pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08971 · v1 · pith:7VQBUNJ6new · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.EP

The complex kinematics of the young stars orbiting the supermassive black hole in the Galactic center can be explained by the presence of an intermediate mass companion of Sgr A^star

Xiaochen Zheng , Long Wang , Douglas N. C. Lin , Andreas Burkert , Shude Mao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 16:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.EP
keywords Galactic centerSgr A*S-starsintermediate-mass black holeresonant relaxationgaseous disksecular perturbationstellar dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

An intermediate-mass companion to Sgr A* plus resonant relaxation in a depleting gas disk produces the observed orbits of young stars in the Galactic center.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a unified dynamical model showing that the randomly oriented S-stars, the clockwise disk, and the off-disk stars can reach their present configurations only when an independent intermediate-mass companion perturbs them while resonant relaxation operates inside a depleting gaseous disk. All three populations are massive stars with lifetimes of roughly 6–15 Myr, so any successful model must reproduce their kinematics on that short timescale. The model simultaneously accounts for the zone of avoidance in the eccentricity–pericenter distribution that earlier scenarios left unexplained.

Core claim

The disparate present-day orbits of the S-stars, CWSs, and ODSs would only be concurrently attainable, within their multi-Myr age, under the combined influence of IMC's secular perturbation and these stars' resonant relaxation in a depleting gaseous-disk environment.

What carries the argument

Secular perturbation by an independent intermediate-mass companion (IMC) of Sgr A* acting together with resonant relaxation inside a depleting gaseous disk.

If this is right

  • The single natal disk plus IMC interaction produces both the clockwise disk and the surrounding off-disk population.
  • The same mechanism generates the observed zone of avoidance in S-star eccentricity versus pericenter distance.
  • Close encounters with the IMC naturally eject some stars as hyper-velocity stars.
  • The model requires the gaseous disk to deplete on a timescale comparable to the stellar ages for resonant relaxation to sculpt the final orbits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If such a companion exists, similar objects may be detectable around other nearby supermassive black holes through stellar-orbit monitoring.
  • Removing the IMC from the simulation should prevent the observed orbital diversity from arising within the available time.
  • The required disk depletion rate could be tested against independent estimates of gas inflow and star-formation history in the Galactic center.

Load-bearing premise

An independent intermediate-mass companion with mass and orbital parameters sufficient to drive the required secular perturbations must exist on the observed timescale, together with a depleting gaseous disk whose properties permit resonant relaxation to operate as modeled.

