Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

First Look at Quartic-in-Spin Binary Dynamics at Third Post-Minkowskian Order

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper computes the first classical gravitational scattering amplitude for a spinning black hole off a spinless one to fourth order in spin at third post-Minkowskian order, and derives impulse and spin-kick observables for arbitrary…

desk verdict First quartic-in-spin 3PM observables are real and technically impressive, but the new non-aligned results lean on a Dirac bracket formalism the authors admit is not yet rigorous. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08961 v3 pith:A2GOXALB submitted 2025-02-13 hep-th gr-qchep-ph

Dogan Akpinar , Fernando Febres Cordero , Manfred Kraus , Alexander Smirnov , Mao Zeng This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qchep-ph
keywords post-MinkowskianexpansionspinningblackholesscatteringamplitudesclassicalobservablesspininterpolationmethodDiracbracketsradiationreactionspin-shiftsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to extend the post-Minkowskian description of gravitational two-body scattering—an expansion in powers of Newton's constant while keeping full velocity dependence—from spin-squared to quartic-in-spin accuracy at third order in the coupling. The authors compute the classical two-loop amplitude for a massive spin-0, spin-1, or spin-2 particle scattering off a scalar, use a spin-interpolation argument to strip away quantum spin-Casimir contaminants, and extract a radial action to $O(G^3 S^4)$. From that radial action, covariant Dirac brackets yield the impulse and spin kick for generally oriented (non-aligned) spins, with checks against known results at $O(G^3 S^2)$. Radiation-reaction contributions are then added to all orders in spin. If the formalism holds, these are the first spin-cubed and spin-quartic observables at third post-Minkowskian order for non-aligned configurations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the radial-action to observable dictionary built from covariant Dirac brackets (Poisson brackets modified to impose the spin-supplementary and gauge constraints). The radial action $I_r$, obtained from the finite part of the two-loop amplitude through the amplitude-action relation, encodes all conservative scattering information, and the Dirac brackets promote the classical Poisson brackets of impact parameter, velocities, and spin tensors to consistent constrained brackets; the change of any observable is then the iterated bracket series with $I_r$. The spin interpolation method is the other essential piece: by computing with fixed spin $s=0,1,2$ fields and demanding representation-independent coefficients, it separates genuine classical spin effects from spin-Casimir terms that would otherwise mix with quantum corrections. This machinery is what lets the paper bypass explicit cut-diagram calculations for non-aligned observables.

What would settle it

A direct classical computation of the non-aligned impulse and spin kick at $O(G^3 S^3)$ or $O(G^3 S^4)$ by an independent method, such as a worldline or effective-field-theory calculation, that disagrees with the paper's supplemental formulas would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the classical dynamics of a Kerr black hole scattering off a spinless one is now known through fourth order in spin at third post-Minkowskian order. Concretely, the paper constructs the $O(G^3 S^4)$ classical amplitude from two-loop scattering amplitudes for massive spin-0, 1, and 2 fields minimally coupled to gravity, resolving the spin-Casimir ambiguity with the spin interpolation method instead of an arbitrary-spin Lagrangian. The radial action obtained from the finite part of the amplitude matches direct classical probe-limit calculations, and the covariant Dirac bracket formalism converts it into impulse and spin-kick observables valid for non-aligned spins. These observables reproduce the known $O(G^3 S^2)$ results and are new at $O(G^3 S^3)$ and $O(G^3 S^4)$. Combining with the radiation-reaction amplitude cancels a high-energy logarithmic divergence through quartic spin order and produces radiation-reaction observables to all orders in spin. The authors further report a spin-shift symmetry in both probe limits and conjecture that it reflects a hidden integrability of Kerr orbits.

Load-bearing premise

The main assumption is that the rule used to convert the computed radial action into observable changes for arbitrarily oriented spins is valid at this order and spin power; the authors state this rule is not yet rigorously established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The $O(G^3 S^3)$ and $O(G^3 S^4)$ impulse and spin-kick formulas for non-aligned spins are the first results at this order and can serve as inputs for post-Minkowskian gravitational-wave models of high-spin binaries.
  • Radiation-reaction observables to all orders in spin extend dissipative two-body dynamics beyond the aligned-spin limit at third post-Minkowskian order.
  • The cancellation of the high-energy logarithmic divergence through quartic spin order indicates the split between conservative and radiative contributions is consistent at this order.
  • The observed spin-shift symmetry in all probe structures at $O(G^3)$ through $S^4$ extends a pattern known from lower orders and motivates the hidden-integrability conjecture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the Dirac-bracket dictionary is valid to all spin orders as the paper suspects, the same amplitude-to-observables pipeline could be reused at higher post-Minkowskian orders, cutting out much of the per-observable cut-diagram work.
  • Editorial inference: the conjectured hidden integrability could be probed by searching for a generalized Carter-like constant of motion for non-aligned spinning probes at quartic spin order; the paper does not construct such a constant.
  • Editorial inference: extending the calculation to two spinning black holes, which the paper lists as future work, would let the quartic-in-spin observables be checked against the known aligned-spin post-Newtonian expansion and against numerical relativity for high-spin binaries.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper computes, for the first time, the classical two-loop amplitude for the scattering of a spinless black hole by a spinning black hole through O(G^3 S^4), using minimal-coupling amplitudes for massive scalar, Proca, and Fierz-Pauli fields and the spin-interpolation method of Ref. [81]. From the radial action obtained via the amplitude-action relation and the covariant Dirac bracket formalism of Ref. [93], the authors derive the impulse and spin kick for general, nonaligned spin configurations, and they further combine the conservative amplitude with the radiation-reaction amplitude of Alessio and Di Vecchia to obtain radiation-reaction contributions to observables, claimed to all orders in spin and beyond the aligned-spin limit. The main checks reported are agreement with known O(G^3 S^2) observables, agreement of the radial action with the spinless-probe Kerr result through O(G^3 S^4), agreement with the aligned-spin PN expansion through O(G^3 S^4), and cancellation of a high-energy logarithmic divergence through quartic order in spin.

