Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 97 references

This paper proves that finite-range hopping cannot realize Chern-ideal bands with nonzero Chern number, and gives an explicit exponentially-decaying two-band construction when orbital positions differ.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 09:48 UTC pith:AF6JXZNR

load-bearing objection Solid core on the Chern-ideal no-go and theta construction, but the WL-ideal generalization overreaches. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20624 v1 pith:AF6JXZNR submitted 2026-07-22 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el

Ideal Bands in Tight-Binding Models

Lexu Zhao , Yang Ge , Shinsei Ryu , Jiabin Yu This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords ideal bandsChern-ideal bandsquantum metricBerry curvaturetight-binding modelsfinite-range hoppingJacobi theta functionfractional Chern insulators
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

It tries to settle when 'ideal' bands—bands whose quantum metric exactly saturates the topological lower bound set by the Chern number—can exist in finite-band tight-binding models with ordinary lattice translations, no magnetic fields. The paper's central positive result is an explicit analytic construction of an isolated Chern-ideal band with Chern number 1 in a two-band model with exponentially decaying hopping, which works only when at least two orbitals sit at different embedded positions modulo lattice vectors. Its central negative result is a theorem that no finite-band tight-binding model with strictly finite-range hopping can host an isolated Chern-ideal band with any nonzero Chern number, regardless of the number of orbitals or orbital positions; the same obstruction extends to critical bands with isolated touchings as long as the Berry curvature stays finite. The relevance is that ideal bands are the lattice analogues of Landau levels and are the starting point for fractional Chern insulator wavefunctions; knowing which hopping ranges allow them tells model builders where to look.

Core claim

On the authors' own terms: a band is Chern-ideal when Tr[g_k]=F_k pointwise (for positive Chern number), i.e., the quantum metric saturates the Chern lower bound and the Dirichlet functional equals the Chern number. The paper discovers that in finite-band tight-binding models with finite-range hopping, an isolated Chern-ideal band with nonzero Chern number cannot exist; the proof uses the local holomorphic structure forced by ideality and shows that the finite Fourier expansion of the Bloch Hamiltonian would make the holomorphic eigenvector w(k) a simultaneous eigenvector of all hopping matrices A_rho, forcing either degeneracy or a constant projector. It also constructs the missing |Ch|=1 c

What carries the argument

The central construction is the meromorphic function f(z) built from the odd Jacobi theta function Θ(z|ω), which has exactly one simple zero modulo the lattice Z+ωZ; the ratio with an exponential prefactor enforces the quasi-periodicity f(z+1)=e^{-2πiν1}f(z), f(z+ω)=e^{-2πiν2}f(z), giving a projector with one pole per BZ and hence Chern number 1. The central obstruction mechanism is the finite sum h(k)=Σ_{ρ∈D} e^{-ik·ρ} A_ρ over distinct embedded displacements ρ; when combined with the locally holomorphic eigenvector w(k) required by ideality, the identity theorem plus linear independence of finitely many exponentials (a Vandermonde determinant) forces each A_ρ to have w(k) as an eigenvector

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the hopping has finite range—only finitely many distinct displacement vectors appear in the Bloch Hamiltonian—so the proof's step of separating the Fourier sum term by term works; the critical-band version additionally needs the Berry curvature to stay finite at the touching points.

