pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16279 · v1 · pith:AJFOICE3new · submitted 2026-04-10 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.AI

Generative AI and Two-Tiered Online Mental Health Communities

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 09:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.AI
keywords generative AIonline mental health communitiescounselor participationtwo-tier platformscrowding-outdemand expansionquasi-natural experimentpaid consultations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Generative AI integration in two-tier mental health platforms increases counselor posting intensity by expanding patient demand and competitive incentives.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the impact of adding a generative AI conversational agent to an online mental health community structured around public Q&A forums and paid private consultations. Drawing on a quasi-natural experiment from the AI rollout, the authors track counselor behavior and find that overall posting rises while response lengths stay stable and per-post recognition falls. This occurs because AI improves initial responsiveness and brings in more patients, creating larger opportunity sets that spur activity from economically motivated counselors even as intrinsically motivated ones reduce involvement. The net result is cross-tier spillovers in which active counselors preserve or grow paid consultations while inactive ones lose ground. These patterns indicate that demand expansion and competition can outweigh intrinsic crowding-out effects in such tiered professional settings.

Core claim

Leveraging the timing of genAI agent integration as a quasi-natural experiment, the study shows that counselor posting intensity increases significantly after AI entry, with activity partially reallocated from non-AI subforums, average response length unchanged, and per-post social recognition declining. Mechanism tests link the rise to improved platform responsiveness and enlarged patient engagement. Counselors respond heterogeneously, with intrinsically motivated ones reducing participation and economically motivated ones intensifying competitive effort. This produces cross-tier spillovers: inactive counselors see declines in paid consultations, while those increasing public participation

What carries the argument

The two-tier platform structure separating public forums from paid consultations, with AI integration treated as an exogenous shock that expands the patient pool and shifts counselor incentives.

If this is right

  • Counselor posting activity rises because AI expands the set of patients seeking help and creates competitive pressure to respond.
  • Economically motivated counselors increase their forum participation to capture the new demand, while intrinsic ones reduce theirs.
  • Counselors who raise public activity maintain or expand their downstream paid consultation volume.
  • Inactive counselors experience reduced paid consultation demand as patients engage more through the AI layer.
  • Activity reallocates from nearby non-AI subforums toward the integrated platform without changing average response length.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same demand-expansion logic could apply to other tiered professional platforms such as legal Q&A sites or educational tutoring services.
  • Platform operators might design hybrid incentive systems that reward human experts for handling cases escalated from AI responses.
  • Longer-term studies could test whether sustained counselor activity improves patient outcomes beyond the short-run participation effects observed here.
  • Platforms without a clear paid tier might experience stronger crowding-out if AI fully substitutes for initial human contact.

Load-bearing premise

The rollout of the generative AI agent can be treated as an exogenous shock isolated from concurrent platform changes or selection effects that would bias counselor behavior estimates.

What would settle it

Finding no increase in counselor posting intensity or no preservation of paid consultations for active counselors after AI integration in a similar two-tier platform would undermine the central claim.

read the original abstract

Online mental health communities (OMHCs) are tiered platforms that connect patients with licensed counselors through public Q&A forums and paid private consultations. Their two-tier structure creates a strategic dilemma for genAI integration. Conversational agents can provide scalable and timely responses to a broader set of patients, alleviating persistent supply shortages, but their large-scale presence may also reshape counselors' participation in providing nuanced expertise, emotionally sensitive support, and paid consultations, which are central to platform revenue and long-run sustainability. Leveraging a quasi-natural experiment from the integration of a genAI-based conversational agent in a leading OMHC, we examine how AI entry affects counselor participation. Using multiple identification strategies, we find that posting intensity increases significantly after AI integration, while average response length remains unchanged and per-post social recognition declines. Mechanism analyses show that AI improves responsiveness and expands patient engagement, enlarging counselors' opportunity sets, with activity partially reallocated from a nearby non-AI subforum. Counselors respond heterogeneously: intrinsically motivated counselors reduce participation, whereas economically motivated counselors intensify competitive effort. These dynamics generate cross-tier spillovers: inactive counselors experience declines in paid consultations, while those who increase public participation preserve or expand downstream demand. Overall, our findings show that in tiered professional platforms, demand expansion and competitive incentives can outweigh intrinsic crowding-out.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the effects of integrating a generative AI conversational agent into a leading two-tiered online mental health community (OMHC) platform, which combines public Q&A forums with paid private consultations. Using a quasi-natural experiment around the AI rollout and multiple identification strategies, the authors find that counselor posting intensity rises significantly post-integration while average response length stays constant and per-post social recognition falls. Mechanism tests indicate improved responsiveness, expanded patient engagement, and partial activity reallocation from a non-AI subforum. Counselors respond heterogeneously by motivation type (intrinsically motivated counselors reduce effort; economically motivated ones increase competitive posting), generating cross-tier spillovers where inactive counselors lose paid consultations but active ones preserve or expand downstream demand. The central claim is that demand expansion and competitive incentives outweigh intrinsic crowding-out.