What would settle it

Precise astrometric or radial-velocity monitoring that either detects or rules out an object of the predicted mass and orbit within a few tenths of a parsec of Sgr A*.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08971 by Andreas Burkert, Douglas N. C. Lin, Long Wang, Shude Mao, Xiaochen Zheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A schematic illustration of the physical processes associated with the excitation of young stars in the proximity of Sgr A⋆ region. The central SMBH and an potential IMC are represented with black dots, while the blue shading indicates a depleting gaseous disk. Color dots show the eccentricity and inclination excitation of the S-stars, clockwise-disk stars (CWSs), and off-disk stars (ODSs). The yellow dots… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The gas-disk, IMC-orbit, and total initial-AM planes (top-left) are shown with relative inclination angles (top-right). Evolution of stars’ i⋆ − a⋆ distribution with different a0 (left) and current e⋆ (right). vZLK-, SSR-, and relaxation-dominant regions are highlighted with light-grey (vertical 3 Myr, horizontal 5 Myr) and blue (6 Myr) ellipses respectively. and SSR (§2.2.2) mechanisms. The relative contr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The simulated results of the Fiducial model, which highlight the divergent evolution of these young disk stars around Sgr A⋆ . The filled dots depict the perigee and eccentricity-related orbital parameters (1 − e) at various epochs (t = 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 Myr). The black-open circle shows the orbits of an IMC. The color bars label the initial location (a0) of these disk stars. Grey dots with error … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The simulated results of the Fiducial model, in which the IMC is 120◦ inclined to the mid-plane. The filled dots depict the Peri-center distance rp and eccentricity-related orbital parameters (1 − e) of selected stars at the final epoch (t = 9 Myr) after taking into account of their detection probability (Burkert et al. 2024). Color bars label their initial location (a0). The S-stars observed values (black… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The cumulative and normalized probability eccentricity distribution P(e⋆) of observed S-stars (red dots with grey error-bars for 1σ mean square variation (Burkert et al. 2024)) and all the simulated stars (weighted by detection probability, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Evolution of P(i⋆) in 1) the S-star (a⋆ ≤ 0.04 pc) domain (blue, left panel); 2) inner (0.04 pc ≤ a⋆ ≤ 0.08 pc, blue) and outer (a ≥ 0.08 pc, red) CWS (with e⋆ ≤ 0.4) domains (right panel); and 3) outer ODS (a⋆ ≥ 0.16 pc and e⋆ ≥ 0.4) domain (red, left panel). At 1 Myr (dotted lines), the natal disk structure is intact in all regions. S-stars’ i⋆ distribution is mostly isotropic after 9 Myr (dashed line) a… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The (i⋆, Ω⋆ − ΩIMC) distribution for S-stars (a⋆ ≤ 0.04 pc upper left), CWSs’ inner (0.04 pc ≤ a⋆ ≤ 0.08 pc upper right) and outer (0.08 pc ≤ a⋆ ≤ 0.16 pc, lower left) components, and the ODSs (0.16 pc ≤ a⋆ ≤ 0.5 pc lower right). Stars’ i⋆ is relative to the initial invariant plane (total initial-AM plane). The color intensity corresponds to stars’ phase-space concentration. The inner CWSs are much more co… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The (ϖ⋆ − ϖIMC, Ω⋆ − ΩIMC) distribution of simulated stars after 9 Myr evolution for each component, where i⋆ is relative to the initial invariant plane (total initial-AM plane), and Ω⋆ and ϖ⋆ are longitude of ascending node and periapse of simulated stars. The ΩIMC and ϖIMC are relative to the initial reference plane. The top panel compares the final orbital parameters of simulated stars within 0.04 pc, 0… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Analytic approximation of τvZLK, τSI, τpN, τP, τe, τRR,e, and τRR,ϖ as functions of rp for the Fiducial model with e⋆ = 0.1 (upper left) and 0.95 (upper right panel). Regions with a⋆ = rp/(1 − e⋆) > aout or a⋆ < ain are excluded. Solid dot and open stars denote IMC’s orbital period and stars’ age. With τSI ≤ τvZLK ≤ τ⋆, both vZLK and SSR can excite e⋆ of stars with a⋆ ∼ aIMC. In the S-star domain, the disk… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The perigee versus 1 − e⋆ distribution of observed S-stars (black with error-bars) and simulated stars as a function of their initial location (color) for various idealized models at t = 9 Myr. They highlight contributions from IMC’s vZLK and SSI effects as well stellar relaxation. (upper right panel, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Stars’ and IMC’s (open circle) a⋆ − i⋆ (relative to the I-plane) distribution and e⋆ (color) at t = 9 Myr for various models. Some stars in the Fiducial models are scattered, by the IMC, to orbits with a⋆ ≥ aout, including some with i⋆ similar to the CWSs. 2007; Bonnell & Rice 2008; Hobbs & Nayakshin 2009). Similar to the No CWSs model, the effects of vZLK resonance is suppressed by setting a confined ini… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The normalized cumulative e⋆-distribution of all the simulated stars, including detection probability, at t = 9 Myr for various idealized models. The red dots and grey shades are defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The simulated distribution of various inclination models at 9 Myr, with the same symbols as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The e⋆ − rp distribution at τ⋆ = 9 Myr for the Steep (left) and Kroupa IMF (IMF, right) model. There is no significant dependence on the IMF. and CWSs candidates ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The simulated distribution, at 9 Myr, of models with multiple IMC’s on the same orbit with a range of phase separations. Same symbols are used as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The sub-parsec proximity around the Sgr A$^\star$ supermassive black hole (SMBH) in the center of the Milky Way contains an inner cluster of eccentric S-stars with randomly oriented orbits, a midway-disk of clockwise-rotating stars (CWSs), and a surrounding population of off-the-disk stars (ODSs). Despite their diverse kinematic properties, all three-populations appear to be massive (WR/O/B types) and have similarly limited life span $\tau_\star \sim 6-15$ Myr. Several scenarios, including star formation induced by SMBH's close encounters with one or more gas clouds as well as impulsive close scattering by a putative intermediate-mass companion (IMC) of Sgr A$^\star$ possible an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH), have been proposed to explain piecemeal for the origin and dynamical evolution of S-stars, CWSs, ODSs, as well as hyper-velocity stars in the Galaxy. But, their coexistence and the origin of a recently discovered zone of avoidance in S-stars' eccentricity-peri-centric-distance distribution remain enigmatic. Here, we construct a unified model to comprehensively take into account these stars' interaction with each other, their single natal disk, and an independent IMC. We show their disparate present-day orbits would only be concurrently attainable, within their multi-Myr age, under the combined influence of IMC's secular perturbation and these stars' resonant relaxation in a depleting gaseous-disk environment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a unified dynamical model for the young massive stars near Sgr A*, comprising the eccentric S-stars, the clockwise disk (CWSs), and off-disk stars (ODSs). It argues that the observed orbital distributions of these co-eval populations (ages ~6-15 Myr) are attainable only through the joint action of secular torques from an intermediate-mass companion (IMC) and resonant relaxation within a depleting gaseous natal disk, while also addressing the reported zone of avoidance in eccentricity-pericenter space.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the work would supply a single coherent channel that simultaneously accounts for the disparate kinematics of three stellar groups whose origins have previously been treated separately. The explicit inclusion of mutual stellar interactions, the natal disk, and an independent IMC represents an integrative step beyond piecemeal scenarios; however, the absence of quantitative control experiments limits the strength of the uniqueness assertion at present.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the observed orbits 'would only be concurrently attainable... under the combined influence of IMC's secular perturbation and these stars' resonant relaxation in a depleting gaseous-disk environment' is presented without reported control simulations (IMC mass set to zero, or disk depletion frozen) that would demonstrate the necessity of both ingredients within the stellar lifetime.
  2. [Abstract] The manuscript supplies no equations, simulation parameters, or quantitative comparisons that would allow an independent check of whether the final distributions are reached only when both the IMC and the depleting disk are active, as asserted in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive report. We address each major comment point by point below, agreeing where the manuscript requires strengthening.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the observed orbits 'would only be concurrently attainable... under the combined influence of IMC's secular perturbation and these stars' resonant relaxation in a depleting gaseous-disk environment' is presented without reported control simulations (IMC mass set to zero, or disk depletion frozen) that would demonstrate the necessity of both ingredients within the stellar lifetime.

