Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Detecting the Coupling of Axion Dark Matter to Neutron Spins at Spallation Sources via Rabi Oscillation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes detecting axion dark matter through Rabi oscillations of neutron spins in a polarized beam, reaching a one-day sensitivity of $f_a/C_n \sim 1.3\times10^7$ GeV.

desk verdict A genuinely new double-Stern-Gerlach Rabi scheme for axion-neutron coupling, with a clean analytic reach estimate, but the projected two-order-of-magnitude improvement rests on unquantified spin-state leakage and velocity-spread effects. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10832 v2 pith:7WDK7YXO submitted 2024-12-14 hep-ph astro-ph.COnucl-exphysics.ins-det

Peter Fierlinger , Jie Sheng , Yevgeny V. Stadnik , Chuan-Yang Xing This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COnucl-exphysics.ins-det
keywords axiondarkmatterneutronspinRabioscillationStern-Gerlachapparatusspallationsourceaxion-nucleoncouplingdirectdetection
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Axion dark matter that couples to neutron spins would act as an oscillating effective magnetic field on a neutron beam, driving resonant spin-flips (Rabi oscillations) when the axion mass-energy matches the neutron's Zeeman splitting in a static magnetic field. The paper proposes a beamline in which a first Stern-Gerlach splitter polarizes the beam, the neutrons traverse a uniform-field region where axion-induced flips accumulate over about 0.1 seconds, and a second Stern-Gerlach splitter counts the flipped neutrons. For a day of running at a high-intensity spallation neutron source, the projected sensitivity is $f_a/C_n \gtrsim 1.3\times10^7$ GeV, which would exceed current ground-based limits by up to two orders of magnitude in the mass window $10^{-12}$ to $10^{-10}$ eV. The resonance is narrow enough that a positive signal would also give a precise measurement of the axion mass.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Rabi resonance between the neutron spin two-level system and the oscillating axion field. The effective axion magnetic field $\mathbf{B}_a$ serves as the transverse oscillatory drive, producing the standard Rabi probability $P_\downarrow(\delta;t)=|\mathbf{B}_a|^2\sin^2(\sqrt{|\mathbf{B}_a|^2+\delta^2}\,t/2)/(|\mathbf{B}_a|^2+\delta^2)$ with detuning $\delta=m_a-\omega_0$. The experimental carrier is a double Stern-Gerlach apparatus: a first inhomogeneous-field splitter prepares a nearly pure spin-down beam, a 40 m uniform-field drift region gives a flight time $\tau\sim 0.1$ s, a magnetic lens refocuses the beam, and a second splitter plus a low-background detector ($10^{-5}$ Hz) selects spin-up neutrons. The projected sensitivity follows from setting the Rabi probability equal to $1/(N_nN_{\rm pulse})$, giving $f_a/C_n \gtrsim \sqrt{\rho_a v_a^2 \tau^2 N_n N_{\rm pulse}/8}$.

What would settle it

A direct laboratory test would place a double Stern-Gerlach apparatus on a polarized beam with no axion field expected and measure the count rate in the spin-flip detector: if the leakage fraction exceeds about $5\times10^{-17}$ per neutron, or if non-adiabatic Majorana transitions from a $10^{-3}$-level magnetic-field inhomogeneity cannot be suppressed below one event per $2\times10^{16}$ neutrons, then the one-day sensitivity claim in Eq. (7) is not achievable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the axion dark matter background, through the derivative coupling $\mathcal{L}_{\rm int}=-(C_N/2f_a)\,\partial_\mu a\,\bar N\gamma^\mu\gamma_5 N$, generates an effective magnetic field $\mathbf{B}_a = (C_n/2f_a)a_0\mathbf{p}_a$ that oscillates at the axion Compton frequency. In a static field $B_0$, the neutron spin forms a two-level system with gap $\omega_0=|g_n|eB_0/2m_p$; on resonance $m_a=\omega_0$, the spin-down-to-spin-up transition probability grows as $P_\downarrow(t)\simeq (C_n a_0|\mathbf{p}_a| t/4f_a)^2$ before saturating in a sine-squared Rabi oscillation. The paper shows that at a spallation source with $N_nN_{\rm pulse}\simeq 2\times10^{16}$ usable neutrons per day and an interaction time $\tau\simeq 0.1$ s, the threshold for seeing one spin-flip event yields $f_a/C_n \gtrsim 1.3\times10^7$ GeV, i.e., sensitivity to axion-neutron couplings roughly two orders of magnitude beyond current ground-based experiments in the mass range $3\times10^{-13}$ to $10^{-10}$ eV. The method is presented as complementary to Ramsey-based neutron-beam searches, which are limited to axion masses below about $10^{-14}$ eV.

