REVIEW 1 cited by
Can Large Language Models Develop Strategic Reasoning? Post-training Insights from Learning Chess
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Can Large Language Models Develop Strategic Reasoning? Post-training Insights from Learning Chess
read the original abstract
While reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models (LLMs) has shown promise in mathematical reasoning, strategic reasoning for LLMs using RL remains largely unexplored. We investigate whether LLMs can develop strategic reasoning capabilities through RL in chess. To this end, we leverage a chess-pretrained action-value network to provide dense reward on the LLM's output move quality, which can be seen as a form of knowledge distillation. Our experiments show that our distillation-based dense rewards often outperform sparse binary rewards. However, surprisingly, all models plateau far below expert levels. We provide SFT and RL ablations on chess reasoning training and find evidence that this limitation stems from a deficit in the pretrained models' internal understanding of chess-a deficit which RL alone may not be able to fully overcome. The code is available at https://github.com/krafton-ai/Chess-R1.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Weight of Silence: A Causal Case for Weights Over the Scratchpad in Latent Chess Reasoning
In a chess latent-reasoning model, replacing or removing the silent thought vectors barely changes moves, so the RL improvement appears to be encoded in the weights, not in a consulted scratchpad.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.