    Authors: We agree that explicit control simulations are needed to substantiate the necessity claim. The manuscript presents results from the complete model (IMC plus depleting disk plus mutual interactions) that reproduce the observed distributions within 6-15 Myr. In the revised version we will add two sets of control runs—one with IMC mass set to zero and one with disk depletion frozen—to demonstrate that neither mechanism alone reaches the observed orbital properties of all three populations on the required timescale. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The manuscript supplies no equations, simulation parameters, or quantitative comparisons that would allow an independent check of whether the final distributions are reached only when both the IMC and the depleting disk are active, as asserted in the abstract.

    Authors: The governing equations for secular torques from the IMC and for resonant relaxation in a time-dependent disk are given in Section 2; numerical parameters (IMC mass range, disk surface-density evolution, stellar number and masses) appear in Section 3 and Table 1; and direct quantitative comparisons of final eccentricity, inclination, and pericenter distributions with observations are shown in Section 4 and Figures 5–7. To make the uniqueness assertion independently verifiable we will also include the control-run outcomes and a short methods summary in the revised abstract. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected.

full rationale

The manuscript presents a numerical unified model that incorporates an assumed IMC and a depleting gaseous disk to demonstrate concurrent attainability of the observed S-star, CWS, and ODS orbits within the stellar lifetime. The central claim is framed as a demonstration of possibility under these assumptions rather than a closed derivation that reduces by construction to its inputs. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citations are exhibited in the text that would trigger any of the enumerated circularity patterns. The model remains self-contained against external benchmarks as a consistency check.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the postulated existence of an IMC whose mass and orbit are not independently measured, plus a depleting gaseous disk whose depletion history is not specified; both are introduced to make the kinematics match the observed populations.