Significance. If the quoted observables are correct, this is a state-of-the-art result: it extends the two-loop spin-dependent binary dynamics to quartic order in spin and provides a compact route to nonaligned observables via covariant Dirac brackets. The computation is supported by a substantial technical apparatus, including numerical unitarity, IBP reduction, tree-level double-copy checks, and agreement with several independent known limits. The paper also ships ancillary files with amplitudes and observables, which is a valuable reproducibility feature. However, the advertised nonaligned O(G^3 S^3) and O(G^3 S^4) observables rest on the Dirac bracket formula of Ref. [93], whose validity at this order is explicitly not established in the manuscript; the provided checks do not exercise the new spin orders in nonaligned configurations. The significance is therefore conditional on closing or explicitly labeling that gap.

major comments (2)
  1. [Observables / Conclusion]
  2. [Observables (radiation-reaction)]
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (6)]
  2. [Sec. Resolving spin structures]
  3. [Supplemental Material]
  4. [Supplemental Material (two-loop coefficients)]
  5. [Conclusion]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the O(G^3S^4) claim is computed from first-principles amplitudes, with only minor self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The central O(G^3S^4) amplitude is obtained from the Lagrangian (1) by numerical unitarity, IBP reduction, and the spin interpolation ansatz (15), whose 20 coefficients are solved from the s=0,1,2 amplitudes; they are not fitted to the target observables. The radial action (17) is read off the finite part of this amplitude via the amplitude-action relation (7), and its probe-limit form is independently checked against the direct classical calculation of Ref. [93]. The non-aligned-spin observables are obtained from Eq. (27), which is the covariant Dirac bracket proposal of the independent Ref. [93], not from the present authors' prior work; the paper's O(G^3S^2) agreement with known results and aligned-spin PN checks provide external anchors. The only self-citation is Ref. [81], which introduced the spin interpolation method; the method is restated in this paper (Eqs. (15) and following), so the citation is not load-bearing for correctness. The Conclusion's admission that the Dirac bracket formalism is not yet rigorously established for non-aligned higher-spin observables is a correctness and validation gap, not a circular reduction: the new S^3/S^4 results are contingent on an unproved external formalism, but they are not defined to be equal to that formalism's input. Score 2 reflects the minor self-citation without imputing circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation has no fitted free parameters: all ansatz coefficients are determined by matching s=0,1,2 amplitudes. The main axioms are the spin-universality assumption of the interpolation method, the validity of the amplitude-action/Dirac-bracket relation for non-aligned spins, and the identification of the massive spin-2 theory with Kerr dynamics. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Spin universality: the coefficients in the spin-structure ansatz are independent of the spin representation of the massive field.
    Introduced to resolve Casimir ambiguities via the spin interpolation method (see 'Resolving spin structures' section); without it the ansatz cannot be fixed from s=0,1,2 amplitudes.
  • domain assumption The amplitude-action relation (7) and the covariant Dirac brackets (22)-(25) apply to non-aligned spin observables at O(G^3).
    The authors state in the conclusion that this has not been rigorously established and is only checked to O(G^3S^2).
  • domain assumption The massive spin-2 Fierz-Pauli Lagrangian (2) correctly captures the quartic spin multipoles of a Kerr black hole.
    Standard identification in the higher-spin amplitude approach; relied on when mapping the amplitude to classical spin dynamics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of First Look at Quartic-in-Spin Binary Dynamics at Third Post-Minkowskian Order." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A2GOXALB

@misc{pith2026250208961,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: First Look at Quartic-in-Spin Binary Dynamics at Third Post-Minkowskian Order},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A2GOXALB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08961}
}
abstract

We compute the conservative and radiation-reaction contributions to classical observables in the gravitational scattering between a spinning and a spinless black hole to the fourth order in spin and third order in the gravitational constant. The conservative results are obtained from two-loop amplitudes for the scattering process of a massive scalar with a massive spin-$s$ field $(s=0, 1, 2)$ minimally coupled to gravity, employing the recently introduced spin interpolation method to resolve all spin-Casimir terms. The two-loop amplitude exhibits a spin-shift symmetry in both probe limits, which we conjecture to be a sign of yet unknown integrability of Kerr orbits through the quartic order in spin and to all orders in the gravitational constant. We obtain the radial action from the finite part of the amplitude and use it to compute classical observables, including the impulse and spin kick. This is done using the recently introduced covariant Dirac brackets, which allow for the computation of classical scattering observables for general (non-aligned) spin configurations. Finally, employing the radiation-reaction amplitude proposed by Alessio and Di Vecchia, together with the Dirac brackets, we obtain radiation-reaction contributions to observables at all orders in spin and beyond the aligned-spin limit. We find agreement with known results up to the quadratic order in spin for both conservative and radiation-reaction contributions. Our results advance the state of the art in the understanding of spinning binary dynamics in general relativity and demonstrate the power and simplicity of the Dirac bracket formalism for relating scattering amplitudes to classical observables.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spinning the Probe in Kerr with WQFT

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Using worldline quantum field theory, the authors derive the impulse and spin kick for a spinning probe scattering in Kerr spacetime through seventh physical post-Minkowskian order.

  2. Searching for Kerr in string amplitudes

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Infinite-spin limits of three-point open-string amplitudes along sub-leading trajectories generate new Bessel-function currents, but the two-harmonic tilted trajectory does not match the two-mode classical string solu...

  3. Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in Black-Hole Scattering at $\mathcal{O}(G^3)$: Quadratic-in-Spin Effects

    hep-th 2025-05 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    First computation of the O(G^3 S^2) momentum-space gravitational waveform for two scattering spinning black holes, plus the leading three-body spinning waveform.

  4. Higher-spin effects in black hole and neutron star binary dynamics: worldline supersymmetry beyond minimal coupling

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    By adding non-minimal couplings to a supersymmetric worldline model, the authors derive new higher-spin Hamiltonians, including an all-order-in-spin Kerr Hamiltonian in 4D and a cubic-in-spin Hamiltonian in arbitrary ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [93]

    Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering at O G5 , and loop integration,

    Zvi Bern, Enrico Herrmann, Radu Roiban, Michael S. Ruf, Alexander V. Smirnov, Vladimir A. Smirnov, and Mao Zeng, “Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering at O G5 , and loop integration,” JHEP 10, 023 (2024), arXiv:2406.01554 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [81]

    Spinning quadrupoles in effective field theories of gravity,

    Andreas Brandhuber, Graham R. Brown, Gabriele Travaglini, and Pablo Vives Matasan, “Spinning quadrupoles in effective field theories of gravity,” (2024), arXiv:2412.17958 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,

    M. Punturo et al. , “The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 194002 (2010)

    2010

  4. [2]

    Laser Interferome- ter Space Antenna,

    Pau Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA), “Laser Interferome- ter Space Antenna,” (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    arXiv 2017

  5. [3]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy be- yond LIGO,

    David Reitze et al. , “Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy be- yond LIGO,” Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [4]

    Iluminando agujeros negros

    , (3) where X = {Φ, Vµ, Hµν} and ε1, ε⋆ 4 are the polarizations associated to the massive spinning particle. We have the on-shell conditions p2 1 = p2 4 = m2 1, p2 2 = p2 3 = m2 2 and the transverse conditions p1 · ε1 = p4 · ε⋆ 4 = 0. The momenta are parametrized [122, 123] as p1 = −¯p1 + q/2 , p 4 = ¯p1 + q/2 , p2 = −¯p2 − q/2 , p 3 = ¯p2 − q/2 , (4) wit...