Load-bearing premise

The entire sensitivity projection rests on the unquantified assumption that the double Stern-Gerlach spin separation can keep non-flipped neutrons from contaminating the spin-flip channel at the level of one part in $10^{16}$, with no estimate of the required extinction ratio or of velocity-spread smearing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One day at a fixed field strength $B_0$ reaches $f_a/C_n\sim 1.3\times10^7$ GeV; scanning $B_0$ from $2.5\times10^{-6}$ to $10^{-3}$ T covers axion masses from $3\times10^{-13}$ to $10^{-10}$ eV in about three years of total beam time.
  • Because the resonance width is only $\Delta\delta\simeq 4\times10^{-14}$ eV for a 0.1 s flight, a detected spin-flip peak would determine the axion mass to that precision without additional instrumentation.
  • The method extends neutron-beam axion searches from the Ramsey-limited regime ($m_a\lesssim 10^{-14}$ eV) up to $10^{-10}$ eV, filling a gap between comagnetometer and haloscope experiments.
  • Longer interaction times and higher integrated neutron fluxes directly improve the sensitivity, so future higher-intensity sources would deepen the reach proportionally.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the paper leaves implicit is applying the same double Stern-Gerlach scheme to stored ultracold neutrons, where flight times of seconds would sharpen the mass resolution and improve the coupling sensitivity beyond the beam projection.
  • The sensitivity estimate treats the axion field as monochromatic and the neutron velocity as single-valued; averaging the Rabi probability over the actual velocity spread and the axion momentum dispersion would widen the effective resonance and modestly degrade the projected reach, a correction a full experimental proposal would need to quantify.
  • The velocity anti-correlation between Majorana backgrounds and the axion signal suggests a self-calibrating cross-check: measuring the spin-flip rate for two different neutron velocity selections would separate the two contributions without changing the magnetic field.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes a beam-based search for axion dark matter through the Rabi oscillation of neutron spins in a double Stern-Gerlach apparatus at spallation sources. The authors derive the spin-flip probability for neutrons in a magnetic field under an oscillating axion-induced pseudo-magnetic field (Eqs. (5)-(6)), and from the condition P_down(tau)=1/(N_n N_pulse) obtain a one-day projected sensitivity f_a/C_n >~ 1.3e7 GeV over the axion mass range 3e-13 - 1e-10 eV (Eq. (7), Fig. 2). The paper argues that this reach surpasses current laboratory constraints and that the full mass range can be scanned in about three years. The quantum-mechanical derivation is standard, but the sensitivity projection depends on several unquantified experimental assumptions about beam velocity spread, Stern-Gerlach extinction, magnetic-field homogeneity, and background rejection.

Significance. The proposed method is conceptually interesting and, if the experimental assumptions can be substantiated, would open a comparatively unexplored mass range for axion-neutron coupling searches using a new observable (single-pass Rabi spin flip) rather than precession or magnetometry. The derivation leading to Eq. (7) is transparent and parameter-free in the sense that no target parameter is fitted, and it yields a falsifiable sensitivity curve. The main value of the paper is therefore as a proposal; its significance is currently limited by the lack of quantitative experimental feasibility analysis for the very small per-neutron signal probability (~5e-17) that the quoted reach assumes.

