Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 42 references

Co-Fusion4D: Spatio-temporal Collaborative Fusion for Robust 3D Object Detection

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-30 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Co-Fusion4D fuses current and past frames with dual attention to correct temporal misalignment in BEV-based 3D detection.

desk verdict Co-Fusion4D adds a current-frame-centric fusion rule plus dual attention to multi-frame BEV detection and posts competitive nuScenes numbers, but the robustness claim against motion noise rests on an untested assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.20301 v2 pith:7X4X6B22 submitted 2026-05-19 cs.CV cs.AI

Wenxuan Li , Qin Zou , Shoubing Chen , Chi Chen , Yingyi Yang , Qingxiang Meng This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords 3DobjectdetectionBEVrepresentationspatiotemporalfusionautonomousdrivingnuScenesattentiontemporalconsistency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces Co-Fusion4D to fix inconsistencies in bird's-eye-view features that arise when objects and the vehicle itself move between frames. It keeps the current frame as the main source of data and brings in selected historical frames only after filtering and alignment steps. A Dual Attention Fusion module then applies both spatial attention within each frame and temporal attention across frames to emphasize reliable motion patterns and reduce noise. This design is tested on the nuScenes dataset and reaches 74.9 percent mAP and 75.6 percent NDS without test-time tricks or outside data. Readers care because stable multi-frame fusion directly supports safer real-time decisions in autonomous driving.

What carries the argument

Current-frame-centric strategy paired with the Dual Attention Fusion (DAF) module that performs alignment, filtering, and adaptive intra-frame plus inter-frame attention.

What would settle it

Performance falling below the reported nuScenes numbers on a new test set that contains faster ego-motion or denser object interactions than the training distribution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Co-Fusion4D addresses cross-frame spatiotemporal inconsistencies in BEV-based detectors by adopting a current-frame-centric strategy with spatiotemporal filtering and alignment, combined with a Dual Attention Fusion module that uses intra-frame spatial attention and inter-frame temporal attention to enhance feature interaction and suppress noise.

Load-bearing premise

The filtering, alignment, and current-frame priority will keep cumulative errors and noisy features from spreading across frames in real driving conditions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Reaches 74.9 percent mAP and 75.6 percent NDS on nuScenes without test-time augmentation or external data.
  • Reduces temporal feature drift by treating the current frame as dominant and historical frames as complementary after alignment.
  • Improves temporal stability of BEV representations through joint spatial and temporal attention in the DAF module.
  • Limits propagation of alignment errors by selective rather than uniform multi-frame fusion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same current-frame priority plus attention design could be tested on other multi-frame perception tasks such as BEV segmentation.
  • Extending the method to longer time windows would require checking whether the alignment step still prevents drift.
  • Deployment on vehicles with different sensor setups would need fresh validation of the filtering thresholds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Co-Fusion4D, a current-frame-centric multi-frame BEV fusion framework for 3D object detection. It applies spatiotemporal filtering and alignment to historical frames, then uses a Dual Attention Fusion (DAF) module with intra-frame spatial and inter-frame temporal attention to suppress misalignment and noisy propagation, claiming this yields SOTA nuScenes results of 74.9% mAP and 75.6% NDS without TTA or external data.

Significance. If the reported gains are shown to arise specifically from the proposed filtering/alignment/DAF design rather than implementation details, the work would offer a practical advance in temporal consistency for driving-scene detectors. The explicit current-frame-dominant mechanism and departure from uniform fusion are conceptually clear strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Method (alignment, filtering, and DAF sections)] The central robustness claim—that the current-frame-centric pipeline plus filtering/alignment plus DAF 'reliably suppresses' cumulative alignment errors and noisy feature propagation—rests on an untested assumption about motion-estimate quality. No error-propagation analysis, uncertainty weighting, or sensitivity experiments under documented nuScenes ego-pose noise appear in the method description; this is load-bearing for the claim that DAF adaptively cancels residual drift.
  2. [Experiments and results] Table reporting the 74.9% mAP / 75.6% NDS result provides no accompanying ablation rows that isolate the contribution of spatiotemporal filtering versus DAF, nor any cross-validation under perturbed object velocities; without these, attribution of the SOTA margin to the proposed components versus post-hoc tuning remains unclear.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces 'Dual Attention Fusion (DAF)' and its intra-/inter-frame attentions but does not preview the mathematical form of the attention weights or the fusion equation, making the high-level description harder to follow before the method section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Method (alignment, filtering, and DAF sections)] The central robustness claim—that the current-frame-centric pipeline plus filtering/alignment plus DAF 'reliably suppresses' cumulative alignment errors and noisy feature propagation—rests on an untested assumption about motion-estimate quality. No error-propagation analysis, uncertainty weighting, or sensitivity experiments under documented nuScenes ego-pose noise appear in the method description; this is load-bearing for the claim that DAF adaptively cancels residual drift.