What would settle it

Take any finite-band tight-binding model with finite-range hopping, such as a two-band Haldane-like model with hopping only to nearest and next-nearest neighbors, and numerically compute the band projector, the trace of the quantum metric Tr g(k), and the Berry curvature F(k); if an isolated band satisfies Tr g(k)=F(k) at every k in the Brillouin zone with nonzero Chern number, the theorem is false. A sharper local check: verify whether the equations C_{αρ}(k)=0 force a common eigenspace of all hopping matrices—if a counterexample exists, the proof's mechanism would fail there.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Any finite-range, finite-band tight-binding model that looks like a Chern-ideal flat band cannot have nonzero Chern number; model building for fractional Chern insulators must use exponentially decaying or other long-range hoppings.
  • The explicit theta-function construction supplies a two-band, exponentially decaying parent Hamiltonian for an isolated |Ch|=1 Chern-ideal band, filling the gap left by previous |Ch|>1 constructions.
  • The no-go also covers critical bands with isolated band touchings and non-diverging Berry curvature, so topological-flat-band models with finite-range hopping cannot be made ideal even if they are not fully gapped.
  • Wilson-loop-ideal bands with zero total Chern number, such as Kane-Mele Z2-ideal bands, inherit the finite-range obstruction because they are unitarily equivalent to two Chern-ideal bands of opposite Chern number; they can be built with exponentially decaying hopping by pairing the |Ch|=1 band with its time-reversal partner.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: The obstruction is fundamentally a locality constraint—ideal quantum geometry with nonzero Chern number requires hopping that extends beyond a finite radius, sharpening the intuition that Landau-level-like bands cannot be exactly realized in compact-support tight-binding models.
  • Inference: Because the quantum metric and Berry curvature depend on the chosen orbital embedding, the same physical tight-binding model can appear ideal in one embedding and non-ideal in another; this suggests that orbital-position data are essential when comparing tight-binding models to continuum Landau-level idealization.
  • Inference: A testable extension is to look for critical topological flat bands with finite-range hopping whose Berry curvature diverges at the touching points; Theorem 5 does not apply there, so such bands could potentially evade the obstruction and might be ideal.
  • Inference: The theta-function ansatz has a free parameter p fixing the pole position; scanning p tunes the locations where the quantum metric vanishes, which could be exploited to control density-density interactions in fractional Chern insulator models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies ideal bands—bands whose quantum metric saturates the topological lower bound—in finite-band tight-binding models with conventional lattice translations, arbitrary orbital embedding, and non-flat dispersion. The central results are: (i) an explicit theta-function construction of isolated |Ch|=1 Chern-ideal bands in two-band models with exponentially decaying hopping, valid when at least two orbitals have different embedded positions modulo lattice vectors; (ii) a no-go theorem stating that isolated Chern-ideal bands with nonzero Chern number cannot exist in finite-band models with finite-range hopping, with an extension to critical bands whose touching set has measure zero and whose Berry curvature is finite; and (iii) a claimed generalization of both construction and obstruction to Wilson-loop-ideal bands with zero total Chern number, such as Kane-Mele Z2-ideal bands. Theorems 4 and 5 are proved in Appendix C via local holomorphic eigenvectors, complexification, and a Vandermonde linear-independence argument. The theta ansatz is verified in Appendix B, including real-analyticity at the poles and the Chern-number count. The WL-ideal generalization in Sec. V, however, is not established by the arguments given.

