Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Tomonaga-Luttinger Liquid Behavior in a Rydberg-encoded Spin Chain

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 24-atom Rydberg ring with dipolar XY couplings realizes a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid, with power-law correlations, tunable Friedel oscillations, and a quench light cone that yield the Luttinger parameters and sound velocities.

desk verdict A strong Rydberg experiment whose FM TLL evidence is credible, but whose AFM claim is a crossover signal — the paper's own numerics say 6% holes destroy the TLL in the thermodynamic limit. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.08179 v1 pith:7XG3AHHU submitted 2025-01-14 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elphysics.atom-ph

Gabriel Emperauger , Mu Qiao , Cheng Chen , Filippo Caleca , Saverio Bocini , Marcus Bintz , Guillaume Bornet , Romain Martin
show 9 more authors
Bastien Gély Lukas Klein Daniel Barredo Shubhayu Chatterjee Norman Yao Fabio Mezzacapo Thierry Lahaye Tommaso Roscilde Antoine Browaeys
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elphysics.atom-ph
keywords Tomonaga-LuttingerliquidRydbergquantumsimulatordipolarXYspinchainLuttingerparameterspin-spincorrelationsFriedeloscillationsquenchdynamicsone-dimensionalcriticality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports experiments on a ring of 24 rubidium atoms in Rydberg states, engineered to realize a one-dimensional spin-1/2 XY chain with long-range dipolar couplings that can be made ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic. It claims that the low-energy states of both chains are Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids, and that measured real-space spin correlations decay as power laws whose exponents give the Luttinger parameter $K$: larger than 1 for the ferromagnetic chain ($K_{\mathrm{FM}} \approx 1.4$–$1.6$) and near or below 1 for the antiferromagnetic chain ($K_{\mathrm{AFM}} \approx 0.9$–$1.0$). It also observes Friedel oscillations around a single removed atom, with a wavevector that follows the predicted linear dependence on magnetization, and, after a quench, a linear light cone of propagating correlations whose slope is related to the TLL sound velocity. The broader point is that a programmable Rydberg simulator can expose universal one-dimensional quantum critical behavior at the single-site level, including how long-range interactions renormalize $K$ and $u$, while also revealing how hole doping and finite size destabilize the liquid.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid parameterization of the low-energy sector, in which all long-wavelength correlations are controlled by the Luttinger parameter $K$ and the sound velocity $u$; for the XY chain the spins map onto free fermions, and $K=1$ for nearest-neighbor couplings. The paper uses the predicted forms $C^x(r)\sim r^{-1/(2K)}$ plus a staggered term and $C^z(r)\sim -2K/(\pi^2 r^2)+\cdots$ to extract $K$ from real-space data, and uses the slope of the correlation light cone in quench dynamics to extract $u$. The dipolar $1/r^3$ couplings enter as a renormalization of $K$ and $u$ relative to the nearest-neighbor XY chain, with ferromagnetic couplings stiffening the liquid ($K>1$) and antiferromagnetic couplings softening it ($K<1$). A secondary machinery element is the empirical exponential decay $e^{-r/\xi}$ introduced to absorb hole-doping and finite-temperature effects when fitting the $x$ correlations.

What would settle it

Compute or measure the ground-state $C^x(r)$ of the AFM dipolar chain with the experimental hole density (about 6%) at sizes $N=100$ to $N=400$. If the correlations settle into the $r^{-2}$ tail of a random-singlet phase instead of a $K$-determined power law over a growing distance range, then the AFM TLL behavior reported here is a short-distance, finite-size effect rather than the underlying critical phase.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the dipolar XY Rydberg chain realizes a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid in both its ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic forms. Concretely, the paper measures connected correlations $C^x(r)$ and $C^z(r)$ after quasi-adiabatic preparation and fits them to the TLL forms $C^x(r)\simeq A r^{-1/(2K)} + B(-1)^{d(r)} r^{-(2K+1/(2K))}$ and $C^z(r)\simeq -2K/(\pi^2 r^2) + D(-1)^{d(r)} r^{-2K}$, with an empirical factor $e^{-r/\xi}$ in the $x$ channel where holes and finite energy act. From these fits it extracts $K_{\mathrm{FM}} \approx 1.6(4)$ from $C^x$ and $1.4(1)$ from $C^z$, and $K_{\mathrm{AFM}} \approx 1.0(3)$ from $C^x$ and $0.90(1)$ from $C^z$, in agreement with numerical simulations that include a hole density of about 4% (FM) and 6% (AFM). The same simulator produces Friedel oscillations around an impurity whose wavevector obeys $2k_F=\pi(1-M_z/N)$, and quench experiments give light-cone velocities $v_g=2.34(5)\,aJ$ (FM) and $v_g=1.66(3)\,aJ$ (AFM), identifying the TLL sound velocity when the sound mode dominates. The paper concludes that the long-range dipolar interactions renormalize the Luttinger parameters away from the nearest-neighbor values $K=1$, $u=2aJ$.

