REVIEW 2 cited by
Closer Look at Efficient Inference Methods: A Survey of Speculative Decoding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Efficient inference in large language models (LLMs) has become a critical focus as their scale and complexity grow. Traditional autoregressive decoding, while effective, suffers from computational inefficiencies due to its sequential token generation process. Speculative decoding addresses this bottleneck by introducing a two-stage framework: drafting and verification. A smaller, efficient model generates a preliminary draft, which is then refined by a larger, more sophisticated model. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of speculative decoding methods, categorizing them into draft-centric and model-centric approaches. We discuss key ideas associated with each method, highlighting their potential for scaling LLM inference. This survey aims to guide future research in optimizing speculative decoding and its integration into real-world LLM applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MineDraft: A Framework for Batch Parallel Speculative Decoding
MineDraft speeds up speculative decoding by keeping two request batches — drafting one batch while verifying the other — gaining up to ~40% per-GPU throughput at moderate draft lengths.
-
Small Language Models (SLMs) Can Still Pack a Punch: A survey (updated 2026)
A literature survey of Small Language Models (1-8B parameters) that can perform comparably or better than larger models, covering general-purpose and task-specific approaches plus creation techniques.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.