boudraa, Ahlem Melouah, and Hayet Farida Mer- ouani. Improving mass discrimination in mammogram-cad system using texture information and super-resolution recon- struction. Evolving Systems, 11(4):697–706, 2020. 1

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Activating more pixels in image super-resolution transformer

    Xiangyu Chen, Xintao Wang, Jiantao Zhou, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Activating more pixels in image super-resolution transformer. In CVPR, pages 22367–22377, 2023. 2

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Image neural field diffusion models

    Yinbo Chen, Oliver Wang, Richard Zhang, Eli Shechtman, Xiaolong Wang, and Michael Gharbi. Image neural field diffusion models. In CVPR, pages 8007–8017, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Demofusion: Democratising high- resolution image generation with no $$$

    Ruoyi Du, Dongliang Chang, Timothy Hospedales, Yi-Zhe Song, and Zhanyu Ma. Demofusion: Democratising high- resolution image generation with no $$$. In CVPR, pages 6159–6168, 2024. 1

    2024

  2. [10]

    Taming transformers for high-resolution image synthesis

    Patrick Esser, Robin Rombach, and Bjorn Ommer. Taming transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. In CVPR, pages 12873–12883, 2021. 4

    2021

  3. [11]

    Adversarial text-to-image synthesis: A review

    Stanislav Frolov, Tobias Hinz, Federico Raue, J ¨orn Hees, and Andreas Dengel. Adversarial text-to-image synthesis: A review. Neural Networks, 144:187–209, 2021. 1

    2021

  4. [12]

    Spotd- iffusion: A fast approach for seamless panorama generation over time

    Stanislav Frolov, Brian B Moser, and Andreas Dengel. Spotd- iffusion: A fast approach for seamless panorama generation over time. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15507, 2024. 1, 3, 4

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Predictability and surprise in large generative models

    Deep Ganguli, Danny Hernandez, Liane Lovitt, Amanda Askell, Yuntao Bai, Anna Chen, Tom Conerly, Nova Das- sarma, Dawn Drain, Nelson Elhage, et al. Predictability and surprise in large generative models. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2022. 1

    2022

  6. [14]

    Single image super-resolution from transformed self-exemplars

    Jia-Bin Huang, Abhishek Singh, and Narendra Ahuja. Single image super-resolution from transformed self-exemplars. In CVPR, pages 5197–5206, 2015. 5

    2015

  7. [15]

    Scaling laws for neural language models

    Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361,

    2001 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Classsr: A general framework to accelerate super-resolution networks by data characteristic

    Xiangtao Kong, Hengyuan Zhao, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Classsr: A general framework to accelerate super-resolution networks by data characteristic. In CVPR, pages 12016– 12025, 2021. 4

    2021

  9. [17]

    Photo- realistic single image super-resolution using a generative ad- versarial network

    Christian Ledig, Lucas Theis, Ferenc Husz´ar, Jose Caballero, Andrew Cunningham, Alejandro Acosta, Andrew Aitken, Alykhan Tejani, Johannes Totz, Zehan Wang, et al. Photo- realistic single image super-resolution using a generative ad- versarial network. In CVPR, 2017. 5

    2017

  10. [18]

    Srdiff: Single image super-resolution with diffusion probabilistic models

    Haoying Li, Yifan Yang, Meng Chang, Shiqi Chen, Huajun Feng, Zhihai Xu, Qi Li, and Yueting Chen. Srdiff: Single image super-resolution with diffusion probabilistic models. In Neurocomputing, 2022. 1, 2, 5

    2022

  11. [19]

    Swinir: Image restoration using swin transformer

    Jingyun Liang, Jiezhang Cao, Guolei Sun, Kai Zhang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Swinir: Image restoration using swin transformer. In ICCV, pages 1833–1844, 2021. 2

    2021

  12. [20]

    Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution

    Bee Lim, Sanghyun Son, Heewon Kim, Seungjun Nah, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. In CVPRW, pages 136–144, 2017. 5

    2017

  13. [21]

    Diffbir: Towards blind image restoration with generative diffusion prior

    Xinqi Lin, Jingwen He, Ziyan Chen, Zhaoyang Lyu, Ben Fei, Bo Dai, Wanli Ouyang, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Diffbir: Towards blind image restoration with generative diffusion prior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15070, 2023. 1, 2

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Blind image super-resolution: A survey and beyond

    Anran Liu, Yihao Liu, Jinjin Gu, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Blind image super-resolution: A survey and beyond. IEEE TPAMI, 2022. 1