    Authors: We recognize that the manuscript does not present explicit error-propagation analysis or sensitivity experiments regarding motion-estimate quality and nuScenes ego-pose noise. The design of the current-frame-centric approach combined with DAF is motivated by the need to handle such issues, but we agree that direct validation would better support the robustness claims. Accordingly, we will incorporate an analysis of error propagation and sensitivity tests in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experiments and results] Table reporting the 74.9% mAP / 75.6% NDS result provides no accompanying ablation rows that isolate the contribution of spatiotemporal filtering versus DAF, nor any cross-validation under perturbed object velocities; without these, attribution of the SOTA margin to the proposed components versus post-hoc tuning remains unclear.

    Authors: The reported results table focuses on the final performance, and while the manuscript discusses the roles of the components, it does not include dedicated ablation rows isolating spatiotemporal filtering from DAF or experiments with perturbed object velocities. We concur that such ablations would clarify the contributions. We will add these ablation studies to the experiments section in the revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: empirical benchmark results with no derivation chain or fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical framework for 3D object detection on nuScenes, describing a current-frame-centric pipeline, spatiotemporal filtering/alignment, and a Dual Attention Fusion module. No equations, parameters fitted to subsets of data, or predictions that reduce to inputs by construction are present. The central claims are performance numbers (74.9% mAP, 75.6% NDS) obtained via standard benchmark evaluation, which are externally falsifiable and independent of any self-referential definitions or self-citation chains. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing internal reductions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Co-Fusion4D: Spatio-temporal Collaborative Fusion for Robust 3D Object Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7X4X6B22

@misc{pith2026260520301,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Co-Fusion4D: Spatio-temporal Collaborative Fusion for Robust 3D Object Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7X4X6B22}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.20301}
}
read the original abstract

In autonomous driving, 3D object detection is essential for accurate perception and reliable decision-making. However, object motion and ego-motion often induce cross-frame spatiotemporal inconsistencies in BEV-based detectors, leading to temporal BEV feature misalignment and degraded spatiotemporal consistency. To address these challenges, we propose Co-Fusion4D, a unified framework that explicitly preserves cross-frame spatiotemporal consistency and suppresses temporal feature drift. Co-Fusion4D adopts a current-frame-centric strategy, treating the current frame as the primary source of information while selectively incorporating historical frames after spatiotemporal filtering and alignment. This dominant-complementary mechanism effectively mitigates cumulative alignment errors, suppresses noisy feature propagation, and exploits reliable temporal cues for a more consistent BEV representation. In addition, Co-Fusion4D integrates a Dual Attention Fusion (DAF) module to further enhance spatiotemporal feature interaction. DAF jointly leverages intra-frame spatial attention and inter-frame temporal attention to adaptively align and fuse multi-frame features, emphasizing motion-consistent regions while suppressing spurious correlations. By departing from conventional uniform fusion paradigms, this design substantially improves the temporal stability and discriminative capability of BEV representations. Extensive experiments on the nuScenes benchmark demonstrate that Co-Fusion4D achieves state-of-the-art performance, with 74.9% mAP and 75.6% NDS, without relying on test-time augmentation or external data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20301 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of Co-Fusion4D: Co-Fusion4D integrates multi-frame, multimodal data, combining images and point clouds. For the current frame, it uses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Intra-frame Static Attention. frame. This not only aids in extracting local features but also enables the capture of global information across the image or point cloud. This mechanism reduces inherent noise in the data, improving the model’s robustness, especially in static scenes with complex spatial structures. The ability to identify long-range dependencies and subtle patterns enhances detec￾tion performance, mak… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Intra-frame Static Attention. Inter-frame Dynamic Attention: Unlike static attention, inter-frame dynamic attention is designed to capture temporal variations and evolution across frames. This mechanism uses a squeeze-and-excitation approach to learn dynamic attention weights for each channel, enabling the model to adjust the importance of channels in response to temporal changes. The specific formula is as follows:… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Four-Stage Training Method. • Focused temporal optimization: Freezing single-frame features restricts the optimization space to cross-frame relationships, allowing alignment modules to compen￾sate for spatial shifts, DAF to learn selective tempo￾ral weighting, and dete…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: 3D object detection results on the nuScenes validation dataset. In the point cloud image on the far right, red boxes represent the ground truth (GT), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Robustness-aware 3d object detection in autonomous driving: A review and outlook.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024