    2023

  7. [5]

    Lis- tening to the Universe with next generation ground- based gravitational-wave detectors,

    Ssohrab Borhanian and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Lis- tening to the Universe with next generation ground- based gravitational-wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 083040 (2024), arXiv:2202.11048 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [6]

    Gravitational waveform accuracy requirements for future ground- based detectors,

    Michael P¨ urrer and Carl-Johan Haster, “Gravitational waveform accuracy requirements for future ground- based detectors,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023151 (2020), arXiv:1912.10055 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 150 references
  1. [7]

    From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Poten- tials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,

    Clifford Cheung, Ira Z. Rothstein, and Mikhail P. Solon, “From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Poten- tials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 251101 (2018), arXiv:1808.02489 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,

    David A. Kosower, Ben Maybee, and Donal O’Connell, “Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,” JHEP 02, 137 (2019), arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Scattering Am- plitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,

    Zvi Bern, Clifford Cheung, Radu Roiban, Chia-Hsien Shen, Mikhail P. Solon, and Mao Zeng, “Scattering Am- plitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 201603 (2019), arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory,

    Zvi Bern, Clifford Cheung, Radu Roiban, Chia-Hsien Shen, Mikhail P. Solon, and Mao Zeng, “Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory,” JHEP 10, 206 (2019), arXiv:1908.01493 [hep- th]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Post-Minkowskian Hamiltonians in general relativity,

    Andrea Cristofoli, N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, Poul H. 7 Damgaard, and Pierre Vanhove, “Post-Minkowskian Hamiltonians in general relativity,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 084040 (2019), arXiv:1906.01579 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Post-Minkowskian Scattering Angle in Ein- stein Gravity,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, Andrea Cristofoli, and Poul H. Damgaard, “Post-Minkowskian Scattering Angle in Ein- stein Gravity,” JHEP 08, 038 (2020), arXiv:1910.09366 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy,

    Andreas Brandhuber, Gang Chen, Gabriele Travaglini, and Congkao Wen, “Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy,” JHEP 10, 118 (2021), arXiv:2108.04216 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Scattering Amplitudes and Conserva- tive Binary Dynamics at O(G4),

    Zvi Bern, Julio Parra-Martinez, Radu Roiban, Michael S. Ruf, Chia-Hsien Shen, Mikhail P. Solon, and Mao Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes and Conserva- tive Binary Dynamics at O(G4),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 171601 (2021), arXiv:2101.07254 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Scattering Amplitudes, the Tail Effect, and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),

    Zvi Bern, Julio Parra-Martinez, Radu Roiban, Michael S. Ruf, Chia-Hsien Shen, Mikhail P. Solon, and Mao Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes, the Tail Effect, and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 161103 (2022), arXiv:2112.10750 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Classical observables from the ex- ponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,

    Poul H. Damgaard, Elias Roos Hansen, Ludovic Plant´ e, and Pierre Vanhove, “Classical observables from the ex- ponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,” JHEP 09, 183 (2023), arXiv:2307.04746 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynam- ics,

    Gregor K¨ alin and Rafael A. Porto, “Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynam- ics,” JHEP 11, 106 (2020), arXiv:2006.01184 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems to Third Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field The- ory Approach,

    Gregor K¨ alin, Zhengwen Liu, and Rafael A. Porto, “Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems to Third Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field The- ory Approach,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 261103 (2020), arXiv:2007.04977 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Radiation-reaction in the Effective Field Theory ap- proach to Post-Minkowskian dynamics,

    Gregor K¨ alin, Jakob Neef, and Rafael A. Porto, “Radiation-reaction in the Effective Field Theory ap- proach to Post-Minkowskian dynamics,” JHEP 01, 140 (2023), arXiv:2207.00580 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Bootstrapping the relativistic two- body problem,

    Christoph Dlapa, Gregor K¨ alin, Zhengwen Liu, and Rafael A. Porto, “Bootstrapping the relativistic two- body problem,” JHEP 08, 109 (2023), arXiv:2304.01275 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Minkowskian order from the effective field the- ory approach,

    Christoph Dlapa, Gregor K¨ alin, Zhengwen Liu, and Rafael A. Porto, “Dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Minkowskian order from the effective field the- ory approach,” Phys. Lett. B 831, 137203 (2022), arXiv:2106.08276 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Classi- cal black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,

    Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, and Jan Steinhoff, “Classi- cal black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,” JHEP 02, 048 (2021), arXiv:2010.02865 [hep- th]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory,

    Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, and Jan Steinhoff, “Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 201103 (2021), arXiv:2101.12688 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [24]

    All things retarded: radiation- reaction in worldline quantum field theory,

    Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, and Benjamin Sauer, “All things retarded: radiation- reaction in worldline quantum field theory,” JHEP 10, 128 (2022), arXiv:2207.00569 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [25]

    thesis, Humboldt U., Berlin, Humboldt U., Berlin (main) (2023), arXiv:2308.04388 [hep-th]

    Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gravitational Scattering of Compact Bodies from Worldline Quantum Field The- ory, Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt U., Berlin, Humboldt U., Berlin (main) (2023), arXiv:2308.04388 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,

    Mathias Driesse, Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, Benjamin Sauer, and Johann Uso- vitsch, “Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 241402 (2024), arXiv:2403.07781 [hep- th]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scat- tering,

    Mathias Driesse, Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Albrecht Klemm, Gustav Mogull, Christoph Nega, Jan Plefka, Benjamin Sauer, and Johann Usovitsch, “Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scat- tering,” Nature 641, 603–607 (2025), arXiv:2411.11846 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Gravitational spin- orbit coupling in binary systems, post-Minkowskian ap- proximation and effective one-body theory,

    Donato Bini and Thibault Damour, “Gravitational spin- orbit coupling in binary systems, post-Minkowskian ap- proximation and effective one-body theory,” Phys. Rev. D 96, 104038 (2017), arXiv:1709.00590 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Gravitational spin- orbit coupling in binary systems at the second post- Minkowskian approximation,

    Donato Bini and Thibault Damour, “Gravitational spin- orbit coupling in binary systems at the second post- Minkowskian approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 98, 044036 (2018), arXiv:1805.10809 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings,