major comments (4)
  1. [Projected Sensitivity (Eq. (7))] The reach is obtained by setting P_down(tau)=1/(N_n N_pulse) with a single interaction time tau=l/v_n for all neutrons. Spallation beams have a broad velocity spectrum, and in the small-coupling regime of Eq. (6) the spin-flip probability scales as tau^2, so the correct quantity is the velocity-weighted average <P_down(l/v)> = integral dv f(v) P_down(delta; l/v), not P_down evaluated at one representative v_n. The spread in tau also broadens the effective resonance lineshape of Eq. (5) and affects the claimed mass resolution. No velocity distribution, velocity-selection scheme, or time-of-flight binning is specified, so the numerical reach in Eq. (7) and Fig. 2 is not yet established.
  2. [Proposed Experimental Setup and Eq. (7)] The target sensitivity corresponds to N_n N_pulse P_down ~ 1 spin-flip per day, i.e. P_down ~ 5e-17 per neutron. With N_n=2e10 unflipped neutrons per pulse, the second Stern-Gerlach apparatus must suppress unflipped neutrons by a factor well below 5e-17 per neutron (equivalently, the separated beam trajectories must have negligible overlap, supplemented by detector spatial discrimination at that level). The paper states that backgrounds are 'controllable' but gives no estimate of the Stern-Gerlach extinction ratio, beam divergence at the second splitter, or detector pixel/fiducial rejection. In addition, the quoted 10^-5 Hz detector background amounts to about 0.86 counts per day, which is comparable to the one expected signal event; Eq. (7)'s background-free assumption should therefore be replaced by a Poisson-statistics treatment with an explicit background count.
  3. [Proposed Experimental Setup (magnetic-field homogeneity)] The stated 10^-3-level homogeneity of B_0 is discussed only as a source of Majorana backgrounds, but it also affects the Rabi resonance itself. The resonance width is Delta(delta) ~ 4e-14 eV x (0.1 s/tau), while a 10^-3 variation of B_0 near the upper end of the scan (B_0=1e-3 T, omega_0~1.2e-10 eV) corresponds to a spread in omega_0 of about 1.2e-13 eV, which is larger than Delta(delta). Field variations along the 40-m flight path therefore detune the spin-flip transition for a significant fraction of the flight time and suppress the mean transition probability relative to Eq. (6). A quantitative model of B_0(z) fluctuations and their effect on Eq. (5) is needed before the projected reach can be taken at face value.
  4. [Proposed Experimental Setup (Majorana transitions)] The argument that Majorana spin-flip backgrounds are distinguishable because they are positively correlated with neutron velocity while the axion signal is negatively correlated is not quantified. The axion-induced per-neutron probability at the projected reach is about 5e-17; even a Majorana transition probability of order 1e-16 would produce roughly two background events per day, comparable to the signal, unless the velocity-correlation analysis rejects them extremely efficiently. The paper should estimate the Majorana transition probability for the quoted 10^-3 field gradients and specify the velocity resolution or time-of-flight binning required for the discrimination to work.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract quotes a mass window of 10^-12 - 10^-10 eV, while the projected sensitivity in the main text and Fig. 2 is stated as 3e-13 - 1e-10 eV; these numbers should be reconciled.
  2. [Proposed Experimental Setup (backgrounds)] The same paragraph refers to 'mHz background-rate neutron detectors' and then quotes a lower background rate of 10^-5 Hz; please specify which rate is assumed in the sensitivity estimate and how the lower rate is achieved.
  3. [Projected Sensitivity (Eq. (7))] Equation (7) should include a detector efficiency factor eta, replacing N_n N_pulse by N_n N_pulse eta; if only a fraction of the spin-flipped neutrons are detected, the reach degrades by eta^{-1/2}.
  4. [Proposed Experimental Setup (beam parameters)] The 20% polarization loss and factor-of-four divergence loss that enter N_n=2e10 are stated without a reference or beam-transport estimate; since N_n enters Eq. (7) only through its square root, the impact is mild, but the source of these numbers should be identified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the sensitivity projection follows algebraically from standard Rabi physics and stated external inputs; self-citations are contextual.

