Scalar-induced gravitational wave from domain wall perturbation

Bo-Qiang Lu

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Scalar-induced gravitational wave from domain wall perturbation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Domain-wall networks imprint scalar perturbations that source a second gravitational-wave background, with a resonant peak at the annihilation scale that can reach 10^-6 in energy density for late decays.

desk verdict A fresh and mostly careful SIGW calculation, but the seed power spectrum is assumed rather than derived, so the headline numbers are not yet supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07677 v3 pith:7YBGKOHM submitted 2024-12-10 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-phhep-th

Bo-Qiang Lu This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-phhep-th MSC 83F0583C35 PACS 04.30.-w98.80.Cq

keywords domainwallsscalar-inducedgravitationalwavessecond-ordercosmologicalperturbationscurvatureperturbationearlyuniversewavebackgroundresonantamplificationwallannihilation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper calculates, for the first time, the gravitational waves produced at second order in perturbation theory by the scalar (curvature) perturbations that a network of domain walls imprints on the surrounding radiation. It argues that the resulting spectrum has a characteristic shape—rising as $k^3$ at low frequencies, peaking at the wall-annihilation wavenumber $k_a$, and decaying as $k^{-16}$ above it—and that the peak amplitude is controlled by how late the walls annihilate. For formation at $10^8$ GeV and annihilation at $10^4$ GeV the peak is around $10^{-22}$; if annihilation is delayed to roughly $10^3$ GeV the peak rises to about $10^{-6}$, comparable to the gravitational-wave burst emitted by the walls' own annihilation. A companion to the widely studied annihilation burst, this signal would give future interferometers a spectrally distinct probe of discrete-symmetry breaking in the early universe.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the curvature perturbation seeded by the wall network, Eq. (2.12): a linear interpolation between the radiation-only limit ($\Phi=0$) and the wall-only limit ($\Phi=\tilde{\Phi}$), with the wall-only potential $\tilde{\Phi}(x) = 2\pi G a \sigma_w (\sqrt{x^2+d_w^2} - |x|)$ approximated by a periodic $\cos^2$ potential with Fourier peak at $k = 2\pi/d_w$. Its one-dimensional power spectrum is converted to an isotropic three-dimensional spectrum, giving $P_\phi(k) \propto k^{-8}$. After annihilation the perturbation propagates as a sound wave with $c_s = 1/\sqrt{3}$; the kernel $F(u,v,z) \approx \sin(vz-\theta_a)\sin(uz-\theta_a)/(uvz^2)$ is what carries the calculation, and it produces the resonant peak when $u+v = \sqrt{3}$ and the large-$v$ plateau when $u \simeq v \gg 1$. All later results—the transfer function, the power spectrum, the resonance amplitude—are proportional to this seeded potential, so its form determines the final gravitational-wave shape.

What would settle it

A lattice or N-body simulation of a scaling domain-wall network in a radiation-dominated background should directly measure the curvature perturbation spectrum $P_\Phi(k)$ and compare it with the $k^{-8}$ form and the amplitude predicted by Eq. (2.12). If the measured spectrum differs from the linear-interpolation prediction—for instance, if it acquires a different $k$-dependence or a different $f_w(\eta)$ scaling—then the induced gravitational-wave spectrum's normalization and peak height (Figs. 3–5) would change accordingly, falsifying the specific prediction while leaving the generic $k^3/k^{-16}$ shape intact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a scaling domain-wall network in a radiation-dominated universe continuously sources a curvature perturbation $\Phi(\eta,x) \simeq f_w(\eta)\tilde{\Phi}(\eta,x)$, where $f_w$ is the wall energy fraction and $\tilde{\Phi}$ is the potential of a wall-only universe; because $f_w$ grows with time, the induced scalar perturbation becomes significant before annihilation. This seed yields a reduced power spectrum $P_\phi(k) \propto (k_B/k)^8$, a steep $k^{-8}$ spectrum peaked at large scales, with a causality-enforced lower cutoff. After annihilation the perturbation becomes a free oscillating radiation mode; its time derivative dominates the second-order source and, through the resonant condition $u+v = \sqrt{3}$, produces a gravitational-wave peak at $k \simeq k_a$. The total spectrum $\Omega_{\rm GW,tot} = \Omega_{\rm GW,f} + \Omega_{\rm GW,a,res} + \Omega_{\rm GW,a,LV}$ scales as $k^3$ below $k_a$ and $k^{-16}$ above it, and for late annihilation ($T_{\rm ann} \simeq 2$–$3\times10^3$ GeV with $T_f = 10^8$ GeV) reaches $\Omega_{\rm GW} \sim 10^{-6}$, comparable to the conventional domain-wall-annihilation burst.

