Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Know Your Limits: Uncertainty Estimation with ReLU Classifiers Fails at Reliable OOD Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.05329 v4 pith:A5MZANON submitted 2020-12-09 cs.LG cs.AI

Know Your Limits: Uncertainty Estimation with ReLU Classifiers Fails at Reliable OOD Detection

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords datatechniquesuncertaintyclassificationestimationidentifyreliablereliably
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A crucial requirement for reliable deployment of deep learning models for safety-critical applications is the ability to identify out-of-distribution (OOD) data points, samples which differ from the training data and on which a model might underperform. Previous work has attempted to tackle this problem using uncertainty estimation techniques. However, there is empirical evidence that a large family of these techniques do not detect OOD reliably in classification tasks. This paper gives a theoretical explanation for said experimental findings and illustrates it on synthetic data. We prove that such techniques are not able to reliably identify OOD samples in a classification setting, since their level of confidence is generalized to unseen areas of the feature space. This result stems from the interplay between the representation of ReLU networks as piece-wise affine transformations, the saturating nature of activation functions like softmax, and the most widely-used uncertainty metrics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Removable Defects: The Economics and Limits of Deliberate Deficiency

    econ.EM 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A deliberately narrow specialist can profitably keep a defect only when the detector that triggers compensation sits outside the defect; inside, the miss rate equals the capture rate.

  2. Removable Defects: The Economics and Limits of Deliberate Deficiency

    econ.EM 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A competence defect is profitably removable exactly when a detector outside the defect can separate fatal cases and an advantage condition holds, with premium equal to the ROC support function at economic prices.