full rationale

The derivation of the projected sensitivity, Eq. (7), is self-contained and non-circular. It follows algebraically from Eq. (6), the standard Rabi formula cited to the Sakurai textbook [46], using the stated external inputs rho_a = 0.4 GeV/cm^3, v_a ~ 10^-3, tau = l/v_n, N_n = 2e10, and N_pulse ~ 1e6; no parameter is fitted to data and then presented as a prediction. The non-relativistic spin Hamiltonian (3) is attributed to Ref. [45], a parameter-free published result with explicitly stated assumptions (non-relativistic reduction of the axial coupling); under the hard-rule criteria this counts as independent support and does not create circularity even though one author overlaps. Ref. [43], by an overlapping group, is used only to contrast the mass reach of a Ramsey-beam approach and does not enter the sensitivity derivation. The paper's feasibility claims, such as 'The main backgrounds in our experimental setup are controllable', do not quantify the required Stern-Gerlach extinction ratio or average over the neutron velocity spread; these are experimental-support gaps, not circular steps, because they concern instrumentation rather than the physics derivation. Overall, no equation is defined in terms of the target result, and no fitted input is relabeled as a discovery. The central sensitivity claim thus stands independently of any self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation depends on standard quantum mechanics, standard halo astrophysics parameters, and several assumed experimental parameters such as Nn, Npulse, tau, and detector background rate. No new particle, force, or entity is introduced: the axion is assumed from prior theory, and the effective field Ba in Eq. (3) is a derived combination of standard inputs. The most fragile inputs are the unquantified spin-channel leakage and background assumptions, which are the difference between a clean analytic projection and a demonstrably feasible measurement.

free parameters (7)
  • Usable neutrons per pulse Nn = 2x10^10
    Assumed from ESS about 10^11 neutrons per pulse, minus 20% polarizer loss and a factor of 4 divergence loss. This drives the sensitivity in Eq. (7).
  • Pulses per day Npulse = 10^6
    Corresponds to a spallation source rate near 11.6 pulses per second. Combined with Nn it gives 2x10^16 total neutrons per day.
  • Interaction time tau = 0.1 s
    Obtained from flight length l = 40 m and neutron speed vn = 1000 m/s. The spin-flip amplitude grows linearly with tau, so this choice sets the sensitivity scale.
  • Detector background rate = 10^-5 Hz
    Assumed feasible with particle-physics tracking detectors. It is used to argue that background counts remain near or below one event per day at the projected limit.
  • Pre-polarization efficiency = 99.9%
    A mirror polarizer is assumed to pre-polarize the beam to 99.9% spin-down, with the first Stern-Gerlach device removing the remainder. Residual leakage after the Stern-Gerlach device is not specified.
  • Magnetic field scan range = 2.5x10^-6 to 10^-3 T
    Sets the probed axion mass range 3x10^-13 to 10^-10 eV through the resonance condition ma = |gn| e B0 / (2 mp).
  • Spin-flip detection efficiency = 1 (implicit)
    The projection assumes every spin-flipped neutron is counted; no acceptance efficiency of the second Stern-Gerlach device or detector is included.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The Schrodinger equation and rotating-wave approximation produce the Rabi probability in Eq. (5).
    Textbook result from Ref. [46], used without modification.
  • domain assumption Local axion dark matter density rho = 0.4 GeV/cm^3 and velocity va = 10^-3.
    Standard halo parameters from PDG [44], used to set a0 and pa in Eq. (3).
  • domain assumption The axion dark matter field is monochromatic and coherent over the 0.1 s interaction time.
    The paper states this approximation is valid for the axion masses considered; tau_coh is much longer than tau for masses at and below 10^-10 eV.
  • domain assumption The neutron beam has speed near 1000 m/s with negligible velocity spread.
    Eq. (7) uses one value of tau. A velocity spread would average the tau^2-dependent Rabi probability and could reduce the projected sensitivity.
  • ad hoc to paper The Stern-Gerlach splitters have effectively zero leakage between the two spin channels.
    Required so that roughly 2x10^16 non-flipped neutrons do not contaminate the spin-flip detector. No extinction ratio is quoted or derived.
  • ad hoc to paper Magnetic-field inhomogeneities at the 10^-3 level produce only velocity-anticorrelated Majorana transition backgrounds.
    Stated qualitatively in the backgrounds paragraph, but no rate estimate or subtraction procedure is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Detecting the Coupling of Axion Dark Matter to Neutron Spins at Spallation Sources via Rabi Oscillation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7WDK7YXO