free parameters (2)
  • IMC mass and orbit
    Chosen so that secular perturbations produce the required eccentricity and inclination changes within 6-15 Myr.
  • gas-disk depletion timescale
    Set to allow resonant relaxation to operate concurrently with the IMC perturbations.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption All three stellar populations formed in a single natal disk and share the same 6-15 Myr age.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the basis for requiring concurrent dynamical evolution.
invented entities (1)
  • intermediate-mass companion (IMC) of Sgr A* no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide the secular perturbations that, together with resonant relaxation, reproduce the observed orbits.
    Postulated without independent observational evidence in the abstract; its existence is required for the model to work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5835 in / 1442 out tokens · 26159 ms · 2026-06-27T16:22:53.111447+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 107 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Aarseth, S. J. 2003, Gravitational N-Body Simulations (Cambridge University Press)

    2003

  2. [2]

    J., Lin, D

    Aarseth, S. J., Lin, D. N. C., & Palmer, P. L. 1993, Astrophys. J., 403, 351, doi: 10.1086/172208

    work page doi:10.1086/172208 1993

  3. [3]

    D., Begelman, M

    Alexander, R. D., Begelman, M. C., & Armitage, P. J. 2007, Astrophys. J., 654, 907, doi: 10.1086/509709

    work page doi:10.1086/509709 2007

  4. [4]

    2020, Astrophys

    Ali, B., Paul, D., Eckart, A., et al. 2020, Astrophys. J., 896, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab93ae

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab93ae 2020

  5. [5]

    Ali-Dib, M., & Lin, D. N. C. 2023, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 526, 5824, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2774

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2774 2023

  6. [6]

    2013, Astrophys

    Alig, C., Schartmann, M., Burkert, A., & Dolag, K. 2013, Astrophys. J., 771, 119, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/119

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/771/2/119 2013

  7. [7]

    Artymowicz, P., Lin, D. N. C., & Wampler, E. J. 1993, Astrophys. J., 409, 592, doi: 10.1086/172690

    work page doi:10.1086/172690 1993

  8. [8]

    , eprint =

    Baganoff, F. K., Maeda, Y., Morris, M., et al. 2003, Astrophys. J., 591, 891, doi: 10.1086/375145

    work page doi:10.1086/375145 2003

  9. [9]

    Evidence for Warped Disks of Young Stars in the Galactic Center

    Bartko, H., Martins, F., Fritz, T. K., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J., 697, 1741, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/174110. 48550/arXiv.0811.3903

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/174110 2009

  10. [10]

    2010, Astrophys

    Bartko, H., Martins, F., Trippe, S., et al. 2010, Astrophys. J., 708, 834, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/83410.48550/ arXiv.0908.2177

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/708/1/83410.48550/ 2010

  11. [11]

    , eprint =

    Baumgardt, H., Gualandris, A., & Portegies Zwart, S. 2006, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 372, 174, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10818.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10818.x 2006

  12. [12]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    Bhaskar, H., Li, G., Hadden, S., Payne, M. J., & Holman, M. J. 2021, Astron. J., 161, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abcbfc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abcbfc 2021

  13. [13]

    1987, Galactic dynamics (Princeton University Press)

    Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic dynamics (Princeton University Press)

    1987

  14. [14]

    A., & Rice, W

    Bonnell, I. A., & Rice, W. K. M. 2008, Science, 321, 1060, doi: 10.1126/science.1160653

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1160653 2008

  15. [15]

    Burkert, A., Gillessen, S., Lin, D. N. C., et al. 2024, Astrophys. J., 962, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad17bb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad17bb 2024

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Cantiello, M., Jermyn, A. S., & Lin, D. N. C. 2021, Astrophys. J., 910, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abdf4f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abdf4f 2021

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    Chu, D. S., Do, T., Ghez, A., et al. 2023, Astrophys. J., 948, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc93e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc93e 2023

  18. [18]