Load-bearing premise

The reported Luttinger parameters are physical only if the power-law forms of Tomonaga-Luttinger theory, modified by one empirical exponential factor $e^{-r/\xi}$, describe the measured correlations over the fitted distances even though the chains contain holes and only 16–28 sites; the paper's own analysis indicates the 6%-doped AFM chain is not a TLL in the thermodynamic limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A Rydberg-encoded dipolar XY chain is a working platform for Tomonaga-Luttinger physics, since all three signatures—power-law correlations, Friedel oscillations, and linear light-cone propagation—are observed in a single system.
  • The extracted Luttinger parameters quantify how long-range dipolar interactions renormalize the liquid: ferromagnetic couplings stiffen it ($K_{\mathrm{FM}}>1$) and antiferromagnetic couplings soften it ($K_{\mathrm{AFM}}<1$), moving away from the nearest-neighbor value $K=1$.
  • The Friedel oscillation wavevector is fixed by the conserved magnetization through $2k_F=\pi(1-M_z/N)$, so the impurity response is a tunable, parameter-free probe of the underlying TLL.
  • Because 6% hole doping drives the AFM chain out of the TLL phase in the thermodynamic limit, genuine AFM TLL behavior requires either lower hole densities or post-selected analysis that accounts for hole positions.
  • Finite-size effects are strong enough in the 24-site FM ring that quench dynamics measure an effective group velocity below the predicted TLL sound velocity, so larger systems or mode-selective initial states are needed to observe the sound mode directly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: repeat the AFM measurement with hole density near 1% or with post-selection on hole positions; if the fitted $K$ values from $C^x$ and $C^z$ converge to a single number and $\xi$ grows, the TLL interpretation is confirmed at larger scales.
  • A second test: increase hole density further and look for the predicted crossover to the $r^{-2}$ decay of the random-singlet phase; observing that crossover would sharpen the boundary between TLL and disorder-dominated behavior.
  • Mode-selective quenches that excite mainly long wavelengths could resolve the FM sound velocity discrepancy and test whether the predicted $u_{\mathrm{FM}}\approx 3.7\,aJ$ is realized.
  • The same correlation-fitting approach could be extended to two-dimensional gapless spin liquids, where power-law signatures are harder to isolate and real-space probes of the kind demonstrated here would be valuable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments on a 24-atom Rydberg ring realizing the dipolar XY spin Hamiltonian, with either ferromagnetic (FM) or antiferromagnetic (AFM) sign of the couplings. Using a quasi-adiabatic ramp, the authors prepare low-energy states, measure spin-spin correlations in the x and z bases, and fit them to Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid (TLL) functional forms to extract the Luttinger parameter K. They observe Friedel oscillations when one atom is removed and measure the light-cone velocity of correlation spreading after a quench from a low-energy product state. The main claims are that the dipolar long-range interactions renormalize K relative to the nearest-neighbor XY chain (K_FM>1, K_AFM<1), that the measured correlation profiles are consistent with TLL power laws after accounting for an exponential cutoff, and that numerical simulations with hole doping and finite temperature reproduce the observations. The paper includes extensive appendices with experimental details, fitting procedures, and numerical methods (MPS, QMC, exact diagonalization).

