Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Empty Signifier Problem: Towards Clearer Paradigms for Operationalising "Alignment" in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.02457 v2 pith:7VREPQN5 submitted 2023-10-03 cs.CL cs.CY

The Empty Signifier Problem: Towards Clearer Paradigms for Operationalising "Alignment" in Large Language Models

classification cs.CL cs.CY
keywords alignmentdimensionsempiricalemptyframeworklanguagelargellms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In this paper, we address the concept of "alignment" in large language models (LLMs) through the lens of post-structuralist socio-political theory, specifically examining its parallels to empty signifiers. To establish a shared vocabulary around how abstract concepts of alignment are operationalised in empirical datasets, we propose a framework that demarcates: 1) which dimensions of model behaviour are considered important, then 2) how meanings and definitions are ascribed to these dimensions, and by whom. We situate existing empirical literature and provide guidance on deciding which paradigm to follow. Through this framework, we aim to foster a culture of transparency and critical evaluation, aiding the community in navigating the complexities of aligning LLMs with human populations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. What Do People Actually Want From AI? Mapping Preference Plurality

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Open-ended preference data reveals substantial plurality in what people want from AI and divergent interpretations of shared values such as truthfulness.

  2. Structural transparency of societal AI alignment through Institutional Logics

    cs.CY 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Introduces a five-component analytical framework, grounded in Institutional Logics, for making visible the organizational and institutional decisions that shape AI alignment.