    Ziying Song, Lin Liu, Feiyang Jia, Yadan Luo, Caiyan Jia, Guoxin Zhang, Lei Yang, and Li Wang. Robustness-aware 3d object detection in autonomous driving: A review and outlook.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Stereodetr: Stereo-based transformer for 3d object detection.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025

    Shiyi Mu, Zichong Gu, Zhiqi Ai, Anqi Liu, Yilin Gao, and Shugong Xu. Stereodetr: Stereo-based transformer for 3d object detection.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Bevfix: Deep feature enhancement for robust 3d object detection.Neural Networks, 190:107675, 2025

    Wenxuan Li, Jian Zhou, Chi Chen, Hongkai Yu, Bo Du, and Qin Zou. Bevfix: Deep feature enhancement for robust 3d object detection.Neural Networks, 190:107675, 2025

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Iter3ddet: Depth-guided iterative fusion and refinement for monocular 3d object detection.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025

    Cheng Feng, Congxuan Zhang, Zhen Chen, Weiming Hu, Ke Lu, and Liyue Ge. Iter3ddet: Depth-guided iterative fusion and refinement for monocular 3d object detection.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Vision-centric bev perception: A survey.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(12):10978–10997, 2024

    Yuexin Ma, Tai Wang, Xuyang Bai, Huitong Yang, Yuenan Hou, Yaming Wang, Yu Qiao, Ruigang Yang, and Xinge Zhu. Vision-centric bev perception: A survey.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(12):10978–10997, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Dgfusion: Dual-guided fusion for robust multi-modal 3d object detection.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025

    Feiyang Jia, Caiyan Jia, Ailin Liu, Shaoqing Xu, Qiming Xia, Lin Liu, Lei Yang, Yan Gong, and Ziying Song. Dgfusion: Dual-guided fusion for robust multi-modal 3d object detection.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Fastpillars: A deployment-friendly pillar-based 3d detector

    Sifan Zhou, Xinyu Zhang, Xiangxiang Chu, Bo Zhang, Ziyu Zhao, and Xiaobo Lu. Fastpillars: A deployment-friendly pillar-based 3d detector. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Bevfusion4d: Learning lidar-camera fusion under bird’s-eye-view via cross-modality guidance and temporal aggregation

    Hongxiang Cai, Zeyuan Zhang, Zhenyu Zhou, Ziyin Li, Wenbo Ding, and Jiuhua Zhao. Bevfusion4d: Learning lidar-camera fusion under bird’s-eye-view via cross-modality guidance and temporal aggregation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17099, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Gafusion: Adaptive fusing lidar and camera with multiple guidance for 3d object detection

    Xiaotian Li, Baojie Fan, Jiandong Tian, and Huijie Fan. Gafusion: Adaptive fusing lidar and camera with multiple guidance for 3d object detection. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 21209–21218, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Co- fix3d: Enhancing 3d object detection with collaborative refinement

    Wenxuan Li, Qin Zou, Chi Chen, Bo Du, and Long Chen. Co- fix3d: Enhancing 3d object detection with collaborative refinement. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07999, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation

    Charles R Qi, Hao Su, Kaichun Mo, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 652–660, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Charles Ruizhongtai Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  5. [13]

    Pointrcnn: 3d object proposal generation and detection from point cloud

    Shaoshuai Shi, Xiaogang Wang, and Hongsheng Li. Pointrcnn: 3d object proposal generation and detection from point cloud. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–779, 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    V oxelnet: End-to-end learning for point cloud based 3d object detection

    Yin Zhou and Oncel Tuzel. V oxelnet: End-to-end learning for point cloud based 3d object detection. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4490–4499, 2018

    2018

  7. [15]

    Second: Sparsely embedded convolutional detection.Sensors, 18(10):3337, 2018

    Yan Yan, Yuxing Mao, and Bo Li. Second: Sparsely embedded convolutional detection.Sensors, 18(10):3337, 2018