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, this is a valuable experimental demonstration of TLL physics in a synthetic Rydberg spin chain, complementing prior cold-atom TLL experiments and extending them to spin systems with long-range dipolar interactions and single-site readout. The paper's strengths are the high degree of experimental control, the quantitative comparison of the data to MPS/QMC simulations that incorporate known imperfections, and the extraction of K from multiple independent correlation channels. The FM results appear internally consistent: the measured K values (1.6(4) from C^x, 1.4(1) from C^z) are compatible with the simulated values including holes (1.55(1) and 1.44(1)). The AFM results are more fragile, because the paper's own numerical analysis concludes that the hole-doped (p≈6%) AFM ground state is not a TLL but a disorder-dominated phase; this directly impacts the central claim for the AFM channel.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV and Appendix I2] The paper's central claim that the AFM chain exhibits TLL behavior is contradicted by its own numerical conclusion in Appendix I2, which states that the ground state of the hole-doped dipolar AFM chain at the experimental hole density p≈6% is not a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid but rather a disorder-dominated phase. In Section IV, the AFM x-correlations are fit to a TLL power law multiplied by an exponential e^{-r/ξ} with ξ=5(1) sites, which is precisely the signature of the disorder-induced crossover away from TLL behavior; the extracted K_AFM≈1.0(3) is therefore a scale-dependent effective exponent, not the Luttinger parameter. The C^z fit yields K_AFM≈0.90(1), but that extraction relies on the uniform 1/r^2 prefactor and is subject to the same caveat if the state is not a TLL. The manuscript should either restrict the TLL claim to the FM case and explicitly describe the AFM results as short-distance TLL-like crossover behavior (as briefly mentioned in Section IV), or provide a quantitative argument that the probed distance range (r≲5) is still controlled by the TLL fixed point despite the disorder. The abstract and conclusion, which claim realization of TLL physics without this qualification, are too strong.
  2. [Section IV and Appendix G] The reported uncertainties on the K values extracted from the C^z fits are understated because they do not propagate the systematic uncertainty in the detection-error correction. The fitting function for C^z includes the multiplicative factor (1−2ε↓−2ε↑)=0.89, and Eq. (3) contains K as a prefactor of the 1/r^2 term. Using the uncertainties quoted in Appendix E (ε↑=2.5±1%, ε↓=3±1%), the relative error on this factor is about ±4%, which should propagate directly to K (e.g., K_AFM=0.90±0.04, not ±0.01). The quoted errors K_FM≈1.4(1) and K_AFM≈0.90(1) are only statistical fit errors; the authors should provide a systematic-error budget for all reported K values.
  3. [Section IV and Fig. 2(a)] The power-law decay for the FM x-correlations is observed only over about 5 sites, after which an empirical exponential cutoff with ξ=15(4) sites dominates. With such a short scaling window, it is not established that the data are better described by a power law with an exponential cutoff than by a pure exponential or other decay forms over the full measured range. The paper should show a quantitative comparison of alternative fit functions (e.g., pure exponential, stretched exponential, or power law without cutoff) or a residual analysis, to support the claim that the extracted exponent is physically meaningful and not simply a fitting artifact. The same concern applies to the AFM x-correlations, where the cutoff is even shorter (ξ=5(1)).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section VI] The abstract states that the quench dynamics 'exhibit a light-cone structure related to the linear sound mode of the underlying TLL'; for the FM chain, however, the measured light-cone velocity v_g=2.34(5)aJ is significantly below the theoretical sound velocity u_FM≈3.7aJ, and the paper attributes this to the quench not populating the sound mode. The abstract and conclusion should be qualified to indicate that the linear light cone is observed for both signs, but the sound-velocity interpretation applies only to the AFM case, where the measured v_g=1.66(3)aJ is close to u_AF≈1.8aJ.
  2. [Section IV] The sentence 'TLL theory predicts that these correlations are scale-invariant, indicative of a quantum critical state' is an overstatement given that the fits include an empirical exponential cutoff e^{-r/ξ} to account for finite temperature and disorder; it would be more precise to say that the data are consistent with power-law decay over a limited distance range with a finite correlation length.
  3. [Section VI] In the AFM paragraph of Section VI, the text reads 'the observed light-cone velocity is much closer to the sound velocity predicted theoretically, uFM ≈ 1.8aJ'; this should be u_AF (or u_AFM), not u_FM.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption refers to a 'grey region' highlighting the effect of doping, but the region is not defined; the caption should explain what the grey region represents and over which distances it applies.
  5. [Appendix G] The cutoff distance r_c is chosen by fitting the ideal ground-state correlations; for the hole-doped AFM x-correlations, where the power-law range is short and the exponential decay is strong, the appropriate r_c may be smaller than the value chosen from the clean system. The authors should discuss whether their r_c choice for the AFM x-correlations is robust against the hole-induced exponential decay.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported Luttinger parameters are extracted from textbook TLL correlation forms and compared with independent numerical ground-state solutions, not with quantities defined by the fits.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central theoretical inputs—the TLL correlation formulas in Eqs. (2) and (3), the kinematic Friedel relation in Eq. (5), and the sound-mode dispersion—are external, textbook results, and the comparison values K_FM = 1.85(1), K_AFM ≈ 0.85(1), and the sound velocities come from independent QMC/DMRG and exact-diagonalization solutions of the stated dipolar XY Hamiltonian, not from the experimental fits. The experimental K values are obtained by fitting the data to the TLL functional forms; this makes K a model-dependent measured parameter, but it does not make the theory's prediction equivalent to the input, because the predicted K values are not extracted from the same fitting procedure. The empirical exponential factor e^{-r/ξ} is an acknowledged correction for imperfections and introduces uncertainty, but K is not defined by ξ, and the paper reports how the cutoff affects the fits. The numerical simulations do use some experimentally informed inputs (temperature, small transverse field, hole density), but these are calibrated independently or matched as consistency checks, and the key predicted K values also exist for the ideal undoped chains. The paper's own Appendix I 2 states that the hole-doped AFM chain is not a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid in the thermodynamic limit; this is an explicitly acknowledged limitation that affects the physical interpretation of K_AFM, but it is a scientific correctness concern, not a circular reduction of the derivation. Self-citations to prior protocols and fitting approaches are methodological and not load-bearing for the claimed TLL realization.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger shows that the central claim rests on standard TLL/CFT functional forms and on several fitted nuisance parameters (exponential cutoffs, hole density, temperature, transverse field) that enter the extraction of K and the comparison with simulations. No new microscopic entities are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • Luttinger parameter K_FM = 1.6(4) from C^x, 1.4(1) from C^z
    Extracted by fitting experimental correlations to TLL power-law forms; central to the claim of TLL behavior.
  • Luttinger parameter K_AFM = 1.0(3) from C^x, 0.90(1) from C^z
    Extracted by fitting experimental correlations to TLL power-law forms; central to the claim of TLL behavior.
  • empirical correlation length xi (FM x fit) = 15(4) sites
    Introduced into the fit function C^x(r) e^{-r/xi} to accommodate preparation errors; affects the extracted K_FM.
  • empirical correlation length xi (AFM x fit) = 5(1) sites
    Introduced into the fit function C^x(r) e^{-r/xi}; the short length reflects hole disorder and limits the K_AFM extraction.
  • hole density p = 0.04 (FM), 0.06 (AFM)
    Used in MPS and QMC simulations to match the experimental correlation decay; not independently measured on a shot-by-shot basis.
  • thermal temperature T/J = about 0.35
    Chosen in finite-temperature simulations to best match the experimental correlation profiles.
  • transverse field h/J = about 10^-2
    Added in FM finite-temperature simulations to stabilize the experimentally observed residual magnetization m_XY about 0.18.
  • adiabatic ramp parameters (T, alpha) = FM: (1.5 us, 20); AFM: (2.5 us, 100)
    Optimized empirically to maximize measured x-correlations; affects the energy and fidelity of the prepared state.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The low-energy physics of the 1D dipolar XY chain is captured by a single Luttinger parameter K and sound velocity u.
    Used to write Eqs. (2)-(4) and to interpret fitted exponents as K; this is the TLL hypothesis under test, but it is assumed in the fitting procedure.
  • domain assumption The Rydberg two-level system maps exactly onto a spin-1/2 with dipolar XY plus van der Waals corrections.
    Appendix A specifies the mapping; systematic errors in the interaction potentials would shift J and K.
  • domain assumption The quasi-adiabatic ramp prepares a state close to the ground state of the target Hamiltonian.
    Sections III and Appendices C and E; non-adiabaticity is quantified by back-and-forth ramps showing contrast loss, and the gap is finite for N=24.
  • domain assumption Holes act as independent static disorder, and their effect on correlations can be captured by an average hole density p with the sublattice-slip picture.
    Section IV and Appendix I; the formula xi_p = 1/|ln(1-2p)| is taken from Ref. [47] and used to explain the exponential cutoff in AFM x correlations.
  • standard math Conformal field theory and chord-distance scaling apply to the finite N=24 ring.
    Used to replace perimeter distance with chord distance and to write the boundary CFT expression Eq. (4) for Friedel oscillations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tomonaga-Luttinger Liquid Behavior in a Rydberg-encoded Spin Chain." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7XG3AHHU

