Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Exponentially tighter bounds on limitations of quantum error mitigation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.11505 v3 pith:7TWJKB4C submitted 2022-10-20 quant-ph math-phmath.MP

Exponentially tighter bounds on limitations of quantum error mitigation

classification quant-ph math-phmath.MP
keywords quantumerrormitigationnoisenear-termapplicationsbeendepths
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Quantum error mitigation has been proposed as a means to combat unwanted and unavoidable errors in near-term quantum computing without the heavy resource overheads required by fault tolerant schemes. Recently, error mitigation has been successfully applied to reduce noise in near-term applications. In this work, however, we identify strong limitations to the degree to which quantum noise can be effectively `undone' for larger system sizes. Our framework rigorously captures large classes of error mitigation schemes in use today. By relating error mitigation to a statistical inference problem, we show that even at shallow circuit depths comparable to the current experiments, a superpolynomial number of samples is needed in the worst case to estimate the expectation values of noiseless observables, the principal task of error mitigation. Notably, our construction implies that scrambling due to noise can kick in at exponentially smaller depths than previously thought. They also impact other near-term applications, constraining kernel estimation in quantum machine learning, causing an earlier emergence of noise-induced barren plateaus in variational quantum algorithms and ruling out exponential quantum speed-ups in estimating expectation values in the presence of noise or preparing the ground state of a Hamiltonian.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Instance-Optimal Matrix Multiplicative Weight Update and Its Quantum Applications

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 8.0

    A new potential-based algorithm achieves instance-optimal O(sqrt(T·S(X||I/d))) regret for matrix LEA with the same complexity as MMWU, using a one-sided Jensen trace inequality.

  2. Theory and Architecture of Syndrome-Resolved Logical Gates

    quant-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0

    A new theorem gives weak (probabilistic) transversal implementations of arbitrary multi-qubit Pauli rotations for CSS codes, enabling an in-place rotation architecture with large projected resource savings.

  3. Exploiting biased noise in variational quantum models

    quant-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Twirling amplitude-damping noise into uniform Pauli/depolarising channels reduces expressivity and gradient magnitudes, while preserving the noise bias yields better VQA optimisation in the studied models.

  4. Reliable high-accuracy error mitigation for utility-scale quantum circuits

    quant-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    QESEM is a characterization-based error mitigation technique that achieves unbiased estimates with substantially reduced runtime cost compared to probabilistic error cancellation while outperforming zero-noise extrapo...

  5. Robust design under uncertainty in quantum error mitigation

    quant-ph 2023-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Presents unbiased uncertainty quantification for post-processing error mitigation and applies it to optimize hyperparameters in Zero Noise Extrapolation and Clifford Data Regression under finite-shot noise.

  6. Feasibility of performing quantum chemistry calculations on quantum computers

    quant-ph 2023-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New criteria reveal VQE needs fault-tolerant quantum computers due to decoherence and QPE has exponentially suppressed success probability from orthogonality catastrophe in classical input states.

  7. Assessing requirements to scale to practical quantum advantage

    quant-ph 2022-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A layered resource estimation framework applied to three quantum applications shows practical advantage requires 10^5-10^6 physical qubits, driven by size, speed, and controllability.

  8. Stability of digital and analog quantum simulations under noise

    quant-ph 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Rigorous worst- and average-case error bounds show comparable worst-case scaling for digital and analog quantum simulators under perturbative noise, with distinct average-case error cancellation and concentration boun...

  9. Mind the gaps: The fraught road to quantum advantage

    quant-ph 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The authors identify four transitions needed to reach fault-tolerant application-scale quantum computing from current NISQ devices.

  10. Mind the gaps: The fraught road to quantum advantage

    quant-ph 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The paper identifies four key hurdles in the transition from NISQ to FASQ quantum computers and argues that targeting them will accelerate progress toward useful quantum advantage.