Significance. If the causal identification is valid, the paper contributes to platform economics and labor studies by providing evidence that AI can expand opportunity sets for professionals in tiered systems rather than purely displacing them, with direct implications for mental health platform design and sustainability. The heterogeneity analysis by counselor motivation and the documented spillovers to paid consultations add empirical nuance to crowding-out debates. The use of mechanism tests strengthens interpretability beyond reduced-form results.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Identification Strategies): The quasi-natural experiment relies on the AI rollout timing being exogenous, yet the manuscript provides insufficient detail on concurrent platform changes, marketing efforts, or selection into counselor participation that could confound the estimated rise in posting intensity and the reallocation patterns from the non-AI subforum.
  2. [Mechanism Analyses] Mechanism Analyses and Results: The conclusion that demand expansion outweighs crowding-out hinges on the reported increases in patient engagement and cross-tier spillovers to paid consultations; without sample sizes, exact econometric specifications, or robustness checks shown for these tests, the magnitude and causal attribution of these effects cannot be fully evaluated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Including approximate effect sizes (e.g., percentage change in posting intensity) would improve the reader's ability to gauge economic significance.
  2. [Introduction] Introduction: The distinction between intrinsically and economically motivated counselors should be operationalized with explicit criteria or survey measures earlier to clarify the heterogeneity results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and for recognizing the paper's potential contribution to platform economics and labor studies in the context of AI integration. We address each major comment below and outline planned revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Identification Strategies): The quasi-natural experiment relies on the AI rollout timing being exogenous, yet the manuscript provides insufficient detail on concurrent platform changes, marketing efforts, or selection into counselor participation that could confound the estimated rise in posting intensity and the reallocation patterns from the non-AI subforum.

    Authors: We agree that greater transparency on the identification strategy is warranted. The manuscript already describes the quasi-natural experiment and multiple identification strategies, but we will expand Section 4 in the revision to include a detailed event timeline drawn from platform records, confirming no concurrent major changes or marketing campaigns coincided with the rollout. We will also clarify that the AI tool was made available to all counselors without selection criteria and add robustness checks using matched samples to address potential participation biases. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Mechanism Analyses] Mechanism Analyses and Results: The conclusion that demand expansion outweighs crowding-out hinges on the reported increases in patient engagement and cross-tier spillovers to paid consultations; without sample sizes, exact econometric specifications, or robustness checks shown for these tests, the magnitude and causal attribution of these effects cannot be fully evaluated.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The main text and tables report sample sizes and core specifications for the mechanism tests on patient engagement and cross-tier spillovers. To address the request for fuller documentation, we will add an appendix in the revision containing the complete econometric specifications (including all controls and fixed effects), exact sample sizes for each test, and additional robustness checks such as alternative time windows and placebo analyses. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely empirical identification on observational data

full rationale

The paper reports results from a quasi-natural experiment on AI rollout timing in an OMHC platform, using multiple identification strategies to estimate changes in counselor posting intensity, response length, patient engagement, and cross-tier spillovers. No theoretical derivation, first-principles model, or fitted functional form is claimed; the central findings rest on external timing variation treated as exogenous and on mechanism tests that do not reduce to the same fitted parameters. No self-citations, ansatzes, or renamings appear as load-bearing steps in any derivation chain. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external data variation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work rests on standard quasi-experimental assumptions such as exogeneity of the AI rollout and validity of the identification strategies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5765 in / 1125 out tokens · 48497 ms · 2026-05-21T09:28:13.429138+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

153 extracted references · 153 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Phang, Chee Wei and Kankanhalli, Atreyi and Tan, Bernard C. Y. , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2015 , type =

  2. [2]

    MIS Quarterly , volume =

    Huang, Ni and Hong, Yili and Burtch, Gordon , title =. MIS Quarterly , volume =. 2017 , type =

  3. [3]