@misc{pith2026250108179,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tomonaga-Luttinger Liquid Behavior in a Rydberg-encoded Spin Chain},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7XG3AHHU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08179}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum fluctuations can disrupt long-range order in one-dimensional systems, and replace it with the universal paradigm of the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid (TLL), a critical phase of matter characterized by power-law decaying correlations and linearly dispersing excitations. Using a Rydberg quantum simulator, we study how TLL physics manifests in the low-energy properties of a spin chain, interacting under either the ferromagnetic or the antiferromagnetic dipolar XY Hamiltonian. Following quasi-adiabatic preparation, we directly observe the power-law decay of spin-spin correlations in real-space, allowing us to extract the Luttinger parameter. In the presence of an impurity, the chain exhibits tunable Friedel oscillations of the local magnetization. Moreover, by utilizing a quantum quench, we directly probe the propagation of correlations, which exhibit a light-cone structure related to the linear sound mode of the underlying TLL. Our measurements demonstrate the influence of the long-range dipolar interactions, renormalizing the parameters of TLL with respect to the case of nearest-neighbor interactions. Finally, comparison to numerical simulations exposes the high sensitivity of TLLs to doping and finite-size effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.08179 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. One dimensional Bose-Hubbard model with long range hopping

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A theory paper predicts the zero- and finite-temperature phase diagram of one-dimensional bosons with power-law hopping, including a divergent Tomonaga-Luttinger exponent for 2<α<3 at low temperature.

  2. Discrete time quasi-crystal in Rydberg atomic chain

    quant-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Rydberg atom chain split into two halves driven at golden-ratio-related frequencies shows stable quasiperiodic time-crystalline order in numerical simulations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    In the absence of this pulse, the measurement basis is z

    A global microwave pulse defines the measurement ba- sis. In the absence of this pulse, the measurement basis is z. To measure spins in thexy plane, we apply a global π/2 pulse, whose phase determines the basis (x or y or any combination of those bases)

  2. [2]

    freezing

    To prevent the spins from evolving during the following of the read-out process, the spin dynamics is stopped by a “freezing” pulse which removes the atoms in|↓⟩ faster than the typical evolution time 2π/J ∼ 1 µs. Depend- ing on the atomic states used in the mapping, we send the atoms either to the state|69D5/2, mJ = −1/2⟩ with a single-photon Gaussian pu...

  3. [3]

    Atoms in |↑⟩ are deexcited to the ground state manifold 5S1/2 by shining a pulse of 1014 nm light on resonance with the short-lived state |6P3/2, F= 3, mF = 3⟩

  4. [4]

    Finally, we perform a global fluorescence imaging of atoms in5S1/2, and map the imaged atoms on |↑⟩, whereas the lost atoms are considered as |↓⟩

    Tweezers are switched back on to recapture the atoms in 5S1/2 and eject those remaining in the Rydberg states by the ponderomotive force. Finally, we perform a global fluorescence imaging of atoms in5S1/2, and map the imaged atoms on |↑⟩, whereas the lost atoms are considered as |↓⟩. Appendix C: Experimental methods for adiabatic preparations To prepare t...

  5. [5]

    Finite fidelity of the initial state preparation The initial state preparation suffers from two limitations. First, the Rydberg excitation has a finite efficiency 1 − ηSTIRAP, leading to a small portion of atoms ηSTIRAP ≈ 2% which are left in the ground state and do not interact with the other atoms. Second, the spin rotations are performed in the presenc...

  6. [6]

    A major limitation is the finite Rydberg lifetimes, which induce leakages from the ideal isolated two-level system (|↑⟩ , |↓⟩) to other atomic states

    Non-adiabaticity and decoherence Several decoherence phenomena affect the time evolution of the system, especially the adiabaticity. A major limitation is the finite Rydberg lifetimes, which induce leakages from the ideal isolated two-level system (|↑⟩ , |↓⟩) to other atomic states. There are two contributions to the Rydberg lifetimes [62]: spontaneous em...