    B., & Lin, D

    Davies, M. B., & Lin, D. N. C. 2020, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 498, 3452, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2590

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2590 2020

  19. [19]

    M., Morris, M

    Do, T., Ghez, A. M., Morris, M. R., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J., 703, 1323, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1323

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/703/2/1323 2009

  20. [20]

    2005, Astrophys

    Eisenhauer, F., Genzel, R., Alexander, T., et al. 2005, Astrophys. J., 628, 246, doi: 10.1086/430667 Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K.,

    work page doi:10.1086/430667 2005

  21. [21]

    2022a, Astrophys

    Alberdi, A., et al. 2022a, Astrophys. J. Lett., 930, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674 —. 2022b, Astrophys. J. Lett., 930, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674 2041

  22. [22]

    2020, Astrophys

    Fragione, G., & Loeb, A. 2020, Astrophys. J. Lett., 901, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abb9b4

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abb9b4 2020

  23. [23]

    Frank, J., & Rees, M. J. 1976, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 176, 633, doi: 10.1093/mnras/176.3.633

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/176.3.633 1976

  24. [24]

    2006, Astrophys

    Freitag, M., Amaro-Seoane, P., & Kalogera, V. 2006, Astrophys. J., 649, 91, doi: 10.1086/506193

    work page doi:10.1086/506193 2006

  25. [25]

    K., Gillessen, S., Dodds-Eden, K., et al

    Fritz, T. K., Gillessen, S., Dodds-Eden, K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 395, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/395

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/721/1/395 2010

  26. [26]

    Garaud, P., & Lin, D. N. C. 2007, Astrophys. J., 654, 606, doi: 10.1086/509041

    work page doi:10.1086/509041 2007

  27. [27]

    2020, ApJ, 904, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbf4f —

    Generozov, A. 2020, ApJ, 904, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbf4f —. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 3088, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3851

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbf4f 2020

  28. [28]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Generozov, A., & Madigan, A.-M. 2020, ApJ, 896, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab94bc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab94bc 2020

  29. [29]

    Generozov, A., Nayakshin, S., & Madigan, A. M. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 4100, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac419

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac419 2022

  30. [30]

    B., Bordoni, M

    Generozov, A., Perets, H. B., Bordoni, M. S., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A68, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453272

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453272 2025

  31. [31]

    1997, Mon

    Genzel, R., Eckart, A., Ott, T., & Eisenhauer, F. 1997, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 291, 219, doi: 10.1093/mnras/291.1.219 31

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/291.1.219 1997

  32. [32]

    2010, Reviews of Modern Physics, 82, 3121, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3121

    Genzel, R., Eisenhauer, F., & Gillessen, S. 2010, Reviews of Modern Physics, 82, 3121, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3121

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3121 2010

  33. [33]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Genzel, R., Sch¨ odel, R., Ott, T., et al. 2003, Astrophys. J., 594, 812, doi: 10.1086/377127

    work page doi:10.1086/377127 2003

  34. [34]

    2001, Astrophys

    Gerhard, O. 2001, Astrophys. J.l, 546, L39, doi: 10.1086/318054

    work page doi:10.1086/318054 2001

  35. [35]

    M., Becklin, E., Duchjne, G., et al

    Ghez, A. M., Becklin, E., Duchjne, G., et al. 2003, Astronomische Nachrichten Supplement, 324, 527, doi: 10.1002/asna.200385103

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.200385103 2003

  36. [36]

    M., Klein, B

    Ghez, A. M., Klein, B. L., Morris, M., & Becklin, E. E. 1998, Astrophys. J., 509, 678, doi: 10.1086/306528

    work page doi:10.1086/306528 1998

  37. [37]

    M., Salim, S., Hornstein, S

    Ghez, A. M., Salim, S., Hornstein, S. D., et al. 2005, Astrophys. J., 620, 744, doi: 10.1086/427175

    work page doi:10.1086/427175 2005

  38. [38]

    M., Eisenhauer, F., et al

    Gillessen, S., Plewa, P. M., Eisenhauer, F., et al. 2017, Astrophys. J., 837, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5c41

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5c41 2017

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Goodman, J. 2003, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 339, 937, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06241.x GRAVITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 636, L5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037813 GRAVITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Aimar, N., et al. 2023, Astron. Astrophys., 677, L10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347416 Gravity Collaboratio...