    Justin Vines, “Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 084002 (2018), arXiv:1709.06016 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Spinning-black-hole scattering and the test-black-hole limit at second post-Minkowskian order,

    Justin Vines, Jan Steinhoff, and Alessandra Buonanno, “Spinning-black-hole scattering and the test-black-hole limit at second post-Minkowskian order,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 064054 (2019), arXiv:1812.00956 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Holomorphic Classical Limit for Spin Effects in Gravitational and Electromagnetic Scatter- ing,

    Alfredo Guevara, “Holomorphic Classical Limit for Spin Effects in Gravitational and Electromagnetic Scatter- ing,” JHEP 04, 033 (2019), arXiv:1706.02314 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Scattering of Spinning Black Holes from Ex- ponentiated Soft Factors,

    Alfredo Guevara, Alexander Ochirov, and Justin Vines, “Scattering of Spinning Black Holes from Ex- ponentiated Soft Factors,” JHEP 09, 056 (2019), arXiv:1812.06895 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [34]

    The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,

    Ming-Zhi Chung, Yu-Tin Huang, Jung-Wook Kim, and Sangmin Lee, “The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,” JHEP04, 156 (2019), arXiv:1812.08752 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Kerr black holes as elementary particles,

    Nima Arkani-Hamed, Yu-tin Huang, and Donal O’Connell, “Kerr black holes as elementary particles,” JHEP 01, 046 (2020), arXiv:1906.10100 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Black-hole scattering with general spin direc- tions from minimal-coupling amplitudes,

    Alfredo Guevara, Alexander Ochirov, and Justin Vines, “Black-hole scattering with general spin direc- tions from minimal-coupling amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 104024 (2019), arXiv:1906.10071 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Classical potential for general spinning bodies,

    Ming-Zhi Chung, Yu-Tin Huang, and Jung-Wook Kim, “Classical potential for general spinning bodies,” JHEP 09, 074 (2020), arXiv:1908.08463 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Heavy Black Hole Effective Theory,

    Poul H. Damgaard, Kays Haddad, and Andreas Helset, “Heavy Black Hole Effective Theory,” JHEP 11, 070 (2019), arXiv:1908.10308 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [39]

    On- shell heavy particle effective theories,

    Rafael Aoude, Kays Haddad, and Andreas Helset, “On- shell heavy particle effective theories,” JHEP 05, 051 (2020), arXiv:2001.09164 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Complete Hamiltonian for spinning bi- nary systems at first post-Minkowskian order,

    Ming-Zhi Chung, Yu-tin Huang, Jung-Wook Kim, and Sangmin Lee, “Complete Hamiltonian for spinning bi- nary systems at first post-Minkowskian order,” JHEP 05, 105 (2020), arXiv:2003.06600 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [41]

    A worldsheet for Kerr,

    Alfredo Guevara, Ben Maybee, Alexander Ochirov, Donal O’connell, and Justin Vines, “A worldsheet for Kerr,” JHEP 03, 201 (2021), arXiv:2012.11570 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Spinning black hole binary dynamics, scattering amplitudes, and effective field theory,

    Zvi Bern, Andres Luna, Radu Roiban, Chia-Hsien Shen, and Mao Zeng, “Spinning black hole binary dynamics, scattering amplitudes, and effective field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 065014 (2021), arXiv:2005.03071 [hep-th]. 8

    2021 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Quadratic- in-spin Hamiltonian at O(G2) from scattering ampli- tudes,

    Dimitrios Kosmopoulos and Andres Luna, “Quadratic- in-spin Hamiltonian at O(G2) from scattering ampli- tudes,” JHEP 07, 037 (2021), arXiv:2102.10137 [hep- th]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [44]

    The 2PM Hamiltonian for binary Kerr to quartic in spin,

    Wei-Ming Chen, Ming-Zhi Chung, Yu-tin Huang, and Jung-Wook Kim, “The 2PM Hamiltonian for binary Kerr to quartic in spin,” JHEP 08, 148 (2022), arXiv:2111.13639 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [45]

    Conservative Binary Dynamics with a Spinning Black Hole at O(G3) from Scattering Amplitudes,

    Fernando Febres Cordero, Manfred Kraus, Guanda Lin, Michael S. Ruf, and Mao Zeng, “Conservative Binary Dynamics with a Spinning Black Hole at O(G3) from Scattering Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 021601 (2023), arXiv:2205.07357 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Binary Dynamics through the Fifth Power of Spin at O(G2),

    Zvi Bern, Dimitrios Kosmopoulos, Andr´ es Luna, Radu Roiban, and Fei Teng, “Binary Dynamics through the Fifth Power of Spin at O(G2),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 201402 (2023), arXiv:2203.06202 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [47]

    Quantum field theory, worldline theory, and spin mag- nitude change in orbital evolution,

    Zvi Bern, Dimitrios Kosmopoulos, Andres Luna, Radu Roiban, Trevor Scheopner, Fei Teng, and Justin Vines, “Quantum field theory, worldline theory, and spin mag- nitude change in orbital evolution,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 045011 (2024), arXiv:2308.14176 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [48]

    NLO deflections for spinning particles and Kerr black holes,

    Gabriel Menezes and Matteo Sergola, “NLO deflections for spinning particles and Kerr black holes,” JHEP 10, 105 (2022), arXiv:2205.11701 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Gravitational bremsstrahlung from spinning binaries in the post-Minkowskian expansion,

    Massimiliano Maria Riva, Filippo Vernizzi, and Leong Khim Wong, “Gravitational bremsstrahlung from spinning binaries in the post-Minkowskian expansion,” Phys. Rev. D 106, 044013 (2022), arXiv:2205.15295 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [50]

    Scattering angles in Kerr metrics,

    Poul H. Damgaard, Jitze Hoogeveen, Andres Luna, and Justin Vines, “Scattering angles in Kerr metrics,” Phys. Rev. D 106, 124030 (2022), arXiv:2208.11028 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [51]

    Classical Gravitational Spinning-Spinless Scattering at O(G2S∞),

    Rafael Aoude, Kays Haddad, and Andreas Helset, “Classical Gravitational Spinning-Spinless Scattering at O(G2S∞),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 141102 (2022), arXiv:2205.02809 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [52]

    Searching for Kerr in the 2PM amplitude,

    Rafael Aoude, Kays Haddad, and Andreas Helset, “Searching for Kerr in the 2PM amplitude,” JHEP 07, 072 (2022), arXiv:2203.06197 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [53]