@misc{pith2026241210832,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Detecting the Coupling of Axion Dark Matter to Neutron Spins at Spallation Sources via Rabi Oscillation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7WDK7YXO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10832}
}
abstract

We propose a novel detection method for axion dark matter using the Rabi oscillation of neutron spins in beam-based measurements. If axions couple to neutron spins, a background oscillating axion dark matter field would drive transitions between spin-up and spin-down neutron states in a magnetic field when the axion particle energy matches the energy gap between the spin states. The transition can be detected in a double-Stern-Gerlach-type apparatus, with the first splitter producing a pure spin-polarized neutron beam and the second splitter selecting spin-flipped signals. Our approach offers enhanced detection capability for axions within the $10^{-12} - 10^{-10} \,$eV mass window with the capability to surpass the sensitivity of current laboratory experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10832 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic experimental setup for detecting neutron spin oscillation. The incoming neutron beam is pre-polarized and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Projected sensitivity to the axion-nucleon coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fundamental Nuclear and Particle Physics At Neutron Sources

    nucl-ex 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A community whitepaper makes the case that ESS and neutron sources offer a competitive, complementary route to search for new physics, with proposed experiments in neutron decay, EDM, baryon number violation, neutrino...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [43]

    Proposal for a Ramsey Neutron-Beam Experiment to Search for Ultralight Axion Dark Matter at the European Spallation Source ,

    P. Fierlinger, M. Holl, D. Milstead, V. Santoro, W. M. Snow, and Y. V. Stadnik, “ Proposal for a Ramsey Neutron-Beam Experiment to Search for Ultralight Axion Dark Matter at the European Spallation Source ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 18, (2024) 181001, [arXiv:2404.15521 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters ,

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al. , “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters ,” Astron. Astro- phys. 641 (2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    arXiv 2020

  3. [2]

    Particle dark mat- ter: Evidence, candidates and constraints ,

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, “ Particle dark mat- ter: Evidence, candidates and constraints ,” Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279–390, [ arXiv:hep-ph/0404175]

    arXiv 2005

  4. [3]

    A survey of dark matter and related topics in cosmology ,

    B.-L. Young, “ A survey of dark matter and related topics in cosmology ,” Front. Phys. (Beijing) 12 no. 2, (2017) 121201. [Erratum: Front.Phys.(Beijing) 12, 121202 (2017)]

    work page 2017

  5. [4]

    Dark matter and the early Universe: a review ,

    A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi, “ Dark matter and the early Universe: a review ,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 119 (2021) 103865, [arXiv:2104.11488 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [5]

    Direct detection of dark mat- ter—APPEC committee report* ,

    J. Billard et al. , “ Direct detection of dark mat- ter—APPEC committee report* ,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 85 no. 5, (2022) 056201, [ arXiv:2104.07634 [hep-ex]]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [6]

    Wave Dark Matter ,

    L. Hui, “ Wave Dark Matter ,” Ann. Rev. Astron. As- trophys. 59 (2021) 247–289, [ arXiv:2101.11735 [astro- ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [7]

    An Introduc- tion to Particle Dark Matter ,

    S. Profumo, L. Giani, and O. F. Piattella, “ An Introduc- tion to Particle Dark Matter ,” Universe 5 no. 10, (2019) 213, [arXiv:1910.05610 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 55 references
  1. [8]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments ,

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, “ Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments ,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70 (2020) 355–394, [arXiv:2006.02838 [astro- ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Primordial black holes as dark matter candidates,

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, “ Primordial black holes as dark matter candidates,” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 48 (2022) 1, [arXiv:2110.02821 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Cosmology of the Invisible Axion ,

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, “ Cosmology of the Invisible Axion ,” Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127–132

    1983

  4. [11]

