Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Understand What LLM Needs: Dual Preference Alignment for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.18676 v2 pith:ACMMIP3B submitted 2024-06-26 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords preferencealignmentdpa-ragknowledgellmsachievingpreferencesdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has demonstrated effectiveness in mitigating the hallucination problem of large language models (LLMs). However, the difficulty of aligning the retriever with the diverse LLMs' knowledge preferences inevitably poses an inevitable challenge in developing a reliable RAG system. To address this issue, we propose DPA-RAG, a universal framework designed to align diverse knowledge preferences within RAG systems. Specifically, we initially introduce a preference knowledge construction pipline and incorporate five novel query augmentation strategies to alleviate preference data scarcity. Based on preference data, DPA-RAG accomplishes both external and internal preference alignment: 1) It jointly integrate pair-wise, point-wise, and contrastive preference alignment abilities into the reranker, achieving external preference alignment among RAG components. 2) It further introduces a pre-aligned stage before vanilla Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT), enabling LLMs to implicitly capture knowledge aligned with their reasoning preferences, achieving LLMs' internal alignment. Experimental results across four knowledge-intensive QA datasets demonstrate that DPA-RAG outperforms all baselines and seamlessly integrates both black-box and open-sourced LLM readers. Further qualitative analysis and discussions also provide empirical guidance for achieving reliable RAG systems. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/dongguanting/DPA-RAG.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GainRAG: Preference Alignment in Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Gain Signal Synthesis

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GainRAG aligns retriever and LLM preferences by training a selector on contrastive-perplexity 'gain' signals plus a pseudo-passage fallback, improving RAG accuracy on six QA datasets.

  2. Tool-Star: Empowering LLM-Brained Multi-Tool Reasoner via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Tool-Star combines cold-start supervised fine-tuning with a multi-tool self-critic reinforcement learning algorithm and hierarchical rewards to improve LLM tool-use reasoning.

  3. Leveraging LLM-Assisted Query Understanding for Live Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Omni-RAG, a query-rewriting and decomposition pipeline on top of standard retrieval and reranking, achieved rank 2 in the SIGIR 2025 LiveRAG Challenge.

  4. Optimizing Web-Based AI Query Retrieval with GPT Integration in LangChain A CoT-Enhanced Prompt Engineering Approach

    cs.HC 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A LangChain plus GPT-4o retrieval pipeline with chain-of-thought prompting is claimed to beat GPT-4o on two QA benchmarks, but the headline numbers are inconsistent with the stated dataset size.

Pith tools