Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LLaMA-Reviewer: Advancing Code Review Automation with Large Language Models through Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.11148 v2 pith:AMGQUAU2 submitted 2023-08-22 cs.SE cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.CLcs.LG
keywords codemodelsllama-reviewerreviewfine-tuningautomationbeencapabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The automation of code review activities, a long-standing pursuit in software engineering, has been primarily addressed by numerous domain-specific pre-trained models. Despite their success, these models frequently demand extensive resources for pre-training from scratch. In contrast, Large Language Models (LLMs) provide an intriguing alternative, given their remarkable capabilities when supplemented with domain-specific knowledge. However, their potential for automating code review tasks remains largely unexplored. In response to this research gap, we present LLaMA-Reviewer, an innovative framework that leverages the capabilities of LLaMA, a popular LLM, in the realm of code review. Mindful of resource constraints, this framework employs parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods, delivering high performance while using less than 1% of trainable parameters. An extensive evaluation of LLaMA-Reviewer is conducted on two diverse, publicly available datasets. Notably, even with the smallest LLaMA base model consisting of 6.7B parameters and a limited number of tuning epochs, LLaMA-Reviewer equals the performance of existing code-review-focused models. The ablation experiments provide insights into the influence of various fine-tuning process components, including input representation, instruction tuning, and different PEFT methods. To foster continuous progress in this field, the code and all PEFT-weight plugins have been made open-source.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rethinking Training Data for Generating Code Review Comments

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Nearly half of the training pairs in a widely used code review comment dataset fail to support learning actionable, diff-grounded review feedback, and taxonomy-guided LLM filtering does not reliably fix this.

  2. The Art of Repair: Optimizing Iterative Program Repair with Instruction-Tuned Models

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using only 1,000 fine-tuning examples with full fine-tuning improves the number of plausible repairs by up to 78%, and iterative generation strategies help base models most on complex benchmarks like Defects4J.

  3. BitsAI-CR: Automated Code Review via LLM in Practice

    cs.SE 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An industrial LLM-based code review system with a two-stage generate-and-filter pipeline and a data flywheel reached 75% precision and a 26.7% developer-action rate on Go code at ByteDance.

Pith tools