    2018

  8. [16]

    Pv-rcnn: Point-voxel feature set abstraction for 3d object detection

    Shaoshuai Shi, Chaoxu Guo, Li Jiang, Zhe Wang, Jianping Shi, Xi- aogang Wang, and Hongsheng Li. Pv-rcnn: Point-voxel feature set abstraction for 3d object detection. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10529– 10538, 2020

    2020

  9. [17]

    Dsc3d: Deformable sampling constraints in stereo 3d object detection for autonomous driving.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 35(3):2794–2805, 2024

    Jiawei Chen, Qi Song, Wenzhong Guo, and Rui Huang. Dsc3d: Deformable sampling constraints in stereo 3d object detection for autonomous driving.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 35(3):2794–2805, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Tinyfusiondet: Hardware-efficient lidar-camera fusion framework for 3d object detection at edge.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025

    Yishi Li, Fanhong Zeng, Rui Lai, Tong Wu, Juntao Guan, Anfu Zhu, and Zhangming Zhu. Tinyfusiondet: Hardware-efficient lidar-camera fusion framework for 3d object detection at edge.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025

    2025

  11. [19]

    Deformable feature aggregation for dynamic multi- modal 3d object detection

    Zehui Chen, Zhenyu Li, Shiquan Zhang, Liangji Fang, Qinhong Jiang, and Feng Zhao. Deformable feature aggregation for dynamic multi- modal 3d object detection. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 628–644. Springer, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Fusionpainting: Multimodal fusion with adaptive attention for 3d object detection

    Shaoqing Xu, Dingfu Zhou, Jin Fang, Junbo Yin, Zhou Bin, and Liangjun Zhang. Fusionpainting: Multimodal fusion with adaptive attention for 3d object detection. In2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pages 3047–3054. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    V oxel field fusion for 3d object detection

    Yanwei Li, Xiaojuan Qi, Yukang Chen, Liwei Wang, Zeming Li, Jian Sun, and Jiaya Jia. V oxel field fusion for 3d object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1120–1129, 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    Unifying voxel-based representation with transformer for 3d object detection.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:18442–18455, 2022

    Yanwei Li, Yilun Chen, Xiaojuan Qi, Zeming Li, Jian Sun, and Jiaya Jia. Unifying voxel-based representation with transformer for 3d object detection.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:18442–18455, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Transfusion: Robust lidar-camera fusion for 3d object detection with transformers

    Xuyang Bai, Zeyu Hu, Xinge Zhu, Qingqiu Huang, Yilun Chen, Hongbo Fu, and Chiew-Lan Tai. Transfusion: Robust lidar-camera fusion for 3d object detection with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1090– 1099, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Bevfusion: A simple and robust lidar-camera fusion framework.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:10421–10434, 2022

    Tingting Liang, Hongwei Xie, Kaicheng Yu, Zhongyu Xia, Zhiwei Lin, Yongtao Wang, Tao Tang, Bing Wang, and Zhi Tang. Bevfusion: A simple and robust lidar-camera fusion framework.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:10421–10434, 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    Bevfusion: Multi-task multi-sensor fusion with unified bird’s-eye view representation

    Zhijian Liu, Haotian Tang, Alexander Amini, Xinyu Yang, Huizi Mao, Daniela L Rus, and Song Han. Bevfusion: Multi-task multi-sensor fusion with unified bird’s-eye view representation. In2023 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pages 2774–2781. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Multi-sensor fusion technology for 3d object detection in autonomous driving: A review

    Xuan Wang, Kaiqiang Li, and Abdellah Chehri. Multi-sensor fusion technology for 3d object detection in autonomous driving: A review. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Transformer-based sensor fusion for autonomous driving: A survey

    Apoorv Singh. Transformer-based sensor fusion for autonomous driving: A survey. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 3312–3317, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Bevformer: Learning bird’s- eye-view representation from multi-camera images via spatiotemporal transformers

    Zhiqi Li, Wenhai Wang, Hongyang Li, Enze Xie, Chonghao Sima, Tong Lu, Yu Qiao, and Jifeng Dai. Bevformer: Learning bird’s- eye-view representation from multi-camera images via spatiotemporal transformers. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 1–18. Springer, 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    Exploring object-centric temporal modeling for efficient multi-view 3d object detection