    Management Science , volume =

    Burtch, Gordon and Hong, Yili and Bapna, Ravi and Griskevicius, Vladas , title =. Management Science , volume =. 2018 , type =

  4. [4]

    and Wei, Qiang , title =

    Qiao, Dandan and Lee, Shun-Yang and Whinston, Andrew B. and Wei, Qiang , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2020 , type =

  5. [5]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Lin, Zhijie and Zhang, Ying and Tan, Yong , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2019 , type =

  6. [6]

    , title =

    Wang, Shouqiang and Özkan-Seely, Gülru F. , title =. Operations Research , volume =. 2018 , type =

  7. [7]

    Journal of Consumer Research , volume =

    Longoni, Chiara and Bonezzi, Andrea and Morewedge, Carey K , title =. Journal of Consumer Research , volume =. 2019 , type =

  8. [8]

    Yang, Yikai and Ngai, Eric W. T. and Wang, Lei , title =. Information & Management , volume =. 2024 , type =

  9. [9]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Fan, Wenjuan and Zhou, Qiqi and Qiu, Liangfei and Kumar, Subodha , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2022 , type =

  10. [10]

    Production and Operations Management , volume =

    Yan, Zhijun and Kuang, Lini and Qiu, Liangfei , title =. Production and Operations Management , volume =. 2022 , type =

  11. [11]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Khurana, Sandeep and Qiu, Liangfei and Kumar, Subodha , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2019 , type =

  12. [12]

    Computers in Human Behavior , volume =

    Guan, Tao and Wang, Le and Jin, Jiahua and Song, Xiaolong , title =. Computers in Human Behavior , volume =. 2018 , type =

  13. [13]

    Human Communication Research , volume =

    Feng, Bo , title =. Human Communication Research , volume =. 2009 , type =

  14. [14]

    Annual Review of Clinical Psychology , volume =

    Lebowitz, Matthew S and Appelbaum, Paul S , title =. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology , volume =. 2019 , type =

  15. [15]

    Psychotherapy Research , volume =

    Nienhuis, Jacob B and Owen, Jesse and Valentine, Jeffrey C and Winkeljohn Black, Stephanie and Halford, Tyler C and Parazak, Stephanie E and Budge, Stephanie and Hilsenroth, Mark , title =. Psychotherapy Research , volume =. 2018 , type =

  16. [16]

    and Jia, N

    Yin, Y. and Jia, N. and Wakslak, C. J. , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , volume =. 2024 , type =

  17. [17]

    The sourcebook of listening research: Methodology and measures , pages =

    Reis, Harry T and Crasta, Dev and Rogge, Ronald D and Maniaci, Michael R and Carmichael, Cheryl L , title =. The sourcebook of listening research: Methodology and measures , pages =. 2017 , type =

  18. [18]

    Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications

    Greene, Kathryn , title =. Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications. , publisher =. 2009 , type =

  19. [19]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Wang, Qili and Qiu, Liangfei and Xu, Wei , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2023 , type =

  20. [20]

    Management Science , volume =

    Deng, Yiting and Lambrecht, Anja and Liu, Yongdong , title =. Management Science , volume =. 2023 , type =. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.4619 , url =

  21. [21]

    Science , volume =

    Noy, Shakked and Zhang, Whitney , title =. Science , volume =. 2023 , type =

  22. [22]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Khern-am-nuai, Warut and Ghasemkhani, Hossein and Qiao, Dandan and Kannan, Karthik , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2024 , type =

  23. [23]

    Journal of marketing Research , volume =

    Weiss, Allen M and Lurie, Nicholas H and MacInnis, Deborah J , title =. Journal of marketing Research , volume =. 2008 , type =

  24. [24]

    Cem and Chintagunta, Pradeep K

    Ozturk, O. Cem and Chintagunta, Pradeep K. and Venkataraman, Sriram , title =. Marketing Science , volume =. 2019 , type =

  25. [25]

    Economic Journal , volume =

    Clark, Andrew E and Doyle, Orla and Stancanelli, Elena , title =. Economic Journal , volume =. 2020 , type =

  26. [26]

    Journal of Marketing Research , volume =

    Banerjee, Shrabastee and Dellarocas, Chrysanthos and Zervas, Georgios , title =. Journal of Marketing Research , volume =. 2021 , type =

  27. [27]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Zhang, Shunyuan and Singh, Param Vir and Ghose, Anindya , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2019 , type =

  28. [28]

    Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4628786 , year =

    Su, Yi and Zhang, Kaiyu and Wang, Qili and Qiu, Liangfei , title =. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4628786 , year =