Load-bearing premise

The whole calculation assumes that in a radiation-dominated universe with a subdominant wall network, the curvature perturbation is simply the wall-only potential times the wall's energy fraction, Eq. (2.12); this linear mixing is fixed only by the two limits (no walls, wall domination) and is not derived from the two-fluid Einstein equations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the domain-wall network annihilates late enough ($T_{\rm ann} \approx 10^3$ GeV for $T_f = 10^8$ GeV), the scalar-induced gravitational-wave background reaches $\Omega_{\rm GW} \sim 10^{-6}$, within reach of future space-based interferometers.
The induced signal is spectrally distinct: it peaks at the perturbation wavenumber at annihilation $k_a$, with a $k^3$ infrared tail and a $k^{-16}$ high-frequency decay, so it can be separated from the broadband annihilation burst and from phase-transition or cosmic-string spectra.
The model predicts a resonant enhancement of about four orders of magnitude at $k \approx k_a$ relative to the non-resonant contributions.
Because the peak amplitude scales as $T_{\rm ann}^{-16}$ and $T_f^{24}$, the spectrum is extremely sensitive to the wall formation and annihilation temperatures, making it a sensitive probe of the wall network's lifetime.
Causality imposes a lower cutoff on the curvature power spectrum ($P_{\phi,\rm cut} \sim 10^{-10}$), preventing an infrared divergence and fixing the $k^3$ infrared scaling of the gravitational-wave spectrum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct measurement of the curvature perturbation power spectrum in a lattice simulation of a domain-wall network would isolate the linear-mixing assumption from the gravitational-wave production step, since the final spectral shape is largely determined by the post-annihilation transfer function.
The resonance mechanism at $u+v = \sqrt{3}$ is not specific to domain walls; the same sharp-transition amplification should appear for any decaying source that hands its perturbation to the radiation fluid, so the peak-at-annihilation signature may be a generic feature of induced gravitational waves from transient sources.
The same $k^{-8}$ curvature spectrum that drives the gravitational-wave background should also drive the overdensities that collapse into primordial black holes, as a companion study argues; a joint constraint from gravitational-wave experiments and black-hole abundance would test the wall model in two independent windows.
A dedicated search at the predicted peak frequency ($k_a \sim 0.1$–$1$ Hz for $T_{\rm ann} \sim 10^3$–$10^4$ GeV) could discriminate between the annihilation burst and the induced spectrum, since the two have different spectral slopes on either side of the peak.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bo-Qiang Lu's paper does something genuinely new: it treats domain-wall perturbations as the source of curvature perturbations that then produce second-order gravitational waves, and it works through the standard machinery carefully. The resonance and large-v approximations follow the established SIGW literature (Kohri-Terada, Inomata et al.) and the final spectrum—peak at the wall-annihilation wavenumber, k^3 IR tail, k^-16 UV tail—is concrete and physically motivated. If the input power spectrum were right, this would be a useful complement to the usual DW annihilation GWs.

The problem is the input. The curvature power spectrum in Sec. 2.2 is the load-bearing piece, and its derivation is not sound. The periodic-wall potential gives a one-dimensional Fourier amplitude with a delta at k = 2 pi/d_w. When Eq. (2.13) (Kaiser-Peacock, 1D-to-3D conversion) is applied to a delta-function 1D spectrum, the result for k < k0 is a smooth spectrum proportional to k^-2, not the retained 3D delta of Eq. (2.14). The later replacement by a k^-8 power spectrum in Eq. (2.23) is therefore an assumption, not a derivation. Since the GW amplitude and the k^3/k^-16 slopes are powers of this P_phi, an error here changes both the peak height (between ~10^-22 and ~10^-6) and the shape. Separately, Eq. (2.12), interpolating the curvature perturbation between f_w -> 0 and f_w -> 1, is asserted from the two limits rather than derived from the two-fluid Einstein equations. Even if that interpolation is accepted, the spectrum construction still needs repair.

