Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 5 cited by

Gravitational waves from binary black holes can carry a quantum graviton state inherited from inflation, with number fluctuations below the classical limit.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 07:55 UTC pith:7S4XOQA5

load-bearing objection The idea is genuinely novel and worth exploring, but the central Fano-factor derivation in Sec. 2.2 is internally inconsistent, so the claimed sub-Poissonian threshold and the f>0.2 Hz condition are not established as written. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2510.23326 v2 pith:7S4XOQA5 submitted 2025-10-27 gr-qc quant-ph

Binary gravitational waves as probes of quantum graviton states

Sugumi Kanno , Jiro Soda , Akira Taniguchi This is my paper
classification gr-qc quant-ph
keywords gravitational wavesgravitonssqueezed vacuumcoherent statessub-Poissonian statisticsinflationsecond-order coherencebinary black holes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether the quantum nature of the graviton can be observed without detecting single gravitons. It argues that gravitational waves from binary black holes, usually modeled as classical radiation, are more precisely a coherent displacement of whatever quantum graviton state fills space; if that state is the squeezed vacuum left by inflation, the emitted waves are coherent-squeezed gravitons. The paper computes the variance-to-mean ratio of the graviton number distribution for this state and finds a parameter regime — frequencies above roughly 0.2 Hz for a loud merger and an inflationary energy scale around 10^15 GeV — where the ratio drops below 1 (sub-Poissonian statistics). Such statistics cannot be produced by any classical source, so a positive measurement would be an unambiguous quantum signature of the graviton. The authors are careful to say the analysis is in-principle: realistic observational feasibility is left for future work.

Core claim

The central claim is that a binary black hole acts as a classical displacement operator on the pre-existing graviton vacuum, so if the early universe left that vacuum squeezed, the gravitational waves we receive are in a coherent-squeezed graviton state. For that state, the graviton-number variance divided by the mean can be less than 1 — sub-Poissonian — provided the squared coherent amplitude exceeds e^{4r}/8, where r is the squeezing strength. Translating r from the inflationary mode function and the coherent amplitude from the binary's orbital parameters, the condition becomes a frequency threshold, numerically about 0.2 Hz for a loud binary merger with masses around thirty solar masses

What carries the argument

The machinery is the two-mode coherent-squeezed graviton state |ψ⟩ = D(ξ̄) S(ζ) |0⟩, formed by displacing the inflationary squeezed vacuum with the binary's classical source. The organizing identity is the condition for sub-Poissonian number statistics: the squared displacement must exceed e^{4r}/8 (for strong squeezing r ≫ 1), which converts through the inflationary squeezing relation r ≈ log(√2 f1/f) into a threshold on the observed frequency f. The paper's diagnostic is the variance-to-mean ratio of the total graviton number in modes k and −k; a value below 1 implies g^(2)(0) < 1, measurable by intensity-intensity correlation interferometry.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction rides on the variance computation in Eq. (2.11), which evaluates the number fluctuations as though the state were the squeezed vacuum; if the standard coherent-squeezed-state variance is used instead, the claimed threshold and sub-Poissonian region do not follow in the stated form.

