Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LLMs with Industrial Lens: Deciphering the Challenges and Prospects -- A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.14558 v2 pith:7ZJMYR6R submitted 2024-02-22 cs.CL

LLMs with Industrial Lens: Deciphering the Challenges and Prospects -- A Survey

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsindustrialacrosschallengesindustrylanguagequestionssurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have become the secret ingredient driving numerous industrial applications, showcasing their remarkable versatility across a diverse spectrum of tasks. From natural language processing and sentiment analysis to content generation and personalized recommendations, their unparalleled adaptability has facilitated widespread adoption across industries. This transformative shift driven by LLMs underscores the need to explore the underlying associated challenges and avenues for enhancement in their utilization. In this paper, our objective is to unravel and evaluate the obstacles and opportunities inherent in leveraging LLMs within an industrial context. To this end, we conduct a survey involving a group of industry practitioners, develop four research questions derived from the insights gathered, and examine 68 industry papers to address these questions and derive meaningful conclusions. We maintain the Github repository with the most recent papers in the field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Decomposed Prompting Does Not Fix Knowledge Gaps, But Helps Models Say "I Don't Know"

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Disagreement between direct and decomposed prompting is a training-free error signal that outperforms standard uncertainty baselines for closed-book QA abstention.

  2. A Systematic Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Language Models for Space Operations

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper runs a systematic comparison of RAG pipelines, retrieval strategies, embedding models, and LLMs on space-domain documents and reports gains in accuracy, relevance, and decision support.