There are smaller issues: the abstract says 'gravitational wave network' where it means 'domain wall network'; the VOS parameters come from simulations without propagated uncertainties, but that is a minor point for a first estimate.

Who is the paper for? Anyone working on stochastic GW backgrounds from topological defects or on SIGW. The idea is worth engaging with; the execution of the standard part is careful; the qualitative claim that DW perturbations leave a second, spectrally distinct background is plausible. But the quantitative prediction in Figs. 3-5 is not yet supported.

My recommendation: send it to peer review, not desk reject. The flaw is localized in Sec. 2.2 and is fixable. A referee should ask for a proper derivation of the 3D power spectrum—either from the actual Fourier transform of the periodic wall network or from a stochastic model of wall fluctuations—and should also ask for justification (or removal) of Eq. (2.12). If those sections are redone, the paper could be solid. As is, the headline numbers should not be taken at face value.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims the first calculation of scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGWs) sourced by curvature perturbations generated by a domain-wall (DW) network. It models the DW network as a one-dimensional periodic array, derives a curvature perturbation and a k^-8 power spectrum, then feeds this spectrum into the standard second-order SIGW formalism. The final prediction, Eq. (4.33) with Figs. 3-5, is that the total SIGW spectrum is the sum of a subdominant pre-annihilation contribution, a resonant contribution peaked at k around k_a, and a large-velocity contribution, with Omega_GW scaling as k^3 below k_a and k^-16 above it. For T_f = 10^8 GeV and T_ann = 10^4 GeV the peak is Omega_GW about 10^-22; for T_ann about 10^3 GeV the peak rises to about 10^-6, comparable to the GW burst from the walls' own annihilation.

Significance. If correct, the paper identifies a new, spectrally distinct stochastic GW background from DW networks, with a resonant peak and steep high-frequency falloff that could be tested by future interferometers. The work has tangible strengths: the second-order GW machinery in Section 3 follows standard references in a traceable way, the analytic reductions are explicit, and no fitted target enters the derivation. However, the central prediction is not yet robust because the seed curvature power spectrum, which controls every downstream amplitude, rests on an unproven interpolation in Eq. (2.12) and an internally inconsistent conversion from a one-dimensional delta-function spectrum to a smooth three-dimensional spectrum in Section 2.2. The significance of the claimed signal is therefore conditional on repairing the seed-spectrum derivation.

major comments (4)