  7. [7]

    A spin |↑⟩ has a probability ε↑ = 2 .5 ± 1% to be measured as |↓⟩, owing to mechanical losses and finite deexcitation effi- ciency

    Read-out errors Spin states can be misread during the measurement phase. A spin |↑⟩ has a probability ε↑ = 2 .5 ± 1% to be measured as |↓⟩, owing to mechanical losses and finite deexcitation effi- ciency. Conversely, a spin |↓⟩ has a probability ε↓ = 3 ± 1% to be measured as |↑⟩ due to spontaneous emission to 5S1/2 before the atom is kicked out from the t...

  8. [8]

    At large distances, any finite energy density turns the power-law decay into an exponential decay

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    (2,3) of the main text] may not de- scribe accurately the system, since this field theory is only valid at asymptotic distances r ≫ 1

    At short distances, the theoretical expression from the LL theory [Eqs. (2,3) of the main text] may not de- scribe accurately the system, since this field theory is only valid at asymptotic distances r ≫ 1

  2. [10]

    Independent detection errors rescale the correlation profile by a global multiplicative factor 1 − 2ε↓ − 2ε↑ = 0 .89, whatever the distance between the spins [Eq. (E2)]. This does not modify the power-law expo- nent of the correlations, but it affects their amplitude which dep...

  3. [11]

    The simulations contain no free parameter

    Simulation of the adiabatic ramp with imperfections The dynamical simulations of the ramp were performed us- ing the time-dependent variational principle (TDVP) with ma- trix product states (MPS), implemented via the ITensor pack- age [64] with truncation error < 10−10 and bon...

  4. [12]

    Ground and thermal state calculations We simulate ground states and thermal states of the Hamil- tonian Htot using the quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) method based on the Stochastic Series Expansion approach [66] for the FM. For the AFM, we use the density matrix renormal- ization g...

  5. [13]

    BRnNq2/MCWQ6nMZjlVU06BDkmcs=

    Simulation of the quench experiment The simulations were done using the software ITensor [64]. We used the TDVP algorithm with time step 0.02 µs (i.e. 0.0051/J), truncation error < 10−5 and bond dimen- sion 1600. They do not include experimental imperfections. Appendix I: Lutt...

  6. [14]

    Dipolar chains without holes Correlation functions and compressibility. Fig. A6 shows QMC results for the ground state of the dipolar FM chain. We compare two system sizes, N = 24 (the experimental one) and a larger one ( N = 100) to capture the asymptotic prop- erties of the ...

  7. [15]

    squeezed space

    Dipolar chains with holes As discussed in the main text, the imperfect preparation of the initial state and the decay of atoms during dynamics leads to holes appearing in the chain. They break the chain into disconnected segments for NN interactions, destroying the power-law c...

  8. [16]

    Analytic origin of the Friedel oscillation The open-chain ground states, at each filling fraction, can be understood as those of a conformal field theory (CFT) with open boundary conditions—a so-called boundary CFT [71, 72]. In this general setting, primary field excitations O...

  9. [17]

    To check this experimentally we use the same adiabatic sequence as in the open ring system

    Background subtraction for Friedel oscillations The ideal ground state of a closed ring (PBC) does not break translational invariance, and in particular we expect no Friedel oscillations. To check this experimentally we use the same adiabatic sequence as in the open ring syste...

  10. [18]

    Giamarchi, Quantum physics in one dimension, The interna- tional series of monographs on physics (Clarendon ; Oxford University Press, Oxford : New York, 2004)

    T. Giamarchi, Quantum physics in one dimension, The interna- tional series of monographs on physics (Clarendon ; Oxford University Press, Oxford : New York, 2004)

    2004

  11. [19]

    Bethe, Zur Theorie der Metalle, Zeitschrift f ¨ur Physik 71, 205–226 (1931)

    H. Bethe, Zur Theorie der Metalle, Zeitschrift f ¨ur Physik 71, 205–226 (1931)

    1931

  12. [20]

    Tomonaga, Remarks on Bloch’s method of sound waves applied to many-fermion problems, Progress of Theoretical Physics 5, 544–569 (1950)

    S.-I. Tomonaga, Remarks on Bloch’s method of sound waves applied to many-fermion problems, Progress of Theoretical Physics 5, 544–569 (1950)

    1950

  13. [21]

    J. M. Luttinger, Fermi surface and some simple equilibrium properties of a system of interacting fermions, Physical Review 119, 1153–1163 (1960)

    1960

  14. [22]

    Luttinger liquid theory

    F. D. M. Haldane, “Luttinger liquid theory” of one-dimensional quantum fluids. I. Properties of the Luttinger model and their extension to the general 1D interacting spinless Fermi gas, Jour- nal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 14, 2585 (1981)

    1981

  15. [23]

    M. A. Cazalilla, R. Citro, T. Giamarchi, E. Orignac, and M. Rigol, One dimensional bosons: From condensed matter systems to ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1405 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    Yacoby, H

    A. Yacoby, H. L. Stormer, N. S. Wingreen, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, Nonuniversal conductance quantiza- tion in quantum wires, Physical Review Letters 77, 4612–4615 (1996)

    1996

  17. [25]

    Grayson, D

    M. Grayson, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and A. M. Chang, Continuum of chiral Luttinger liquids at the fractional quantum Hall edge, Physical Review Letters 80, 1062–1065 (1998)