Significance. If the Chern-ideal results stand, they are a substantial contribution: they fill a known gap by providing an analytic |Ch|=1 Chern-ideal band construction for inequivalent embedded orbitals, and they give a sharp finite-range obstruction that applies regardless of the number of orbitals and the embedding. The proofs are self-contained and do not rely on fitted parameters: a and δ in the theta ansatz are fixed algebraically by quasi-periodicity, and p is a genuine but harmless free parameter. The no-go for finite-range hopping is a strong, falsifiable statement and is proved locally, so it also covers critical bands under explicit regularity assumptions. The WL-ideal generalization, if correctly proven, would be important for Kane-Mele-type ideal bands, but the present Sec. V argument does not supply such a proof.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. V] The claimed no-go for WL-ideal bands does not follow from Theorem 4. Theorem 4 applies to an isolated energy eigenband satisfying h(k)w(k)=E(k)w(k) (Eq. C9). The paper argues that a two-band WL-ideal subspace can be unitarily rotated into two Chern-ideal states, and then invokes Theorem 4. But those Chern-ideal states are not eigenstates of h(k) unless the unitary rotation commutes with the restricted Hamiltonian. If the two parent bands are non-degenerate, the rotated states are not energy eigenstates at all; if the bands are degenerate, they are eigenstates but the eigenspace has dimension at least two, which is exactly the degeneracy that Theorem 4 derives as a contradiction. The sentence 'The Chern-ideal states have the same embedding as the parent WL-ideal band' fixes the transformation law under reciprocal lattice shifts, but not the spectral-projector property. Therefore the state
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Sec. IV / Thm. 5] The abstract and Sec. IV refer to 'isolated band touching points', while Theorem 5 assumes only that the touching set has measure zero and that the Berry curvature is finite. Please align these statements and explicitly state the regularity and ideal-condition assumptions on the non-touching set.
  2. [Sec. B.2 / Eq. (B31)] The pole-counting relation used to conclude Ch=1 was derived in Sec. B.1 for periodic w(k+G)=w(k). When applying it to the quasi-periodic f of Eq. (B84), it would be helpful to note explicitly that the automorphy factors cancel in |f| and therefore do not contribute to the curvature distribution, so the pole count remains valid.
  3. [Sec. V] The exponentially-decaying construction for WL-ideal bands is only sketched ('can be naturally done' for Kane-Mele Z2-ideal bands), and comprehensive constructions are left to future work. Given the abstract claims a generalization, the scope of the claim should be stated more precisely.
  4. [Note added] The note about overlapping results in Refs. [77,78] would be more useful if it identified which specific results overlap, rather than stating only that the overlapping results agree.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the Chern-ideal construction and finite-range no-go are derived from stated assumptions; the Sec V WL-ideal gap is a proof gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is not circular. In Sec III, the ansatz f(z)=e^{-2πiν1 z}Θ(z-p-ν1ω+ν2|ω)/Θ(z-p|ω) is not fitted to the desired conclusion: the parameters a and δ are fixed algebraically by the quasi-periodicity conditions (Eqs. B81-B83), p is a free parameter, and the Chern-ideal property Tr[g_k]=F_k is then verified directly (Sec B 2b). In Sec IV/Appendix C, Theorem 4 derives the contradiction from finite-range hopping, local holomorphicity of w(k), finiteness of D, and the identity theorem; the conclusion is not assumed. Theorem 5 is explicitly conditional on measure-zero band touchings and non-diverging Berry curvature, and the proof uses those assumptions rather than presupposing the no-go. The only notable self-citation is Sec V's reliance on Ref. [35] for the unitary equivalence between WL-ideal bands and Chern-ideal states. Under the review rules, that cited mathematical result is parameter-free and its assumptions do not include the finite-range no-go conclusion, so it counts as independent evidence rather than an unverified self-citation loop. There is, however, a genuine proof gap in Sec V: the text moves from 'Chern-ideal states' (eigenstates of the non-Abelian Berry curvature) to the applicability of Theorem 4, which concerns isolated energy eigenbands; unitary rotations need not commute with the restricted Hamiltonian unless the two bands are degenerate, in which case the band is not isolated. That is a logical non-sequitur, but it is not a circular reduction of a conclusion to its own input, so it does not raise the circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on standard complex analysis (theta functions, identity theorem, Vandermonde independence), the standard quantum-geometric inequality, and two domain premises: exponentially decaying hopping ↔ real-analytic projectors, and finite-range models have finitely many displacement channels. The construction requires Δξ∉L; the no-go requires an isolated band, or a critical band with measure-zero touchings and finite curvature. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • p (pole position in theta ansatz) = arbitrary complex number
    Eq. (B84): any p gives a valid Ch=1 ideal projector; the family is parameterized by p but no value is fit to data or required for the theorem.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Quantum geometric inequality Tr g ≥ |F| and ideal condition for Ch>0 reduces to pointwise equality Tr g=F
    Definition of Chern-ideal band; standard quantum geometry, reviewed in App. A.2.
  • standard math Real-analytic projectors with the appropriate G-twist generate exponentially decaying parent Hamiltonians
    Theorem 3 in App. A, built on Refs [70,71,79,80]; bridges the theta-function construction to a tight-binding model.
  • standard math A nonconstant doubly periodic meromorphic function cannot have a single simple pole in a fundamental domain
    Used in App. B.1 for the periodic-embedding no-go and in counting the Chern number of the constructed f.
  • standard math Jacobi theta function properties: Θ is entire, quasi-periodic with multipliers -1 and -e^{-πiω-2πiz}, and has one simple zero per lattice
    Review/proof in App. B.2a; used to build f with exactly one simple pole per BZ.
  • domain assumption For the finite-range no-go, the target band is isolated (or critical with measure-zero touching set and finite Berry curvature)
    Stated in Theorems 4 and 5; the proof requires a local neighborhood where the band is nondegenerate and the projector is analytic.
  • domain assumption At least two orbitals have different embedded positions modulo lattice vectors for the Ch=1 construction
    Eq. (B33); if Δξ∈L the ansatz degenerates to f=1 and the previous no-go applies.
  • domain assumption The two WL-ideal bands considered are unitarily equivalent to two Chern-ideal bands with opposite Chern numbers
    Used in Sec. V to import the Chern-ideal no-go; taken from Ref [35] and not re-derived here.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 29484 in / 24284 out tokens · 199423 ms · 2026-08-01T09:48:52.597221+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