[2.2, Eqs. (2.13)-(2.15) and (2.23)] The derivation of the curvature power spectrum is internally inconsistent. Equation (2.10) gives a one-dimensional Fourier amplitude proportional to delta(k - 2*pi/d_w). Substituting this into the stated 1D-to-3D relation, Eq. (2.13), yields a smooth spectrum with no delta factor for k < 2*pi/d_w, not the delta-peaked P_tildePsi of Eq. (2.14). The paper then uses Eq. (2.15) and Eq. (2.23) to obtain a smooth k^-8 spectrum, but no orientation average over wall directions and no derivation from the three-dimensional Einstein equations is given. Because Eqs. (4.5), (4.30), and (4.32) are all proportional to powers of P_phi, this step controls both the peak amplitude and the claimed k^3/k^-16 shape. This needs to be repaired or explicitly stated as a modeling assumption with its consequences quantified.
[2.1, Eq. (2.12)] The curvature perturbation in the two-component universe is set to Phi(eta,x) = f_w(eta) * Phi_tilde(eta,x) by interpolating between the limits f_w -> 0 and f_w -> 1. This is not derived from the two-fluid Einstein equations. In particular, the argument that the DW perturbation is initially isocurvature and hence Phi(eta_i)=0 is not by itself sufficient to justify the linear scaling with f_w at all intermediate times. Since every later result, including the transfer function and the overall GW amplitude, is proportional to this seeding potential, the validity of Eq. (2.12) is load-bearing. The authors should either derive this relation from the two-fluid equations or present a separate calculation that tests its accuracy.
[4.1, Eqs. (4.1)-(4.4)] The treatment of the delta-function transfer function before annihilation is problematic. The text states that d[f(x)delta(x-x0)]/dx = 0 and uses this to reduce the source to a product of deltas in Eq. (4.2). But Eq. (4.1) contains f_w(eta), which is time-dependent, and d_w(eta), which is also time-dependent, so the distributional time derivative of Phi_k(eta) does not vanish. This affects the pre-annihilation source term and also the matching condition used in Eqs. (4.10)-(4.12). The derivation should be repeated with a regulated, finite-width spectrum or with an explicit treatment of the time-dependent coefficients.
[4.2.1, Eqs. (4.6)-(4.12)] The post-annihilation matching sets Phi'_k(eta_a)=0 with the explanation that the derivative of Eq. (4.1) with respect to conformal time is zero because of the Dirac delta function. This is not correct, since both f_w(eta) and the argument of the delta depend on eta. The constants C1 and C2 in Eqs. (4.11)-(4.12), and therefore the post-annihilation resonant and large-v signals, depend on this boundary condition. The matching should be rederived from the equations of motion, including the source term, or justified by an explicit limiting procedure.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract] The phrase 'gravitational waves produced by scalar perturbations generated from the gravitational wave network' should be 'domain-wall network'; the same typo appears in the abstract's opening sentence.
[Section 2.2, Eq. (2.22)] The random variable E_hat(k) is introduced after Eq. (2.20), but it is used implicitly in the definition of Phi_k(eta) before its formal introduction; please reorder for clarity.
[Figs. 3, 4, and 5] The vertical axes are labeled 'Log10(GW)' in several figures; the label should read 'Log10(Omega_GW)' for clarity.
[Section 4.3, Fig. 4 caption] The text says the peak amplitude scales as Omega_GW proportional to T_f^24, but the contour plot covers a wide dynamic range; a brief statement of the assumed relation sigma_w = T_f^3 would help the reader reproduce the scaling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DW-source spectrum is derived from standard Einstein and VOS inputs, and the final GW spectrum is an output, not a fitted target.

full rationale

The central chain is: thin-wall energy-momentum tensor (2.5) to Poisson equations (2.6)-(2.7), potential (2.8) and network potential (2.9); 1D-to-3D spectrum conversion via the standard formula (2.13) leading to P_phi (2.23); standard second-order GW formalism (3.1)-(3.28) taken from Refs. [10,16,43,44]; and evaluation of the resulting integrals with the DW transfer function, giving Eqs. (4.5), (4.30), and (4.32), whose sum (4.33) is the prediction. No fitted observable appears: the wall scaling parameter A, the VOS parameters, the formation/annihilation temperatures, and sigma_w are external inputs, and Omega_GW,tot is computed rather than matched to any target spectrum. The self-citations [30,31] appear in the introduction as motivation and in Eq. (4.34) for the comparison annihilation spectrum; the dw-Lw relation used in the derivation is re-derived in Appendix A and grounded in standard VOS references [41,42], so these self-citations are not load-bearing. The weakest points are the linear interpolation in Eq. (2.12) and the 1D-to-3D spectrum construction in Eqs. (2.13)-(2.15), but these are unsupported assumptions or potential internal inconsistencies, not reductions of the final prediction to its own inputs. They should be weighed as correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard SIGW machinery plus four model-specific assumptions: the interpolation (2.12), the cosine approximation for the wall potential, the one-scale scaling network, and radiation-era isocurvature initial conditions. There are no new particles or forces. The quantitative predictions depend on the free model inputs Tf and Tann and on the simulation constant A.

free parameters (3)

A (DW scaling constant) = A approximately 1 (from lattice simulations, Ref. [40])
Sets Lw = t/A, dw = eta/(2A), the characteristic wavenumber k = 4 pi A / eta and the wall energy fraction fw; all spectral positions and amplitudes scale with A.
Tf (domain wall formation temperature) = 1e8 GeV (example), varied in Fig. 4
Sets the wall tension sigma_w approximately Tf^3 and the overall amplitude Omega_GW proportional to Tf^24; a free model input.
Tann (domain wall annihilation temperature) = 1e4, 5e3, 1e3, 2e3, 3e3 GeV (examples)
Sets the annihilation scale k_a and the peak amplitude Omega_GW proportional to Tann^-16; chosen by hand to explore detectability.