    Shihao Wang, Yingfei Liu, Tiancai Wang, Ying Li, and Xiangyu Zhang. Exploring object-centric temporal modeling for efficient multi-view 3d object detection. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 3621–3631, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    Focalfusion: An object-centric temporal fusion framework for multi-modal 3d detection

    Yuting Wan, Liguo Sun, Jiuwu Hao, and Pin Lv. Focalfusion: An object-centric temporal fusion framework for multi-modal 3d detection. Neurocomputing, page 131914, 2025

    2025

  23. [31]

    nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving

    Holger Caesar, Varun Bankiti, Alex H Lang, Sourabh V ora, Venice Erin Liong, Qiang Xu, Anush Krishnan, Yu Pan, Giancarlo Baldan, and Oscar Beijbom. nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern re...

    2020

  24. [32]

    Automatic differentiation in pytorch

    Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Soumith Chintala, Gregory Chanan, Edward Yang, Zachary DeVito, Zeming Lin, Alban Desmaison, Luca Antiga, and Adam Lerer. Automatic differentiation in pytorch. 2017

    2017

  25. [33]

    Mmdetection3d: Openmmlab next- generation platform for general 3d object detection, 2020

    MMDetection3D Contributors. Mmdetection3d: Openmmlab next- generation platform for general 3d object detection, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    Lidarmultinet: Towards a unified multi-task network for lidar perception

    Dongqiangzi Ye, Zixiang Zhou, Weijia Chen, Yufei Xie, Yu Wang, Panqu Wang, and Hassan Foroosh. Lidarmultinet: Towards a unified multi-task network for lidar perception. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pages 3231–3240, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Focalformer3d: focusing on hard instance for 3d object detection

    Yilun Chen, Zhiding Yu, Yukang Chen, Shiyi Lan, Anima Anandkumar, Jiaya Jia, and Jose M Alvarez. Focalformer3d: focusing on hard instance for 3d object detection. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 8394–8405, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Ob- jectfusion: Multi-modal 3d object detection with object-centric fusion

    Qi Cai, Yingwei Pan, Ting Yao, Chong-Wah Ngo, and Tao Mei. Ob- jectfusion: Multi-modal 3d object detection with object-centric fusion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 18067–18076, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Msmdfusion: Fusing lidar and camera at multiple scales with multi-depth seeds for 3d object detection

    Yang Jiao, Zequn Jie, Shaoxiang Chen, Jingjing Chen, Lin Ma, and Yu- Gang Jiang. Msmdfusion: Fusing lidar and camera at multiple scales with multi-depth seeds for 3d object detection. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 21...

    2023

  30. [38]

    Sparsefusion: Fusing multi-modal sparse representations for multi- sensor 3d object detection

    Yichen Xie, Chenfeng Xu, Marie-Julie Rakotosaona, Patrick Rim, Federico Tombari, Kurt Keutzer, Masayoshi Tomizuka, and Wei Zhan. Sparsefusion: Fusing multi-modal sparse representations for multi- sensor 3d object detection. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Confere...

    2023

  31. [39]

    Is-fusion: Instance-scene collaborative fusion for multimodal 3d object detection

    Junbo Yin, Jianbing Shen, Runnan Chen, Wei Li, Ruigang Yang, Pascal Frossard, and Wenguan Wang. Is-fusion: Instance-scene collaborative fusion for multimodal 3d object detection. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14905–1...

    2024

  32. [40]

    Graphbev: Towards robust bev feature alignment for multi-modal 3d object detection

    Ziying Song, Lei Yang, Shaoqing Xu, Lin Liu, Dongyang Xu, Caiyan Jia, Feiyang Jia, and Li Wang. Graphbev: Towards robust bev feature alignment for multi-modal 3d object detection. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 347–366. Springer, 2025

    2025

  33. [41]

    A method of time alignment in bev features for multimodal fusion object detection of intelligent vehicles.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025

    Chen Lin, Zhicheng He, Yu Qiu, and Yuanyi Huang. A method of time alignment in bev features for multimodal fusion object detection of intelligent vehicles.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025

    2025

  34. [42]

    Lift: Learning 4d lidar image fusion transformer for 3d object detection

    Yihan Zeng, Da Zhang, Chunwei Wang, Zhenwei Miao, Ting Liu, Xin Zhan, Dayang Hao, and Chao Ma. Lift: Learning 4d lidar image fusion transformer for 3d object detection. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 17172– 17181, 2022

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed June 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.