A band is called ideal when its Dirichlet functional saturates the topological lower bound. We study ideal bands in finite-band tight-binding models with conventional two-dimensional lattice translation symmetries, allowing the bands to have non-flat dispersion. We first provide an analytic construction of isolated Chern-ideal bands with Chern number $|\mathrm{Ch}|=1$ in finite-band models with exponentially decaying hopping. This construction applies only when at least two orbitals have different embedded positions (modulo lattice vectors), complementing the previously known construction for $|\mathrm{Ch}|>1$. We then show that isolated Chern-ideal bands with any nonzero Chern number cannot exist in finite-band models with finite-range hopping, regardless of the embedded orbital positions. The conclusion holds even if there are isolated band touching points, as long as the Berry curvature does not diverge anywhere in the Brillouin zone. We finally generalize the conclusions to Wilson-loop-ideal bands with zero total Chern number, such as Kane-Mele $\mathbb{Z}_2$-ideal bands.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Liu, X.-B

    T. Liu, X.-B. Qiang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Quantum geome- try in condensed matter, Natl. Sci. Rev.12, nwae334 (2025)

    2025

  2. [2]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. Törmä, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materials, npj Quantum Mater.10, 101 (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    A. Gao, N. Nagaosa, N. Ni, and S.-Y . Xu, Quantum geome- try phenomena in condensed matter systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. (2026), arXiv:2508.00469 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Jiang, T

    Y . Jiang, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Revealing quantum geometry in nonlinear quantum materials, Rep. Prog. Phys.88, 076502 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Verma, P

    N. Verma, P. J. W. Moll, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, Quantum geometry and the hidden scales in materials, Nat. Rev. Phys.8, 226 (2026)

    2026

  6. [6]

    Kitamura, A

    T. Kitamura, A. Daido, and Y . Yanase, Quantum geometry in correlated electron phases: From flatband to dispersive band, Appl. Phys. Lett.128, 130501 (2026)

    2026

  7. [7]

    Peotta, K.-E

    S. Peotta, K.-E. Huhtinen, and P. Törmä, Quantum geometry in superfluidity and superconductivity, inQuantum Mixtures with Ultra-cold Atoms, edited by R. Grimm, M. Inguscio, G. Lam- poresi, and S. Stringari (IOS Press, 2025) pp. 373–404

    2025

  8. [8]

    Cano and J

    J. Cano and J. Wang, Ideal quantum geometry for fractional Chern insulators, arXiv:2606.05496 [cond-mat.str-el] (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    Yang, From Berry curvature to quantum metric: a new era of quantum geometry metrology for Bloch electrons in solids, Chin

    B.-J. Yang, From Berry curvature to quantum metric: a new era of quantum geometry metrology for Bloch electrons in solids, Chin. Phys. Lett.43, 020712 (2026)

    2026

  10. [10]

    R. B. Laughlin, Anomalous quantum Hall effect: An incom- pressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1395 (1983)

    1983

  11. [11]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional quantization of the Hall effect: A hierarchy of incompressible quantum fluid states, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 605 (1983)

    1983

  12. [12]

    C. Jian, Z. Gu, and X. Qi, Momentumspace instantons and max- imally localized flatband topological hamiltonians, Phys. Status Solidi RRL7, 154 (2013)

    2013

  13. [13]

    Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insulators, Phys

    R. Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B90, 165139 (2014)

    2014

  14. [14]

    Claassen, C

    M. Claassen, C. H. Lee, R. Thomale, X.-L. Qi, and T. P. De- vereaux, Position-momentum duality and fractional quantum Hall effect in Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 236802 (2015)

    2015

  15. [15]

    C. H. Lee, M. Claassen, and R. Thomale, Band structure engi- neering of ideal fractional Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B96, 165150 (2017)

    2017

  16. [16]

    P. J. Ledwith, G. Tarnopolsky, E. Khalaf, and A. Vishwanath, Fractional Chern insulator states in twisted bilayer graphene: An analytical approach, Phys. Rev. Research2, 023237 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    Ozawa and B

    T. Ozawa and B. Mera, Relations between topology and the quantum metric for Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B104, 045103 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    Mera and T

    B. Mera and T. Ozawa, Kähler geometry and Chern insulators: Relations between topology and the quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B104, 045104 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Exact Lan- dau level description of geometry and interaction in a flatband, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 246403 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    Mera and T

    B. Mera and T. Ozawa, Engineering geometrically flat Chern bands with fubini-study kähler structure, Phys. Rev. B104, 115160 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    Wang and Z

    J. Wang and Z. Liu, Hierarchy of ideal flatbands in chi- ral twisted multilayer graphene models, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 176403 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and E. Khalaf, Family of ideal Chern flatbands with arbitrary Chern number in chiral twisted graphene multilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 176404 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Northe, G

    C. Northe, G. Palumbo, J. Sturm, C. Tutschku, and E. M. Hankiewicz, Interplay of band geometry and topology in ideal Chern insulators in the presence of external electromagnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B105, 155410 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    J. Wang, S. Klevtsov, and Z. Liu, Origin of model fractional Chern insulators in all topological ideal flatbands: Explicit color-entangled wave function and exact density algebra, Phys. Rev. Research5, 023167 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Estienne, N

    B. Estienne, N. Regnault, and V . Crépel, Ideal Chern bands as Landau levels in curved space, Phys. Rev. Research5, L032048 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, V ortexability: A unifying criterion for ideal fractional Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B108, 205144 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    J. Dong, P. J. Ledwith, E. Khalaf, J. Y . Lee, and A. Vishwanath, Many-body ground states from decomposition of ideal higher Chern bands: Applications to chirally twisted graphene multi- layers, Phys. Rev. Research5, 023166 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Kwon and B.-J

    S. Kwon and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometric bound and ideal condition for Euler band topology, Phys. Rev. B109, L161111 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Z. Liu, B. Mera, M. Fujimoto, T. Ozawa, and J. Wang, The- ory of generalized Landau levels and its implications for non- abelian states, Phys. Rev. X15, 031019 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Ji and B

    G. Ji and B. Yang, Quantum metric induced hole dispersion and emergent particle-hole symmetry in topological flat bands, arXiv:2409.08324 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    N. Okuma, Constructing vortex functions and basis states of Chern insulators: Ideal condition, inequality from index theo- rem, and coherentlike states on the von neumann lattice, Phys. Rev. B110, 245112 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Andrews, M

    B. Andrews, M. Raja, N. Mishra, M. P. Zaletel, and R. Roy, Stability of fractional Chern insulators with a non-Landau level continuum limit, Phys. Rev. B109, 245111 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Crépel, N

    V . Crépel, N. Regnault, and R. Queiroz, Chiral limit and origin of topological flat bands in twisted transition metal dichalco- genide homobilayers, Commun. Phys.7, 146 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Emanuel, A

    P. Emanuel, A. Keselman, and Y . Oreg, Unifying framework for fractional Chern insulator stabilization, Phys. Rev. B112, 6 235133 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    A. A. Azam, B. Lian, S. Ryu, and J. Yu, Wilson-loop- ideal bands and general idealization, arXiv:2509.05410 [cond- mat.mes-hall] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Sarkar, X