    1998

  18. [26]

    Schwartz, M

    A. Schwartz, M. Dressel, G. Gr ¨uner, V . Vescoli, L. De- giorgi, and T. Giamarchi, On-chain electrodynamics of metallic (TMTSF)2x salts: Observation of Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid response, Physical Review B 58, 1261–1271 (1998). 17

    1998

  19. [27]

    Bockrath, D

    M. Bockrath, D. H. Cobden, J. Lu, A. G. Rinzler, R. E. Smal- ley, L. Balents, and P. L. McEuen, Luttinger-liquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes, Nature 397, 598–601 (1999)

    1999

  20. [28]

    O. M. Auslaender, A. Yacoby, R. de Picciotto, K. W. Baldwin, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Tunneling spectroscopy of the elementary excitations in a one-dimensional wire, Science 295, 825–828 (2002)

    2002

  21. [29]

    J ´erome, Organic conductors : From charge density wave TTF-TCNQ to superconducting (TMTSF)2PF6, Chemical Re- views 104, 5565–5592 (2004)

    D. J ´erome, Organic conductors : From charge density wave TTF-TCNQ to superconducting (TMTSF)2PF6, Chemical Re- views 104, 5565–5592 (2004)

    2004

  22. [30]

    J. Lee, S. Eggert, H. Kim, S.-J. Kahng, H. Shinohara, and Y . Kuk, Real space imaging of one-dimensional standing waves: Direct evidence for a Luttinger liquid, Physical Review Letters 93, 166403 (2004)

    2004

  23. [31]

    B. Lake, D. A. Tennant, C. D. Frost, and S. E. Nagler, Quantum criticality and universal scaling of a quantum antiferromagnet, Nature Materials 4, 329–334 (2005)

    2005

  24. [32]

    Klanj ˇsek, H

    M. Klanj ˇsek, H. Mayaffre, C. Berthier, M. Horvati´c, B. Chiari, O. Piovesana, P. Bouillot, C. Kollath, E. Orignac, R. Citro, and T. Giamarchi, Controlling Luttinger liquid physics in spin ladders under a magnetic field, Physical Review Letters 101, 137207 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    H. Li, Z. Xiang, T. Wang, M. H. Naik, W. Kim, J. Nie, S. Li, Z. Ge, Z. He, Y . Ou, R. Banerjee, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, A. Zettl, S. G. Louie, M. P. Zaletel, M. F. Crommie, and F. Wang, Imaging tunable Luttinger liquid systems in van der Waals heterostructures ar...

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Paredes, A

    B. Paredes, A. Widera, V . Murg, O. Mandel, S. F ¨olling, I. Cirac, G. V . Shlyapnikov, T. W. H ¨ansch, and I. Bloch, Tonks–Girardeau gas of ultracold atoms in an optical lattice, Nature 429, 277–281 (2004)

    2004

  27. [35]

    Kinoshita, T

    T. Kinoshita, T. Wenger, and D. S. Weiss, Observation of a one- dimensional Tonks-Girardeau gas, Science 305, 1125–1128 (2004)

    2004

  28. [36]

    Fabbri, M

    N. Fabbri, M. Panfil, D. Cl ´ement, L. Fallani, M. Inguscio, C. Fort, and J.-S. Caux, Dynamical structure factor of one- dimensional Bose gases: experimental signatures of beyond- Luttinger liquid physics, Physical Review A91, 043617 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    Hofferberth, I

    S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, T. Schumm, A. Imambekov, V . Gritsev, E. Demler, and J. Schmiedmayer, Probing quantum and thermal noise in an interacting many-body system, Nature Physics 4, 489–495 (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    Yang, Y .-Y

    B. Yang, Y .-Y . Chen, Y .-G. Zheng, H. Sun, H.-N. Dai, X.- W. Guan, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, Quantum criticality and the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid in one-dimensional Bose gases, Physical Review Letters 119, 165701 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    T. Yang, P. Griˇsins, Y . Chang, Z. Zhao, C. Shih, T. Giamarchi, and R. Hulet, Measurement of the dynamical structure factor of a 1D interacting Fermi gas, Physical Review Letters 121, 103001 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Pagano, M

    G. Pagano, M. Mancini, G. Cappellini, P. Lombardi, F. Sch¨afer, H. Hu, X.-J. Liu, J. Catani, C. Sias, M. Inguscio, and L. Fallani, A one-dimensional liquid of fermions with tunable spin, Nature Physics 10, 198 (2014)

    2014

  33. [41]

    T. A. Hilker, G. Salomon, F. Grusdt, A. Omran, M. Boll, E. Demler, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Revealing hidden antiferro- magnetic correlations in doped Hubbard chains via string cor- relators, Science 357, 484 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Senaratne, D

    R. Senaratne, D. Cavazos-Cavazos, S. Wang, F. He, Y .-T. Chang, A. Kafle, H. Pu, X.-W. Guan, and R. G. Hulet, Spin- charge separation in a one-dimensional Fermi gas with tunable interactions, Science 376, 1305 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Cavazos-Cavazos, R

    D. Cavazos-Cavazos, R. Senaratne, A. Kafle, and R. G. Hulet, Thermal disruption of a Luttinger liquid, Nature Communica- tions 14, 3154 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Zheludev, Quantum critical dynamics and scaling in one- dimensional antiferromagnets, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 131, 34 (2020)