    2022

  15. [23]

    Repaint: Inpainting using denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    Andreas Lugmayr, Martin Danelljan, Andres Romero, Fisher Yu, Radu Timofte, and Luc Van Gool. Repaint: Inpainting using denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In CVPR,

  16. [24]

    Srflow: Learning the super-resolution space with normalizing flow

    Andreas Lugmayr, Martin Danelljan, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Srflow: Learning the super-resolution space with normalizing flow. In ECCV, 2020. 5

    2020

  17. [25]

    Structure-preserving super resolution with gradient guidance

    Cheng Ma, Yongming Rao, Yean Cheng, Ce Chen, Jiwen Lu, and Jie Zhou. Structure-preserving super resolution with gradient guidance. In CVPR, 2020. 5

    2020

  18. [26]

    A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics

    David Martin, Charless Fowlkes, Doron Tal, and Jitendra Malik. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In ICCV, volume 2, pages 416–423. IEEE, 2001. 5

    2001

  19. [27]

    Sketch-based manga retrieval using manga109 dataset

    Yusuke Matsui, Kota Ito, Yuji Aramaki, Azuma Fujimoto, Toru Ogawa, Toshihiko Yamasaki, and Kiyoharu Aizawa. Sketch-based manga retrieval using manga109 dataset. Multi- media tools and applications, 76:21811–21838, 2017. 5

    2017

  20. [28]

    Bigger is not always better: Scaling properties of latent diffusion models

    Kangfu Mei, Zhengzhong Tu, Mauricio Delbracio, Hossein Talebi, Vishal M Patel, and Peyman Milanfar. Bigger is not always better: Scaling properties of latent diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01367, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Yoda: You only diffuse areas

    Brian B Moser, Stanislav Frolov, Federico Raue, Sebastian Palacio, and Andreas Dengel. Yoda: You only diffuse areas. an area-masked diffusion approach for image super-resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07977, 2023. 5

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Waving goodbye to low-res: A diffusion-wavelet approach for image super-resolution

    Brian B Moser, Stanislav Frolov, Federico Raue, Sebastian Palacio, and Andreas Dengel. Waving goodbye to low-res: A diffusion-wavelet approach for image super-resolution. In 2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2024. 1, 5

    2024

  23. [31]

    Hitchhiker’s guide to super-resolution: Introduction and recent advances

    Brian B Moser, Federico Raue, Stanislav Frolov, Sebastian Palacio, J¨orn Hees, and Andreas Dengel. Hitchhiker’s guide to super-resolution: Introduction and recent advances. IEEE TPAMI, 45(8):9862–9882, 2023. 1, 5

    2023

  24. [32]

    Diffusion models, image super-resolution, and everything: A survey

    Brian B Moser, Arundhati S Shanbhag, Federico Raue, Stanislav Frolov, Sebastian Palacio, and Andreas Dengel. Diffusion models, image super-resolution, and everything: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2024. 1, 5

    2024

  25. [33]

    Xpsr: Cross-modal priors for diffusion-based image super-resolution

    Yunpeng Qu, Kun Yuan, Kai Zhao, Qizhi Xie, Jinhua Hao, Ming Sun, and Chao Zhou. Xpsr: Cross-modal priors for diffusion-based image super-resolution. arXiv:2403.05049,

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Merging and splitting diffusion paths for semanti- cally coherent panoramas

    Fabio Quattrini, Vittorio Pippi, Silvia Cascianelli, and Rita Cucchiara. Merging and splitting diffusion paths for semanti- cally coherent panoramas. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15660,

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Learning 9 transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning 9 transferable visual models from natural language supervision. pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021. 2

    2021

  28. [36]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In CVPR, 2022. 1, 2, 4, 5

    2022

  29. [37]

    Image super- resolution via iterative refinement

    Chitwan Saharia, Jonathan Ho, William Chan, Tim Sali- mans, David J Fleet, and Mohammad Norouzi. Image super- resolution via iterative refinement. IEEE TPAMI, 2022. 1, 2, 5, 7

    2022

  30. [38]

    Audiences, aesthetics and affordances analysing practices of visual communication on social media

    Maria Schreiber. Audiences, aesthetics and affordances analysing practices of visual communication on social media. Digital Culture & Society, 3(2):143–164, 2017. 1

    2017

  31. [39]

    Real-time single image and video super-resolution using an efficient sub-pixel convolutional neural network