    Scattering in black hole backgrounds and higher-spin amplitudes. Part II,

    Yilber Fabian Bautista, Alfredo Guevara, Chris Ka- vanagh, and Justin Vines, “Scattering in black hole backgrounds and higher-spin amplitudes. Part II,” JHEP 05, 211 (2023), arXiv:2212.07965 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [54]

    Boundary to bound dictionary for generic Kerr orbits,

    Riccardo Gonzo and Canxin Shi, “Boundary to bound dictionary for generic Kerr orbits,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 084065 (2023), arXiv:2304.06066 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [55]

    Classical gravitational scattering amplitude at O(G2S∞ 1 S∞ 2 ),

    Rafael Aoude, Kays Haddad, and Andreas Helset, “Classical gravitational scattering amplitude at O(G2S∞ 1 S∞ 2 ),” Phys. Rev. D 108, 024050 (2023), arXiv:2304.13740 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [56]

    Covariant actions and propaga- tors for all spins, masses, and dimensions,

    Lukas W. Lindwasser, “Covariant actions and propaga- tors for all spins, masses, and dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 085010 (2024), arXiv:2307.11750 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [57]

    Resummed spinning waveforms from five-point amplitudes,

    Andreas Brandhuber, Graham R. Brown, Gang Chen, Joshua Gowdy, and Gabriele Travaglini, “Resummed spinning waveforms from five-point amplitudes,” JHEP 02, 026 (2024), arXiv:2310.04405 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [58]

    Spinning waveforms from the Kosower- Maybee-O’Connell formalism at leading order,

    Stefano De Angelis, Pavel P. Novichkov, and Ric- cardo Gonzo, “Spinning waveforms from the Kosower- Maybee-O’Connell formalism at leading order,” Phys. Rev. D 110, L041502 (2024), arXiv:2309.17429 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [59]

    Leading-order gravitational radiation to all spin orders,

    Rafael Aoude, Kays Haddad, Carlo Heissenberg, and Andreas Helset, “Leading-order gravitational radiation to all spin orders,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 036007 (2024), arXiv:2310.05832 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [60]

    Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in black-hole scattering at O G3 : linear-in-spin effects,

    Lara Bohnenblust, Harald Ita, Manfred Kraus, and Johannes Schlenk, “Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in black-hole scattering at O G3 : linear-in-spin effects,” JHEP 11, 109 (2024), arXiv:2312.14859 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [61]

    One-Loop Observables to Higher Order in Spin,

    Juan Pablo Gatica, “One-Loop Observables to Higher Order in Spin,” (2024), arXiv:2412.02034 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [62]

    The uncertainty principle and classical amplitudes,

    Andrea Cristofoli, Riccardo Gonzo, Nathan Moynihan, Donal O’Connell, Alasdair Ross, Matteo Sergola, and Chris D. White, “The uncertainty principle and classical amplitudes,” JHEP 06, 181 (2024), arXiv:2112.07556 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [63]

    Observables from the spinning eikonal,

    Andres Luna, Nathan Moynihan, Donal O’Connell, and Alasdair Ross, “Observables from the spinning eikonal,” JHEP 08, 045 (2024), arXiv:2312.09960 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [64]

    The Eikonal Phase and Spinning Observables,

    Juan Pablo Gatica, “The Eikonal Phase and Spinning Observables,” (2023), arXiv:2312.04680 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  59. [65]

    Spin Effects in the Effective Field Theory Approach to Post- Minkowskian Conservative Dynamics,

    Zhengwen Liu, Rafael A. Porto, and Zixin Yang, “Spin Effects in the Effective Field Theory Approach to Post- Minkowskian Conservative Dynamics,” JHEP 06, 012 (2021), arXiv:2102.10059 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  60. [66]

    Gravitational Bremsstrahlung and Hid- den Supersymmetry of Spinning Bodies,

    Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, and Jan Steinhoff, “Gravitational Bremsstrahlung and Hid- den Supersymmetry of Spinning Bodies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 011101 (2022), arXiv:2106.10256 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [67]

    SUSY in the sky with gravitons,

    Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, and Jan Steinhoff, “SUSY in the sky with gravitons,” JHEP 01, 027 (2022), arXiv:2109.04465 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  62. [68]

    Conser- vative and Radiative Dynamics of Spinning Bodies at Third Post-Minkowskian Order Using Worldline Quan- tum Field Theory,

    Gustav Uhre Jakobsen and Gustav Mogull, “Conser- vative and Radiative Dynamics of Spinning Bodies at Third Post-Minkowskian Order Using Worldline Quan- tum Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 141102 (2022), arXiv:2201.07778 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  63. [69]

    Linear response, Hamiltonian, and radiative spinning two- body dynamics,

    Gustav Uhre Jakobsen and Gustav Mogull, “Linear response, Hamiltonian, and radiative spinning two- body dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 044033 (2023), arXiv:2210.06451 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  64. [70]

    Conservative Scattering of Spinning Black Holes at Fourth Post- Minkowskian Order,

    Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, Benjamin Sauer, and Yingxuan Xu, “Conservative Scattering of Spinning Black Holes at Fourth Post- Minkowskian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151401 (2023), arXiv:2306.01714 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  65. [71]

    Dissipative Scattering of Spinning Black Holes at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,

    Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, and Benjamin Sauer, “Dissipative Scattering of Spinning Black Holes at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 241402 (2023), arXiv:2308.11514 [hep- th]

    2023 arXiv

  66. [72]

    Angular momentum loss due to spin-orbit effects in the post-Minkowskian expansion,

    Carlo Heissenberg, “Angular momentum loss due to spin-orbit effects in the post-Minkowskian expansion,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 106003 (2023), arXiv:2308.11470 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  67. [73]

    Consistent actions for massive particles interacting with electromagnetism and grav- ity,

    Lukas W. Lindwasser, “Consistent actions for massive particles interacting with electromagnetism and grav- ity,” JHEP 08, 081 (2024), arXiv:2309.03901 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  68. [74]

    Black hole per- turbation theory meets CFT2: Kerr-Compton ampli- tudes from Nekrasov-Shatashvili functions,

    Yilber Fabian Bautista, Giulio Bonelli, Cristoforo Iossa, Alessandro Tanzini, and Zihan Zhou, “Black hole per- turbation theory meets CFT2: Kerr-Compton ampli- tudes from Nekrasov-Shatashvili functions,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 084071 (2024), arXiv:2312.05965 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [75]

    From higher-spin gauge interactions to Compton amplitudes for root-Kerr,

    Lucile Cangemi, Marco Chiodaroli, Henrik Johans- son, Alexander Ochirov, Paolo Pichini, and Evgeny Skvortsov, “From higher-spin gauge interactions to Compton amplitudes for root-Kerr,” JHEP 09, 196 9 (2024), arXiv:2311.14668 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [76]