    S. Sarkar, X. Wan, Y . Zhang, and K. Sun, Ideal topologi- cal flat bands in chiral symmetric moiré systems from non- holomorphic functions, Nat. Commun.16, 7062 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Y . Liu, A. Aryal, K. Yang, D. Calugaru, Z. Fang, H. Hu, Q. Yan, B. A. Bernevig, and C.-X. Liu, Ideal topological flat bands in two-dimensional moiré heterostructures with Type-II band alignment, arXiv:2507.06168 [cond-mat.mes-hall] (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Fukui, Gradient flow and Bogomolny bounds for quantum metric actions, Phys

    T. Fukui, Gradient flow and Bogomolny bounds for quantum metric actions, Phys. Rev. B112, 245162 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    Fujimoto, D

    M. Fujimoto, D. E. Parker, J. Dong, E. Khalaf, A. Vishwanath, and P. Ledwith, Higher vortexability: Zero-field realization of higher Landau levels, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106502 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Two-dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559 (1982)

    1982

  41. [41]

    Bellissard, A

    J. Bellissard, A. van Elst, and H. Schulz-Baldes, The noncom- mutative geometry of the quantum Hall effect, J. Math. Phys. 35, 5373 (1994)

    1994

  42. [42]

    Neupert, L

    T. Neupert, L. Santos, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Fractional quantum Hall states at zero magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236804 (2011)

    2011

  43. [43]

    Sheng, Z.-C

    D. Sheng, Z.-C. Gu, K. Sun, and L. Sheng, Fractional quantum Hall effect in the absence of Landau levels, Nat. Commun.2, 389 (2011)

    2011

  44. [44]

    Regnault and B

    N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Fractional Chern insulator, Phys. Rev. X1, 021014 (2011)

    2011

  45. [45]

    K. Sun, Z. Gu, H. Katsura, and S. Das Sarma, Nearly flatbands with nontrivial topology, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236803 (2011)

    2011

  46. [46]

    Tang, J.-W

    E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen, High-temperature frac- tional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236802 (2011)

    2011

  47. [47]

    J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, and B. A. Bernevig, Universal wil- son loop bound of quantum geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 086401 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele,Z 2 topological order and the quan- tum spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  49. [49]

    B. A. Bernevig and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 106802 (2006)

    2006

  50. [50]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  51. [51]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells, Science314, 1757 (2006)

    2006

  52. [52]

    Z.-D. Song, L. Elcoro, and B. A. Bernevig, Twisted bulk- boundary correspondence of fragile topology, Science367, 794 (2020)

    2020

  53. [53]

    Levin and A

    M. Levin and A. Stern, Fractional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 196803 (2009)

    2009

  54. [54]

    Neupert, L

    T. Neupert, L. Santos, S. Ryu, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Frac- tional topological liquids with time-reversal symmetry and their lattice realization, Phys. Rev. B84, 165107 (2011)

    2011

  55. [55]

    Stern, Fractional topological insulators: A pedagogical re- view, Annu

    A. Stern, Fractional topological insulators: A pedagogical re- view, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.7, 349 (2016)

    2016

  56. [56]

    Neupert, C

    T. Neupert, C. Chamon, T. Iadecola, L. H. Santos, and C. Mudry, Fractional (Chern and topological) insulators, Phys. Scr.T164, 014005 (2015)

    2015

  57. [57]

    Cheng, S

    M. Cheng, S. Musser, A. Raz, N. Seiberg, and T. Senthil, Order- ing the topological order in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B113, 115103 (2026)

    2026

  58. [58]

    Kapit and E

    E. Kapit and E. Mueller, Exact parent hamiltonian for the quan- tum Hall states in a lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 215303 (2010)

    2010

  59. [59]

    Li, Y .-J

    Y .-Q. Li, Y .-J. Wang, P.-H. Lin, B. Wang, and Z.-D. Song, Stable topology in exactly flat bands, arXiv:2603.12258 [cond- mat.str-el] (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    R.-H. Liu, J. Hu, and C. Fang, The theory of topological- topological flat bands, arXiv:2603.24672 [cond-mat.mes-hall] (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    Fermi arcs

    F. D. M. Haldane, Attachment of surface “Fermi arcs” to the bulk Fermi surface: “Fermi-level plumbing” in topological met- als, arXiv:1401.0529 [cond-mat.str-el] (2014)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  62. [62]