What would settle it

Recompute the variance of n_a + n_b directly in the state D(ξ) S(ζ) |0⟩ rather than via the squeezed-vacuum expression in Eq. (2.11); if the result differs parametrically, the frequency threshold in Eq. (4.11) is not the correct nonclassicality criterion. Observationally, an intensity-correlation measurement of the gravitational-wave field from a loud binary in the predicted sub-hertz-to-100 Hz band that finds g^(2)(0) ≥ 1 would rule out the specific window, though not necessarily the squeezed-state scenario if decoherence intervenes.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A sub-Poissonian measurement would establish that gravitons have nonclassical number statistics, bypassing the need to detect individual gravitons.
  • The threshold frequency sets a target band (roughly sub-hertz to tens of hertz) for comparing outputs of two gravitational-wave detectors.
  • Because the threshold depends on the inflationary energy scale and squeezing strength, a positive or null result would constrain those early-universe parameters.
  • The formalism applies to any early-universe mechanism that leaves gravitons in a nonclassical state, so the same test could distinguish inflationary squeezing from other scenarios.
  • The paper leaves realistic observational feasibility, including noise and decoherence, to future work; the claim is in-principle.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If confirmed, the same two-mode correlation could be used to estimate the squeezing parameter r from the measured variance-to-mean ratio, effectively turning a binary merger into a probe of the cosmological graviton state.
  • The predicted sub-Poissonian band sits near the planned low-frequency gravitational-wave observatories, which may motivate dedicated correlation searches in the 0.1–10 Hz window.
  • Decoherence of the squeezed graviton state by astrophysical or cosmological environments could push the variance-to-mean ratio back above 1, so a null result would not falsify inflationary production without a decoherence model.
  • The same coherent-squeezed construction applies to any classical source, so binaries with different masses, eccentricities, or orientations would shift the frequency threshold; mapping that parameter dependence is a testable extension.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that gravitational waves from binary black holes can serve as probes of the quantum state of gravitons, focusing on whether the primordial graviton vacuum carries nonclassical features imprinted by inflation. The authors model the binary source as a coherent displacement acting on a squeezed vacuum, analyze the resulting coherent-squeezed state, and compute the Fano factor of the graviton number distribution. They claim that for a GW150914-like source and an inflationary Hubble scale H ~ 10^-4 M_Pl, sub-Poissonian statistics (F<1) occur for frequencies f > 0.2 Hz, providing an observable signature of nonclassical gravitons. The paper is organized as a proposal: it reviews HBT interferometry, derives a nonclassicality condition, maps the inflationary squeezed state and the binary coherent displacement into a coherent-squeezed state, and converts the condition into a frequency estimate. It explicitly acknowledges that a realistic assessment of observational feasibility is left for future work. The central claim is therefore conditional on the correctness of the Fano-factor derivation and on the assumed inflationary squeezing parameters.

Significance. If the central derivation were correct, the proposal would be a genuinely novel way to search for quantum-gravitational effects through astrophysical gravitational waves, and the frequency window f > 0.2 Hz would make the idea concretely testable with existing and near-future interferometers. The paper is clearly written, acknowledges its own limitations, and builds on a well-established quantum-optics toolkit. However, the Fano-factor calculation in Section 2.2 contains internal inconsistencies, and the state analyzed there is not the state produced by the binary source in Section 3.2. Because the final threshold (4.11) rests directly on these calculations, the main result is not established as written. The idea may still be worth pursuing, but the present manuscript does not yet provide a reliable derivation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2.11)] The variance is written as <0|(n_a+n_b)^2|0> - <0|n_a+n_b|0>^2, which is identically zero for the vacuum and is not the variance in the state |psi> defined by Eq. (2.8). No unitary transformation is exhibited that would make these vacuum expectation values equal to the variance in |psi>. The right-hand side of Eq. (2.11) appears to correspond to a different state, one with equal coherent displacements in both modes before a two-mode squeeze, not to S(zeta)|xi> with the single-mode displacement operator of Eq. (2.7).
  2. [Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (2.10)-(2.12)] The mean <n_a> in Eq. (2.10) contains the phase factor cos(theta-phi/2) characteristic of single-mode squeezing or of a symmetric two-mode coherent-squeezed state. For the state as defined, namely S_ab(zeta)D_a(xi)|0> with D_a a single-mode displacement, the correct mean has no such phase dependence. Consequently the Fano factor in Eq. (2.12) and the condition (2.13) are derived for a state that is not the one introduced in Eqs. (2.7)-(2.9).
  3. [Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (2.15)-(2.17)] The relation |psi> = D(xibar)S(zeta)|0> = S(zeta)D(xi)|0> with xi = xibar cosh r + xibar* e^{i phi} sinh r is the single-mode displacement-squeeze ordering identity. For the two-mode squeeze operator in Eq. (2.9), interchanging a single-mode displacement with the squeeze generates a displacement in the second mode as well, so Eq. (2.16) is not valid in the two-mode setting. Since Eq. (2.17) is the direct input to the frequency estimate, the threshold is unsupported.
  4. [Sec. 3.2 and Sec. 4] The physical state produced by the binary source is D_k(xi_k)D_{-k}(xi_{-k})S_{k,-k}(zeta)|0>, with xi_k determined by Eqs. (3.26)-(3.27). The amplitudes for k and -k are generically different and direction-dependent. This is not the symmetric two-mode coherent-squeezed state analyzed in Section 2.2, and the paper does not compute the Fano factor for the actual state. Therefore the mapping from the theoretical condition to the numerical estimate (4.6)/(4.11) is not established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.7)-(4.10)] There is a dimensional inconsistency between the expression in Eq. (4.7), which contains T sqrt(f), and the later form 1/sqrt(T f) in Eqs. (4.9)-(4.10). Starting from Eq. (3.26) and using V ~ T^3, the natural scaling is 1/sqrt(T f). The authors should correct Eq. (4.7) and verify the numerical estimate.
  2. [General presentation] There are numerous typographical errors: 'Minlowski' in the Introduction, 'conforaml' and 'differenciation' in Sec. 3.1, 'tragectories' in Sec. 3.2, 'x-yplane plane', 'the fano factor' capitalization, and 'we have use' in Sec. 2.2. These should be fixed in any revision.
  3. [Eq. (3.17)] The second term in the mode expansion is written with e^{i omega t}; it should presumably be e^{i omega_k t}. Also, the spatial dependence with a^dagger_{-k} e^{i k.x} is unconventional; the authors should check the sign and consistency with Eq. (3.23).
  4. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.4)] The derivation of the cutoff frequency f_1 should be shown in more detail, including the numerical inputs z_eq = 2.4e4 and 1/(2H_eq) = 10^11 s, so that the reader can verify the normalization H/(2 pi) ... .