    Spin- ning binary dynamics in cubic effective field theories of gravity,

    Andreas Brandhuber, Graham R. Brown, Paolo Pichini, Gabriele Travaglini, and Pablo Vives Matasan, “Spin- ning binary dynamics in cubic effective field theories of gravity,” JHEP 08, 188 (2024), arXiv:2405.13826 [hep- th]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [77]

    Dynamics of spinning binary at 2PM,

    Gang Chen and Tianheng Wang, “Dynamics of spinning binary at 2PM,” JHEP 12, 213 (2025), arXiv:2406.09086 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  72. [78]

    Bootstrapping the spin- ning two body problem in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity using worldline QFT,

    Arpan Bhattacharyya, Debodirna Ghosh, Saptaswa Ghosh, and Sounak Pal, “Bootstrapping the spin- ning two body problem in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity using worldline QFT,” JHEP 04, 175 (2025), arXiv:2407.07195 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  73. [79]

    Conservative Spin-Magnitude Change in Orbital Evolution in General Relativity,

    Mark Alaverdian, Zvi Bern, Dimitrios Kosmopoulos, Andres Luna, Radu Roiban, Trevor Scheopner, and Fei Teng, “Conservative Spin-Magnitude Change in Orbital Evolution in General Relativity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 101602 (2025), arXiv:2407.10928 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  74. [80]

    Spin- ning waveforms in cubic effective field theories of grav- ity,

    Andreas Brandhuber, Graham R. Brown, Gang Chen, Gabriele Travaglini, and Pablo Vives Matasan, “Spin- ning waveforms in cubic effective field theories of grav- ity,” JHEP 12, 039 (2024), arXiv:2408.00587 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Spinning black hole scattering at O(G3S2): Casimir terms, radial action and hidden symmetry,

    Dogan Akpinar, Fernando Febres Cordero, Manfred Kraus, Michael S. Ruf, and Mao Zeng, “Spinning black hole scattering at O(G3S2): Casimir terms, radial action and hidden symmetry,” JHEP 03, 126 (2025), arXiv:2407.19005 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Binary Kerr black-hole scattering at 2PM from quantum higher-spin Compton,

    Lara Bohnenblust, Lucile Cangemi, Henrik Johansson, and Paolo Pichini, “Binary Kerr black-hole scattering at 2PM from quantum higher-spin Compton,” (2024), arXiv:2410.23271 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  77. [84]

    Spinning bodies in general relativ- ity from bosonic worldline oscillators,

    Kays Haddad, Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, and Jan Plefka, “Spinning bodies in general relativ- ity from bosonic worldline oscillators,” JHEP 02, 019 (2025), arXiv:2411.08176 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Generalized Wilson lines and the gravitational scattering of spinning bodies,

    Domenico Bonocore, Anna Kulesza, and Johannes Pirsch, “Generalized Wilson lines and the gravitational scattering of spinning bodies,” JHEP 05, 034 (2025), arXiv:2412.16049 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Scattering of spinning compact ob- jects from a worldline EFT,

    Maor Ben-Shahar, “Scattering of spinning compact ob- jects from a worldline EFT,” JHEP 03, 108 (2024), arXiv:2311.01430 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Scattering amplitudes for all masses and spins,

    Nima Arkani-Hamed, Tzu-Chen Huang, and Yu- tin Huang, “Scattering amplitudes for all masses and spins,” JHEP 11, 070 (2021), arXiv:1709.04891 [hep- th]

    2021 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Spin effects in the effective quantum field theory of general relativity,

    Andreas Ross and Barry R. Holstein, “Spin effects in the effective quantum field theory of general relativity,” J. Phys. A 40, 6973–6978 (2007)

    2007

  82. [89]

    Spin Effects in Long Range Electromagnetic Scattering,

    Barry R. Holstein and Andreas Ross, “Spin Effects in Long Range Electromagnetic Scattering,” (2008), arXiv:0802.0715 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  83. [90]

    Gravitational spin Hamiltonians from the S matrix,

    Varun Vaidya, “Gravitational spin Hamiltonians from the S matrix,” Phys. Rev. D 91, 024017 (2015), arXiv:1410.5348 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  84. [91]

    Ob- servables and amplitudes for spinning particles and black holes,

    Ben Maybee, Donal O’Connell, and Justin Vines, “Ob- servables and amplitudes for spinning particles and black holes,” JHEP 12, 156 (2019), arXiv:1906.09260 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Strong-field scattering of two spinning black holes: Numerical rel- ativity versus post-Minkowskian gravity,

    Piero Rettegno, Geraint Pratten, Lucy M. Thomas, Pa- tricia Schmidt, and Thibault Damour, “Strong-field scattering of two spinning black holes: Numerical rel- ativity versus post-Minkowskian gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 124016 (2023), arXiv:2307.06999 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Scattering and Bound Observables for Spinning Particles in Kerr Spacetime with Generic Spin Orientations,

    Riccardo Gonzo and Canxin Shi, “Scattering and Bound Observables for Spinning Particles in Kerr Spacetime with Generic Spin Orientations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 221401 (2024), arXiv:2405.09687 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Massive twistor worldline in electromagnetic fields,

    Joon-Hwi Kim, Jung-Wook Kim, and Sangmin Lee, “Massive twistor worldline in electromagnetic fields,” JHEP 08, 080 (2024), arXiv:2405.17056 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Classical eikonal from Magnus expan- sion,

    Joon-Hwi Kim, Jung-Wook Kim, Sungsoo Kim, and Sangmin Lee, “Classical eikonal from Magnus expan- sion,” JHEP 01, 111 (2025), arXiv:2410.22988 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Radiation eikonal for post- Minkowskian observables,

    Jung-Wook Kim, “Radiation eikonal for post- Minkowskian observables,” Phys. Rev. D 111, L121702 (2025), arXiv:2501.07372 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Radiation re- action for spinning black-hole scattering,

    Francesco Alessio and Paolo Di Vecchia, “Radiation re- action for spinning black-hole scattering,” Phys. Lett. B 832, 137258 (2022), arXiv:2203.13272 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Quantum Theory and Five-Dimensional Theory of Relativity. (In German and English),

    Oskar Klein, “Quantum Theory and Five-Dimensional Theory of Relativity. (In German and English),” Z. Phys. 37, 895–906 (1926)

    1926

  92. [100]

    On the invariant form of the wave equation and the equations of motion for a charged point mass. (In German and English),