    A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion ,

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, “ A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion ,” Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133–136

    1983

  5. [12]

    The Not So Harmless Axion ,

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, “ The Not So Harmless Axion ,” Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 137–141

    1983

  6. [13]

    Axion Dark Matter ,

    C. B. Adams et al. , “Axion Dark Matter ,” in Snowmass

  7. [14]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons ,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “ CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443

    1977

  8. [15]

    A New Light Boson? ,

    S. Weinberg, “A New Light Boson? ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223–226

    1978

  9. [16]

    Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons ,

    F. Wilczek, “ Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279–282

    1978

  10. [17]

    The Strong CP problem and axions ,

    R. D. Peccei, “ The Strong CP problem and axions ,” Lect. Notes Phys. 741 (2008) 3–17, [ arXiv:hep-ph/0607268]

    2008 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Axions In String Theory ,

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, “ Axions In String Theory ,” JHEP 06 (2006) 051, [ arXiv:hep-th/0605206]

    2006 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Experimental Tests of the Invisible Ax- ion,

    P. Sikivie, “ Experimental Tests of the Invisible Ax- ion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1415–1417. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 52, 695 (1984)]

    1983

  13. [20]

    A new upper limit on the axion-photon coupling with an ex- tended CAST run with a Xe-based Micromegas detector,

    CAST Collaboration, K. Altenm¨ uller et al. , “ A new upper limit on the axion-photon coupling with an ex- tended CAST run with a Xe-based Micromegas detector,” [arXiv:2406.16840 [hep-ex]]

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    Physics po- tential of the International Axion Observatory (IAXO) ,

    IAXO Collaboration, E. Armengaud et al., “Physics po- tential of the International Axion Observatory (IAXO) ,” JCAP 06 (2019) 047, [ arXiv:1904.09155 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Extensive Search for Axion Dark Matter over 1 GHz with CAPP’S Main Axion Experiment ,

    CAPP Collaboration, S. Ahn et al. , “ Extensive Search for Axion Dark Matter over 1 GHz with CAPP’S Main Axion Experiment ,” Phys. Rev. X 14 no. 3, (2024) 031023, [arXiv:2402.12892 [hep-ex]]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Search for axion dark matter with the QUAX–LNF tunable 6 haloscope,

    QUAX Collaboration, A. Rettaroli et al. , “ Search for axion dark matter with the QUAX–LNF tunable 6 haloscope,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 2, (2024) 022008, [arXiv:2402.19063 [physics.ins-det]]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Near-quantum limited axion dark mat- ter search with the ORGAN experiment around 26 µeV,

    A. P. Quiskamp, G. Flower, S. Samuels, B. T. McAl- lister, P. Altin, E. N. Ivanov, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar, “ Near-quantum limited axion dark mat- ter search with the ORGAN experiment around 26 µeV,” [arXiv:2407.18586 [hep-ex]]

    arXiv

  18. [25]

    Ax- ion Dark Matter eXperiment around 3.3 µeV with Dine-Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky Discovery Ability ,

    ADMX Collaboration, C. Bartram et al. , “ Ax- ion Dark Matter eXperiment around 3.3 µeV with Dine-Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky Discovery Ability ,” [arXiv:2408.15227 [hep-ex]]

    arXiv

  19. [26]

    Search for Axionlike Dark Matter through Nuclear Spin Precession in Electric and Mag- netic Fields ,

    C. Abel et al. , “ Search for Axionlike Dark Matter through Nuclear Spin Precession in Electric and Mag- netic Fields ,” Phys. Rev. X 7 no. 4, (2017) 041034, [arXiv:1708.06367 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Search for Axionlike Dark Matter with a Liquid-State Nuclear Spin Comagnetometer ,

    T. Wu et al. , “ Search for Axionlike Dark Matter with a Liquid-State Nuclear Spin Comagnetometer ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 no. 19, (2019) 191302, [arXiv:1901.10843 [hep-ex]]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Constraints on bosonic dark mat- ter from ultralow-field nuclear magnetic resonance ,