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the sub-Poissonian condition and frequency threshold are derived from explicit Bogoliubov and interaction-Hamiltonian inputs; the apparent variance identity in Eq. (2.11) is a derivation gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The squeezed-state input is not imported as a black box: Eqs. (3.10)-(3.13) derive the Bogoliubov coefficients and identify the Bunch-Davies vacuum with a two-mode squeezed state, with the squeezing parameter given by (3.12). The coherent displacement is likewise derived from the binary interaction Hamiltonian in Eqs. (3.20)-(3.25). The Fano-factor condition (2.13)-(2.17) is an algebraic consequence of the number statistics of that coherent-squeezed state, and Eqs. (4.6)/(4.11) merely rewrite it using (4.4)-(4.5) and the order-of-magnitude estimate (4.10). No parameter is fitted to the quantity being predicted, no uniqueness theorem is invoked, and the self-citations ([18], [30], [31]) are contextual rather than load-bearing. I note two non-circular concerns: Eq. (2.11) writes the variance as vacuum expectation values without showing the unitary transformation from the state |ψ> to |0>, so the displayed intermediate step is not justified as written; and the paper leaves observational feasibility to future work. These are correctness/completeness issues, not an equivalence of the output to the input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard inflationary squeezing (with the squeezing amplitude as a free input), the coherent-state description of binary GWs, and the quantum-optics Fano-factor criterion. No genuinely new entity is invented, but the squeezing parameters are model inputs, and the order-of-magnitude threshold follows from a chosen normalization H = 1e-4 M_Pl and the GW150914 parameters.

