Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optimal Multi-Objective Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.13607 v1 pith:A2DPGAMJ submitted 2025-01-23 cs.LG cs.AIcs.ITmath.ITstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.ITmath.ITstat.ML
keywords bestobjectivetimealgorithmboundidentificationmulti-objectiveproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider a multi-armed bandit setting with finitely many arms, in which each arm yields an $M$-dimensional vector reward upon selection. We assume that the reward of each dimension (a.k.a. {\em objective}) is generated independently of the others. The best arm of any given objective is the arm with the largest component of mean corresponding to the objective. The end goal is to identify the best arm of {\em every} objective in the shortest (expected) time subject to an upper bound on the probability of error (i.e., fixed-confidence regime). We establish a problem-dependent lower bound on the limiting growth rate of the expected stopping time, in the limit of vanishing error probabilities. This lower bound, we show, is characterised by a max-min optimisation problem that is computationally expensive to solve at each time step. We propose an algorithm that uses the novel idea of {\em surrogate proportions} to sample the arms at each time step, eliminating the need to solve the max-min optimisation problem at each step. We demonstrate theoretically that our algorithm is asymptotically optimal. In addition, we provide extensive empirical studies to substantiate the efficiency of our algorithm. While existing works on pure exploration with multi-objective multi-armed bandits predominantly focus on {\em Pareto frontier identification}, our work fills the gap in the literature by conducting a formal investigation of the multi-objective best arm identification problem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Best Group Identification in Multi-Objective Bandits

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors formalize Best Group Identification in multi-objective bandits and give elimination algorithms with upper and lower sample-complexity bounds for Pareto and linear objectives.

Pith tools