  29. [29]

    Available at SSRN 4686658 , year =

    Yuan, Ziqing and Chen, Hailiang , title =. Available at SSRN 4686658 , year =

  30. [30]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Lysyakov, Mikhail and Viswanathan, Siva , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2023 , type =

  31. [31]

    Nature medicine , volume =

    Thirunavukarasu, Arun James and Ting, Darren Shu Jeng and Elangovan, Kabilan and Gutierrez, Laura and Tan, Ting Fang and Ting, Daniel Shu Wei , title =. Nature medicine , volume =. 2023 , type =

  32. [32]

    MIS quarterly , pages =

    Wasko, Molly McLure and Faraj, Samer , title =. MIS quarterly , pages =. 2005 , type =

  33. [33]

    Annual Review of Resource Economics , volume =

    Hausman, Catherine and Rapson, David S , title =. Annual Review of Resource Economics , volume =. 2018 , type =

  34. [34]

    and Greene, David and Nisbett, Richard E

    Lepper, Mark R. and Greene, David and Nisbett, Richard E. , title =. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , volume =. 1973 , type =

  35. [35]

    Management Science , volume =

    Sen, Ananya and Grad, Tom and Ferreira, Pedro and Claussenb, Joerg , title =. Management Science , volume =. 2024 , type =

  36. [36]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Majchrzak, Ann and Malhotra, Arvind , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2016 , type =

  37. [37]

    MIS Quarterly , volume =

    Chen, Wei and Wei, Xiahua and Zhu, Kevin Xiaoguo , title =. MIS Quarterly , volume =. 2018 , type =

  38. [38]

    Management Science , volume =

    Huang, Ni and Burtch, Gordon and Gu, Bin and Hong, Yili and Liang, Chen and Wang, Kanliang and Fu, Dongpu and Yang, Bo , title =. Management Science , volume =. 2019 , type =

  39. [39]

    Management Science , volume =

    Rishika, Rishika and Ramaprasad, Jui , title =. Management Science , volume =. 2019 , type =

  40. [40]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Guo, Chenhui and Kim, Tae Hun and Susarla, Anjana and Sambamurthy, Vallabh , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2020 , type =

  41. [41]

    Journal of Management Information Systems , volume =

    Chen, Kun and Fan, Yifan and Liao, Shaoyi Stephen , title =. Journal of Management Information Systems , volume =. 2023 , type =

  42. [42]

    and Teng, Ching- I

    Liao, Gen-Yih and Huang, Tzu-Ling and Dennis, Alan R. and Teng, Ching- I. , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2024 , type =

  43. [43]

    Journal of Management Information Systems , volume =

    Guo, Shanshan and Guo, Xitong and Fang, Yulin and Vogel, Doug , title =. Journal of Management Information Systems , volume =. 2017 , type =

  44. [44]

    and Guo, Chenhui and Lin, Mingfeng , title =

    Goes, Paulo B. and Guo, Chenhui and Lin, Mingfeng , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2016 , type =

  45. [45]

    and Morris, James G

    Ray, Soumya and Kim, Sung S. and Morris, James G. , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2014 , type =

  46. [46]

    Marketing Science , volume =

    Cong, Ziwei and Zhao, Ying and Zhang, Zilei , title =. Marketing Science , volume =. 2025 , pages =

  47. [47]

    MIS Quarterly , volume =

    Goh, Jie Mein and Gao, Guodong and Agarwal, Ritu , title =. MIS Quarterly , volume =. 2016 , type =

  48. [48]

    and Lin, Mingfeng and Yeung, Ching-man Au , title =

    Goes, Paulo B. and Lin, Mingfeng and Yeung, Ching-man Au , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2014 , type =

  49. [49]

    Wasko, M. M. and Faraj, S. , title =. MIS Quarterly , volume =. 2005 , type =

  50. [50]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Lin, Yu-Kai and Rai, Arun and Yang, Yukun , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2022 , type =

  51. [51]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Gnewuch, Ulrich and Morana, Stefan and Hinz, Oliver and Kellner, Ralf and Maedche, Alexander , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2024 , type =

  52. [52]

    Wang, W. G. and Gao, G. D. and Agarwal, R. , title =. Management Science , year =

  53. [53]

    Management Science , volume =

    Deng, Yipu and Zheng, Jinyang and Khern-am-nuai, Warut and Kannan, Karthik , title =. Management Science , volume =. 2022 , type =