free parameters (4)
  • squeezing parameter r_k = sinh r_k = 1/(2 k² η₁²), equivalently r_k = asinh(f₁²/(2 f²))
    The squeezing amplitude is taken from the inflationary Bogoliubov coefficient β_k matched at the inflation-radiation transition. This is a model-dependent quantity that sets the exponential amplification in the nonclassicality condition (2.17), so the final threshold inherits its uncertainty.
  • inflationary Hubble scale H = free parameter, normalized to H = 10^{-4} M_Pl in the estimate
    The frequency threshold (4.11) depends on sqrt(H), and the paper settles on the GUT-scale normalization without a bound or scan over H. This enters as an adjustable input.
  • transition time η₁ (or f₁) = absorbed into f₁ in Eq. (4.3)
    The inflation-to-radiation transition time determines the squeezing amplitude. It is an input to the calculation, set by when inflation ends, and is not independently measured.
  • coherent amplitude ξ_k = |ξ_k| = 1.0e38 (μ/16M⊙)(aΩ/0.41)² (0.2s/T)^{1/2} (68 Hz/f)^{1/2}
    Derived from the binary model parameters for GW150914, including the orbital velocity chosen at ISCO. The ISCO choice is an assumption that sets the variance estimate, and the scaling with 1/sqrt(f) enters the final threshold.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Gravitational waves from a binary are described by a coherent state (linear coupling to a classical source).
    Used in Sections 1 and 3.2; the quadratic and higher-order terms in the interaction are neglected without a quantitative control on their effect on number statistics.
  • domain assumption The primordial graviton state is the pure squeezed state obtained from the Bunch-Davies vacuum through the Bogoliubov transformation at the inflation-radiation transition.
    Section 3.1; this assumes no decoherence between inflation and now, although the conclusion mentions decoherence as a caveat without a quantitative estimate.
  • domain assumption The Fano factor F < 1 criterion, derived for a single-mode coherent-squeezed electromagnetic state, carries over directly to gravitons and to the two-mode (k, -k) state.
    Section 2; the paper switches from single-mode counting to two-mode counting without making the correspondence explicit.
  • standard math The standard inflationary scale factor matching a(η) = −1/[H(η−2η₁)] during inflation and a(η) = −η/(Hη₁²) during radiation, with a sharp transition at η₁.
    Eq. (3.3); standard textbook assumption, needed for the Bogoliubov coefficients (3.11).
invented entities (1)
  • No new physical entity beyond the squeezed coherent graviton state no independent evidence
    purpose: The paper does not introduce a new particle, mediator, force, or dimension. The graviton is standard.
    The only novel element is the combined quantum state of already-known gravitons; no falsifiable handle outside the paper is attached to that combined state beyond the proposed measurement itself.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 11551 in / 8517 out tokens · 62848 ms · 2026-08-04T07:55:34.045753+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

It is well known that the most reliable way to reveal the quantum nature of light is through photon number statistics, since photons exhibiting sub-Poissonian statistics unambiguously demonstrate their quantum behavior. In this paper, we show that gravitons emitted by binary systems can, in principle, exhibit analogous sub-Poissonian statistics. The key idea is that the vacuum state of gravitons may not be the standard Minkowski vacuum but rather a nonclassical state imprinted with the physics of the early Universe, such as inflation. Accordingly, gravitational waves from binary systems provide a means to probe the graviton states generated in the early Universe. As a concrete example, we show that squeezed graviton states originating from inflation can, in principle, imprint nonclassical graviton number statistics on gravitational waves from binary systems. In particular, we identify the frequency range in which the resulting coherent-squeezed graviton state can exhibit sub-Poissonian statistics. A realistic assessment of observational feasibility is left for future work.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Squeezed Gravitons and One-Loop Self-Energy under Light-Cone Smearing

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Graviton quantum fluctuations smear the light cone in a state-dependent way that regularizes UV singularities in scalar field one-loop diagrams.

  2. Squeezed-state radiation in shockwave scattering: QCD-Gravity double copy

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The n-particle gluon radiation spectrum in shockwave scattering is a generalized Susskind-Glogower squeezed coherent state, and multi-graviton radiation follows similarly via double copy, with feasible large squeezing...

  3. Graviton-induced which-path decoherence in matter-wave interferometry

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Radiative graviton decoherence in matter-wave interferometers is shown to be far below detection, even with strongly squeezed inflationary graviton states.

  4. Squeezed Gravitons and One-Loop Self-Energy under Light-Cone Smearing

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Gravitons in different quantum states smear the light cone via operator treatment of Synge's world function, regularizing UV singularities in phi^3 and phi^4 one-loop diagrams with a 10^{-10} correction from primordia...

  5. Quantum description of gravitational waves generated by a classical source

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Quantum expectation value of gravitational waves from a classical source reproduces the classical retarded solution with Poisson graviton emission indicating a coherent state.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 13 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Is a graviton detectable?Int

    Freeman Dyson. Is a graviton detectable?Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 28:1330041, 2013

    2013

  2. [2]

    The Noise of Gravitons.Int

    Maulik Parikh, Frank Wilczek, and George Zahariade. The Noise of Gravitons.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 29(14):2042001, 2020. arXiv:2005.07211 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Noise and decoherence induced by gravitons