assumptions (5)

ad hoc to paper Eq. (2.12): Phi(eta,x) approximately fw(eta) times the wall-only Phi in the radiation-dominated two-component universe
The paper fixes the perturbation by matching two limits (fw to 0 gives Phi = -Psi, fw = 1 gives Phi = Psi) but does not derive the linear interpolation. All later spectra inherit this approximation.
ad hoc to paper Eq. (2.9): the periodic wall array potential is replaced by C cos^2(pi x / dw)
C is fixed by matching spatial averages of the summed |x - j dw| potential and the cosine, not by matching Fourier components; this is the origin of the single-wavenumber delta spectrum.
domain assumption One-scale assumption rho_w = sigma_w / Lw and scaling Lw = t / A
Standard VOS model from Refs. [40,41,42] adopted without modification; if the network is not in the scaling regime the time dependence of fw and of k changes.
domain assumption Radiation-dominated background and isocurvature initial condition delta_rho(eta_i) = 0, Phi(eta_i) = 0
The source is assumed to start as a pure isocurvature perturbation in a radiation era; this sets the initial condition for the transfer function and is not derived here.
standard math Second-order SIGW formalism with Green's function solution, Eqs. (3.10)-(3.15)
Adopted from Refs. [10,16,43,44]; the paper does not re-derive the source term or the radiation-era Green's function.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scalar-induced gravitational wave from domain wall perturbation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7YBGKOHM

@misc{pith2026241207677,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scalar-induced gravitational wave from domain wall perturbation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7YBGKOHM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07677}
}

read the original abstract

Domain walls represent two-dimensional topological defects that emerge from the spontaneous breaking of discrete symmetries in various new physics models. In this study, we undertake the first calculation of gravitational waves produced by scalar perturbations generated from the gravitational wave network. Our findings indicate that the gravitational wave spectrum is notably distinct from that of other sources. This opens up a promising avenue for future gravitational wave experiments aimed at exploring the role of domain walls in the early universe.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Primordial Black Hole from Tensor-induced Density Fluctuation: First-order Phase Transitions and Domain Walls
astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

Tensor perturbations from FOPT and domain-wall sources are claimed to induce second-order scalar perturbations large enough to form primordial black holes, potentially all of the dark matter.
The Domain Wall Soliton's Tension
hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The one-loop domain wall tension in 3+1d phi^4 theory is computed as m^3/(3λ) + 0.0410959 m^3 under a chosen renormalization scheme.
Can tensor-scalar induced GWs dominate PTA observations ?
astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A Bayesian fit to NANOGrav 15-year data finds that tensor-scalar induced gravitational waves plus primordial tensor waves can fit the PTA background, with amplitudes constrained by CMB, BAO, and PBH limits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

[1]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 6 061102, [1602.03837]

arXiv 2016
[2]

Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys

NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023), no. 1 L8, [ 2306.16213]

arXiv 2023
[3]

Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III

EPT ACollaboration, J. Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals , 2306.16214

arXiv
[4]

D. J. Reardon et al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array , Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023), no. 1 L6, [ 2306.16215]

arXiv 2023
[5]

Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , Res

H. Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23 (2023), no. 7 075024, [2306.16216]

arXiv 2023
[6]

Caprini and D

C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves , Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018), no. 16 163001, [ 1801.04268]

arXiv 2018
[7]

Dom` enech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review , Universe 7 (2021), no

G. Dom` enech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review , Universe 7 (2021), no. 11 398, [2109.01398]

arXiv 2021
[8]

Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A1, [ 1807.06205]

arXiv 2020

Show all 46 references

[9]

C. T. Byrnes, P. S. Cole, and S. P. Patil, Steepest growth of the power spectrum and primordial black holes , JCAP 06 (2019) 028, [ 1811.11158]

2019 arXiv
[10]

K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson, and D. Wands, The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations , Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 123518, [ gr-qc/0612013]

2007 arXiv
[11]

Bugaev and P

E. Bugaev and P. Klimai, Induced gravitational wave background and primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 023517, [ 0908.0664]