  54. [54]

    and Ryan, Richard M

    Deci, Edward L. and Ryan, Richard M. , title =. Psychological Inquiry , volume =

  55. [55]

    Incentives and Prosocial Behavior , journal =

    B. Incentives and Prosocial Behavior , journal =

  56. [56]

    , title =

    Emerson, Richard M. , title =. Annual Review of Sociology , volume =

  57. [57]

    , title =

    Muchnik, Lev and Aral, Sinan and Taylor, Sean J. , title =. Science , volume =

  58. [58]

    , title =

    Wu, Fang and Huberman, Bernardo A. , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

  59. [59]

    Management Science , volume =

    Dellarocas, Chrysanthos , title =. Management Science , volume =

  60. [60]

    Is a core-periphery network good for knowledge sharing?

    Lu, Yingda and Singh, Param Vir and Sun, Baohong , journal=. Is a core-periphery network good for knowledge sharing?. 2017 , publisher=

  61. [61]

    Management Science , volume =

    Yang, Bicheng and Chan, Tat and Owan, Hideo and Tsuru, Tsuyoshi , title =. Management Science , volume =. 2024 , type =

  62. [62]

    Management Science , volume =

    Xu, Yuqian and Dai, Hongyan and Yan, Wanfeng , title =. Management Science , volume =. 2024 , type =

  63. [63]

    , title =

    Seymour, Mike and Yuan, Lingyao and Riemer, Kai and Dennis, Alan R. , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2024 , type =

  64. [64]

    Manufacturing & Service Operations Management , volume =

    Hou, Ting and Li, Meng and Tan, Yinliang and Zhao, Huazhong , title =. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management , volume =. 2024 , type =

  65. [65]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Han, Elizabeth and Yin, Dezhi and Zhang, Han , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2023 , type =

  66. [66]

    Organization Science , volume =

    Hui, Xiang and Reshef, Oren and Zhou, Luofeng , title =. Organization Science , volume =. 2024 , type =

  67. [67]

    Nature , volume =

    Castelvecchi, Davide , title =. Nature , volume =. 2023 , type =

  68. [68]

    Marketing Science , volume =

    Li, Peiyao and Castelo, Noah and Katona, Zsolt and Sarvary, Miklos , title =. Marketing Science , volume =. 2024 , type =

  69. [69]

    Management Science , volume =

    Chen, Zenan and Chan, Jason , title =. Management Science , volume =. 2024 , type =

  70. [70]

    Nature , volume =

    Zhou, Lexin and Schellaert, Wout and Martínez-Plumed, Fernando and Moros-Daval, Yael and Ferri, Cèsar and Hernández-Orallo, José , title =. Nature , volume =. 2024 , type =

  71. [71]

    Yang, M. C. and Ren, Y. Q. and Adomavicius, G. , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2019 , type =

  72. [72]

    Journal of the American statistical Association , volume =

    Abadie, Alberto and Diamond, Alexis and Hainmueller, Jens , title =. Journal of the American statistical Association , volume =. 2010 , type =

  73. [73]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society , volume =

    Lechner, Michael , title =. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society , volume =. 2002 , type =

  74. [74]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Fan, Wenjuan and Zhou, Qiqi and Qiu, Liangfei and Kumar, Subodha , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2023 , type =

  75. [75]

    Information Systems Research , volume =

    Liang, Huigang and Xue, Yajiong , title =. Information Systems Research , volume =. 2022 , type =

  76. [76]

    2023 , url =

    GitHub , title =. 2023 , url =

  77. [77]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , pages =

    Brynjolfsson, Erik and Li, Danielle and Raymond, Lindsey , title =. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , pages =. 2025 , type =

  78. [78]

    and Zhang, Miaomiao and Jacimovic, Vladimir and Lakhani, Karim R

    Boussioux, Leonard and Lane, Jacqueline N. and Zhang, Miaomiao and Jacimovic, Vladimir and Lakhani, Karim R. , title =. Organization Science , volume =. 2024 , type =

  79. [79]

    and Bell, J

    Doshi, Anil R. and Bell, J. Jason and Mirzayev, Emil and Vanneste, Bart S. , title =. Strategic Management Journal , volume =. 2025 , type =

  80. [80]

    and Miner, Adam S

    Sharma, Ashish and Lin, Inna W. and Miner, Adam S. and Atkins, David C. and Althoff, Tim , title =. Nature Machine Intelligence , volume =. 2023 , type =

Showing first 80 references.