    A. Zheludev, Quantum critical dynamics and scaling in one- dimensional antiferromagnets, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 131, 34 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Jurcevic, B

    P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, C. Hempel, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Quasiparticle engineering and entan- glement propagation in a quantum many-body system, Nature 511, 202–205 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    Richerme, Z.-X

    P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. Lee, C. Senko, J. Smith, M. Foss- Feig, S. Michalakis, A. V . Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions, Nature 511, 198 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    Morvan, T

    A. Morvan, T. I. Andersen, X. Mi, C. Neill, A. Petukhov, K. Kechedzhi, D. A. Abanin, A. Michailidis, R. Acharya, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, J. Atalaya, J. C. Bardin, J. Basso, A. Bengtsson, G. Bortoli, A. Bourassa, J. Bovaird, L. Brill, M. Broughton, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Bue...

    2022

  40. [48]

    F. Fang, K. Wang, V . S. Liu, Y . Wang, R. Cimmino, J. Wei, M. Bintz, A. Parr, J. Kemp, K.-K. Ni, and N. Y . Yao, Probing critical phenomena in open quantum systems using atom arrays arXiv.2402.15376 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    S. Kim, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, M. E. Tai, A. M. Kaufman, P. Segura, Y . Li, J. Kwan, J. L´eonard, B. Bakkali-Hassani, and M. Greiner, Adiabatic state preparation in a quantum Ising spin chain arXiv.2404.07481 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Annals of Physics 16, 407 (1961)

    1961

  43. [51]

    M. F. Maghrebi, Z.-X. Gong, and A. V . Gorshkov, Continuous symmetry breaking in 1D long-range interacting quantum sys- tems, Physical Review Letters 119, 023001 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    J. T. Schneider, S. J. Thomson, and L. Sanchez-Palencia, En- tanglement spectrum and quantum phase diagram of the long- range XXZ chain, Physical Review B 106, 014306 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Gupta, G

    T. Gupta, G. Masella, F. Mattiotti, N. V . Prokof’ev, and G. Pupillo, Scale-invariant phase transition of disordered bosons in one dimension arXiv:2310.17682 (2023). 18

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    J. Y . Lee, J. Ramette, M. A. Metlitski, V . Vuleti ´c, W. W. Ho, and S. Choi, Landau-forbidden quantum criticality in Rydberg quantum simulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 083601 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Friedel, Metallic alloys, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 7, 287 (1958)

    J. Friedel, Metallic alloys, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 7, 287 (1958)

    1958

  48. [56]

    Nogrette, H

    F. Nogrette, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, D. Barredo, L. B ´eguin, A. Vernier, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Single-atom trapping in holographic 2D arrays of microtraps with arbitrary geome- tries, Physical Review X 4, 021034 (2014)

    2014

  49. [57]

    Schymik, V

    K.-N. Schymik, V . Lienhard, D. Barredo, P. Scholl, H. Williams, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, Enhanced atom-by- atom assembly of arbitrary tweezer arrays, Physical Review A 102, 063107 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Since the diameter of the circle ( 124 µm) is large compared with the nearest-neighbor distance, we do not expect strong de- viations from an ideal one-dimensional chain

  51. [59]

    C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V . S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee, M. Schuler, A. M. L¨auchli, M. P. Zaletel, T. Lahaye, N. Y . Yao, and A. Browaeys, Continuous symmetry breaking in a two- dimensional Rydberg array, Nature ...

    2023

  52. [60]

    L. Feng, O. Katz, C. Haack, M. Maghrebi, A. V . Gorshkov, Z. Gong, M. Cetina, and C. Monroe, Continuous symmetry breaking in a trapped-ion spin chain, Nature 623, 713 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Richerme, C

    P. Richerme, C. Senko, J. Smith, A. Lee, S. Korenblit, and C. Monroe, Experimental performance of a quantum simula- tor: Optimizing adiabatic evolution and identifying many-body ground states, Physical Review A 88, 012334 (2013)

    2013

  54. [62]

    The link between the two is rij = N π sin(π|i − j|/N)

    We use the chord distance rij instead of the perimeter distance |i − j| to avoid biases due to the periodic boundary conditions. The link between the two is rij = N π sin(π|i − j|/N). A the- oretical justification relies on conformal field theory, see for in- stance [74, 75]

  55. [63]

    L. Gori, T. Barthel, A. Kumar, E. Lucioni, L. Tanzi, M. Inguscio, G. Modugno, T. Giamarchi, C. D’Errico, and G. Roux, Finite-temperature effects on interacting bosonic one- dimensional systems in disordered lattices, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033650 (2016)

    2016

  56. [64]

    Bocini, F

    S. Bocini, F. Caleca, F. Mezzacapo, and T. Roscilde, Non-local quench spectroscopy of fermionic excitations in 1D quantum spin chains arXiv:2407.14802 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Eggert and I

    S. Eggert and I. Affleck, Magnetic impurities in half-integer- spin Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chains, Physical Review B 46, 10866 (1992)

    1992

  58. [66]

    Fath, Luttinger liquid behavior in spin chains with a mag- netic field, Physical Review B 68, 134445 (2003)

    G. Fath, Luttinger liquid behavior in spin chains with a mag- netic field, Physical Review B 68, 134445 (2003)

    2003

  59. [67]

    D. V . Else, R. Thorngren, and T. Senthil, Non-Fermi Liquids as Ersatz Fermi Liquids: General Constraints on Compressible Metals, Physical Review X 11, 021005 (2021)

    2021

  60. [68]

    Cheng and N

    M. Cheng and N. Seiberg, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems, SciPost Physics 15, 051 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    C. Chen, G. Emperauger, G. Bornet, F. Caleca, B. G ´ely, M. Bintz, S. Chatterjee, V . Liu, D. Barredo, N. Y . Yao, T. La- haye, F. Mezzacapo, T. Roscilde, and A. Browaeys, Spec- troscopy of elementary excitations from quench dynamics in a dipolar XY Rydberg simulator arXiv.231...