2010 arXiv
[12]

Alabidi, K

L. Alabidi, K. Kohri, M. Sasaki, and Y. Sendouda, Observable Spectra of Induced Gravitational Waves from Inflation , JCAP 09 (2012) 017, [ 1203.4663]. – 27 –

2012 arXiv
[13]

Assadullahi and D

H. Assadullahi and D. Wands, Gravitational waves from an early matter era , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 083511, [ 0901.0989]

2009 arXiv
[14]

Alabidi, K

L. Alabidi, K. Kohri, M. Sasaki, and Y. Sendouda, Observable induced gravitational waves from an early matter phase , JCAP 05 (2013) 033, [ 1303.4519]

2013 arXiv
[15]

E. D. Kovetz, Probing Primordial-Black-Hole Dark Matter with Gravitational Waves , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017), no. 13 131301, [ 1705.09182]

2017 arXiv
[16]

Kohri and T

K. Kohri and T. Terada, Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 12 123532, [1804.08577]

2018 arXiv
[17]

Inomata, K

K. Inomata, K. Kohri, T. Nakama, and T. Terada, Enhancement of Gravitational Waves Induced by Scalar Perturbations due to a Sudden Transition from an Early Matter Era to the Radiation Era, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 043532, [ 1904.12879]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 049901 (2023)]

2019 arXiv
[18]

Dom` enech, C

G. Dom` enech, C. Lin, and M. Sasaki, Gravitational wave constraints on the primordial black hole dominated early universe , JCAP 04 (2021) 062, [ 2012.08151]. [Erratum: JCAP 11, E01 (2021)]

2021 arXiv
[19]

T. W. B. Kibble, G. Lazarides, and Q. Shafi, Walls Bounded by Strings , Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 435

1982
[20]

Preskill and A

J. Preskill and A. Vilenkin, Decay of metastable topological defects , Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 2324–2342, [hep-ph/9209210]

1993 arXiv
[21]

D. I. Dunsky, A. Ghoshal, H. Murayama, Y. Sakakihara, and G. White, GUTs, hybrid topological defects, and gravitational waves , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 7 075030, [2111.08750]

2022 arXiv
[22]

Babichev, D

E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov, S. Ramazanov, and A. Vikman, Gravitational shine of dark domain walls, JCAP 04 (2022), no. 04 028, [ 2112.12608]

2022 arXiv
[23]

Babichev, D

E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov, S. Ramazanov, R. Samanta, and A. Vikman, NANOGrav spectral index γ=3 from melting domain walls , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 12 123529, [ 2307.04582]

2023 arXiv
[24]

Schr¨ oder and R

T. Schr¨ oder and R. Brandenberger,Embedded domain walls and electroweak baryogenesis , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 4 043516, [ 2404.13035]

2024 arXiv
[25]

Lu, C.-W

B.-Q. Lu, C.-W. Chiang, and T. Li, Clockwork axion footprint on nanohertz stochastic gravitational wave background, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 10 L101304, [ 2307.00746]

2024 arXiv
[26]

Gouttenoire and E

Y. Gouttenoire and E. Vitagliano, Domain wall interpretation of the PTA signal confronting black hole overproduction , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 6 L061306, [ 2306.17841]

2024 arXiv
[27]

Blasi, A

S. Blasi, A. Mariotti, A. Rase, and A. Sevrin, Axionic domain walls at Pulsar Timing Arrays: QCD bias and particle friction , JHEP 11 (2023) 169, [ 2306.17830]

2023 arXiv
[28]

Antoniadis et al., The International Pulsar Timing Array second data release: Search for an isotropic gravitational wave background , Mon

J. Antoniadis et al., The International Pulsar Timing Array second data release: Search for an isotropic gravitational wave background , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 510 (2022), no. 4 4873–4887, [2201.03980]

2022 arXiv
[29]

Chiang and B.-Q

C.-W. Chiang and B.-Q. Lu, Testing clockwork axion with gravitational waves , JCAP 05 (2021) 049, [2012.14071]. – 28 –

2021 arXiv
[30]