    Sugumi Kanno, Jiro Soda, and Junsei Tokuda. Noise and decoherence induced by gravitons. Phys. Rev. D, 103(4):044017, 2021. arXiv:2007.09838 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Quantum Mechanics of Gravitational Waves.Phys

    Maulik Parikh, Frank Wilczek, and George Zahariade. Quantum Mechanics of Gravitational Waves.Phys. Rev. Lett., 127(8):081602, 2021. arXiv:2010.08205 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Signatures of the quantiza- tion of gravity at gravitational wave detectors.Phys

    Maulik Parikh, Frank Wilczek, and George Zahariade. Signatures of the quantiza- tion of gravity at gravitational wave detectors.Phys. Rev. D, 104(4):046021, 2021. arXiv:2010.08208 [hep-th]. 15

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Indirect detection of gravitons through quantum entanglement.Phys

    Sugumi Kanno, Jiro Soda, and Junsei Tokuda. Indirect detection of gravitons through quantum entanglement.Phys. Rev. D, 104(8):083516, 2021. arXiv:2103.17053 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Probing GHz gravitational waves with graviton–magnon resonance.Eur

    Asuka Ito, Tomonori Ikeda, Kentaro Miuchi, and Jiro Soda. Probing GHz gravitational waves with graviton–magnon resonance.Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(3):179, 2020. arXiv:1903.04843 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    A formalism for magnon gravitational wave detectors.Eur

    Asuka Ito and Jiro Soda. A formalism for magnon gravitational wave detectors.Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(6):545, 2020. arXiv:2004.04646 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Exploring high-frequency gravitational waves with magnons.Eur

    Asuka Ito and Jiro Soda. Exploring high-frequency gravitational waves with magnons.Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(8):766, 2023. arXiv:2212.04094 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Upper limits on the amplitude of ultra-high-frequency gravitational waves from graviton to photon conversion.Eur

    Aldo Ejlli, Damian Ejlli, Adrian Mike Cruise, Giampaolo Pisano, and Hartmut Grote. Upper limits on the amplitude of ultra-high-frequency gravitational waves from graviton to photon conversion.Eur. Phys. J. C, 79(12):1032, 2019. arXiv:1908.00232 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Asher Berlin, Diego Blas, Raffaele Tito D’Agnolo, Sebastian A. R. Ellis, Roni Harnik, Yonatan Kahn, and Jan Sch¨ utte-Engel. Detecting high-frequency gravitational waves with microwave cavities.Phys. Rev. D, 105(11):116011, 2022. arXiv:2112.11465 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Valerie Domcke, Camilo Garcia-Cely, and Nicholas L. Rodd. Novel Search for High- Frequency Gravitational Waves with Low-Mass Axion Haloscopes.Phys. Rev. Lett., 129(4):041101, 2022. arXiv:2202.00695 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Search for high-frequency gravitational waves with Rydberg atoms.Eur

    Sugumi Kanno, Jiro Soda, and Akira Taniguchi. Search for high-frequency gravitational waves with Rydberg atoms.Eur. Phys. J. C, 85(1):31, 2025. arXiv:2311.03890 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Detecting kHz gravitons from a neutron star merger with a multi-mode resonant mass detector.Class

    Germain Tobar, Igor Pikovski, and Michael Edmund Tobar. Detecting kHz gravitons from a neutron star merger with a multi-mode resonant mass detector.Class. Quant. Grav., 42(5):055017, 2025. arXiv:2406.16898 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion

    Taiki Ikeda, Youka Kaku, Sugumi Kanno, and Jiro Soda. Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion. 7 2025

    2025

  16. [16]

    Enhancing photon-axion conversion probability with squeezed coherent states

    Taiki Ikeda, Sugumi Kanno, and Jiro Soda. Enhancing photon-axion conversion probability with squeezed coherent states. 6 2025. 16

    2025

  17. [17]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(6):061102, 2016

    2016

  18. [18]

    Quantum nature of gravitational waves from binary black holes

    Sugumi Kanno, Jiro Soda, and Akira Taniguchi. Quantum nature of gravitational waves from binary black holes. 8 2025

    2025

  19. [19]

    Manikandan and Frank Wilczek

    Sreenath K. Manikandan and Frank Wilczek. Squeezed Quasinormal Modes from Nonlinear Gravitational Effects. 8 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Entanglement and squeezing of gravitational waves