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Cheneau, P

    M. Cheneau, P. Barmettler, D. Poletti, M. Endres, P. Schauß, T. Fukuhara, C. Gross, I. Bloch, C. Kollath, and S. Kuhr, Light- cone-like spreading of correlations in a quantum many-body system, Nature 481, 484 (2012)

    2012

  63. [71]

    Giamarchi and H

    T. Giamarchi and H. J. Schulz, Anderson localization and inter- actions in one-dimensional metals, Phys. Rev. B37, 325 (1988)

    1988

  64. [72]

    D. S. Fisher, Random antiferromagnetic quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 50, 3799 (1994)

    1994

  65. [73]

    Altman, Y

    E. Altman, Y . Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and G. Refael, Phase tran- sition in a system of one-dimensional bosons with strong disor- der, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 150402 (2004)

    2004

  66. [74]

    D’Errico and M

    C. D’Errico and M. G. Tarallo, One-dimensional disordered bosonic systems, Atoms 9, 10.3390/atoms9040112 (2021)

    2021 doi

  67. [75]

    Bintz, V

    M. Bintz, V . S. Liu, J. Hauschild, A. Khalifa, S. Chatterjee, M. P. Zaletel, and N. Y . Yao, Dirac spin liquid in quantum dipole arrays arXiv.2406.00098 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Barredo, S

    D. Barredo, S. de L ´es´eleuc, V . Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbi- trary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science 354, 1021–1023 (2016)

    2016

  69. [77]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individ- ually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nature Physics 16, 132–142 (2020)

    2020

  70. [78]

    Weber, C

    S. Weber, C. Tresp, H. Menke, A. Urvoy, O. Firstenberg, H. P. B¨uchler, and S. Hofferberth, Calculation of Rydberg interaction potentials, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 50, 133001 (2017)

    2017

  71. [79]

    T. F. Gallagher, Oscillator strengths and lifetimes, in Rydberg Atoms, Cambridge Monographs on Atomic, Molec- ular and Chemical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1994) p. 38–49

    1994

  72. [80]

    I. I. Beterov, I. I. Ryabtsev, D. B. Tretyakov, and V . M. Entin, Quasiclassical calculations of blackbody-radiation-induced de- population rates and effective lifetimes of Rydberg ns, np, and nd alkali-metal atoms with n ≤ 80, Physical Review A 79, 052504 (2009)

    2009

  73. [81]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITen- sor software library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Physics Codebases , 004 (2022)

    2022

  74. [82]

    A. J. Daley, Quantum trajectories and open many-body quan- tum systems, Advances in Physics 63, 77 (2014)

    2014

  75. [83]

    O. F. Syljuasen and A. W. Sandvik, Quantum Monte Carlo with directed loops, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046701 (2002)

    2002

  76. [84]

    Verstraete, J

    F. Verstraete, J. J. Garc´ıa-Ripoll, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product density operators: Simulation of finite-temperature and dissipa- tive systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 207204 (2004)

    2004

  77. [85]

    Weinberg and M

    P. Weinberg and M. Bukov, QuSpin: a Python Package for Dynamics and Exact Diagonalisation of Quantum Many Body Systems part I: spin chains, SciPost Phys. 2, 003 (2017)

    2017

  78. [86]

    Laflorencie, H

    N. Laflorencie, H. Rieger, A. W. Sandvik, and P. Henelius, Crossover effects in the random-exchange spin-1 2 antiferromag- netic chain, Phys. Rev. B 70, 054430 (2004)

    2004

  79. [87]

    J. A. Hoyos, A. P. Vieira, N. Laflorencie, and E. Miranda, Cor- relation amplitude and entanglement entropy in random spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 76, 174425 (2007)

    2007

  80. [88]

    J. L. Cardy, Conformal invariance and surface critical behavior, Nuclear Physics B 240, 514 (1984)

    1984

  81. [89]

    T. W. Burkhardt and E. Eisenriegler, Universal order-parameter profiles in confined critical systems with boundary fields, Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 18, L83 (1985)

    1985

  82. [90]

    P. H. Ginsparg, Applied Conformal Field Theory, in Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics (1988) arXiv:hep-th/9108028

    1988 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S ´en´echal, 11. Finite-size scaling and boundaries 11.1 Conformal invariance on a cylin- der, in Conformal Field Theory, Graduate texts in contempo- rary physics (Springer, New York, 2011) p. 409–412

    2011

  84. [92]

    Slagle, D

    K. Slagle, D. Aasen, H. Pichler, R. S. K. Mong, P. Fendley, X. Chen, M. Endres, and J. Alicea, Microscopic characteriza- tion of Ising conformal field theory in Rydberg chains, Physical Review B 104, 235109 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.