    Wenzhe Shi, Jose Caballero, Ferenc Husz´ar, Johannes Totz, Andrew P Aitken, Rob Bishop, Daniel Rueckert, and Zehan Wang. Real-time single image and video super-resolution using an efficient sub-pixel convolutional neural network. In CVPR, pages 1874–1883, 2016. 1

    2016

  32. [40]

    Natural and realistic single image super-resolution with ex- plicit natural manifold discrimination

    Jae Woong Soh, Gu Yong Park, Junho Jo, and Nam Ik Cho. Natural and realistic single image super-resolution with ex- plicit natural manifold discrimination. In CVPR, 2019. 5

    2019

  33. [41]

    Ntire 2018 challenge on single image super-resolution: Meth- ods and results

    Radu Timofte, Shuhang Gu, Jiqing Wu, and Luc Van Gool. Ntire 2018 challenge on single image super-resolution: Meth- ods and results. In CVPRW, 2018. 5

    2018

  34. [42]

    Exploiting diffusion prior for real-world image super-resolution

    Jianyi Wang, Zongsheng Yue, Shangchen Zhou, Kelvin CK Chan, and Chen Change Loy. Exploiting diffusion prior for real-world image super-resolution. arXiv preprint, 2023. 1, 2

    2023

  35. [43]

    Recovering realistic texture in image super-resolution by deep spatial feature transform

    Xintao Wang, Ke Yu, Chao Dong, and Chen Change Loy. Recovering realistic texture in image super-resolution by deep spatial feature transform. In CVPR, pages 606–615, 2018. 5

    2018

  36. [44]

    Esrgan: En- hanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks

    Xintao Wang, Ke Yu, Shixiang Wu, Jinjin Gu, Yihao Liu, Chao Dong, Yu Qiao, and Chen Change Loy. Esrgan: En- hanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks. In ECCV, 2018. 2, 5

    2018

  37. [45]

    Uncovering the disentanglement capability in text-to-image diffusion models

    Qiucheng Wu, Yujian Liu, Handong Zhao, Ajinkya Kale, Trung Bui, Tong Yu, Zhe Lin, Yang Zhang, and Shiyu Chang. Uncovering the disentanglement capability in text-to-image diffusion models. In CVPR, pages 1900–1910, 2023. 1

    1900

  38. [46]

    Seesr: Towards semantics-aware real-world image super-resolution

    Rongyuan Wu, Tao Yang, Lingchen Sun, Zhengqiang Zhang, Shuai Li, and Lei Zhang. Seesr: Towards semantics-aware real-world image super-resolution. arXiv:2311.16518, 2023. 1, 2, 4, 5

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Pixel-aware stable diffusion for realistic image super-resolution and personalized stylization

    Tao Yang, Rongyuan Wu, Peiran Ren, Xuansong Xie, and Lei Zhang. Pixel-aware stable diffusion for realistic image super-resolution and personalized stylization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14469, 2023. 1, 2, 5

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    On single image scale-up using sparse-representations

    Roman Zeyde, Michael Elad, and Matan Protter. On single image scale-up using sparse-representations. In International conference on curves and surfaces, pages 711–730. Springer,

  41. [49]

    Achieving on-mobile real-time super- resolution with neural architecture and pruning search

    Zheng Zhan, Yifan Gong, Pu Zhao, Geng Yuan, Wei Niu, Yushu Wu, Tianyun Zhang, Malith Jayaweera, David Kaeli, Bin Ren, et al. Achieving on-mobile real-time super- resolution with neural architecture and pruning search. In ICCV, pages 4821–4831, 2021. 1

    2021

  42. [50]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In ICCV, pages 3836–3847, 2023. 1

    2023

  43. [51]

    Ranksr- gan: Generative adversarial networks with ranker for image super-resolution

    Wenlong Zhang, Yihao Liu, Chao Dong, and Yu Qiao. Ranksr- gan: Generative adversarial networks with ranker for image super-resolution. In ICCV, 2019. 5

    2019

  44. [52]

    Recognize anything: A strong image tagging model

    Youcai Zhang, Xinyu Huang, Jinyu Ma, Zhaoyang Li, Zhaochuan Luo, Yanchun Xie, Yuzhuo Qin, Tong Luo, Yaqian Li, Shilong Liu, et al. Recognize anything: A strong image tagging model. In CVPR, pages 1724–1732, 2024. 4

    2024

  45. [53]

    Towards robust blind face restoration with codebook lookup transformer

    Shangchen Zhou, Kelvin Chan, Chongyi Li, and Chen Change Loy. Towards robust blind face restoration with codebook lookup transformer. NeurIPS, 35, 2022. 2 10

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.