pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.14064 · v1 · pith:ADFRWIEAnew · submitted 2025-05-20 · 📡 eess.IV · cs.AI· cs.CV· cs.LG

NOVA: A Benchmark for Anomaly Localization and Clinical Reasoning in Brain MRI

classification 📡 eess.IV cs.AIcs.CVcs.LG
keywords modelsnovaclinicalacrossanomalybenchmarkbraindistribution
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In many real-world applications, deployed models encounter inputs that differ from the data seen during training. Out-of-distribution detection identifies whether an input stems from an unseen distribution, while open-world recognition flags such inputs to ensure the system remains robust as ever-emerging, previously $unknown$ categories appear and must be addressed without retraining. Foundation and vision-language models are pre-trained on large and diverse datasets with the expectation of broad generalization across domains, including medical imaging. However, benchmarking these models on test sets with only a few common outlier types silently collapses the evaluation back to a closed-set problem, masking failures on rare or truly novel conditions encountered in clinical use. We therefore present $NOVA$, a challenging, real-life $evaluation-only$ benchmark of $\sim$900 brain MRI scans that span 281 rare pathologies and heterogeneous acquisition protocols. Each case includes rich clinical narratives and double-blinded expert bounding-box annotations. Together, these enable joint assessment of anomaly localisation, visual captioning, and diagnostic reasoning. Because NOVA is never used for training, it serves as an $extreme$ stress-test of out-of-distribution generalisation: models must bridge a distribution gap both in sample appearance and in semantic space. Baseline results with leading vision-language models (GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and Qwen2.5-VL-72B) reveal substantial performance drops across all tasks, establishing NOVA as a rigorous testbed for advancing models that can detect, localize, and reason about truly unknown anomalies.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MedOpenClaw and MedFlowBench: Auditing Medical Agents in Full-Study Workflows

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 8.0

    MedFlowBench evaluates VLM agents on full radiology and pathology studies by requiring both task answers and verifiable evidence like key slices and regions of interest, revealing that answer-only scores overestimate ...

  2. Wasserstein-Aligned Localisation for VLM-Based Distributional OOD Detection in Medical Imaging

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    WALDO reformulates zero-shot anomaly localisation as comparative inference using entropy-weighted Sliced Wasserstein distances for reference selection and Goldilocks zone sampling, achieving 19% relative mAP@30 improv...

  3. Wasserstein-Aligned Localisation for VLM-Based Distributional OOD Detection in Medical Imaging

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    WALDO improves zero-shot anomaly localization in medical imaging by selecting reference distributions via entropy-weighted Sliced Wasserstein distances and Goldilocks zone sampling, yielding a 19% relative gain on bra...

  4. GAZE: Grounded Agentic Zero-shot Evaluation with Viewer-Level Tools and Literature Retrieval on Rare Brain MRI

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GAZE framework with viewer tools and literature retrieval achieves 58.2 mAP@0.3 lesion localization and 34.9% top-1 diagnostic accuracy on 906 rare brain MRI cases in zero-shot setting, with larger gains on rarest pat...