Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Word Embeddings Are Steers for Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.12798 v2 pith:AM55VBX5 submitted 2023-05-22 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords languageembeddingswordgenerationlm-steermodellm-steersmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language models (LMs) automatically learn word embeddings during pre-training on language corpora. Although word embeddings are usually interpreted as feature vectors for individual words, their roles in language model generation remain underexplored. In this work, we theoretically and empirically revisit output word embeddings and find that their linear transformations are equivalent to steering language model generation styles. We name such steers LM-Steers and find them existing in LMs of all sizes. It requires learning parameters equal to 0.2% of the original LMs' size for steering each style. On tasks such as language model detoxification and sentiment control, LM-Steers can achieve comparable or superior performance compared with state-of-the-art controlled generation methods while maintaining a better balance with generation quality. The learned LM-Steer serves as a lens in text styles: it reveals that word embeddings are interpretable when associated with language model generations and can highlight text spans that most indicate the style differences. An LM-Steer is transferrable between different language models by an explicit form calculation. One can also continuously steer LMs simply by scaling the LM-Steer or compose multiple LM-Steers by adding their transformations. Our codes are publicly available at \url{https://github.com/Glaciohound/LM-Steer}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. REFLEX: Self-Refining Explainable Fact-Checking via Verdict-Anchored Style Control

    cs.CL 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    REFLEX improves explainable fact-checking by using verdict-anchored style control and self-disagreement signals to disentangle fact from style in LLM outputs, achieving SOTA results with minimal self-refined samples.

  2. Balancing Stylization and Truth via Disentangled Representation Steering

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    StyliTruth separates style and truth directions in the activations of selected attention heads, then steers each token along the disentangled subspaces to preserve truthfulness during stylization.

Pith tools