    A. Garcon et al. , “ Constraints on bosonic dark mat- ter from ultralow-field nuclear magnetic resonance ,” Sci. Adv. 5 no. 10, (2019) eaax4539, [arXiv:1902.04644 [hep- ex]]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Axion-like Relics: New Constraints from Old Comagne- tometer Data,

    I. M. Bloch, Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, and T. Volansky, “Axion-like Relics: New Constraints from Old Comagne- tometer Data,” JHEP 01 (2020) 167, [arXiv:1907.03767 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Search for axion-like dark matter with spin-based amplifiers,

    M. Jiang, H. Su, A. Garcon, X. Peng, and D. Bud- ker, “ Search for axion-like dark matter with spin-based amplifiers,” Nature Phys. 17 no. 12, (2021) 1402–1407, [arXiv:2102.01448 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [31]

    New constraints on axion-like dark matter using a Floquet quantum detector ,

    NASDUCK Collaboration, I. M. Bloch, G. Ronen, R. Shaham, O. Katz, T. Volansky, and O. Katz, “ New constraints on axion-like dark matter using a Floquet quantum detector ,” Sci. Adv. 8 no. 5, (2022) abl8919, [arXiv:2105.04603 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Laboratory Constraints on the Neutron-Spin Coupling of feV-Scale Axions,

    J. Lee, M. Lisanti, W. A. Terrano, and M. Romalis, “Laboratory Constraints on the Neutron-Spin Coupling of feV-Scale Axions,” Phys. Rev. X 13 no. 1, (2023) 011050, [arXiv:2209.03289 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Con- straints on axion-like dark matter from a SERF comag- netometer,

    NASDUCK Collaboration, I. M. Bloch, R. Shaham, Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky, and O. Katz, “Con- straints on axion-like dark matter from a SERF comag- netometer,” Nature Commun. 14 no. 1, (2023) 5784, [arXiv:2209.13588 [hep-ph]]

    2023

  27. [34]

    Search for ultralight axion dark mat- ter in a side-band analysis of a 199Hg free-spin pre- cession signal ,

    C. Abel et al. , “ Search for ultralight axion dark mat- ter in a side-band analysis of a 199Hg free-spin pre- cession signal ,” SciPost Phys. 15 no. 2, (2023) 058, [arXiv:2212.02403 [nucl-ex]]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Dark matter search with a strongly-coupled hybrid spin system ,

    K. Wei et al., “Dark matter search with a strongly-coupled hybrid spin system ,” [arXiv:2306.08039 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  29. [36]

    Constraining ultralight dark matter through an accelerated resonant search,

    Z. Xu et al., “Constraining ultralight dark matter through an accelerated resonant search,” Commun. Phys. 7 no. 1, (2024) 226, [ arXiv:2309.16600 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Searching for dark matter with a 1000 km baseline interferometer ,

    D. Gavilan-Martin et al., “Searching for dark matter with a 1000 km baseline interferometer ,” [ arXiv:2408.02668 [hep-ph]]

  31. [38]

    Proposal for a Cosmic Axion Spin Pre- cession Experiment (CASPEr) ,

    D. Budker, P. W. Graham, M. Ledbetter, S. Rajendran, and A. Sushkov, “Proposal for a Cosmic Axion Spin Pre- cession Experiment (CASPEr) ,” Phys. Rev. X 4 no. 2, (2014) 021030, [ arXiv:1306.6089 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Overview of the Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr),

    D. F. Jackson Kimball et al. , “ Overview of the Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr),” Springer Proc. Phys. 245 (2020) 105–121, [ arXiv:1711.08999 [physics.ins-det]]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [40]

    The European Spallation Source De- sign,

    R. Garoby et al. , “ The European Spallation Source De- sign,” Phys. Scripta 93 no. 1, (2018) 014001

    2018

  34. [41]

    The spallation neutron source in oak ridge: A powerful tool for materi- als research ,

    T. Mason, D. Abernathy, I. Anderson, J. Ankner, T. Egami, G. Ehlers, A. Ekkebus, G. Granroth, M. Hagen, K. Herwig, J. Hodges, C. Hoffmann, C. Horak, L. Horton, F. Klose, J. Larese, A. Mese- car, D. Myles, J. Neuefeind, M. Ohl, C. Tulk, X.-L. Wang, and J. Zhao, “ The spallation...