    V. Fock, “On the invariant form of the wave equation and the equations of motion for a charged point mass. (In German and English),” Z. Phys.39, 226–232 (1926)

    1926

  93. [101]

    Der Comptoneffekt nach der Schr¨ odingerschen Theorie,

    W. Gordon, “Der Comptoneffekt nach der Schr¨ odingerschen Theorie,” Z. Phys. 40, 117–133 (1926)

    1926

  94. [102]

    Sur la theorie ondulatoire des elec- trons positifs et negatifs,

    Alexandru Proca, “Sur la theorie ondulatoire des elec- trons positifs et negatifs,” J. Phys. Radium 7, 347–353 (1936)

    1936

  95. [103]

    On relativistic wave equa- tions for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field,

    M. Fierz and W. Pauli, “On relativistic wave equa- tions for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 173, 211–232 (1939)

    1939

  96. [104]

    Compton black-hole scattering for s ≤ 5/2,

    Marco Chiodaroli, Henrik Johansson, and Paolo Pi- chini, “Compton black-hole scattering for s ≤ 5/2,” JHEP 02, 156 (2022), arXiv:2107.14779 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Two-loop Integrand Decomposition into Master Integrals and Surface Terms,

    Harald Ita, “Two-loop Integrand Decomposition into Master Integrals and Surface Terms,” Phys. Rev. D 94, 116015 (2016), arXiv:1510.05626 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Subleading Poles in the Numerical Unitar- ity Method at Two Loops,

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, M. Jaquier, and B. Page, “Subleading Poles in the Numerical Unitar- ity Method at Two Loops,” Phys. Rev. D 95, 096011 (2017), arXiv:1703.05255 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Two-Loop Four-Gluon Am- plitudes from Numerical Unitarity,

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, M. Jaquier, B. Page, and M. Zeng, “Two-Loop Four-Gluon Am- plitudes from Numerical Unitarity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 142001 (2017), arXiv:1703.05273 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Planar Two-Loop Five- Gluon Amplitudes from Numerical Unitarity,

    Samuel Abreu, Fernando Febres Cordero, Harald Ita, Ben Page, and Mao Zeng, “Planar Two-Loop Five- Gluon Amplitudes from Numerical Unitarity,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 116014 (2018), arXiv:1712.03946 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Planar Two-Loop Five-Parton Ampli- tudes from Numerical Unitarity,

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page, and V. Sotnikov, “Planar Two-Loop Five-Parton Ampli- tudes from Numerical Unitarity,” JHEP 11, 116 (2018), arXiv:1809.09067 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Caravel: A C++ framework for the compu- tation of multi-loop amplitudes with numerical uni- tarity,

    S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, 10 M. Kraus, B. Page, E. Pascual, M. S. Ruf, and V. Sot- nikov, “Caravel: A C++ framework for the compu- tation of multi-loop amplitudes with numerical uni- tarity,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 267, 108069 (2021), arXiv:2009.11957 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Two-Loop Four- Graviton Scattering Amplitudes,

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, M. Jaquier, B. Page, M. S. Ruf, and V. Sotnikov, “Two-Loop Four- Graviton Scattering Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 211601 (2020), arXiv:2002.12374 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  104. [112]

    xPert: Computer alge- bra for metric perturbation theory,

    David Brizuela, Jose M. Martin-Garcia, and Guillermo A. Mena Marugan, “xPert: Computer alge- bra for metric perturbation theory,” Gen. Rel. Grav.41, 2415–2431 (2009), arXiv:0807.0824 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  105. [113]

    xTras : A field-theory inspired xAct package for mathematica,

    Teake Nutma, “xTras : A field-theory inspired xAct package for mathematica,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1719–1738 (2014), arXiv:1308.3493 [cs.SC]

    2014 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Massive and Massless Spin-2 Scatter- ing and Asymptotic Superluminality,

    James Bonifacio, Kurt Hinterbichler, Austin Joyce, and Rachel A. Rosen, “Massive and Massless Spin-2 Scatter- ing and Asymptotic Superluminality,” JHEP 06, 075 (2018), arXiv:1712.10020 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  107. [115]

    A Re- lation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings,

    H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen, and S. H. H. Tye, “A Re- lation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings,” Nucl. Phys. B 269, 1–23 (1986)

    1986

  108. [116]

    New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, and Henrik Johansson, “New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 085011 (2008), arXiv:0805.3993 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Perturbative Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory,

    Zvi Bern, John Joseph M. Carrasco, and Henrik Jo- hansson, “Perturbative Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 061602 (2010), arXiv:1004.0476 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Scatter- ing equations and Kawai-Lewellen-Tye orthogonality,

    Freddy Cachazo, Song He, and Ellis Ye Yuan, “Scatter- ing equations and Kawai-Lewellen-Tye orthogonality,” Phys. Rev. D 90, 065001 (2014), arXiv:1306.6575 [hep- th]

    2014 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Scat- tering of Massless Particles in Arbitrary Dimensions,

    Freddy Cachazo, Song He, and Ellis Ye Yuan, “Scat- tering of Massless Particles in Arbitrary Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 171601 (2014), arXiv:1307.2199 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Efficient Calculation of Crossing Symmetric BCJ Tree Numerators,

    Alex Edison and Fei Teng, “Efficient Calculation of Crossing Symmetric BCJ Tree Numerators,” JHEP 12, 138 (2020), arXiv:2005.03638 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Double copy for massive quantum particles with spin,

    Henrik Johansson and Alexander Ochirov, “Double copy for massive quantum particles with spin,” JHEP09, 040 (2019), arXiv:1906.12292 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  114. [122]

    On the double copy for spinning matter,

    Yilber Fabian Bautista and Alfredo Guevara, “On the double copy for spinning matter,” JHEP 11, 184 (2021), arXiv:1908.11349 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Iterations of regge cuts,

    P. V. Landshoff and J. C. Polkinghorne, “Iterations of regge cuts,” Phys. Rev. 181, 1989–1995 (1969)

    1969

  116. [124]

    Extremal black hole scattering at O(G3): gravi- ton dominance, eikonal exponentiation, and differen- tial equations,

    Julio Parra-Martinez, Michael S. Ruf, and Mao Zeng, “Extremal black hole scattering at O(G3): gravi- ton dominance, eikonal exponentiation, and differen- tial equations,” JHEP 11, 023 (2020), arXiv:2005.04236 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops,

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov, “Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops,” Nucl. Phys. B 192, 159–204 (1981)

    1981

  118. [126]

    High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,

    S. Laporta, “High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 5087–5159 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0102033

    2000 arXiv

  119. [127]