    Thiago Guerreiro. Entanglement and squeezing of gravitational waves. 1 2025

    2025

  21. [21]

    Mavromatos, Sarben Sarkar, and Sotirios-Neilos Vlachos

    Panagiotis Dorlis, Nick E. Mavromatos, Sarben Sarkar, and Sotirios-Neilos Vlachos. Super- radiant Axionic Black-Hole Clouds as Seeds for Graviton Squeezing. 7 2025

    2025

  22. [22]

    Mavromatos, Sarben Sarkar, and Sotirios-Neilos Vlachos

    Pangiotis Dorlis, Nick E. Mavromatos, Sarben Sarkar, and Sotirios-Neilos Vlachos. Squeezed gravitons from superradiant axion fields around rotating black holes. 7 2025

    2025

  23. [23]

    A. G. Abac et al. Directional Search for Persistent Gravitational Waves: Results from the First Part of LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s Fourth Observing Run. 10 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    Cambridge University Press, 2013

    Girish S Agarwal.Quantum optics. Cambridge University Press, 2013

    2013

  25. [25]

    Hanbury Brown and R

    R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss. A Test of a new type of stellar interferometer on Sirius.Nature, 178:1046–1048, 1956

    1956

  26. [26]

    Hanbury Brown and R

    R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss. Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light.Nature, 177:27–29, 1956

    1956

  27. [27]

    Hanbury Brown-Twiss interferometry and second-order correlations of inflaton quanta.Phys

    Massimo Giovannini. Hanbury Brown-Twiss interferometry and second-order correlations of inflaton quanta.Phys. Rev. D, 83:023515, 2011

    2011

  28. [28]

    Glauber theory and the quantum coherence of curvature inhomo- geneities.Class

    Massimo Giovannini. Glauber theory and the quantum coherence of curvature inhomo- geneities.Class. Quant. Grav., 34(3):035019, 2017

    2017

  29. [29]

    Quantum coherence of cosmological perturbations.Mod

    Massimo Giovannini. Quantum coherence of cosmological perturbations.Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 32(35):1750191, 2017

    2017

  30. [30]

    Detecting nonclassical primordial gravitational waves with Hanbury-Brown–Twiss interferometry.Phys

    Sugumi Kanno and Jiro Soda. Detecting nonclassical primordial gravitational waves with Hanbury-Brown–Twiss interferometry.Phys. Rev. D, 99(8):084010, 2019. 17

    2019

  31. [31]

    Nonclassical primordial gravitational waves from the initial entangled state

    Sugumi Kanno. Nonclassical primordial gravitational waves from the initial entangled state. Phys. Rev. D, 100(12):123536, 2019

    2019

  32. [32]

    Hanbury-Brown-Twiss interferome- try and quantum nature of primordial gravitational waves in Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz gravity.Phys

    Sugumi Kanno, Hiroki Matsui, and Shinji Mukohyama. Hanbury-Brown-Twiss interferome- try and quantum nature of primordial gravitational waves in Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 111(10):104077, 2025

    2025

  33. [33]

    L. P. Grishchuk and Yu. V. Sidorov. On the Quantum State of Relic Gravitons.Class. Quant. Grav., 6:L161–L165, 1989

    1989

  34. [34]

    L. P. Grishchuk and Yu. V. Sidorov. Squeezed quantum states of relic gravitons and pri- mordial density fluctuations.Phys. Rev. D, 42:3413–3421, 1990

    1990

  35. [35]

    The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO.Class

    Seiji Kawamura et al. The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO.Class. Quant. Grav., 28:094011, 2011

    2011

  36. [36]

    Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna.Living Rev

    Pierre Auclair et al. Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna.Living Rev. Rel., 26(1):5, 2023

    2023

  37. [37]

    Hertzberg and Jacob A

    Mark P. Hertzberg and Jacob A. Litterer. Bound on quantum fluctuations in gravitational waves from LIGO-Virgo.JCAP, 03:009, 2023

    2023

  38. [38]

    Maleknejad, M

    A. Maleknejad, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and J. Soda. Gauge Fields and Inflation.Phys. Rept., 528:161–261, 2013. 18

    2013