    2006

  35. [42]

    Intro- duction to the overall physics design of csns acceler- ators,

    W. Sheng, F. Shou-Xian, F. Shi-Nian, L. Wei-Bin, O. Hua-Fu, Q. Qing, T. Jing-Yu, and W. Jie, “ Intro- duction to the overall physics design of csns acceler- ators,” Chinese Physics C 33 no. S2, (Jun, 2009) 1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/33/S2/001

    2009 doi

  36. [44]

    Review of particle physics ,

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, S. Navas et al. , “Review of particle physics ,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 3, (2024) 030001

    2024

  37. [45]

    Axion-induced ef- fects in atoms, molecules, and nuclei: Parity nonconser- vation, anapole moments, electric dipole moments, and spin-gravity and spin-axion momentum couplings ,

    Y. V. Stadnik and V. V. Flambaum, “ Axion-induced ef- fects in atoms, molecules, and nuclei: Parity nonconser- vation, anapole moments, electric dipole moments, and spin-gravity and spin-axion momentum couplings ,” Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 4, (2014) 043522, [ arXiv:1312.6667 [hep- ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  38. [46]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Me- chanics. Quantum physics, quantum information and quantum computation. Cambridge University Press, 10, 2020

    2020

  39. [47]

    A magnetic neutron lens ,

    H. Shimizu, T. Oku, H. Sato, C. Otani, H. Kato, Y. Suda, H. Nakagawa, T. Kamiyama, Y. Kiyanagi, and T. Wakabayashi, “ A magnetic neutron lens ,” Physica B: Condensed Matter 276-278 (2000) 63–64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0921452699013265

    2000

  40. [48]

    The HIBEAM program: search for neutron oscillations at the ESS ,

    V. Santoro et al. , “ The HIBEAM program: search for neutron oscillations at the ESS ,” [ arXiv:2311.08326 [physics.ins-det]]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Limits on new long range nuclear spin- dependent forces set with a K - He-3 co-magnetometer ,

    G. Vasilakis, J. M. Brown, T. W. Kornack, and M. V. Romalis, “ Limits on new long range nuclear spin- dependent forces set with a K - He-3 co-magnetometer ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 261801, [ arXiv:0809.4700 [physics.atom-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Particle Physics Implications of a Recent Test of the Gravitational In- verse Sqaure Law ,

    E. G. Adelberger, B. R. Heckel, S. A. Hoedl, C. D. Hoyle, D. J. Kapner, and A. Upadhye, “ Particle Physics Implications of a Recent Test of the Gravitational In- verse Sqaure Law ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 131104, [arXiv:hep-ph/0611223]

    2007 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Searching for So- lar Axions Using Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Ob- servatory,

    A. Bhusal, N. Houston, and T. Li, “ Searching for So- lar Axions Using Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Ob- servatory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 no. 9, (2021) 091601, [arXiv:2004.02733 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Upper Limit on the QCD Axion Mass from Isolated Neutron Star Cooling ,

    M. Buschmann, C. Dessert, J. W. Foster, A. J. Long, and B. R. Safdi, “ Upper Limit on the QCD Axion Mass from Isolated Neutron Star Cooling ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 9, (2022) 091102, [ arXiv:2111.09892 [hep-ph]]. 7

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    An Improved experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron ,

    C. A. Baker et al. , “ An Improved experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 131801, [ arXiv:hep-ex/0602020]

    2006 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Theta vacua, QCD sum rules, and the neutron electric dipole moment ,

    M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, “ Theta vacua, QCD sum rules, and the neutron electric dipole moment ,” Nucl. Phys. B 573 (2000) 177–200, [ arXiv:hep-ph/9908508]

    2000 arXiv

  47. [2021]

    [ arXiv:2203.14923 [hep-ex]]

    3, 2022. [ arXiv:2203.14923 [hep-ex]]

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.