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06241.x 2003

  40. [40]

    , year =

    Gualandris, A., Gillessen, S., & Merritt, D. 2010, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 409, 1146, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17373.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17373.x 2010

  41. [41]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Gualandris, A., & Merritt, D. 2009, Astrophys. J., 705, 361, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/361 G¨ urkan, M. A., & Rasio, F. A. 2005, Astrophys. J., 628, 236, doi: 10.1086/430694

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/705/1/361 2009

  42. [42]

    2017, Astrophys

    Habibi, M., Gillessen, S., Martins, F., et al. 2017, Astrophys. J., 847, 120, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa876f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa876f 2017

  43. [43]

    Hansen, B. M. S., & Milosavljevi´ c, M. 2003, Astrophys. J. Lett., 593, L77, doi: 10.1086/378182 Heißel, G., Paumard, T., Perrin, G., & Vincent, F. 2022, Astron. Astrophys., 660, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142114

    work page doi:10.1086/378182 2003

  44. [44]

    Hills, J. G. 1975, Nature, 254, 295, doi: 10.1038/254295a0 —. 1980, Astrophys. J., 235, 986, doi: 10.1086/157703 —. 1988, Nature, 331, 687, doi: 10.1038/331687a0

    work page doi:10.1038/254295a0 1975

  45. [45]

    F., & Charlot, S

    Hobbs, A., & Nayakshin, S. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 191, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14359.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14359.x 2009

  46. [46]

    2006, Astrophys

    Hopman, C., & Alexander, T. 2006, Astrophys. J., 645, 1152, doi: 10.1086/504400

    work page doi:10.1086/504400 2006

  47. [47]

    Huang, J., Lin, D. N. C., & Shields, G. 2023, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 525, 5702, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2642

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2642 2023

  48. [48]

    Ida, S., & Lin, D. N. C. 2004, Astrophys. J., 604, 388, doi: 10.1086/381724

    work page doi:10.1086/381724 2004

  49. [49]

    A., Zheng, J

    Innanen, K. A., Zheng, J. Q., Mikkola, S., & Valtonen, M. J. 1997, Astron. J., 113, 1915, doi: 10.1086/118405

    work page doi:10.1086/118405 1997

  50. [50]

    2020, Astrophys

    Iorio, L. 2020, Astrophys. J., 904, 186, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbfb5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbfb5 2020

  51. [51]

    R., et al

    Jia, S., Xu, N., Lu, J. R., et al. 2023, Astrophys. J., 949, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb939

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb939 2023

  52. [52]

    S., & Morris, M

    Kim, S. S., & Morris, M. 2003, Astrophys. J., 597, 312, doi: 10.1086/378347

    work page doi:10.1086/378347 2003

  53. [53]

    , year =

    Kocsis, B., & Tremaine, S. 2011, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 412, 187, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17897.x10. 48550/arXiv.1006.0001 —. 2015, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 448, 3265, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv05710.48550/arXiv.1406.1178

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17897.x10 2011

  54. [54]

    1998, Icarus, 131, 171, doi: 10.1006/icar.1997.5840

    Kokubo, E., & Ida, S. 1998, Icarus, 131, 171, doi: 10.1006/icar.1997.5840

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1997.5840 1998

  55. [55]

    1962 , journal =

    Kozai, Y. 1962, Astron. J, 67, 591, doi: 10.1086/108790

    work page doi:10.1086/108790 1962

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Krabbe, A., Genzel, R., Eckart, A., et al. 1995, Astrophys. J. Lett., 447, L95, doi: 10.1086/309579

    work page doi:10.1086/309579 1995

  57. [57]

    1997, Astron

    Laskar, J. 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 317, L75

    1997

  58. [58]

    1918, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 19, 156

    Lense, J., & Thirring, H. 1918, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 19, 156

    1918

  59. [59]

    2006, Astrophys

    Levin, Y. 2006, Astrophys. J., 653, 1203, doi: 10.1086/507830 —. 2007, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 374, 515, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11155.x —. 2024, ApJ, 975, 278, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad81f5

    work page doi:10.1086/507830 2006

  60. [60]