    Lim, J.-N

    L.-K. Lim, J.-N. Fuchs, and G. Montambaux, Geometry of Bloch states probed by stückelberg interferometry, Phys. Rev. A92, 063627 (2015)

    2015

  63. [63]

    S. H. Simon and M. S. Rudner, Contrasting lattice geome- try dependent versus independent quantities: Ramifications for Berry curvature, energy gaps, and dynamics, Phys. Rev. B102, 165148 (2020)

    2020

  64. [64]

    Fuchs and F

    J.-N. Fuchs and F. Piéchon, Orbital embedding and topology of one-dimensional two-band insulators, Phys. Rev. B104, 235428 (2021)

    2021

  65. [65]

    Huhtinen, J

    K.-E. Huhtinen, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, A. Chew, B. A. Bernevig, and P. Törmä, Revisiting flat band superconductivity: Dependence on minimal quantum metric and band touchings, Phys. Rev. B106, 014518 (2022)

    2022

  66. [66]

    P. M. Tam, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, and J. Yu, Corner charge fluctuation as an observable for quantum geometry and entan- glement in two-dimensional insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 246603 (2024)

    2024

  67. [67]

    Fubini, Sulle metriche definite da una forma hermitiana, Atti del Reale istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti63, 502 (1904)

    G. Fubini, Sulle metriche definite da una forma hermitiana, Atti del Reale istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti63, 502 (1904)

    1904

  68. [68]

    Study, Krzeste wege im komplexen gebiet, Math

    E. Study, Krzeste wege im komplexen gebiet, Math. Ann.60, 321 (1905)

    1905

  69. [69]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall conductance in a two-dimensional peri- odic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  70. [70]

    Kuchment, Tight frames of exponentially decaying Wannier functions, J

    P. Kuchment, Tight frames of exponentially decaying Wannier functions, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.42, 025203 (2008)

    2008

  71. [71]

    Kuchment, An overview of periodic elliptic operators, Bull

    P. Kuchment, An overview of periodic elliptic operators, Bull. Am. Math. Soc.53, 343 (2016)

    2016

  72. [72]

    F. D. M. Haldane and E. H. Rezayi, Periodic laughlin-jastrow wave functions for the fractional quantized hall effect, Phys. Rev. B31, 2529(R) (1985)

    1985

  73. [73]

    Kharchev and A

    S. Kharchev and A. Zabrodin, Theta vocabulary I, J. Geom. Phys.94, 19 (2015)

    2015

  74. [74]

    Slavnov, A

    N. Slavnov, A. Zabrodin, and A. Zotov, Scalar products of Bethe vectors in the 8-vertex model, J. High Energy Phys.2020 (6), 123

    2020

  75. [75]

    Kulkarni and N

    G. Kulkarni and N. A. Slavnov, Form factors of local operators in the generalized algebraic Bethe ansatz, Theor. Math. Phys. 221, 1940 (2024)

    1940

  76. [76]

    Varjas, A

    D. Varjas, A. Abouelkomsan, K. Yang, and E. J. Bergholtz, Topological lattice models with constant berry curvature, Sci- Post Phys.12, 118 (2022)

    2022

  77. [77]

    Li and F

    B. Li and F. Wu, Quantum-geometric design of lattice gen- eralized Landau levels, arXiv:2607.08702 [cond-mat.mes-hall] (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  78. [78]

    Z. Wang, C. Raca, and S. H. Simon, Symmetry and quantum geometry in Bloch bands (2026), to appear

    2026

  79. [79]

    Panati and A

    G. Panati and A. Pisante, Bloch bundles, Marzari-Vanderbilt functional and maximally localized Wannier functions, Com- mun. Math. Phys.322, 835–875 (2013)

    2013

  80. [80]

    Monaco, G

    D. Monaco, G. Panati, A. Pisante, and S. Teufel, Optimal de- cay of Wannier functions in Chern and quantum Hall insulators, Commun. Math. Phys.359, 61 (2018). 7

    2018

Showing first 80 references.