    FIRE6: Feyn- man Integral REduction with Modular Arithmetic,

    A. V. Smirnov and F. S. Chuharev, “FIRE6: Feyn- man Integral REduction with Modular Arithmetic,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 247 , 106877 (2020), arXiv:1901.07808 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  120. [128]

    FIRE 6.5: Feynman integral reduction with new simplification li- brary,

    Alexander V. Smirnov and Mao Zeng, “FIRE 6.5: Feynman integral reduction with new simplification li- brary,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 302, 109261 (2024), arXiv:2311.02370 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Feynman integral reduction: balanced reconstruction of sparse rational functions and implementation on supercomputers in a co-design approach,

    Alexander Smirnov and Mao Zeng, “Feynman integral reduction: balanced reconstruction of sparse rational functions and implementation on supercomputers in a co-design approach,” (2024), arXiv:2409.19099 [hep- ph]

    2024 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Conservative Binary Dynamics at Order α5 in Electrodynamics,

    Zvi Bern, Enrico Herrmann, Radu Roiban, Michael S. Ruf, Alexander V. Smirnov, Vladimir A. Smirnov, and Mao Zeng, “Conservative Binary Dynamics at Order α5 in Electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 251601 (2024), arXiv:2305.08981 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  123. [131]

    A novel approach to integration by parts reduction,

    Andreas von Manteuffel and Robert M. Schabinger, “A novel approach to integration by parts reduction,” Phys. Lett. B 744, 101–104 (2015), arXiv:1406.4513 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction,

    Tiziano Peraro, “Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction,” JHEP 12, 030 (2016), arXiv:1608.01902 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Balancing act: Multivariate rational reconstruc- tion for IBP,

    A. V. Belitsky, A. V. Smirnov, and R. V. Yakovlev, “Balancing act: Multivariate rational reconstruc- tion for IBP,” Nucl. Phys. B 993, 116253 (2023), arXiv:2303.02511 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  126. [134]

    How to choose master integrals,

    A. V. Smirnov and V. A. Smirnov, “How to choose master integrals,” Nucl. Phys. B 960, 115213 (2020), arXiv:2002.08042 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Factorization of denomina- tors in integration-by-parts reductions,

    Johann Usovitsch, “Factorization of denomina- tors in integration-by-parts reductions,” (2020), arXiv:2002.08173 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Comparison of post-Minkowskian and self-force expansions: Scattering in a scalar charge toy model,

    Leor Barack et al. , “Comparison of post-Minkowskian and self-force expansions: Scattering in a scalar charge toy model,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 024025 (2023), arXiv:2304.09200 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  129. [137]

    On an exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,

    Poul H. Damgaard, Ludovic Plante, and Pierre Vanhove, “On an exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,” JHEP 11, 213 (2021), arXiv:2107.12891 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Scalar QED as a toy model for higher-order effects in classical gravitational scatter- ing,

    Zvi Bern, Juan Pablo Gatica, Enrico Herrmann, An- dres Luna, and Mao Zeng, “Scalar QED as a toy model for higher-order effects in classical gravitational scatter- ing,” JHEP 08, 131 (2022), arXiv:2112.12243 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Gravitational Faraday effect from on-shell amplitudes,

    Wei-Ming Chen, Ming-Zhi Chung, Yu-tin Huang, and Jung-Wook Kim, “Gravitational Faraday effect from on-shell amplitudes,” JHEP 12, 058 (2022), arXiv:2205.07305 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  132. [140]

    We also provide two computer-readable files, ancillary amp.m and ancillary obs.m, which include the amplitudes as well as the observables computed in this work

    Supplemental Material, includes an appendix with full expressions for classical amplitudes to third post- Minkowskian order and to fourth order in spin. We also provide two computer-readable files, ancillary amp.m and ancillary obs.m, which include the amplitudes as well as th...

  133. [141]

    The Relativistic Spherical Top,

    Andrew J. Hanson and T. Regge, “The Relativistic Spherical Top,” Annals Phys. 87, 498 (1974)

    1974

  134. [142]

    Post- Newtonian observables for aligned-spin binaries to sixth order in spin from gravitational self-force and Comp- ton amplitudes,

    Yilber Fabian Bautista, Mohammed Khalil, Matteo Sergola, Chris Kavanagh, and Justin Vines, “Post- Newtonian observables for aligned-spin binaries to sixth order in spin from gravitational self-force and Comp- ton amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 124005 (2024), arXiv:2408.01871 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Universality of ultra- relativistic gravitational scattering,

    Paolo Di Vecchia, Carlo Heissenberg, Rodolfo Russo, and Gabriele Veneziano, “Universality of ultra- relativistic gravitational scattering,” Phys. Lett. B 811, 135924 (2020), arXiv:2008.12743 [hep-th]. 11

    2020 arXiv

  136. [144]

    A System- atic Lagrangian Formulation for Quantum and Classical Gravity at High Energies,

    Ira Z. Rothstein and Michael Saavedra, “A System- atic Lagrangian Formulation for Quantum and Classical Gravity at High Energies,” (2024), arXiv:2412.04428 [hep-th]

    2024

  137. [145]

    Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields,

    Brandon Carter, “Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields,” Phys. Rev. 174, 1559–1571 (1968)

    1968

  138. [146]

    Conserved quantities of spinning test par- ticles in general relativity. i,

    R R¨ udiger, “Conserved quantities of spinning test par- ticles in general relativity. i,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sci- ences 375, 185–193 (1981)

    1981

  139. [147]

    Conserved quantities of spinning test par- ticles in general relativity. ii,

    R Rudiger, “Conserved quantities of spinning test par- ticles in general relativity. ii,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences , 229–239 (1983)

    1983

  140. [148]

    Complete integrability of geodesic motion in general Kerr-NUT-AdS spacetimes,

    Don N. Page, David Kubiznak, Muraari Vasudevan, and Pavel Krtous, “Complete integrability of geodesic motion in general Kerr-NUT-AdS spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 061102 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0611083

    2007 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Generalized Carter constant for quadrupolar test bod- ies in Kerr spacetime,

    Geoffrey Comp` ere, Adrien Druart, and Justin Vines, “Generalized Carter constant for quadrupolar test bod- ies in Kerr spacetime,” SciPost Phys. 15, 226 (2023), arXiv:2302.14549 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  142. [150]

    FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?

    Vladyslav Shtabovenko, Rolf Mertig, and Frederik Orellana, “FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?” Comput. Phys. Commun. 306, 109357 (2025), arXiv:2312.14089 [hep-ph]. Supplemental Material Here we present full results for the classical spinning amplitud...

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.