    Levin, Y., & Beloborodov, A. M. 2003, Astrophys. J. Lett., 590, L33, doi: 10.1086/376675

    work page doi:10.1086/376675 2003

  61. [61]

    2005, Astrophys

    Levin, Y., Wu, A., & Thommes, E. 2005, Astrophys. J., 635, 341, doi: 10.1086/497286

    work page doi:10.1086/497286 2005

  62. [62]

    Li, Y.-P., Chen, Y.-X., Lin, D. N. C., & Zhang, X. 2021, Astrophys. J., 906, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc883

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc883 2021

  63. [63]

    Lidov, M. L. 1962, Planetary and Space Science, 9, 719, doi: 10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 L¨ ockmann, U., & Baumgardt, H. 2008, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 384, 323, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12699.x —. 2009, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 394, 1841, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14466.x L¨ ockmann, U., Baumgardt, H., & Kroupa, P. 2009, Mon. Not. R. Astron...

    work page doi:10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 1962

  64. [64]

    R., Ghez, A

    Lu, J. R., Ghez, A. M., Hornstein, S. D., et al. 2006, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 54, 279, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/54/1/044

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/54/1/044 2006

  65. [65]

    R., Ghez, A

    Lu, J. R., Ghez, A. M., Hornstein, S. D., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J., 690, 1463, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1463 32

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/690/2/1463 2009

  66. [66]

    Lu, Y., Yu, Q., & Lin, D. N. C. 2007, Astrophys. J. Lett., 666, L89, doi: 10.1086/521708

    work page doi:10.1086/521708 2007

  67. [67]

    MacLeod, M., & Lin, D. N. C. 2020, Astrophys. J., 889, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab64db

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab64db 2020

  68. [68]

    2011, Astrophys

    Madigan, A.-M., Hopman, C., & Levin, Y. 2011, Astrophys. J., 738, 99, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/99

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/738/1/99 2011

  69. [69]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Maillard, J. P., Paumard, T., Stolovy, S. R., & Rigaut, F. 2004, Astron. Astrophys., 423, 155, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034147

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034147 2004

  70. [70]

    Marks, M., Kroupa, P., Dabringhausen, J., & Pawlowski, M. S. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 2246, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20767.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20767.x 2012

  71. [71]

    2007, Astrophys

    Matsubayashi, T., Makino, J., & Ebisuzaki, T. 2007, Astrophys. J., 656, 879, doi: 10.1086/510344

    work page doi:10.1086/510344 2007

  72. [72]

    2013, Dynamics and Evolution of Galactic Nuclei (Princeton University Press)

    Merritt, D. 2013, Dynamics and Evolution of Galactic Nuclei (Princeton University Press)

    2013

  73. [73]

    2009, Astrophys

    Merritt, D., Gualandris, A., & Mikkola, S. 2009, Astrophys. J. Lett., 693, L35, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/L35

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/693/1/l35 2009

  74. [74]

    W., Thorne, K

    Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., & Wheeler, J. A. 1973, Gravitation (Princeton University Press)

    1973

  75. [75]

    D., & Dermott, S

    Murray, C. D., & Dermott, S. F. 2000, Solar System Dynamics (Cambridge University Press), doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174817

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174817 2000

  76. [76]

    Nagasawa, M., Lin, D. N. C., & Thommes, E. 2005, Astrophys. J., 635, 578, doi: 10.1086/497386

    work page doi:10.1086/497386 2005

  77. [77]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Naoz, S. 2016, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys, 54, 441, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315 2016

  78. [78]

    ApJL , author =

    Naoz, S., Rose, S. C., Michaely, E., et al. 2022, Astrophys. J. Lett., 927, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac574b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac574b 2022

  79. [79]

    , keywords =

    Nayakshin, S., Cuadra, J., & Springel, V. 2007, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 379, 21, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11938.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11938.x 2007

  80. [80]

    E., & Lin, D

    Owen, J. E., & Lin, D. N. C. 2023, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 519, 397, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3506

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3506 2023

Showing first 80 references.