Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

As of 20 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 23 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2402.13950.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2402.13950 v4

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 23 of 23 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00

measured 23 of 23 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-15T18:21:12.982072Z

measured 1 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved0
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

3
arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation cdcf9ed1-56fc-4d97-84f8-5859871475be · inbound

Graph-Guided Textual Explanation Generation Framework cites this paper.

Graph-Guided Textual Explanation Generation Framework Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 45

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-11T14:18:17.280116Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation cd179fd0-e071-4722-b82b-e15b89589d5e · inbound

MetaOpenFOAM 2.0: Large Language Model Driven Chain of Thought for Automating CFD Simulation and Post-Processing cites this paper.

MetaOpenFOAM 2.0: Large Language Model Driven Chain of Thought for Automating CFD Simulation and Post-Processing Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 32

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-09T18:47:52.813212Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c52bc77d-6ced-4579-a42f-72044479ff24 · inbound

How does Chain of Thought Think? Mechanistic Interpretability of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Sparse Autoencoding cites this paper.

How does Chain of Thought Think? Mechanistic Interpretability of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Sparse Autoencoding Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 32

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T18:21:12.982072Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 62719d44-efa0-405d-9abc-fa7a3b47f033 · inbound

OwkinZero: Accelerating Biological Discovery with AI cites this paper.

OwkinZero: Accelerating Biological Discovery with AI Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 2024

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:29:04.638177Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 5854ae43-60be-495c-8d42-70b940f74dd0 · inbound

Do Cognitively Interpretable Reasoning Traces Improve LLM Performance? cites this paper.

Do Cognitively Interpretable Reasoning Traces Improve LLM Performance? Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 18

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:40:54.301852Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f5622d77-e35d-4133-9a74-5ddc57809070 · inbound

Self-Reflective Generation at Test Time cites this paper.

Self-Reflective Generation at Test Time Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 14

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T12:41:42.777000Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a003e3a2-a1a3-4431-917c-c05e411e3e94 · inbound

CLARity: Reasoning Consistency Alone Can Teach Reinforced Experts cites this paper.

CLARity: Reasoning Consistency Alone Can Teach Reinforced Experts Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 35

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T10:40:47.386849Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 669ad559-149d-446c-b4ed-e2ac2ac1b8f7 · inbound

Music Recommendation with Large Language Models: Challenges, Opportunities, and Evaluation cites this paper.

Music Recommendation with Large Language Models: Challenges, Opportunities, and Evaluation Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 114

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T21:09:25.221007Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 344a4803-c6e1-4cef-9fd2-c1ff94c9ff56 · inbound

Training Language Models to Use Prolog as a Tool cites this paper.

Training Language Models to Use Prolog as a Tool Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 7

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-17T01:18:48.436324Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 61bd8538-6cb4-49bf-ac1f-56ab0af9eb93 · inbound

Training Language Models to Use Prolog as a Tool cites this paper.

Training Language Models to Use Prolog as a Tool Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T18:01:23.106483Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 1a67d5fe-2db1-4825-be8b-b753830b974c · inbound

A Survey on Evaluating Quality and Trustworthiness in LLM-Generated Data cites this paper.

A Survey on Evaluating Quality and Trustworthiness in LLM-Generated Data Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 165

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T08:15:27.273637Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 43f79d4b-0f1a-474b-bbd2-159c73bbcb88 · inbound

ReSS: Learning Reasoning Models for Tabular Data Prediction via Symbolic Scaffold cites this paper.

ReSS: Learning Reasoning Models for Tabular Data Prediction via Symbolic Scaffold Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 26

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T14:00:29.061203Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation c8ea0c65-a0cd-4fa0-950d-f566186a0ffe · inbound

ReSS: Learning Reasoning Models for Tabular Data Prediction via Symbolic Scaffold cites this paper.

ReSS: Learning Reasoning Models for Tabular Data Prediction via Symbolic Scaffold Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 26

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-21T01:03:53.028928Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 0ce75d48-d798-4dc8-88e8-db63868eef39 · inbound

The Reasoning Trap: An Information-Theoretic Bound on Closed-System Multi-Step LLM Reasoning cites this paper.

The Reasoning Trap: An Information-Theoretic Bound on Closed-System Multi-Step LLM Reasoning Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 23

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T09:41:03.976968Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 429f5d5f-38e0-4c7a-add5-314ac18b5c71 · inbound

Mechanism Plausibility in Generative Agent-Based Modeling cites this paper.

Mechanism Plausibility in Generative Agent-Based Modeling Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 65

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-14T19:27:50.923984Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation f26797f6-ac5f-4497-9b67-0c761a3bc278 · inbound

Mechanism Plausibility in Generative Agent-Based Modeling cites this paper.

Mechanism Plausibility in Generative Agent-Based Modeling Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 65

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-20T20:53:43.326278Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 6f8330f5-ea30-4fca-8b39-95bcb00d40ab · inbound

Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework cites this paper.

Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 18

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-06-30T13:34:40.591100Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation b2974b76-6f6c-4261-8ea0-90887e57f827 · inbound

Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework cites this paper.

Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 18

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-01T08:05:31.899167Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 00070c01-c549-4fab-a583-aac1ff5ed4ea · inbound

Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework cites this paper.

Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 18

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-02T23:27:26.719497Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 6734681c-ff98-4261-9efc-bfeb70bd1124 · inbound

Detecting Unfaithful Chain-of-Thought via Circuit-Guided Internal-External Discrepancy cites this paper.

Detecting Unfaithful Chain-of-Thought via Circuit-Guided Internal-External Discrepancy Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 36

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-06-29T21:53:59.531891Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation b45ffc0e-525e-4a8a-b6f8-e112a35cc641 · inbound

Graph-Native Reinforcement Learning Enables Traceable Scientific Hypothesis Generation through Conceptual Recombination cites this paper.

Graph-Native Reinforcement Learning Enables Traceable Scientific Hypothesis Generation through Conceptual Recombination Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 51

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-02T12:26:55.874060Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation dddbd25d-30da-4937-972f-1b8dc8f22db9 · inbound

Training Large Language Models for Self-Explanation Faithfulness cites this paper.

Training Large Language Models for Self-Explanation Faithfulness Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 64

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T08:36:24.761289Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 628fe6e9-acd7-4bff-b3d6-10f8aea2e7c7 · inbound

Training Large Language Models for Self-Explanation Faithfulness cites this paper.

Training Large Language Models for Self-Explanation Faithfulness Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 124

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T08:36:28.767008Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.