Lu, C.-W

B.-Q. Lu, C.-W. Chiang, and T. Li, Primordial black hole from domain wall fluctuations , 2409.09986
[31]

Lu, C.-W

B.-Q. Lu, C.-W. Chiang, and T. Li, A Common Origin for Nano-Hz Gravitational Wave Background and Black Hole Merger Events , 2409.10251

arXiv
[32]

Saito and J

R. Saito and J. Yokoyama, Gravitational wave background as a probe of the primordial black hole abundance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 161101, [ 0812.4339]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 107, 069901 (2011)]

2009 arXiv
[33]

Saito and J

R. Saito and J. Yokoyama, Gravitational-Wave Constraints on the Abundance of Primordial Black Holes , Prog. Theor. Phys. 123 (2010) 867–886, [ 0912.5317]. [Erratum: Prog.Theor.Phys. 126, 351–352 (2011)]

2010 arXiv
[34]

De Luca, G

V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias, and A. Riotto, On the Gauge Invariance of Cosmological Gravitational Waves, JCAP 03 (2020) 014, [ 1911.09689]

2020 arXiv
[35]

Inomata and T

K. Inomata and T. Terada, Gauge Independence of Induced Gravitational Waves , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 2 023523, [ 1912.00785]

2020 arXiv
[36]

Yuan, Z.-C

C. Yuan, Z.-C. Chen, and Q.-G. Huang, Scalar induced gravitational waves in different gauges , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 6 063018, [ 1912.00885]

2020 arXiv
[37]

Vilenkin, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls , Phys

A. Vilenkin, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls , Phys. Rept. 121 (1985) 263–315

1985
[38]

Nambu, H

Y. Nambu, H. Ishihara, N. Gouda, and N. Sugiyama, Anisotropies of the cosmic background radiation by domain wall networks ,
[39]

Kaiser and J

N. Kaiser and J. A. Peacock, Power spectrum analysis of one-dimensional redshift surveys , Astrophys. J. 379 (1991) 482–506

1991
[40]

Hiramatsu, M

T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, and K. Saikawa, On the estimation of gravitational wave spectrum from cosmic domain walls , JCAP 02 (2014) 031, [ 1309.5001]

2014 arXiv
[41]

Martins, Defect Evolution in Cosmology and Condensed Matter

C. Martins, Defect Evolution in Cosmology and Condensed Matter. Springer, 2016

2016
[42]

C. J. A. P. Martins, I. Y. Rybak, A. Avgoustidis, and E. P. S. Shellard, Extending the velocity-dependent one-scale model for domain walls , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016), no. 4 043534, [1602.01322]

2016 arXiv
[43]

Baumann, P

D. Baumann, P. J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi, and K. Ichiki, Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 084019, [hep-th/0703290]

2007 arXiv
[44]

Papanikolaou, V

T. Papanikolaou, V. Vennin, and D. Langlois, Gravitational waves from a universe filled with primordial black holes , JCAP 03 (2021) 053, [ 2010.11573]

2021 arXiv
[45]

R.-G. Cai, S. Pi, and M. Sasaki, Universal infrared scaling of gravitational wave background spectra, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 8 083528, [ 1909.13728]

2020 arXiv
[46]

Hiramatsu, M

T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa, and T. Sekiguchi, Axion cosmology with long-lived domain walls , JCAP 01 (2013) 001, [ 1207.3166]. – 29 –

2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 6 061102, [1602.03837]

arXiv 2016

[2] [2]

Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys

NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023), no. 1 L8, [ 2306.16213]

arXiv 2023

[3] [3]

Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III

EPT ACollaboration, J. Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals , 2306.16214

arXiv

[4] [4]

D. J. Reardon et al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array , Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023), no. 1 L6, [ 2306.16215]

arXiv 2023

[5] [5]

Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , Res

H. Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23 (2023), no. 7 075024, [2306.16216]

arXiv 2023

[6] [6]

Caprini and D

C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves , Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018), no. 16 163001, [ 1801.04268]

arXiv 2018

[7] [7]

Dom` enech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review , Universe 7 (2021), no

G. Dom` enech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review , Universe 7 (2021), no. 11 398, [2109.01398]

arXiv 2021

[8] [8]

Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A1, [ 1807.06205]

arXiv 2020